NATION

PASSWORD

Political Parties from your nation

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]
User avatar
Walosia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 803
Founded: Jul 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Political Parties from your nation

Postby Walosia » Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:35 am

This is a post about the largest political party in Walosia, their history and political viewpoints.
Feel free to post about a political party from your nation (should you allow such things :p )
This post will be split into two parts, with the first focusing on its history.

The Liberals (Walosia):
Image

Chairman: Imperial Senate President, Markus Galigan
Senate leader: Gaius Rufus Cassian
(Imperial Senator from District of Akropolis)
Chairman of the Liberal Praetorian Council: Gaia Selena Appius
(Praetor for the Commune of Fairhaven)

Founded:
September 6th 1901

Preceded by:
The Liberal Union of Walosia
The Moderate Right
The Freedom Party

Headquarters:
Campaign HQ Constantine
Liberty Avenue
Waldovia
Walosia

Youth wing: Young Liberals
Student wing: Students for Liberty
Total membership: 58 million paying members

Ideology:
Latin Liberalism
Progressivism
Modern capitalism
Environmentalism

Etruscan affiliation:
Union of Liberal Etruscans

International affiliation:
Alliance of Liberal and Libertarian Parties

Colors:
Blue

The Imperial Walosian Senate:
287/1000

District Senates:
1431/5000

Praetorianships:
388/1259

Latin Union Forum:
32/50

History:
Formation and rebranding (1901 – 1910):
The main predecessor to The Liberals was a century old party known as The Liberal Union, a major political powerhouse in its day. Following the Second Maldovia War in 1820 and the following economic depression, The Liberal Union was largely blamed for both by the Walosian populous and public support for the more left leaning, and newly established party “Workers United League” drew many former supporters from The Liberal Union. The era between 1838 and 1890 saw the domination of Workers United League in national politics and The Liberal Union was quickly reduced to an opposition party. Throughout the majority of years between the great economic depression of the 1830s and 40s and the establishment of The Liberals, The Liberal Union would never regain the presidency and was reduced to the third largest party, behind both the Workers United League and the Conservative Union, which became the two dominating political factions of the last half of the 19th century.
Image
Gaius Lucretius Scipio in 1903

The decisive political turning point for the Liberal Union came with the election of Titus Lucretius Scipio to Party chairman in 1898 and the “September Breakup” in 1899. Titus was a famous socio-liberal philosopher and politicians in the end of the 19th century and ran on a platform of modernizing and re-inventing the party platform to be more open to socialist policies championed by the Workers United League, this including universal healthcare, a positive reform of regulations and a renewed view on both taxes and education. The Liberal Union National Conference of 1899 saw the enactment of several socio-liberal policies, including the acceptance of universal healthcare and a progressive tax reform. This would result in the September Breakup, which saw several highly prominent libertarian politicians and representatives from The Liberal Union breaking with the party, either by going over to the Libertarian Union or by staying independent.

The September Breakup saw the internal fracture of the party, which left the party itself in turmoil. The socio-liberals in one side, championing a combination of socialist and liberal policies, against the libertarian and the classical liberals on the other, arguing for less government and to stay with principles rather than populist ideas championed by the Workers United League. The internal arguments and disagreements came to such a boiling point that during the Liberal Union National Conference of 1900, around 40% of the political representatives from the party refused to attend. Titus would at this point champion for the reorganization of the party into a new organization, which would unite the socio-liberals under one party and in 1901 he founded The Liberals. Most of the loyal representatives to Titus would switch party and embrace The Liberals, while the remainder of the Liberal Union either discontinued or entered other parties. The Liberal Union was declared a “defunct party” in 1903.

The new party would focus on rebuilding its internal structure and its public image. However skeptical of socialism on a grand scale, The Liberals introduced a series of party platform policies focusing on melding together the libertarian right with the socialist left, a tactic that proved itself working. The first representatives from The Liberals were elected to the Imperial Senate already in the 1902 presidential election and by the end of the first ten years; The Liberals had a prominent position in both local, district and national politics.

Titus Lucretius Scipio (1910 – 1918):
The success of The Liberals in the first decade of the 20th century saw the potential for a successful presidential campaign by Titus in the 1906 presidential election. Running on a platform of halting The Workers United League’s more radical political ideas and opposing the introduction of both a national heritage tax and a railroad tax, The Liberals and Titus found strong support within the railroad community and the middle class, while struggling to keep a strong base within the working class and the upper class. This ultimately lost Titus the presidency in the 1906 election to The Conservative Union. However, thanks to two scandals, one involving an affair by the Conservative Walosian President (The Red Rose Scandal) and the Avignon Contact Scandal (a scandal where Avignon spies had infiltrated The Liberals headquarters on behalf of the Workers United League), the popularity of both major parties decreased and by the 1910 election, Titus was projected to win by a landslide.
Image
Titus would often attend rallies and interact with the audience, as seen here during a "tug of war" between attending political rivals

Running on a campaign of privatization of the railroad industry, a notoriously infamous industry for workers and customers, a generous tax break to middle and working class citizens and to introduce both school and health care choice, Titus won the presidency by a landslide, giving The Liberals a 38% plurality. The plurality gave The Liberals a governing hand going into the 1910s and by cooperating with both the Progressive Voices (the predecessor to The Progress Party) and The Libertarian Union; Titus´s administration received enough delegates to have a majority. The administration of Titus became famous for drafting the plans for The Latin Union and helping to meddle in the regional conflict between The Arabian Republic and The Persian Republic, which saw peace in 1913. Internally, the administration of Titus would be plagued by strikes in the coal industry, the 1912 Santiago earthquake, which killed around 1.200 Walosians, and the unpopular decision to open trade relations with former colonies of Lesontsy. In addition, Titus with his 8 years in office helped privatize the former nationalized Walosian Railway Services and providing the middle and working class with tax credits and cuts while still maintaining many of the services currently administered by the Imperial Government.
Image
Titus`s terms in office would also be dominated by a series of miner strikes.
Here from a coal mine northwest of Fairhaven in 1913.

Titus attempted to run for a third term in 1918, but due to extended skepticism by the Walosian public for further privatization as well as with Titus´s decreasing popularity in his last months as president, the presidency went to the Workers United League and Valerius Sabinus. Even though Titus lost the third election, The Liberals were now a major player on the Walosian political scene and their influence continued to grow, especially among the middle class, which would become their main voter base during the first half of the 20th century.

1920s opposition:
The victory of Valerius Sabinus and the reduction of The Liberals to opposition gave leeway for Titus to continued marketing his party. The Liberals would in the 1920s be considered one of the most outspoken critics of both The Workers United League and the Conservatives, which again helped market the party and its principles. Titus would until his heart attack in 1921 continue in the Imperial Senate and raising awareness for the economic and social issues he and his party stood for. Following his heart attack in 1921, The Liberal National Convention would in 1922 replace him with Gaia Arya Licinia, the first female to hold the office of Chairman. Arya would remain as chairwoman of The Liberals until the primary elections of 1929. Arya and her secretaries would administer The Liberals during their first major opposition role, as The Workers United League would win the presidency in both the 1922 and the 1926 elections. During the 1920s, The Liberals would refuse to enter into any coalition with either WUL or the Conservatives and focused on branding themselves as a stand alone alternative to the socialist left and the libertarian or nationalist right.

The 1920s saw the emergence of a globalist movement among progressive Walosians, this with focus on the establishment of The Latin Union in 1915 and the softening of aggression towards Khelshar and Anglia, two former colonial rivals and current economic powerhouses. The Workers United League favored protectionist trading with the old Walosian allies and ideological partners, including Lesontsy, Merito, former Germanic colonies and Westphalia in addition with opening trade with Avignon in 1924. The Liberals favored the establishment of a trade agreement and the continued softening of the approach towards Anglia and Khelshar, a sentiment they received positive acclaim for from the younger generation of the 1920s. The Liberals would also voice their critique towards the WUL government’s decision to bail out Constantinople Banking Services following their bankruptcy in 1927 and the continued subsidy of the Walosian agriculture and mineral industry.

Arya Licinia would during the 1920s become known as “Lady Liberty” among her supporters, having voiced an early support for women’s right to chose (abortions) and the introduction of a male “judicial abortion”. Arya was staunchly anti-war; she supported the dismantling of the Walosian nuclear triad (a position never adapted by the party) and for the dissolution of both the Department of Education and the Department of Internal Affairs. The DoA would be dissolved upon their victory in the 1930 presidential election. Arya is by many seen as the mother of the Liberal movement and as one of the four founding members of the Liberals, the other three being Titus, Marcus and Lucius.
Image
Gaia Arya Licinia in 1916 would become
a symbol of female empowerment.


Marcus and Lucius, two full term presidencies (1930 – 1954):
The presidential campaigns of 1930 were dominated by two distinct scandals of the latest Workers United League president (Antonio Martin Lucchese), the Lucchese Bank Scandal and the Arabic Weapons Trade agreement. The Lucchese bank scandal was centered on the allegation that President Antonio had used his political influence over the finance department to help the bank avert taxes and to help key financial figures escape prosecution. The Arabic Weapons Trade scandal focused on the extensive weapons trade between Walosia and the Arabian Republic and whether or not these weapons were used to extensively target civilians during the Pauliner Insurrection of 1922. These scandals resulted in an average approval rating for the Antonio administration below 30% and indirectly resulted in Antonio stepping down as chairman of the Workers United League in the last year of his presidency. These two scandals were heavily politicized during the 1930 campaigns and resulted in the end of the two-term president and the end of the 1920s Workers United League executive dominance.

Gaius Marcus Maranzano replaced Arya Licinia during the 1929 Liberal National Convention and after having won the primary election in the run up to the presidential election, Marcus became the Liberals presidential candidate. Running on a platform of the legalization of marijuana and other softer narcotic substances and the lowering of taxes and regulations on housing, vehicles and alcohol, Marcus found a solid voter base with younger adults and within the progressive middle class. Marcus also ran on a platform of limiting the government’s responsibilities and economic overreach in response to the scandalous last administration. The 1920s saw the revitalization of classical economics, with literature from pre-war economists such as “Gaius Censorius Nevitta” and “Neritus Eusebius”, as well as with the foreign influence from the Khelsharian economist “Friedrich Adenauer” and the Westphalian “Giovanni Marchese Di Saracco”. The revitalization of the classical and libertarian economic theories, referred to as “Modern Censorian Economics”, would help elect many liberal and libertarian politicians and help The Liberals with acquiring further political influence over national politics. The policies of Modern Censorian Economics would shape much of the next 25 years under administration by The Liberals.
Image
Marcus Marazano, a staunch Libertarian
would oversee the first coalition
government with the Libertarian Union.


Marcus, having won the presidency in 1930, entered into a Liberal coalition with The Libertarian Union and his first term saw the reversal on some of the lefts core policies, including the ban on private health care clinics, common core curriculum for privately run lower education and the protectionist policies of large subsidies to the Walosian agriculture and oil sector. The first term of Marcus also saw the drafting and enactment of the first “Latin-Germanic trade agreement”, a comprehensive free trade agreement between Walosia, Khelshar and her former colonies and the establishment of the Anglian-Latin Trade Commission, an initiative to reduce tariffs and regulations in the trade between Anglia and Walosia. Marcus also strengthens the position of the Latin Union and during his first term, the last three former colonies would become members, leaving only Persia a non-member.

Domestically, Marcus´s administration oversaw the dismantling of the Department of Domestic Affairs (The DODA), the legalization of marijuana in 1934 and the comprehensive “Liberal Housing and Development Act” in 1933. This housing act saw the removal of roughly 40% of all regulations on housing development and around 75% of all fees and taxes on housing construction and maintenance. This in effect resulted in the development of many Walosian suburbs and saw the overall expansion of several major cities, including Waldovia and Constantinople. It would now become easier for young adults to purchase houses and apartments with low utility costs and while the overall housing price decreased, many championed this act as a gift to the younger generation. In his second term, Marcus would also oversee a similar act for automobile manufacturer and while investing on public transport; the regulatory cut to the automobile industry set in motion the Walosian entry to the global automobile market. The end of Marcus´s second term branded him “The Jupiter for young Latins” for his policies often benefiting young Walosians.
Image
Marcus`s housing policy would oversee
a radical development of suburbs.
These suburbs became known as
"Cities of Marcus".


Marcus´s third term oversaw the outbreak of two conflicts, the Merito-Tokoshiba War of 1939 and the Severny Civil War, two conflicts Walosia was drawn into due to their relationship with the involved countries. The Merito Republic was a member of the Latin Union and thusly called upon other members for assistance and the Severny Civil War saw the involvement of Novgorod, a Walosian military ally in the Far East. These wars were extremely unpopular among most of The Liberals voter base and Marcus`s administration saw a drastic decrease in popularity. Marcus´s third term also saw a general strike within the health care sector, a crippling strike within the agriculture sector and during his last year in office, an overall rise in violent crimes as a result of easier access to firearms following a recent liberalization of that industry.

The successor as The Liberals presidential candidate was a former Libertarian politician turned liberal, from Akropolis, Lucius Augusto Flavian. He campaigned on the continued privatization of many sectors within Walosia, including the privatization of all international airports, electricity producers and a further deregulation of both the housing and education industry in Walosia. What made him popular among Marcus´s voter base was his non-interventionist policy in regards to the various conflicts Walosia was currently embroiled in. He campaign for the withdrawal of Walosian troops from former colonies and a withdrawal from active engagements in conflicts not directly involving Walosian territories. This made him hugely popular among the working and middle class, but gave him an ill reputation among globalists and from the other members in the Latin Union. Lucius won the presidency with 31% of the Imperial Senators in 1942.

Lucius´s received three terms in office, this due to increased skepticism shown by the Walosian populous towards extended socialism and the growing of an all-encompassing government. The Liberal government under Lucius made some liberal reforms to the health care sector and to publicly financed education, allowing for private contractors to compete with publicly funded health insurance and education stipends/grants. It was also during Lucius´s presidency that he, in a speech to the 1943 Liberal National Convention, framed the five legitimate roles of the government, a principal that The Liberals later cemented into their program.
Image
Lucius became hugely popular with the free marked right
and an eyesore for the left.

Lucius made good on his promise to withdraw Walosian troops from active conflicts, and to a great dismay with her allies in the Latin Union, no active troops were currently in conflict when Lucius left office in 1954. Lucius also championed further free trade agreements with under-developed nations (usually former colonies) and to encourage entrepreneurship among foreign citizens in return for foreign aid. Domestically, Lucius three terms were dominated by the continued tax reforms and the introduction of the famous flat tax, a system that is still in use today. It was also during Lucius second term that the Citizens Medical Insurance came into being as a response to the single payer system championed by the left. When Lucius left office in 1954, he left behind a government far smaller than what Marcus entered in 1930 as well as having overseen the largest industrial and economic boom since before the war in 1820, this thanks to both a overall liberalization, the opening of trade with former Novgorod colonies and a boom in research and technological advancements. However, thanks to an increased skepticism towards non-interventionist policies and the liberalization of the health care sector and the welfare state itself, The Liberals lost the 1954 presidential election to the Conservative Party.

The sixties and seventies/The Three Dragons:
With the Conservatives having won the 1954 presidency and entering into a partnership with the centrist wing of the Workers United League, The Liberals was reduced to an opposition party. The 1954 national election proved disheartening for The Liberals, with their number of District Senators reduced by 15% and the number of Praetorianships reduced by 19% following the 1956 local election. The increased skepticism towards radical capitalism and libertarianism championed by Lucius didn’t appeal in the same nature as the moderate policies of The Liberals did in the past. Lucius lost his position as chairman in the internal 1954 election; a position lost to the far more moderate Castillo Senator Selena Antonio Escobar. The 24 years of Liberal dominance over the executive branch had left many political parties in disarray, including many branches of the Progress party and for the nationalists on the right. The entry of the Conservatives to the executive branch helped consolidate power to three major political parties in an era historians tend to call “The Three Dragons”, representing the three dragons of Walosian politics. The three dragons represented the liberals and moderate libertarians in “The Liberals”, the culturally and socially conservatives in “The Conservative Party” and the social democrats and moderate socialists in “The Workers United League.” Many smaller parties would continue to represent the more radical wings of Walosian politics, with the far more nationalistic “National Party of Walosia”, the progressives in “Progress Party” and the libertarians and classical liberals in “The Libertarian Union.”

Throughout the 50s, 60s and 70s, two of the three dragons would hold an equal number of presidencies, leading to an era of political gridlock and the lack of a continuous political development. The extensive liberalization of Walosian politics and culture seen under the 24 year executive dominance of the Liberals brought with it a general shift in politics for other parties as well, with the conservatives being far more liberal in their 1954 administration and the socialist Workers United League being open to accept more liberal policy changes than prior. The first administration of the Conservative president Paulus Giuseppe focused on restoring Walosian reputation within the Latin Union, not by sending troops, but by signing the Latin Union Universal Research Agreement, in which Walosia obligated a set number of denaris to the common research of universities in Union countries. The Liberals, having elected Selena Escobar to the position of chairwoman began focusing on local elections. Selena has inherited a party in internal turmoil, as the libertarian fraction oppose any attempts by Selena to drive a more moderate approach. In the public’s eye, Selena received appraise from most liberal news outlets and a Census Bureau poll conducted in 1957 showed that 64% viewed Selena as a better candidate to represent the Liberals than Lucius before her.
Image
Selena A. Escobar in early 1956.

The 1960 presidential election saw the victory of the Workers United League, who entered their first executive presidency since their lose to The Liberals in 1930. The election itself proved positive for The Liberals, who won an additional 32 seats, making them the second largest party in opposition. This thanks to the moderate approaches made by Selena in her attempts to divert working class voters away from the WUL. However, the victory of The Workers United League came as a shock to the Walosian public, as many opinion polls had The Liberals at a narrow victory for the presidency. The 1960s election created a far more left oriented Imperial Senate than previously expected and provided The Communist Party of Walosia with five senators, all five from the industrial areas in northern Walosia. In addition did the Red and Green Union received twenty Imperial Senators and helped create the left leaning “Socialist and Environmentalist Bloc”. This bloc would together have 502 votes in the Imperial Senate, effectively giving them a majority. This is by many seen as the mainstream breakthrough for the environmentalist movement in Walosia.

The 1960s administration by President John Schwesig, born to Khelsharian immigrants, was driven by the revitalization of many lost industries, including both the extensive aluminum production and the agriculture industry. In addition, the John administration focused on a green tax shift to impose strict tariffs, taxes and fees on environmentally damaging activities while using that income to subsidies green initiatives, especially within energy. The Liberals opposed many of these policies, often criticizing the administration of “killing jobs as part of an experiment in green energy”. Extensive rhetoric from prominent Liberal politicians in addition to the policies of John Schwesig helped fuel the oil crash in 1963 and the subsequent fall in oil and gas prices. The Liberals would during this opposition period win their first majority within The Latin Union General Forum, the governing body of the Latin Union, in which they advocated for a continued decentralization of the institution.

The 1960s opposition created a wave of anti-communist and anti-socialist tendencies, both within The Liberals and within the Libertarian Union. Many members of both parties viewed the Communist Party as leveraging and unprecedented amount of political influence over the socialist coalition. Both The LU and The Liberals were suspected of propagating directly anti-communist scare tactics and the 1964 Senate shooting was largely blamed on anti-communist skepticism. As a result of this attack and the political backlash received as a result, the Liberals were reduced to the third largest party, with the Conservatives winning the presidency. Many blamed dirty political game on the reduction of The Liberals, much because many prominent far-left politicians blamed the libertarian movement for inciting violence against socialists.
Image
The anti-communist sentiment created groups intended on
fighting communist and socialist ideologies within Walosia.
This included the "blue brigade", a paramilitary
group with ties to politicians within
The Liberals.

The two next presidencies would be won by the conservatives in 1964 and the WUL in 1968, with The Liberals being reduced to the third largest party. Selena resigned as the chairwoman following the election loss in 1964 and retired from politics. Her next successor would inherit a struggling political party, having lost their plurality in 1/3 District Senates and buckling under a series of scandals. Dimitrios Maximos would only serve as the Chairman for 6 months before he was embroiled in a scandal involving illicit campaign funds and his successor, Cristóbal Bánez de Santamaria Álvarez would himself be fired from the position 7 months later, this thanks to a publicity scandal and an affair. The next chairman to hold the position and successfully restore much of the party´s political influence was Imperial Senator Yannis Stathakis, a moderate liberal from Akropolis who won the internal election in 1971. At the time of Yannis and his succession to the position as Chairman, the Liberals had lost its position as the third largest party in the Imperial Senate to the Progress Party, a modern historical first. Yannis also became the first Liberals chairman since Selena to receive 60%+ majority support within his own party, a strong support his predecessors lacked.

During his time as the chairman, which spanned the 1972 general election and the 1974 local election, Yannis would rebrand much of the Liberals policies to incorporate more principled stances on social policies, which included the complete overturn of “Catharine Marcella V. The People of Olympia”, a Supreme Court decision from 1968 that upheld the constitutionality and enforcement of the 1964 complete ban on prostitution. In addition to prostitution, Yannis made immigration a political issue, where The Liberals would favor easier access for immigrants to legally obtain work permits and to liberalize immigration, a sector of the Walosian public sector that saw increased regulation during the 1960 Workers United League presidency. Tapping into these subjects helped The Liberals and Yannis reach popular support. During the 1972 presidential election, the Liberals received 21% of the popular vote, effectively regaining the position as the third largest party and their position as one of the three dragons.

The 1974 local elections proved beneficial for The Liberals, which thanks to strategic campaigning, helped secure a political stronghold in the liberal east coast and within Logata and western Kingston. This secured The Liberals with the position as the second largest party in local municipalities and communes, only made second by The Workers United League, who still garnished strong support from rural Walosia and the industrial districts in northern Walosia and Maldovia. The victories in various local elections helped fuel popular support for The Liberals during the 1976 presidential election. Yannis himself stepped down following the loss of his Imperial seat in his Akropolis constituency.

Cato Plautus Corvus (1980 – 1984):
The first candidate to successfully run a presidential campaign since the 1950s was Cato Plautus Corvus, a moderate Liberal that took over after Yannis following his retirement from politics in 1974. Cato was a moderate Liberal who appealed to many of the same political principles and voter bases as Yannis had done. However, Cato considered himself more domestic in policies and campaigning on domestic issues as opposed to Yannis who frequently sited Walosia´s responsibilities and globalist policies. Three of Cato´s campaign issues focused on a revitalization of the Walosian infrastructure, with focus on the railroad, intercity collective transport, road construction and airport accessibility, issuing additional licenses for oil extraction by Walosian corporations and strengthening the Walosian Legion. These policies provided Cato with a strong support, both among the working class, with oil workers and infrastructure construction workers voting in record numbers, and from nationalists and those who favored a stronger Walosian military. In the 1980 Presidential election, Cato won by a margin of 39%, entering government in a coalition government with The Libertarian Union and the Conservative Party.
Image
Cato Plautus Corvus would help revitalize and distanse
The Liberals from the 60s and 70s turmoils and violence.

Cato´s only presidential term was dominated by the passage of the “Walosian Infrastructure Revitalization Act” in 1981 and the software tech boom of the 1980s, an industry that had previously been limited to the Westphalian Republic. In response to this economic boom, Cato introduced the “Intraweb Privacy and Software Patent Liberalization Act” in 1982, securing privacy online as well as to secure the patent legality of newly developed software’s by increasing the patent expiration schedule to ten years as opposed to five.

In 1983, Cato and his administration authorized the contract to Hydro International for oil extraction in the “Asgard Delta” in northern Saint Halvards. To staunch opposition by all four Districts in Saint Halvards and a mass protest by environmental protection groups, the Cato administration issued operational licenses to Hydro. This was an extremely unpopular political decision, especially within the Workers United League dominated island of Saint Halvards and with many left leaning politicians calling for a vote of no confidence against the Cato administration. The Liberals themselves were split over the issue, but a vote of no confidence was never issued. However, the issue itself ultimately lost Cato his re-election in 1984. Cato´s four years in office was dominated largely by an exponential growth in the software and information technology sector and an increased radicalization of environmentalists, both within The Liberals and outside. Many views Cato as the man who enshrined Walosia on her path to a global position within the IT sector, a path his successor would continue to focus on.

In opposition (1984 – 1992):
The reduction of The Liberals to an opposition party following the loss in the 1984 Presidential Election was largely thanks to the Hydro scandal and the immense unpopularity received as a result of that. Cato himself stepped down as the Chairman following the election loss and was replaced by Gaia Victoria Aquina, a Senator from Olympia who branded herself as a socially conservative than Cato and attempted to implement more Pagan-friendly policies, in stark contrast to previous Chairmen/women in previous years. Victoria herself would only serve a tenure of six months before Antonius Hadrianus Verus replaced her and even though many of her policies were reversed, she was able to introduce a more religiously friendly policy platform to The Liberals. The party itself now opened for allowing religious groups, preferably those belonging to the Roman Pagan faith, to establish, operate and enroll students in charter schools founded on religious principles. In addition, her proposal to include religious subsidy into the party´s political platform remained up until 2016 when Markus Galigan removed it.

The Environmentalist Revolution/Antonius Hadrianus Verus (1992 – 1996):
During the two election cycles where The Liberals was in opposition to the Workers United League (1984 – 1988) and The Conservative Party (1988 – 1992), the Liberals went through a series of political and policy reversals related to environmental issues. The man who is often credited with what many come to call the “liberal environmentalist revolution” was Antonius Hadrian Verus, an Imperial Senator from Baetica. Upon his election to the position as Chairman, Antonius was a staunch advocate for environmental protection and from the get go, he intended to move The Liberals and their view on environmental protection further away from a pure capitalist view and over to allow government to regulate such industries. In a 1986 speech to the Liberal National Convention, he advocated for a sixth legitimate role of government in protecting the environment as he argued “capitalism, an economic system that advocates growth, cannot be fully trusted with protecting the environment, as it is both not profitable and not inherit to its principles of profit, growth and resources.”
Image
Antonius Verus during his famed speech to the
Liberal National Convention in 1986.

Many high-ranking party members quickly shunned Antonius´s views on the failure of capitalism to protect the environment, but the larger majority of the party found his policy proposals appealing. The increased popularity and focus on humans’ impact on climate change and push for regulations on environmental issues created an atmosphere of political change within the party. The 1970s and 80s saw an increase in climate disasters, such as the “1977 Latina Oil and Gas Titan Oil Leak” and the far more severe 1981 explosion at the Hydro Centurion Oil platform north of Asgard, which left 101 people dead and around 200 wounded. Many viewed these disasters as a result of poor oversight, corporate cuts in safety measures and the use of cheap labor, which in return gave The Workers United League the incentive to push for further governmental regulation. Hadrian himself used these disasters as arguments for why government regulation was needed, which helped spark the “environmental revolution” within The Liberals.

Environmental issues would play an important part in the 1992 Presidential election and it was clear that the many of the new political policies on combating climate change and environmentalism drew voters from Workers United League to The Liberals. Running on a platform of increased carbon emission regulation, the establishment of an independent Department of Environmental Protection with various agencies enforcing regulations, and a massive subsidy program for green initiatives and technology. During the 1992 Presidential election, it was estimated that a total of 14% of former WUL voters shifted allegiance to The Liberals, and Hadrian would win the presidency with a 39% majority vote. Hadrian would become the first Liberal president since 1980 and the first to officially enter into a coalition government with The Workers United League. This was unprecedented and many viewed the coalition to result in political gridlock and an ineffective executive government. The Workers United League was given the Department of Environmental Protection, with the underlying Agency of Green Innovation, and the Department of Labor. The remaining departments went to Liberal politicians.

The decision to enter into a coalition with the Workers United League proved difficult, as the two parties agreed on little other than their shared view of environmental issues. However, as The Liberals remained the dominant party in the coalition, and could more often than WUL rely on support from both The Conservatives and The Libertarian Union. The coalition between WUL and The Liberals, nicknamed the “Terra Nova Declaration”, proved politically disastrous for The Workers United League, who more than once had to support legislation contrary to their ideological belief. An example of this was the 1994 Act of Self Regulation within Personal Transport, which removed the previous required license for selling personal transportation services to other individuals. In return, the Liberals would support an act proposed by WUL that would introduce stricter regulations for hunting licenses. The media would rather focus on the legislative proposals forced upon WUL, which again gave them a poor reputation and suffered thusly as a result.
Image
Hadrian and the leader of WUL Nichole Giovani announcing the partnership
between Liberals and WUL.

Hadrian´s administration would also oversee the largest media privatization act since the creation of the Walosian National Television in 1811. Prior to the Hadrian administration, the WNT was collectively financed by a national fee imposed on every consumer who owned a television set. The Imperial government also retained the right to compose the WNT national review board, which in WNTs long run often meant electing politically sympathizing board members. The privatization act, drafted and approved by the Hadrian government and implemented by their conservative successors, effectively privatized WNT, sold off the Imperial governments ownership and withdrew any WNT special broadcasting rights and privileges. The additional tax implemented on private TV-owners were also lifted. This process took an additional 5-years to perfect, but 2001, WNT had been privatized and split into several smaller multi-media corporations. This caused immense outrage among the left-wing politicians in Walosia, and is often viewed as one of the primary causes to Hadrians loss in the 1996 Presidential Election.

The Conservative 21st century:
The 1996 Presidential Election saw the victory of Victor Fernando Arrabal, a Conservative politician from Olympia. The election itself reduced The Liberals to becoming the largest opposition party, just a few Senators larger than WUL, who became the third largest party. The next four years of Conservative administration would help cement their next era of domination within Walosian politics, an era known as the “Conservative 21st Century.”

The Conservative Party would, in addition to implement the privatization of the WNT, halt a series of progressive libertarian policies enacted by Hadrians previous administration. The “Firearms Deregulation Act”, which would reduce the total number of banned firearms types and the “Fire Brigades Good Samaritan Act”, which would privatize the nations fire departments into non-profits, were all either scrapped or vetoed by Victor as soon as he became president. This created a lot of tension between the Liberals and the Conservatives, but because of the large position held by the WUL, the Conservative were able to find political support for their action in reversing previously passed Liberal policies.

The first four years of Victor Arrabal would be dominated by The Arabic Civil War in Arabia Superior (Etrusca) and the subsequent handling of the conflict. When the civil war broke out because of the “Gendasar Capitol Attack”, in which three Sunni extremists representing the “Arabian Reconstructionists” attacked the Arabian Capitol building, resulting in the death of sixteen Senators, the minister of foreign affairs and the capture and hostage taking of three other ministers, not including either the vice-president or the president himself. The Arabian defense ministry viewed the terrorist attack as an act of war against the state itself and called upon the Latin Union for military aid. The first major offensive against the Arabian Reconstructionists, who had maintained large support amount western Arabians, occurred on August 20th, 1997 and involved 20.000 Latin Union troops, of which 13.000 were Walosian.

The war itself became increasingly unpopular in the Walosian populous and throughout the remainder of the 90s, Victor refocused on establishing peace in the country, most notably by arranging the “1998 Arabic Peace Summit”, a summit that resulted in the signing of the “Arabian Peace Accords.” The accord would in short devolve authority from the national Arabian government to the regional councils, recognize the Arabian Reconstructionists as a legitimate political party and halt any further military actions, on both parts. The accord would retain peace in the region and was often viewed as the work of Victor himself, which ejected him onto popularity back home. In their next election, the Conservatives would receive 41% of the popular vote and roughly 43% of all Imperial Senators, granting them with a political position of prominence which the Conservatives had only briefly experienced before.

The next two terms of Victor Arrabal would be dominated by a series of conservative domestic legislations as well as the enactment of the “Latin Union Free Movement Agreement”, a move he would be highly criticized for by the nationalists and socialist parties. The Conservative Party ran on a ticket of reducing regulations on religious charter schools, reinstating the tax-exempt status of religious congregations as well as to introduce a curriculum in the “Common Curriculum Program” with greater emphasis on Roman Paganism and cultural studies, a series of legislation that they were able to enact during Victors terms as President.

The end of Victor Arrabals terms in office came as a result of three distinct scandals in the years prior to the 2016 presidential elections, primarily the “Australis File Transfer.” In early 2014, the Waldovian Times received documents revealing transfer of documents and finances from Victor`s top aids and political allies to Australis, a country to the south famous for their status as a tax haven. The documents, which itself would proclaim Victors career as dead, involved 310 million Denaris in personal assets from Victor`s top advisors, including the Senior Vice President Michael Duadalis. The two other scandals involved the use of HealthCare funds to stabilize a local hospital in rural Augustin, Olympia owned by Victor`s own brother. The last scandal involved the sexual misconduct of Victor`s minister of defense, of which he resigned and would eventually be sentenced to two years in prison.

All these scandals would dominate the 2016 presidential election and eventually lead to the victory of famed Liberal Markus Galigan, a staunch socio-liberal from Waldovia.

Markus Galigan (2016 – Incumbent):

Image
Markus Galigan during a campaign rally following his victory in the Presidential Election.

Markus, who ran on a platform of liberalizing (read: cutting) the tax code, legalize organized prostitution and increase subsidies to private initiatives in clean energy, found a strong base within younger voters, especially those in academia and university. He also ran on a ticket with famed eco-libertarian politician Gaius Emilio Roberto Sanchez and advocated a halt in expanding oil and gas reserves and further granting of licenses in excavation. Markus Galigans victory in 2016 saw the Liberals returning to the position as largest party and he would maintain a plurality of around 287 Imperial Senators, a percentage of 28%. As a result of this plurality, the Liberals decided to enter into a coalition with the Progress Party, the Conservative Party and the Libertarian Union, forming the nicknamed the “Grand Coalition.”

In the two years Markus has been president, he has been able to help reduce the capital gains tax, reformed the Inheritance tax to devolve its authority to the Districts and helped reduce regulations on private industry, especially those within fishery and agricultural sectors. In foreign policy he became known as a hardline non-interventionist, withdrawing a record number of Walosian troops from overseas military bases and closing thirteen bases in Germania, around 40% of all bases located on the continent. He also helped sign the “Latin-Germanic Nuclear Reduction Treaty” in 2018, which set in motion the biggest reduction process in nuclear weapons, expected to reduce and demolish around 64% of all nuclear weapons at Walosian, Westphalian and Khelsharian possession.

See part 2 for more
Last edited by Walosia on Mon Jul 16, 2018 5:01 am, edited 3 times in total.
Member of the following Alliances
IATA Member
Full Member of the International Space Agency

CANON UPDATE (OOC):
I have given this a lot of thought and I have decided to do some major changes to the Walosian History Canon.

The largest change that I will be doing is the removal of the “Walosian-Khelsharian War of 2009” and the following abdication of Empress Liat as well as the removal of the character Liat completely. The reason why is because I have developed my nation into a more realistic fashion during the 2014-2015 era and after reviewing older post I see that the war and abdication of Liat is both unrealistic, doesn’t fit with the overall nation and is simply unprofessional.

User avatar
Walosia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 803
Founded: Jul 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

The Liberals (Part 2)

Postby Walosia » Mon Jul 16, 2018 5:08 am

Policies and ideology:
The majority of the Liberals follow the ideology of Latin Liberalism, commonly referred to as “Modern Liberalism” within Walosia. This ideology is based upon the economic model of capitalism, freedom and individual responsibilities and choice. A key aspect of the Latin Liberalism is the “six pillars of government responsibilities”, an important element within the ideology of The Liberals. The six pillars of government responsibilities include all three components of the justice system (courts, law enforcement and correction, accounting all for one pillar), the armed forces, the climate, healthcare, consumer protection and education. More will be presented below. In addition to Latin liberalism, most senators from The Liberals view themselves as socially progressive and strengthening individual social freedom within the boundaries of Latin culture.

Economic Policy:
The Liberals believe in the economic concepts of capitalism, free markets and individual financial responsibilities. They also believe that the primary factor behind economic growth and prosperity is a smaller government and as few regulations as possible. The Liberals are an advocator for the Walosian flat-tax system and their policies favors tax cuts over costly government programs. They tend to be business friendly and oppose traditional subsidy programs to industries that can objectively survive on their own. On a principle issue, The Liberals view taxation as a necessary evil needed for a functioning government, which separates them from the more radical Libertarian Union Party. On concrete economic issues, The Liberals oppose the establishment of a national inheritance tax, favors the liberalization of the central banks control over national interest rates and favors the Imperial Governments selling their majority shareholdings in Hydro International.

Social Policy:
In general, the Liberals believe in social progressivism with focus on individual freedom, scientific and cultural advancement and a focus on Latin culture and the Walosian identity. The Liberals was the first party to advocate for a third gender on legal documents and being a champion of Internet freedom and oppose government surveillance. Areas of social policies are the most disputed political question within the various factions in the party, with those more conservative usually leaning towards a policy of cultural homogeneity and distance from multiculturalism, while the progressive factions tend to be more open to multiculturalism. The Liberals are a key advocate for reproductive rights, with the question of financing of such services still remaining a hot button political issue within the party, and for a more liberal visa policy in regards to education and workers. The Liberals is a key supporter of absolute freedom of speech, religious freedom and secularization, but still maintains internal dispute in regards to religious symbols and attire in relation to the more conservative monotheist religions (Islam and Christianity), having criticized the use of burqa and niquab in public places.

Foreign Policy:
In relation to foreign policy, The Liberals tend to favor close connections to the former Walosian colonies, both through the Latin Union as well as through individual alliances and agreements. The Liberals favor the continuous Latin Defense Alliance between Walosia and Westphalia in addition to the comprehensive free trade agreement World Trade Network between Walosia and twenty-six other sovereign nations. Throughout their modern history, The Liberals have been favoring free trade over protectionist policies, which is the main reason why Walosia today is the nation enforcing fewest import tariffs of the industrialized countries in Tellus Magna.

The relationship between Walosia and Westphalia, the two largest and most influential Latin countries today, has been part of The Liberals policy since the Westphalian Democratic Revolution in the late 1880s. The Liberals favors relationships with Westphalia, the former colonies of Walosia, with Novgorod and Merito, while remaining skeptical to both Khelshar and Anglia. However, despite this skepticism, The Liberals saw the signing of the “Latin-Germanic Trade Agreement” in 2017 between Walosia, Westphalia, Khelshar and six former Khelsharian colonies in Germania.

Defense:
The Liberals favor a strong Walosian military with a global reach as well as taking part in global politics and the military decisions sanctioned by the Congress of Nations. Throughout the presidency of Markus Galigan (since 2016), The Liberals have increased funding towards the military, especially within the Cyber Defense of the Homefront Legion and the Naval Legion, with purchasing of three new Class 1 Orion Submarines (nuclear capable) for the price tag of 4.9 billion Denaris, a decision they received a lot of criticism for, especially by the Workers United League.

The Liberals favor an active global involvement and thusly favors the involvement of Walosia in the Arabic Civil War and the Zahend War as these were sanctioned by the Latin Union and the Congress of Nations respectfully. The Liberals also favors upholding the 2 years mandatory conscription for both genders and the continual membership of Walosia into the military branch of the Latin Union, a combined economic and military alliance between Walosia and her former colonies in Tellus Magna. The Liberals view Walosia as a global power and have thusly pledge to secure Walosias shared responsibility for global security, both from terrorism, and external and rouge states.

