Ok WA delegates! I need your help! There is a corrupted, terrible nation that we must condemn.
Its name is Anarchy Paradise. Please view my SC proposal "condemn AP" and vote!
by Jointland » Mon Dec 24, 2018 7:37 am
by Kaboomlandia » Mon Dec 24, 2018 7:39 am
by The Galactic Liberal Democracy » Mon Dec 24, 2018 7:39 am
Jointland wrote:Ok WA delegates! I need your help! There is a corrupted, terrible nation that we must condemn.
Its name is Anarchy Paradise. Please view my SC proposal "condemn AP" and vote!
Cossack Khanate wrote:This shall forever be known as World War Sh*t: Newark Aggression. Now if I see one more troop deployed, I will call on the force of all the Hindu gods to reverse time and wipe your race of the face of the planet. Cease.
The Black Party wrote:(TBP kamikaze's into all 99999999999 nukes before they hit our territory because we just have that many pilots ready to die for dah blak regime, we also counter-attack into your nation with our entire population of 45 million because this RP allows it.)
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Galatic Liberal Democracy short-circuits all of NS with FACTS and LOGIC
by Wrapper » Mon Dec 24, 2018 8:02 am
Security Council Proposal
ID: jointland_1545661854
Condemn Anarchy Paradise
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: Anarchy Paradise
Proposed by: Jointland
INTRODUCTION: I made a proposal a very short time ago, the same that I'm proposing now, because the first one was written in the wrong way and was made illegal. Anyway, I propose to get to the point.
PROBLEMS OF Anarchy Paradise: 1- this nation has stated in some of its dispatches that equality and freedom are its great ideals, on which the state is based. So why has it left two psychotic dictatorships to enter its region? I'll tell you. Because it's a disgusting and corrupt government.
How could it put two nations before their own ideals?
2- Anarchy Paradise has declared several times to hate the WA, even if I do not know why. Probably because it has been banned. We can not let its anti-WA campaign continue, since it has even forbidden anyone who is a member of the WA to enter the region! Does Anarchy Paradise hate the WA? Well. We must show that we are not interested in your opinion, and that we too can hate him for his corruption and hypocrisy. The way is easy. Let's condemn it.
by Tinhampton » Mon Dec 24, 2018 8:07 am
Wrapper wrote:Let's play Spot The Illegalities. Who wants to go first?
by Greater vakolicci haven » Mon Dec 24, 2018 8:10 am
Wrapper wrote:Security Council Proposal
ID: jointland_1545661854
Condemn Anarchy Paradise
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: Anarchy Paradise
Proposed by: Jointland
INTRODUCTION: I made a proposal a very short time ago, the same that I'm proposing now, because the first one was written in the wrong way and was made illegal. Anyway, I propose to get to the point.
PROBLEMS OF Anarchy Paradise: 1- this nation has stated in some of its dispatches that equality and freedom are its great ideals, on which the state is based. So why has it left two psychotic dictatorships to enter its region? I'll tell you. Because it's a disgusting and corrupt government.
How could it put two nations before their own ideals?
2- Anarchy Paradise has declared several times to hate the WA, even if I do not know why. Probably because it has been banned. We can not let its anti-WA campaign continue, since it has even forbidden anyone who is a member of the WA to enter the region! Does Anarchy Paradise hate the WA? Well. We must show that we are not interested in your opinion, and that we too can hate him for his corruption and hypocrisy. The way is easy. Let's condemn it.
Let's play Spot The Illegalities. Who wants to go first?
by Fecaw » Mon Dec 24, 2018 8:16 am
Wrapper wrote:Let's play Spot The Illegalities. Who wants to go first?
Tinhampton wrote:thrusts her hand up, LOL Rules 3 (no operative clause), 4b ("him... his" in reference to Anarchy Paradise), and 4d ("I"), at the very minimum.
That said, no support under any circumstances. The actions Jointland lists, if I did them, would not make Condemn Tinhampton a viable prospect.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement