NATION

PASSWORD

LGBTQ Elected Officials’ Letter to the 116th Congress

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Kannap
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 67477
Founded: May 07, 2012
Democratic Socialists

LGBTQ Elected Officials’ Letter to the 116th Congress

Postby Kannap » Thu Dec 13, 2018 5:55 pm

The Hill wrote:More than 150 LGBT elected officials penned a letter released this week calling on the incoming Congress to prioritize four LGBT equality initiatives.

Those initiatives include protecting trans constituents from "anti-trans Trump administration policies," passing federal legislation to protect the rights of LGBT people, focusing on HIV/AIDs treatment — particularly in communities of color — and supporting asylum claims from queer people around the world.

The 152 elected officials penned the letter, which will be delivered to the 116th Congress, during a conference last week. The gathering was hosted by Victory Institute, an advocacy organization focused on training and supporting LGBT political candidates.

The list of signatories includes down-ballot LGBTQ officials, including councilmembers, state senators and representatives, mayors and more.

“LGBTQ political power is growing thanks to the rainbow wave of LGBTQ people who won elected office in November — and this letter is the first sign of us wielding that new power,” Victory Institute President and CEO Annise Parker said in a statement. Parker is also the mayor of Houston.

Some analysts have said the 2018 midterm elections amounted to a "rainbow wave," with a record number of "out" LGBT candidates running and winning. Over 240 of the 432 LGBTQ candidates, or 56.5 percent, won their elections, Victory Institute's political action committee Victory Fund found in an analysis.

“The current U.S. Congress failed to advance equality policies and legislation that most Americans support: non-discrimination protections, addressing the HIV/AIDS crisis, protecting trans people from abusive policies, and being a moral voice on the global stage," Parker said in the statement.

"The next Congress can remedy these wrongs and LGBTQ elected officials are determined to add their voice and energize their constituents around these important measures," she added.

The officials are encouraging the 116th Congress to pass the Equality Act, federal legislation that would guarantee protections for LGBTQ people, which has not been passed.

The letter also details challenges faced by the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS (PACHA). In the letter, signatories note that Trump dismissed all remaining members of the council last year after some of members resigned over what they said was the Trump administration's inaction on the issue.

"Nearly 40,000 people are newly diagnosed with HIV each year in the United States and racial and ethnic minorities are disproportionately represented," the letter reads. "Almost 3 out of 4 new HIV diagnoses are among racial and ethnic minorities."

"If current HIV diagnoses rates persist, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention predict about 1 in 2 black gay men and 1 in 4 Latino gay men will be diagnosed with HIV during their lifetime," it continues. "This alarming lifetime risk is a call to action to increase prevention and care strategies now."

The letter also calls several of the Trump administration's actions "anti-trans," including its ban on transgender people in the military and the revocation of federal guidelines specifying that trans students can use public restrooms aligning with their gender identity.

"We call on Members of Congress to oppose all efforts to discriminate against transgender people or to limit the definition of gender identity and expression to mere biology," the letter reads.

The LGBT elected officials are still gathering signatures for the letter before it is delivered next year.

Source


So, 152 (and counting) LGBTQ elected officials have signed a letter to be delivered to the new Congress next year. The letter is a call to action for the new Congress to act on behalf of LGBTQ Americans in progressing the long fought pursuit for equal rights. The letter calls for the following four points of action:

1. Passage of The Equality Act
2. Reducing HIV/AIDS
3. Protecting Transgender People
4. Improving Our Commitment to LGBTQI Rights Globally

Lets look at these, one-by-one. Starting with the passage of The Equality Act. The passage of The Equality Act would be an amendment to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. An amendment that would further the reach of that the Civil Rights Act to include sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity. The Equality Act, if passed, would finally provide incredibly needed discrimination protections for LGBTQ people.