The Liberals also favors the continued existence of a Walosian nuclear deterrent and to the continued maintenance of the Walosian nuclear triad.

Health Policy:
One of the key pillars of government responsibilities is within health care. Their predecessor, The Liberal Union was the third major party to officially recognize citizens right to proper healthcare and to advocate for a more or less universal health care to Walosian citizens. However, as opposed to the more socialist leaning “Workers United League”, the Liberals do not believe the government provides better healthcare than private initiatives and enterprises. The Liberals believe in comprehensive cooperation between the private and public sector in providing the best possible health care to Walosian citizens and The Liberals are an advocate for a more deregulated health care industry with government funded insurances for citizens. Since “The Liberal Health Care Act” of 1924 came into effect, The Liberals have favored privatization and deregulation while still maintaining the Citizens Medical Insurance as a universal policy for all Walosian citizens.

Drug Policy:
The Liberals heavily favors a deregulated and legal marked for recreational drug usage such as marijuana. The Liberals believe in the philosophy not to criminalize activities seen as “victimless crimes” and thusly favors a legalized marked rather than prohibition. The Liberals have also favored the privatization of Walosias many cannabis shops and an increase of importable goods in the category of soft narcotics. The Liberals favors a decriminalized system for heavier drugs such as with cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine with a focus on medicinal rehabilitation. The Liberals was one of the first parties to introduce hard narcotics to the list of prescribed drugs sold in Walosia and their official party line in regards to harder narcotics is to liberalize the production of said drugs while still keeping it for medicinal use only. Many Liberal politicians hold highly libertarian views in this matter favoring a full legalization of all narcotic substances, while others maintain a policy of decriminalization and continued government manufacturing of harder drugs.

Education Policy:
The Liberals favor a system of charter schools and believes that the private sector is better suited to provide an education and training for future traits and jobs, while the government is best suited for funding such programs for children and young adults. Most senators from The Liberals believe in such a system for all grades and levels of education, including elementary schools all the way up to higher education with generous scholarships and stipends for all students. However, The Liberals believe in regulations on such charter schools, both related to student-teacher relations, discipline with review boards for expelled students and giving each school the right to decide their own internal rules. This topic was a central issue in the 2016 Presidential Election, with The Liberals advocating a charter school reconstruction of colleges and universities.

The Liberals favors the National Curriculum with a focus on the Latin language, science and social studies. They heavily favor a secular education with a focus on secular values, subjects and the Latin/Walosian culture. They view the National Curriculum as an absolute requirement for all private and publicly funded schools, religious as well as secular. In addition, The Liberals support government subsidy towards academic research, while working together with the market and each university to decide research project. They also support the yearly Latin Union research contribution, which in 2017 was 1.2 billion Denaris.

Family Policy:
The Liberals view the family as a central aspect of Walosian society and that the family itself remains the second smallest minority that must be protected, with the smallest being the individual itself. The Liberals believe that each family holds better knowledge of their financial and social situation than the Imperial government. As a result of this ideological belief, The Liberals favor tax credits and schemes for family saving accounts (and health savings account) and tax credits for stay at home parents. In addition, they support social policies like parental leave, strengthening of healthcare insurance for infants and adolescents and subsidy for kinder-garden for low-income families. However, most of the policies championed by The Liberals focuses on tax-credits and cooperation between private businesses and families with children. A few “socialist” policies such as parental leave and “single-payer child health care” is still maintained due to their popularity among the Walosian public.

Labor and welfare policy:
The Liberals views state benefits and the social security net as a necessary evil to avoid large class conflicts. One of their main goals has been to reduce the total number of recipients of government welfare programs to a minimum, this by focusing on liberal job policies that ensure few, but necessary regulations in the job marked. The Liberals favor tax credits for union memberships and comprehensive job safety regulations in sectors with a high risk of job related injuries. They also support the Social Security system and its tax, while opposing a minimum wage policy. As a replacement to a minimum wage, they support an agreed upon minimum wage between each employer and the trade group representing his/her workers. They do support legislation that makes it illegal to “grossly underpay an employee”, but refuses to support any legislation calling for a specific and universal minimum wage. In the 2016 Presidential election, The Liberals favored the removal of the “General Employer´s Tax” (a fixed percentage tax on employers based on the salary of their employees), a tax they were able to remove by support from the Imperial Senate in June 2018.

Energy and climate policy:
The Liberals have since their famous “Liberal National Convention of 1992” been an advocate for green and renewable sources of energy and the prevention of global warming. Ideologically, The Liberals believe that the solution to global warming lies within the regulatory body of the Imperial Government and with comprehensive cooperation with national industries and businesses. The Liberals do not favor what many would call symbolic politics and views most regulatory legislations in regards to environmental protection with a focus on pragmatism. As a result of this, they do not favor heavy regulation on small and medium sized businesses, as they contribute less to the overall carbon emission and climate damaging activities as compared to what multi national corporations usually do. The Liberals favors and have championed in the past policies in relation to Walosian car manufacturing, such as a progressive tax on cars with poor environmental standards and subsidies towards cleaner methods of transportation such as electric cars and trains. They have also favored a carbon tax on large corporations and direct regulation of corporate waste management. As a result of these policies championed by The Liberals, most oil extracted from Walosia is exported to the international community, as most local industries, corporations and private individuals have embraced green energy and alternative energy methods. Many senators from The Liberals consider themselves environmentalists, which have generated criticism from the more ideologically principled parties such as The Libertarian Union and The Conservatives.

Justice and crime policy:
The Liberals favors a strict crime policy, which upholds the practice of life imprisonment and the death penalty on a national level. They also support harsher sentences for violent crimes, while favoring lowering sentences for non-violent crimes such as smuggling. They were also a strong supporter for the 2016 Police Cooperation Act, which authorized the Homefront Legion to aid local law enforcement agents and police officers in operations. The Liberals also favors the authorization for private security firms to operate with non-lethal weaponry per a license, a proposal expected to be voted down in the Imperial Senate when it is up for review in August 2019.

Organization:
Party Structure:
The Liberals are comprised of two initial parties, The Political Party, consisting of all paid members of The Liberals, professional politicians as well as party volunteers and regular members, and Liberty Policy Institute, an invite-only think tank with focus on the liberal and libertarian political ideologies. Liberty Policy Institute also prints a weekly news magazine entitled “O Liberali” and is sent to all paying members of The Liberals, with many from The Libertarian Union and other liberal and libertarian parties often subscribing as well.

