by Indo-Malaysia » Sun Nov 18, 2018 2:45 pm
by Internationalist Bastard » Sun Nov 18, 2018 2:49 pm
by Indo-Malaysia » Sun Nov 18, 2018 2:57 pm
Internationalist Bastard wrote:I for one always focused on the individual aspect of military history. The life of the soldier, what they had to do in battle. Part of this is my past in the infantry, and part of this is the old fascination with the warrior. But it’s always been cool to me to learn, say, about musket loading drills, the Roman legions fort building, or even just the logistics of warfare
by Internationalist Bastard » Sun Nov 18, 2018 3:02 pm
Indo-Malaysia wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:I for one always focused on the individual aspect of military history. The life of the soldier, what they had to do in battle. Part of this is my past in the infantry, and part of this is the old fascination with the warrior. But it’s always been cool to me to learn, say, about musket loading drills, the Roman legions fort building, or even just the logistics of warfare
You were an infantryman?
What unit (probably wrong term, but ya get the gist) did you serve with?
On the topic of life of soldiers, there was an interesting documentary shown in cinemas and TG by Peter Jackson called They Shall not Grow Old, which is coloured in magnificently and has sound. It really does shed light on the individuals of the Great War.
by Boreal Light » Sun Nov 18, 2018 3:02 pm
by Rusthenia » Sun Nov 18, 2018 3:04 pm
Internationalist Bastard wrote:Indo-Malaysia wrote:You were an infantryman?
What unit (probably wrong term, but ya get the gist) did you serve with?
On the topic of life of soldiers, there was an interesting documentary shown in cinemas and TG by Peter Jackson called They Shall not Grow Old, which is coloured in magnificently and has sound. It really does shed light on the individuals of the Great War.
I’ll take a look
And I was just a UN peacekeeper it’s not real soldier work
USS Monitor wrote:It's long...
Moskva Chronicle: TEMPORARILY CLOSED
by Indo-Malaysia » Sun Nov 18, 2018 3:06 pm
Boreal Light wrote:Did anyone here read Matterhorn: A Novel of the Vietnam War, by Karl Marlantes?
I found it absolutely fascinating, and my ability to visualize what it was like day-to-day for individual soldiers in Vietnam expanded greatly.
Many reviewers considered it to be the portrayal of the war. Having never been in the army myself, I would also be interested to know what someone thought of the book who had been / is presently in the military.
Also, one of the latest Dan Carlin podcasts was an interview with Max Hastings, a former British journalist who worked in Vietnam, and who recently released Vietnam: an Epic Tragedy: 1945-1975. The interview was so good that I am very much looking forward to reading this book. Just wanted to throw this out there, should anyone be interested.
Internationalist Bastard wrote:Indo-Malaysia wrote:You were an infantryman?
What unit (probably wrong term, but ya get the gist) did you serve with?
On the topic of life of soldiers, there was an interesting documentary shown in cinemas and TG by Peter Jackson called They Shall not Grow Old, which is coloured in magnificently and has sound. It really does shed light on the individuals of the Great War.
I’ll take a look
And I was just a UN peacekeeper it’s not real soldier work
by Internationalist Bastard » Sun Nov 18, 2018 3:49 pm
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Sun Nov 18, 2018 3:52 pm
Internationalist Bastard wrote:Indo-Malaysia wrote:You were an infantryman?
What unit (probably wrong term, but ya get the gist) did you serve with?
On the topic of life of soldiers, there was an interesting documentary shown in cinemas and TG by Peter Jackson called They Shall not Grow Old, which is coloured in magnificently and has sound. It really does shed light on the individuals of the Great War.
I’ll take a look
And I was just a UN peacekeeper it’s not real soldier work
by Gig em Aggies » Sun Nov 18, 2018 3:55 pm
by Internationalist Bastard » Sun Nov 18, 2018 3:57 pm
Gig em Aggies wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:Oh Mali
Forgive me but I believe the forum has grown tired of me telling the stories
Where you in Mali during the French intervention against Islamic militants a few years ago?
But for me military history intrigues me from a standpoint of technology and its use that's why I Love history & military channel shows such as 20th century battlefields, Weaponology, Tops Tens, etc...
by Internationalist Bastard » Sun Nov 18, 2018 3:57 pm
by Saiwania » Sun Nov 18, 2018 4:03 pm
Internationalist Bastard wrote:I’ll take a look. And I was just a UN peacekeeper it’s not real soldier work
by Internationalist Bastard » Sun Nov 18, 2018 4:07 pm
Saiwania wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:I’ll take a look. And I was just a UN peacekeeper it’s not real soldier work
You shouldn't have been there in my view to "keep the peace" but rather, to hunt down and destroy insurgents or whoever was part of the problem which caused you to be deployed.
There is one piece of equipment I think should make a comeback which is- the flamethrower. That it causes a cruel and painful death is not a bug, but a feature in my view. Nothing better to clear out caves or bunkers. That is the way to deal with that problem, not sending any tunnel rats like in Vietnam. I remain to be convinced that Thermobaric weapons are truly enough to fully serve as a replacement for flamethrowers. A more portable means of burning targets to a crisp should be available. Napalm should still be utilized.
by Indo-Malaysia » Sun Nov 18, 2018 4:17 pm
Saiwania wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:I’ll take a look. And I was just a UN peacekeeper it’s not real soldier work
You shouldn't have been there in my view to "keep the peace" but rather, to hunt down and destroy insurgents or whoever was part of the problem which caused you to be deployed.