The Letter wrote:Despite significant steps forward, many LGBTQI Americans continue to lack non-discrimination protections where they live. The patchwork nature of current laws leaves millions of people subject to uncertainty and potential discrimination that impacts their safety, their families, and their day-to-day lives.

Thirty states still lack fully-inclusive non-discrimination protections for LGBTQI people, meaning that LGBTQI people are at risk of being fired, denied housing, and denied services for who they are or whom they love. Nearly two-thirds of self-identified LGBTQI Americans reported experiencing discrimination in their personal lives.

The Equality Act will provide non-discrimination protections for LGBTQI people in employment, housing, credit, education, public spaces and services and all federally funded programs.


Secondly, reduction of HIV/AIDS. This point brings attention to the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS (PACHA), which was established by President Bill Clinton. One year ago, President Donald Trump dismissed the remaining members of this council. With this in mind, the letter calls upon Congress to establish a Congressional Advisory Commission on HIV/AIDS, calls for setting a goal to hit zero new infections in the United States each year, and to take "proactive measures to address the continuing disparities in HIV diagnoses and treatment in communities of color."

The Letter wrote:Today, after decades of direct action, political organizing, and strategic prevention and programmatic efforts, we have the bio-medical interventions to stop new HIV infections, and help those who are HIV-positive reduce their viral loads to undetectable. The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) adopted a transformative agenda for the global HIV response, which aims to get zero new infections, zero AIDS-related deaths, and zero discrimination or stigma.

Despite the progress that has been made, nearly 40,000 people are newly diagnosed with HIV each year in the United States and racial and ethnic minorities are disproportionately represented. Almost 3 out of 4 new HIV diagnoses are among racial and ethnic minorities. If current HIV diagnoses rates persist, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention predict about 1 in 2 black gay men and 1 in 4 Latino gay men will be diagnosed with HIV during their lifetime. This alarming lifetime risk is a call to action to increase prevention and care strategies now.


Third, protecting transgender people. This one is pretty straight-forward for what it says, calling on Congress to "oppose all efforts to discriminate against transgender people or to limit the definition of gender identity and expression to mere biology."

The letter wrote:The Trump Administration has threatened to make several changes to strip away rights from transgender and intersex people. Soon after taking office, President Trump announced that he would institute a ban on enlisting and retaining transgender military personnel because the military should not be “burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail.” The Trump Administration revoked federal guidelines specifying that transgender students have the right to use public school restrooms that match their gender identity. And recently, the Administration announced plans to change federal civil-rights law to include a definition of sex as “a person’s status as male or female based on immutable biological traits identifiable by or before birth.”

These actions eradicate federal recognition of some 1.4 million transgender Americans. The proposed changes can have a traumatic effect, leaving people exposed and their rights revoked.


Finally, improving our commitment to LGBTQI rights globally. For this, the letter calls for Congress to "Oppose efforts to change the asylum system in ways which would make it more difficult for LGBTQI people who are facing persecution and violence in their home countries from seeking asylum in the United States." It also calls upon Congress to ensure that LGBTQI rights are "a cornerstone of our foreign policy at the United Nations and throughout the world."

The Letter wrote:LGBTQI people of all ages and in all regions of the world suffer from violations of their human rights. They are physically attacked, kidnapped, raped and murdered. In more than a third of the world’s countries, people may be arrested and jailed (and in at least five countries executed) for engaging in private, consensual, same sex relationships. Transgender people are often denied identity papers that reflect their preferred gender, without which they cannot work, travel, open a bank account or access services. LGBTQI children and adolescents face bullying and discrimination in school. Young people may also be thrown out of their homes by their parents, forced into psychiatric institutions or forced to marry based on their actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity.

LGBTQI asylum seekers may flee their countries due to persecution based on their sexual orientation or gender identity, or for the same reasons as any other refugee – such as ethnic conflict, political unrest, or the lack of religious freedom. The U.S. Department of Justice has announced plans to restructure the current asylum system to make it more difficult for people to apply for asylum. These proposals will have a serious impact on numerous people, especially LGBTQI people from Central America who are already living in this country.


