NATION

PASSWORD

Abandoned

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Carstantinopipal
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 134
Founded: Sep 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Abandoned

Postby Carstantinopipal » Wed Jan 16, 2019 3:26 pm

Man, you guys worked on everything too well
Last edited by Carstantinopipal on Thu Jan 17, 2019 7:58 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12655
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Wed Jan 16, 2019 3:28 pm

If you want to talk about euthanasia, you need to look at Asssisted Suicide Act.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Carstantinopipal
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 134
Founded: Sep 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Carstantinopipal » Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:38 pm

Imperium Anglorum wrote:If you want to talk about euthanasia, you need to look at Asssisted Suicide Act.

I have read it over, do you believe that sense my resolution grants immortal beings the right to euthanasia contradicts that resolutions grant to nations that they can choose for themselves if euthanasia is legal?

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12655
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:39 pm

Yes. And the solution is to repeal the old act.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Carstantinopipal
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 134
Founded: Sep 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Carstantinopipal » Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:41 pm

Imperium Anglorum wrote:Yes. And the solution is to repeal the old act.

Well I dont believe it prohibits the WA getting involved in a nation's euthanasia politics, especially for cases where suicide is the only option, does it?

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12655
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:32 pm

Grants every member state, subject only to this resolution and active resolutions previously adopted by this Assembly, the authority to determine for itself the legal status of assisted suicide and euthanasia in its jurisdiction;

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Carstantinopipal
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 134
Founded: Sep 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Carstantinopipal » Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:43 pm

Imperium Anglorum wrote:Grants every member state, subject only to this resolution and active resolutions previously adopted by this Assembly, the authority to determine for itself the legal status of assisted suicide and euthanasia in its jurisdiction;

Yes I know, as I said I have read it, but I don't believe this is baring further WA involvement.

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12655
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Wed Jan 16, 2019 6:09 pm

Why not?

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Carstantinopipal
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 134
Founded: Sep 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Carstantinopipal » Wed Jan 16, 2019 6:21 pm

Imperium Anglorum wrote:Why not?

Well it is not explicitly said, its not very clear if it is blocking WA involvement and it seems up to interpretation.

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12655
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Wed Jan 16, 2019 10:53 pm

It explicitly does those things. If something is subject only to that resolution and it's antecedents, your proposal would contradict that statement. Then it's illegal from the contradiction rule.
Last edited by Imperium Anglorum on Wed Jan 16, 2019 10:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22870
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Wed Jan 16, 2019 11:23 pm

Carstantinopipal wrote:
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Why not?

Well it is not explicitly said, its not very clear if it is blocking WA involvement and it seems up to interpretation.

That clause from the Assisted Suicide Act could not possibly be more explicit in reserving to member states full authority to determine the legality of assisted suicide/euthanasia.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Carstantinopipal
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 134
Founded: Sep 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Carstantinopipal » Thu Jan 17, 2019 5:31 am

It could be more explicit and it should be, but this is a pointless argument. I see some ways we can fix this, we can change the wording so that it doesn't even mention, state assisted suicide, which seems to be the contridicting point. We can change it to be a suggestion but if I were to do that then I could just change the whole resolution to be a ban on forced immortality which I am now leaning towards doing. Or I guess we can make the attempt that IA suggested and repeal the old resolution but I am more in favor for just changing the resolution as a whole to a ban on forced immortality personally.

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12655
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Thu Jan 17, 2019 6:36 am

The contradiction happens solely in that place where the grant occurs, giving nations authority to legislate on euthanasia, which this is, solely within the confines of that resolution and its antecedents.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Carstantinopipal
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 134
Founded: Sep 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Carstantinopipal » Thu Jan 17, 2019 6:46 am

Then what change do you suggest for the resolution?

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12655
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Thu Jan 17, 2019 6:51 am

For now, nothing. Repeal Assisted Suicide Act.

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Carstantinopipal
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 134
Founded: Sep 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Carstantinopipal » Thu Jan 17, 2019 7:01 am

I don't believe there is much need to repeal that resolution, I am going to rewrite this as a ban on forced immortality.

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 16989
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Separatist Peoples » Thu Jan 17, 2019 7:03 am

Carstantinopipal wrote:I don't believe there is much need to repeal that resolution, I am going to rewrite this as a ban on forced immortality.

"I'm not sure how that wouldn't inevitably be a violation of the Patient's Rights Act. A procedure that causes immortality sounds an awful lot like a medical procedure, in which case, forced procedures are already banned."

His Worshipfulness, the Most Unscrupulous, Plainly Deceitful, Dissembling, Strategicly Calculating Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Imperium Anglorum
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 12655
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Imperium Anglorum » Thu Jan 17, 2019 7:14 am

If you cannot end your life, is that not forced immortality?

Author: 1 SC and 56+ GA resolutions
Maintainer: GA Passed Resolutions
Developer: Communiqué and InfoEurope
GenSec (24 Dec 2021 –); posts not official unless so indicated
Delegate for Europe
Elsie Mortimer Wellesley
Ideological Bulwark 285, WALL delegate
Twice-commended toxic villainous globalist kittehs

User avatar
Carstantinopipal
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 134
Founded: Sep 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Carstantinopipal » Thu Jan 17, 2019 7:57 am

Separatist Peoples wrote:
Carstantinopipal wrote:I don't believe there is much need to repeal that resolution, I am going to rewrite this as a ban on forced immortality.

"I'm not sure how that wouldn't inevitably be a violation of the Patient's Rights Act. A procedure that causes immortality sounds an awful lot like a medical procedure, in which case, forced procedures are already banned."

That is true, well then it seems this issue is already resolved, back to the drawing board

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21475
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Thu Jan 17, 2019 11:06 am

Carstantinopipal wrote:
Separatist Peoples wrote:"I'm not sure how that wouldn't inevitably be a violation of the Patient's Rights Act. A procedure that causes immortality sounds an awful lot like a medical procedure, in which case, forced procedures are already banned."

That is true, well then it seems this issue is already resolved, back to the drawing board

OOC
For future reference, when you abandon an idea here it is preferable to leave the proposal in place so that people can see what the comments were about.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads