[PASSED] Repeal Condemn Macedon

[Frisbeeteria]

The Security Council,

Understanding SC 1 is a historical resolution notable for being the first resolution in the Security Council.

Believing two condemnations is illogical for a region that, as well as its allies, is no longer active.

Adding a SC resolution should provide substantial evidence a target deserves a condemnation.

Noting the first condemnation was deserved, however, the resolution did not sufficiently explain why Macedon was deserving of condemnation.

Acknowledging Kuriko's condemnation of Macedon in SC #269 goes much further in depth about why Macedon deserves a condemnation.

Noting the aforementioned second condemnation resolution was drafted and passed with the intent of repealing SC 1.

Understanding SC #1 has been replaced and is no longer needed.

Hereby repeals Condemn Macedon

Co- authored by Lord Dominator, Kuriko, and Praeceps


UPDATED!

Tel me what you guys think!

[Borovan entered the region as he]

NOTICING the region of Macedon deserves its latest condemnation due to the wrongs it has inflicted.

BELIEVING, however, TWO condemnations is absurd for a region that has, as well as its allies, ceased to exist.

APPLAUDING Kuriko for showing the entity of NationStates the evil Macedon has inflicted.

BELIEVING his resolution goes much more in-depth about why Macedon deserves a condemnation.

FURTHER BELIEVING two condemnations only serve to give the region more attention.

UNDERSTANDING the resolution is no longer needed

HEREBY repeals "Condemn Macedon"

Tel me what you guys think!

his to it. its historical. yes i agree two is too much but it is what it is.

[Kaboomlandia]

I’m pretty sure Kuriko already plans to get rid of the shitty first condemnation and has something drafted for it, so this isn’t really necessary.

[Milozoldyck]

This is hilarious. Full support.

[Drop Your Pants]

I’m pretty sure Kuriko already plans to get rid of the shitty first condemnation and has something drafted for it, so this isn’t really necessary.

As I said over discord, I hereby release this draft and its content to Praetor of The North Pacific. They may do with this draft as they will, which hopefully entails submitting it to the SC and putting it to vote

Think the floor is open.

[The Gilded Star]

I wonder if there'd be enough support to repeal the recently passed condemnation in favor of preserving the historical one instead. Probably not, but this entire situation feels like it's been a mess.

[Kaboomlandia]

I wonder if there'd be enough support to repeal the recently passed condemnation in favor of preserving the historical one instead. Probably not, but this entire situation feels like it's been a mess.

The new condemn passed because the old one was terribly written. There’s no point preserving it now that a better one has passed.

[Kuriko]

I wonder if there'd be enough support to repeal the recently passed condemnation in favor of preserving the historical one instead. Probably not, but this entire situation feels like it's been a mess.

The new condemn passed because the old one was terribly written. There’s no point preserving it now that a better one has passed.

From what I hear, Concrete Slab and Praetor are working together on a repeal now. I'm just hoping it doesn't take too much longer.....

[Lord Dominator]

The new condemn passed because the old one was terribly written. There’s no point preserving it now that a better one has passed.

From what I hear, Concrete Slab and Praetor are working together on a repeal now. I'm just hoping it doesn't take too much longer.....

I'm confused as to what was wrong with the other one

[The Gilded Star]

The new condemn passed because the old one was terribly written. There’s no point preserving it now that a better one has passed.

Seems there's several people that want to keep the original's historic value and don't care for the new one. There's probably enough numbers to force the old repeal through but there's definitely some divisiveness over it.

[Wallenburg]

Believing two condemnations is illogical for a region that, as well as its allies, is no longer active.

This is a hypocritical argument when one of the coauthors wrote the second, "illogical" condemnation. I suggest you remove it.

Acknowledging Kuriko condemnation of Macedon in SC #269 goes much further in depth about why Macedon deserves a condemnation.

Kuriko needs an " 's " there.