So NSG, how do you feel about this? What do you think? Which one of these, personally, is most important of the four for you or are they all equally important? Do you think Congress should act upon this letter? Do you think Congress will act upon this letter? General thoughts after reading this post?

For me, personally, the first point of the four is most important because its the one - of the four - that directly effects me in my present state. Living in the state of North Carolina, my employment can be terminated solely due to my sexuality, furthermore it's illegal to sue the employer in state courts for the discriminatory termination. State law (thanks House Bill 2) bans local municipalities from establishing laws ensuring protection from discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation.

Overall, however, all four points are important and need to acted upon by Congress since Donald Trump has shown that he's not going to do anything to actually care for the American people, especially those who are LGBTQ.

Also, in closing, if anybody wants the link to the letter, as well as the long list of all who have signed it thus far, here it is.
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
T H E M O U N T A I N S A R E C A L L I N G A N D I M U S T G O
G A Y S I N C E 1 9 9 7
.::The List of National Sports::.
27 years old, gay demisexual, they/them agnostic, North Carolinian. Pumpkin Spice everything.
TET's resident red panda
Red Panda Network
Jill Stein 2024

User avatar
Western Vale Confederacy
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9211
Founded: Nov 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Western Vale Confederacy » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:02 pm

Y'know, those four points all seem relatively reasonable (an expanded treatment and awareness campaign against HIV/AIDS is particularly of great value since it doesn't just affect the LGBT community, but everybody) and within the confines of understandability.

I'm a bit suspicious about the range of "anti-discrimination protections" would exactly be, but otherwise, four demands that certainly would be an enormous improvement in the quality of life of LGBT folks and a lovely popularity boost from those same folks.

Then again, I am not Trump, so let us hope he thinks as pragmatically and for the people's concerns as much as I do.

User avatar
The National Salvation Front for Russia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 490
Founded: Nov 19, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The National Salvation Front for Russia » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:04 pm

I agree with all of them except the fourth point.

America really doesn't need another reason for the "World's Policeman" to meddle with foreign countries.
Russian Nationalist
Christian Democrat & Regionalist
Мы спасeм Россию!

Cлужить России - To Serve Russia
I support the Community for Democracy and Rights of Nations

User avatar
Kannap
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 67477
Founded: May 07, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kannap » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:10 pm

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:Y'know, those four points all seem relatively reasonable (an expanded treatment and awareness campaign against HIV/AIDS is particularly of great value since it doesn't just affect the LGBT community, but everybody) and within the confines of understandability.

I'm a bit suspicious about the range of "anti-discrimination protections" would exactly be, but otherwise, four demands that certainly would be an enormous improvement in the quality of life of LGBT folks and a lovely popularity boost from those same folks.

Then again, I am not Trump, so let us hope he thinks as pragmatically and for the people's concerns as much as I do.


"The Equality Act will provide non-discrimination protections for LGBTQI people in employment, housing, credit, education, public spaces and services and all federally funded programs."

I can't speak for everybody who signed it, of course, but this line from the letter does explain what anti-discrimination protections would be granted by The Equality Act. Employment is a big one, not barring somebody from a job they're perfectly qualified for solely because their sexual orientation or gender identity - or fire them solely for their sexual orientation or gender identity. Housing is similar to employment but in regards to housing. I'm not entirely sure what "credit" pertains to, but I imagine education would be "you can't kick students out or bar students from enrollment solely because of their sexual orientation or gender identity."
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
T H E M O U N T A I N S A R E C A L L I N G A N D I M U S T G O
G A Y S I N C E 1 9 9 7
.::The List of National Sports::.
27 years old, gay demisexual, they/them agnostic, North Carolinian. Pumpkin Spice everything.
TET's resident red panda
Red Panda Network
Jill Stein 2024

User avatar
Hrythingia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 747
Founded: Mar 08, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hrythingia » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:20 pm

Kannap wrote:
Western Vale Confederacy wrote:Y'know, those four points all seem relatively reasonable (an expanded treatment and awareness campaign against HIV/AIDS is particularly of great value since it doesn't just affect the LGBT community, but everybody) and within the confines of understandability.