There is one piece of equipment I think should make a comeback which is- the flamethrower. That it causes a cruel and painful death is not a bug, but a feature in my view. Nothing better to clear out caves or bunkers. That is the way to deal with that problem, not sending any tunnel rats like in Vietnam. I remain to be convinced that Thermobaric weapons are truly enough to fully serve as a replacement for flamethrowers. A more portable means of burning targets to a crisp should be available. Napalm should still be utilized.
Internationalist Bastard wrote:Saiwania wrote:
You shouldn't have been there in my view to "keep the peace" but rather, to hunt down and destroy insurgents or whoever was part of the problem which caused you to be deployed.
There is one piece of equipment I think should make a comeback which is- the flamethrower. That it causes a cruel and painful death is not a bug, but a feature in my view. Nothing better to clear out caves or bunkers. That is the way to deal with that problem, not sending any tunnel rats like in Vietnam. I remain to be convinced that Thermobaric weapons are truly enough to fully serve as a replacement for flamethrowers. A more portable means of burning targets to a crisp should be available. Napalm should still be utilized.
Er yeah
Um anyway weaponry is cool, it’s fun to study
by Kubra » Sun Nov 18, 2018 4:30 pm
No you western imperialist, the katana is superior to the flamethrowerSaiwania wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:I’ll take a look. And I was just a UN peacekeeper it’s not real soldier work
You shouldn't have been there in my view to "keep the peace" but rather, to hunt down and destroy insurgents or whoever was part of the problem which caused you to be deployed.
There is one piece of equipment I think should make a comeback which is- the flamethrower. That it causes a cruel and painful death is not a bug, but a feature in my view. Nothing better to clear out caves or bunkers. That is the way to deal with that problem, not sending any tunnel rats like in Vietnam. I remain to be convinced that Thermobaric weapons are truly enough to fully serve as a replacement for flamethrowers. A more portable means of burning targets to a crisp should be available. Napalm should still be utilized.
by Gig em Aggies » Sun Nov 18, 2018 5:33 pm
lets see Katana range a few feet vs a flamethrower range 30-50 yards I'll take a flamethrower over a katana any dayKubra wrote:No you western imperialist, the katana is superior to the flamethrowerSaiwania wrote:
You shouldn't have been there in my view to "keep the peace" but rather, to hunt down and destroy insurgents or whoever was part of the problem which caused you to be deployed.
There is one piece of equipment I think should make a comeback which is- the flamethrower. That it causes a cruel and painful death is not a bug, but a feature in my view. Nothing better to clear out caves or bunkers. That is the way to deal with that problem, not sending any tunnel rats like in Vietnam. I remain to be convinced that Thermobaric weapons are truly enough to fully serve as a replacement for flamethrowers. A more portable means of burning targets to a crisp should be available. Napalm should still be utilized.
by Internationalist Bastard » Sun Nov 18, 2018 5:35 pm
by Internationalist Bastard » Sun Nov 18, 2018 5:35 pm
Indo-Malaysia wrote:Saiwania wrote:
You shouldn't have been there in my view to "keep the peace" but rather, to hunt down and destroy insurgents or whoever was part of the problem which caused you to be deployed.
There is one piece of equipment I think should make a comeback which is- the flamethrower. That it causes a cruel and painful death is not a bug, but a feature in my view. Nothing better to clear out caves or bunkers. That is the way to deal with that problem, not sending any tunnel rats like in Vietnam. I remain to be convinced that Thermobaric weapons are truly enough to fully serve as a replacement for flamethrowers. A more portable means of burning targets to a crisp should be available. Napalm should still be utilized.
Personally, I believe the end of terrorism will come about not through violence, but through education. Though I'll leave t at that before I go off topic .Internationalist Bastard wrote:Er yeah
Um anyway weaponry is cool, it’s fun to study
Indeed.
Though it is a shitty click bait website now, I used to lurk on list verse to look at the strange and obscure weapons fielded across history. Some of them Medieval ones look bloody brutal.
by Engleberg » Sun Nov 18, 2018 6:46 pm
Umbrellya wrote:"You are literally the most unashamed German I've ever met."
Wiena wrote:"Engleberg you surely are the most savage guy in the whole game."
West Leas Oros 2 wrote:Anything Left of Center: *exists*
Engle: FUCKING REDS!
by Kubra » Sun Nov 18, 2018 7:30 pm
Steel folded 1000 times rapidly cools gaijin flames
by Unstoppable Empire of Doom » Sun Nov 18, 2018 9:16 pm
by Grater Tovakia » Sun Nov 18, 2018 9:31 pm
by Genivaria » Sun Nov 18, 2018 11:11 pm
by Indo-Malaysia » Sun Nov 18, 2018 11:39 pm
Genivaria wrote:Something I've always found interesting is the gradual rise of the common infantryman over the centuries when previously cavalry (especially armored cavalry) had dominated the field in Europe since the fall of the Roman Empire.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: East Leaf Republic, Hypron, Philjia, Senkaku, Singaporen Empire, Spirit of Hope, Turenia
Advertisement