[Borovan entered the region as he]

Believing two condemnations is illogical for a region that, as well as its allies, is no longer active.

This is a hypocritical argument when one of the coauthors wrote the second, "illogical" condemnation. I suggest you remove it.

Acknowledging Kuriko condemnation of Macedon in SC #269 goes much further in depth about why Macedon deserves a condemnation.

Kuriko needs an " 's " there.

They weren't listed as coauthors when I first quoted him. Bare improvements and edits were made

[The Church of Satan]

Macedon's activities were so long ago that even though the new one is more detailed I didn't support it in the first place. The new one is unnecessary because Macedon has been inactive, dead really that the new one is pointless. The original one is SC#1, a piece of history. It was also written when Macedon was active and had earned the condemnation which is why I'd rather repeal the new one.

[Jakker]

It's going to be really sad if this passes. Don't buy the argument that repealing a proposal doesn't remove it from history. If we want to give Macedon two condemnations, that feels more appropriate than repealing the very first proposal of the SC. Removing historical content simply because the proposal doesn't match the standards of today is beyond silly.

[Palsada]

It's going to be really sad if this passes. Don't buy the argument that repealing a proposal doesn't remove it from history. If we want to give Macedon two condemnations, that feels more appropriate than repealing the very first proposal of the SC. Removing historical content simply because the proposal doesn't match the standards of today is beyond silly.

Agreed, I hope this does not pass.

[Yokiria]

SC#1 was never meant to remain on the books forever.

It's time to let it go.

[South World]

Believing two condemnations is illogical for a region that, as well as its allies, is no longer active.

If the region and its allies are non longer active, why are we wasting time on this? Opposed

[Wittebosland]

I can't quite understand why people are hesitant to remove the old resolution on grounds of seniority. That's the bloody point of a flexible law system, so that the new can advance beyond the old!

I thought that adding an extra condemnation just for clarification was unfair, so I believe that this is a perfect way to wrap it up.

[Strong union state]

You people who want a repeal of condemn Macedona disgust me it is stupid!

[Kuriko]

You people who want a repeal of condemn Macedona disgust me it is stupid!

You're a nation of 50 million pop, want to explain a little more clearly why you don't want it repealed if you just started playing this game? And its Macedon, not Macedona. Also, there's a new condemnation on the books anyways.

[Kilkerneys Landing]

Following the updated condemnation of Macedon, I believe this original resolution is pretty much useless in its current state, seeing that there is an updated version. I approve of this, whilst it is a historical piece of Nation States history it isn't that important anymore.

[Strong union state]

You people who want a repeal of condemn Macedon disgust me it is stupid!

You're a nation of 50 million pop, want to explain a little more clearly why you don't want it repealed if you just started playing this game? And its Macedon, not Macedon. Also, there's a new condemnation on the books anyways.

First of all Populations don't matter it has to do with a Government of Dictatorship that is why you would have a condemn region. So I respect your yes vote I do not get it. But I have they are having a second condemn vote okay then. As far as newness I am not too but a little new I do understand how the game works lately.

[Flanderlion]

Believing two condemnations is illogical for a region that, as well as its allies, is no longer active.

If the region and its allies are non longer active, why are we wasting time on this? Opposed

This region is the reason we have the SC/liberations. They still control the regions. I don't really understand why people even want to repeal it, it's like destroying the old cave drawings because they aren't relevant anymore.

[Yokiria]

I don't really understand why people even want to repeal it, it's like destroying the old cave drawings because they aren't relevant anymore.

As Wittebosland astutely pointed out:

I can't quite understand why people are hesitant to remove the old resolution on grounds of seniority. That's the bloody point of a flexible law system, so that the new can advance beyond the old!

[Kuriko]

Nice to see that while I've been doing things nicely, and fairly, others are fighting dirty and trying to make me look like an a**hole in front of the entire WA. I'm not naming names, we all know who it is, but I am a little upset about the telegram and its view of me.