I'm a bit suspicious about the range of "anti-discrimination protections" would exactly be, but otherwise, four demands that certainly would be an enormous improvement in the quality of life of LGBT folks and a lovely popularity boost from those same folks.

Then again, I am not Trump, so let us hope he thinks as pragmatically and for the people's concerns as much as I do.


"The Equality Act will provide non-discrimination protections for LGBTQI people in employment, housing, credit, education, public spaces and services and all federally funded programs."

I can't speak for everybody who signed it, of course, but this line from the letter does explain what anti-discrimination protections would be granted by The Equality Act. Employment is a big one, not barring somebody from a job they're perfectly qualified for solely because their sexual orientation or gender identity - or fire them solely for their sexual orientation or gender identity. Housing is similar to employment but in regards to housing. I'm not entirely sure what "credit" pertains to, but I imagine education would be "you can't kick students out or bar students from enrollment solely because of their sexual orientation or gender identity."

It should be the business owner's decision who he serves/caters/employs.
The Wielderdom of Hrythingia
Þæs Ƿealdaríċe Hrýðinglondes

State type: Semi-Elective Monarchy
Leader: Earl Wynmar II of The Ashwold, Hrythwealda
Capital: Ernburh
Language: Hrystic (Old English)
Religion: Catholicism
Characteristics: Isolationist, mercantile, conservative, rural, deeply religious
Industries: sheep/beef agriculture, fishing, offshore oil, financial services
Britonnis nati, Anglis Dei Gratia! A Catholic Conservative Briton, Late Antiquities Student and Reservist Officer in training. Interests: hunting, rugby, choral music, history, literature, linguistics and alcohol.

Ar i Dduw, er mwyn fy Ngheidwad, Roddi i mi galon lân.

Se Þræd Eald Englisċes

User avatar
The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints
Envoy
 
Posts: 249
Founded: Oct 05, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:22 pm

Hrythingia wrote:It should be the business owner's decision who he serves/caters/employs.


It is their decision. If they're not interested in serving the public, they may keep their doors closed and locked. But, if they open their doors to the public, they may serve the public.

User avatar
Hrythingia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 747
Founded: Mar 08, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hrythingia » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:23 pm

The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints wrote:
Hrythingia wrote:It should be the business owner's decision who he serves/caters/employs.


It is their decision. If they're not interested in serving the public, they may keep their doors closed and locked. But, if they open their doors to the public, they may serve the public.

They are interested in serving the public but it should be up to them who they serve; it is their labour after all.
The Wielderdom of Hrythingia
Þæs Ƿealdaríċe Hrýðinglondes

State type: Semi-Elective Monarchy
Leader: Earl Wynmar II of The Ashwold, Hrythwealda
Capital: Ernburh
Language: Hrystic (Old English)
Religion: Catholicism
Characteristics: Isolationist, mercantile, conservative, rural, deeply religious
Industries: sheep/beef agriculture, fishing, offshore oil, financial services
Britonnis nati, Anglis Dei Gratia! A Catholic Conservative Briton, Late Antiquities Student and Reservist Officer in training. Interests: hunting, rugby, choral music, history, literature, linguistics and alcohol.

Ar i Dduw, er mwyn fy Ngheidwad, Roddi i mi galon lân.

Se Þræd Eald Englisċes

User avatar
The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints
Envoy
 
Posts: 249
Founded: Oct 05, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:25 pm

Kannap wrote:...I'm not entirely sure what "credit" pertains to, ...


Home loans, business loans, etc.

The sort of things one might deny if interested in segregating the undesirables.

User avatar
The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints
Envoy
 
Posts: 249
Founded: Oct 05, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:28 pm

Hrythingia wrote:They are interested in serving the public but it should be up to them who they serve.


No, they are interested in segregating, stigmatizing, and, ultimately, eliminating.

Please do not be overly surprised when the Public take exception, and action.

User avatar
Kannap
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 67477
Founded: May 07, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kannap » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:28 pm

Hrythingia wrote:
Kannap wrote:
"The Equality Act will provide non-discrimination protections for LGBTQI people in employment, housing, credit, education, public spaces and services and all federally funded programs."

I can't speak for everybody who signed it, of course, but this line from the letter does explain what anti-discrimination protections would be granted by The Equality Act. Employment is a big one, not barring somebody from a job they're perfectly qualified for solely because their sexual orientation or gender identity - or fire them solely for their sexual orientation or gender identity. Housing is similar to employment but in regards to housing. I'm not entirely sure what "credit" pertains to, but I imagine education would be "you can't kick students out or bar students from enrollment solely because of their sexual orientation or gender identity."

It should be the business owner's decision who he serves/caters/employs.


Do you also believe employers should be able to refuse to hire somebody on the basis on them being male/female, black, white, Asian, handicapped, Christian, Jewish, Islamic?
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
T H E M O U N T A I N S A R E C A L L I N G A N D I M U S T G O
G A Y S I N C E 1 9 9 7
.::The List of National Sports::.
27 years old, gay demisexual, they/them agnostic, North Carolinian. Pumpkin Spice everything.
TET's resident red panda
Red Panda Network
Jill Stein 2024

User avatar
Kannap
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 67477
Founded: May 07, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kannap » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:30 pm

The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints wrote:
Kannap wrote:...I'm not entirely sure what "credit" pertains to, ...


Home loans, business loans, etc.

The sort of things one might deny if interested in segregating the undesirables.


Ah, yeah absolutely then, I imagine I'll have a husband on day with whom we may or may not pursue a home loan to be able to have a home to start a family.
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
T H E M O U N T A I N S A R E C A L L I N G A N D I M U S T G O
G A Y S I N C E 1 9 9 7
.::The List of National Sports::.
27 years old, gay demisexual, they/them agnostic, North Carolinian. Pumpkin Spice everything.
TET's resident red panda
Red Panda Network
Jill Stein 2024

User avatar
Kannap
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 67477
Founded: May 07, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kannap » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:31 pm

The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints wrote:
Hrythingia wrote:They are interested in serving the public but it should be up to them who they serve.


No, they are interested in segregating, stigmatizing, and, ultimately, eliminating.

Please do not be overly surprised when the Public take exception, and action.


I say we organize sit-ins in every business that refuses to serve LGBT people.
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
T H E M O U N T A I N S A R E C A L L I N G A N D I M U S T G O
G A Y S I N C E 1 9 9 7
.::The List of National Sports::.
27 years old, gay demisexual, they/them agnostic, North Carolinian. Pumpkin Spice everything.
TET's resident red panda
Red Panda Network
Jill Stein 2024

User avatar
Hrythingia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 747
Founded: Mar 08, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hrythingia » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:33 pm

Kannap wrote:
Hrythingia wrote:It should be the business owner's decision who he serves/caters/employs.


Do you also believe employers should be able to refuse to hire somebody on the basis on them being male/female, black, white, Asian, handicapped, Christian, Jewish, Islamic?

Yes that ought to be their choice, even if it is the choice to be a numpty. If the wider public perceive that business to be awful then they may boycott it. Problem solved.
The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints wrote:
Hrythingia wrote:They are interested in serving the public but it should be up to them who they serve.


No, they are interested in segregating, stigmatizing, and, ultimately, eliminating.

Please do not be overly surprised when the Public take exception, and action.

No they want to run a business but may not want to have dealings with certain people which they oughtn't be made to have.
The Wielderdom of Hrythingia
Þæs Ƿealdaríċe Hrýðinglondes

State type: Semi-Elective Monarchy
Leader: Earl Wynmar II of The Ashwold, Hrythwealda
Capital: Ernburh
Language: Hrystic (Old English)
Religion: Catholicism
Characteristics: Isolationist, mercantile, conservative, rural, deeply religious
Industries: sheep/beef agriculture, fishing, offshore oil, financial services
Britonnis nati, Anglis Dei Gratia! A Catholic Conservative Briton, Late Antiquities Student and Reservist Officer in training. Interests: hunting, rugby, choral music, history, literature, linguistics and alcohol.

Ar i Dduw, er mwyn fy Ngheidwad, Roddi i mi galon lân.

Se Þræd Eald Englisċes

User avatar
Western Vale Confederacy
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9211
Founded: Nov 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Western Vale Confederacy » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:34 pm

Kannap wrote:
The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints wrote:
Home loans, business loans, etc.

The sort of things one might deny if interested in segregating the undesirables.


Ah, yeah absolutely then, I imagine I'll have a husband on day with whom we may or may not pursue a home loan to be able to have a home to start a family.


It's already bad enough that banks outright flatly refuse to grant you a loan if your credit score isn't the dictionary definition of immaculate perfection or if your profession isn't CEO of Walmart for at least 25 years, let alone being refused because of one's sex, sexual orientation, race, pre-existing conditions, and other such things.

User avatar
The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints
Envoy
 
Posts: 249
Founded: Oct 05, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:36 pm

Hrythingia wrote:
The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints wrote:
No, they are interested in segregating, stigmatizing, and, ultimately, eliminating.

Please do not be overly surprised when the Public take exception, and action.

No they want to run a business but may not want to have dealings with certain people which they oughtn't be made to have.


So...basically exactly what I said, then? :?

User avatar
Mardla
Minister
 
Posts: 2465
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Mardla » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:37 pm

I called my congressman today, told him to build the wall. I did not say anything about speciaininitiative to protect aberrant sexual proclivities. However if these proclivities bring AIDS, I suggest they stop. Sex is supposed to bring life, not death.
Last edited by Mardla on Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Kannap
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 67477
Founded: May 07, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kannap » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:37 pm

Hrythingia wrote:
Kannap wrote:
Do you also believe employers should be able to refuse to hire somebody on the basis on them being male/female, black, white, Asian, handicapped, Christian, Jewish, Islamic?

Yes that ought to be their choice, even if it is the choice to be a numpty. If the wider public perceive that business to be awful then they may boycott it. Problem solved


Thank you, just wanted to be sure your stance was as rubbish as first presented. If every business actually did as you just said, society would be far more divided and divisive than imaginable compared to today.
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
T H E M O U N T A I N S A R E C A L L I N G A N D I M U S T G O
G A Y S I N C E 1 9 9 7
.::The List of National Sports::.
27 years old, gay demisexual, they/them agnostic, North Carolinian. Pumpkin Spice everything.
TET's resident red panda
Red Panda Network
Jill Stein 2024

User avatar
Hrythingia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 747
Founded: Mar 08, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hrythingia » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:38 pm

The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints wrote:
Hrythingia wrote:No they want to run a business but may not want to have dealings with certain people which they oughtn't be made to have.


So...basically exactly what I said, then? :?

No. They most likely have no interest in actively pursuing such people in the street, they just don't want them in their building. Remember that someone's business is their property, many people live in flats above their shop, it is an extension of their home. It should be entirely up to the business owner who crosses that threshold.
The Wielderdom of Hrythingia
Þæs Ƿealdaríċe Hrýðinglondes

State type: Semi-Elective Monarchy
Leader: Earl Wynmar II of The Ashwold, Hrythwealda
Capital: Ernburh
Language: Hrystic (Old English)
Religion: Catholicism
Characteristics: Isolationist, mercantile, conservative, rural, deeply religious
Industries: sheep/beef agriculture, fishing, offshore oil, financial services
Britonnis nati, Anglis Dei Gratia! A Catholic Conservative Briton, Late Antiquities Student and Reservist Officer in training. Interests: hunting, rugby, choral music, history, literature, linguistics and alcohol.

Ar i Dduw, er mwyn fy Ngheidwad, Roddi i mi galon lân.

Se Þræd Eald Englisċes

User avatar
The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints
Envoy
 
Posts: 249
Founded: Oct 05, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:38 pm

Hrythingia wrote:
Kannap wrote:
Do you also believe employers should be able to refuse to hire somebody on the basis on them being male/female, black, white, Asian, handicapped, Christian, Jewish, Islamic?

Yes that ought to be their choice, even if it is the choice to be a numpty. If the wider public perceive that business to be awful then they may boycott it. Problem solved.


Sweet. I'm time traveling back to just moment before the passage of the Civil Rights Act 1964 to let every one know there's a better way!

Tired of being discriminated against on the basis of your skin color? Just stop going where you not allowed to go in the first plac...

No, wait....
Last edited by The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints on Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Hrythingia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 747
Founded: Mar 08, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hrythingia » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:41 pm

Kannap wrote:
Hrythingia wrote:Yes that ought to be their choice, even if it is the choice to be a numpty. If the wider public perceive that business to be awful then they may boycott it. Problem solved


Thank you, just wanted to be sure your stance was as rubbish as first presented. If every business actually did as you just said, society would be far more divided and divisive than imaginable compared to today.

How so? People cam just go elsewhere. And if no one will serve them then there's problem a deeper societal issue in which case that person's position in society might need to be analysed.
The Wielderdom of Hrythingia
Þæs Ƿealdaríċe Hrýðinglondes

State type: Semi-Elective Monarchy
Leader: Earl Wynmar II of The Ashwold, Hrythwealda
Capital: Ernburh
Language: Hrystic (Old English)
Religion: Catholicism
Characteristics: Isolationist, mercantile, conservative, rural, deeply religious
Industries: sheep/beef agriculture, fishing, offshore oil, financial services
Britonnis nati, Anglis Dei Gratia! A Catholic Conservative Briton, Late Antiquities Student and Reservist Officer in training. Interests: hunting, rugby, choral music, history, literature, linguistics and alcohol.

Ar i Dduw, er mwyn fy Ngheidwad, Roddi i mi galon lân.

Se Þræd Eald Englisċes

User avatar
The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints
Envoy
 
Posts: 249
Founded: Oct 05, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:42 pm

Hrythingia wrote:No. They most likely have no interest in actively pursuing such people in the street, they just don't want them in their building.


Remember kids, if they only deny you a home or apartment, or food to eat, without actually beating you in the streets, it's all perfectly legit.

Hrythingia wrote:Remember that someone's business is their property...


True. And property rights are not unlimited, especially in the situation were you intentionally extend an invitation for the public to enter.

User avatar
Hrythingia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 747
Founded: Mar 08, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hrythingia » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:43 pm

The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints wrote:
Hrythingia wrote:Yes that ought to be their choice, even if it is the choice to be a numpty. If the wider public perceive that business to be awful then they may boycott it. Problem solved.


Sweet. I'm time traveling back to just moment before the passage of the Civil Rights Act 1965 to let every one know there's a better way!

Tired of being discriminated against on the basis of your skin color? Just stop going where you not allowed to go in the first plac...

No, wait....

I'll concede, its a wee bit more complicated in America where you aren't as historically homogenous than where I am from so the issue of whether if blacks do not feel welcome in the country they should consider returning where they came from as would be the case in the UK as the overwhelming majority are recent arrivals. That said even in America's case its the business owner's choice who he serves or not, no matter harsh that sounds.
The Wielderdom of Hrythingia
Þæs Ƿealdaríċe Hrýðinglondes

State type: Semi-Elective Monarchy
Leader: Earl Wynmar II of The Ashwold, Hrythwealda
Capital: Ernburh
Language: Hrystic (Old English)
Religion: Catholicism
Characteristics: Isolationist, mercantile, conservative, rural, deeply religious
Industries: sheep/beef agriculture, fishing, offshore oil, financial services
Britonnis nati, Anglis Dei Gratia! A Catholic Conservative Briton, Late Antiquities Student and Reservist Officer in training. Interests: hunting, rugby, choral music, history, literature, linguistics and alcohol.

Ar i Dduw, er mwyn fy Ngheidwad, Roddi i mi galon lân.

Se Þræd Eald Englisċes

User avatar
Hrythingia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 747
Founded: Mar 08, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hrythingia » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:45 pm

The Niceties of Normal Moral Constraints wrote:
Hrythingia wrote:No. They most likely have no interest in actively pursuing such people in the street, they just don't want them in their building.


Remember kids, if they only deny you a home or apartment, or food to eat, without actually beating you in the streets, it's all perfectly legit.

Hrythingia wrote:Remember that someone's business is their property...


True. And property rights are not unlimited, especially in the situation were you intentionally extend an invitation for the public to enter.

But you have no right to those things, they are commodities and the result of someone else's labour. You need to find a seller and have the money for it. If you can't find those things, then that's unfortunate but ultimately tough.
The Wielderdom of Hrythingia
Þæs Ƿealdaríċe Hrýðinglondes

State type: Semi-Elective Monarchy
Leader: Earl Wynmar II of The Ashwold, Hrythwealda
Capital: Ernburh
Language: Hrystic (Old English)
Religion: Catholicism
Characteristics: Isolationist, mercantile, conservative, rural, deeply religious
Industries: sheep/beef agriculture, fishing, offshore oil, financial services
Britonnis nati, Anglis Dei Gratia! A Catholic Conservative Briton, Late Antiquities Student and Reservist Officer in training. Interests: hunting, rugby, choral music, history, literature, linguistics and alcohol.

Ar i Dduw, er mwyn fy Ngheidwad, Roddi i mi galon lân.

Se Þræd Eald Englisċes

User avatar
Kannap
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 67477
Founded: May 07, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kannap » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:46 pm

Mardla wrote:I called my congressman today, told him to build the wall.


Don't know how this applies to the content of this thread, but whatever.

Mardla wrote:I did not say anything about speciain initiative to protect aberrant sexual proclivities.


This isn't a "special initiative to protect aberrant sexual proclivities," this is a push to finally guarantee equal protections of the law that are shared with other groups of people based on components of their being that they're born with, why should LGBT people be barred from those equal protections?

Mardla wrote:However if these proclivities bring AIDS, I suggest they stop. Sex is supposed to bring life, not death.


1. Being gay doesn't cause AIDS
2. AIDS is a problem in homosexual and heterosexual sex, brought about by lack of awareness about safe sex policies that apply to both homosexuals and heterosexuals. 3. Sex is utilized by all kinds of people for enjoyment rather than birthing new life.
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
T H E M O U N T A I N S A R E C A L L I N G A N D I M U S T G O
G A Y S I N C E 1 9 9 7
.::The List of National Sports::.
27 years old, gay demisexual, they/them agnostic, North Carolinian. Pumpkin Spice everything.
TET's resident red panda
Red Panda Network
Jill Stein 2024

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54796
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:47 pm

A lot of people call on Congress to do a lot of things.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Plan Neonie, ROMANIA THE GREAT, Shrillland, The Kharkivan Cossacks, The Orson Empire, Tillania, Tungstan, Uiiop, Untecna, Xind

Advertisement

Remove ads