The Liberals maintains a hierarchal structure similar to that of the Walosian state itself. All paying members join a local Municipal or Communal chapter, often called “Local Liberals of (insert name of commune), with an example being the Local Liberals of Akropolis. Each chapter maintains a political Board of Executives, elected by members of that chapter and is given control over local political rallies, projects, commercials and recruitment. The next hierarchal step is the District Liberal Party, the professional branch of The Liberals and the political body tasked with running District campaigns, manage most of the party´s finances and electing prominent representatives for office in District and local government bodies. Membership to the District Liberal Party (for example the Fairhaven Liberal Party) is reserved for the professional politicians and representatives from The Liberals in local, District and National politics. Each District affiliated party organization is administered in the same manner as the Communal chapters, with a board of executives, elected by the paying members of that Districts communal party organizations. These District party organizations each holds an annual District Convention, where district politics will be discussed, local policies and stances enacted and representatives for public office elected, most notably the representatives for the District Senate and Imperial Senate.

The last hierarchal step for the Liberals is the national party itself, a more loosely organized branch of the party than the lower ones. The national party is organized with the ”National Board of Liberals”, the highest so called “Board of executives” in the party structure. Only high-ranking national representatives or national liberal politicians are represented here and the board itself is tasked with structuring the national political agenda for the party based upon changes and political decisions made by the National Convention. The chairman or leader of the National Board of Liberals is considered the highest authority within the party and Markus Galigan have served as chairman since 2016, when he himself became president of Walosia. An internal process within the national board elects the chairman and the process itself is shrouded in secrecy.

The National Convention of the Liberals is a bi-annual event that gathers around 800 representatives (vote-eligible) to argue and vote over changes to the national policy of the Liberals. The convention itself is open to anyone who wishes to participate, but the number of “voting-eligible”, those who are allowed to vote over changes to party platform, is almost always around 800 representatives. These representatives are local politicians of higher office, District Senators and national politicians and representatives. The president and members of the cabinet is almost always present, as well as the leaders of Students For Liberty and Young Liberals. In addition to the National Convention, the Liberals operate with a Liberal Praetorian Council, a national council that gathers all Praetors with affiliation to The Liberals to function as a second tier body for internal policy making. Only Praetors (leaders of Communes/Municipalities) can participate and the council is chaired by Gaia Selena Appius.

Party Factions:
Since the party itself is fragmented into fifty smaller District branches, many with political viewpoints that differ from the national party, the concept of party factions have risen in later years. All District branches have to affiliate with The Liberals party principles, but direct policy may vary.

The Principle caucus:
One of the largest caucuses within the Liberals is known as “The Principled Caucus” and dominates the local and district political scenery in Northern Waldovia, Northern Logata and Maldovia. The Principled Caucus, as suggested by their name, takes a more principled stance on many issues, often rejecting popular and populist positions and favoring a hard-lined set of principled ideas, often like the Libertarian Union to the right.

The Principle Caucus holds rigid anti-government positions and favors less government interference in both the economy and social policies, favors free trade and reducing government spending in general, and in social welfare and military expenditure particularly.

As this caucus is one of the larger ones of The Liberals, it is often viewed as a conservative counterweight to the far more socio-liberal Saint Antonia Caucus and the more nationalistic Fort Walosia caucus. In recent history, very few members of the Principled Caucus have entered national politics, as most of them tend to focus on local and district politics, and wasteful spending in regional matters. One of the more prominent politicians from the Principled Caucus is Gaius Cornelius Paternus Agaton, a staunch classical liberal modeled after the Flavian-school of Liberalism (Lucius Augusto Flavian, see above).

Fort Walosia (Castellum Valosae):
The Fort Walosia-Caucus is one of the smaller caucuses and receives their name from their policy of protectionist trade policies and the support of strict nation-wide tariffs in order to protect local and national industries, most notably the agriculture and tech-industries. As this caucus is rather small, the only major difference and their only major cause is to create a “fort of tariffs” around Walosia, as suggested by their name. This caucus enjoys large support from rural areas, most notably farmlands and smaller urban areas in central Walosia and Saint Halvards.

Third Wave Conservatives:
Third Wave Conservatives, the collective term given to members of The Liberals who subscribe to more stringent policies when concerned with cultural influences of non-Latin and non-Walosian cultures and immigration. Third Wave Conservatives support strict immigration policies, selective citizenship practices and a general skepticism towards cultural influences.

What separates Third Wave Conservatives from their political adversaries in The Conservative Party and The National Party of Walosia is their core belief in The Liberals values and principles, including small government, social-liberalism and personal responsibility. Third Wave Conservatives are primarily Liberals, but share a lot of political agreements with both the Conservatives and the Nationalists, which makes them one of the caucuses with bipartisan approval among party lines.

Saint Antonia Caucus:
The Saint Antonia Caucus, named after Empress Antonia, is the largest caucus within The Liberals and subscribes to the Socio-Liberal school of Titus Scipio, the first chairman of The Liberals in the early 20th century. They strongly support socio-liberalism, with a focus on curtailing capitalisms many flaws, often by using ideological policies from socialism and social-democracy. However, the Saint Antonia Caucus still holds firm believes in capitalism, personal responsibility and small government. They do however support a larger government with more responsibilities than their Principled counterparts.

Saint Antonia Caucus hold strong support within the national Liberals as well as within most major urban hubs, most notably Waldovia, Constantinople, Apollonia, Capua and Fairhaven. They also maintain strong support within the middle class and is today considered the dominant caucus within The Liberals, with The Principled Caucus tailing their number two. One of the more prominent members of the Saint Antonia Caucus is the current Walosian President, Gaius Markus Galigan, a staunch Social liberal politician from Waldovia.

Voter base:
Compared to other political parties in Walosia, The Liberals main voter base is within academia, the middle class and in the secondary and tertiary industries, including many service professionals. The working class and most blue collar wage-earners tend to favor the more left leaning Workers United League while the white collar business executives and the upper class tend to favor either the Libertarian or the Conservative tickets at elections. The Liberals have a majority of the higher educated in their voter based, with 38% of university educated professionals voting Liberals. The Liberals are also favored among the youth, with approximately 41% of the age group 18-24 voting Liberals with Workers United League coming second with 36% of the registered voters in the same age group. The Liberals have a steady track record with women, as around 29% of registered women vote for The Liberals.

Among various interest groups, The Liberals are favored both by the secular Walosians and the environmentalists, while struggling to keep a solid base in the LGBTQ group (who favors Workers United League) and the various religious organizations (who prefers many different parties, most commonly The Conservatives or the Pagan Union). Within the various ethnic groups, The Liberals have a strong voter base within the Latin-Walosians, the Arabic-Latins and the Germanic-Latins, while continues to struggle with the Westphalian-Latins and the Merito Walosians. Of the various immigrant communities, The Liberals are favored within the Slavic, Khelsharian and Anglian communities, while lacks strong support from the Avignon-French and the Kurbatovo immigrants.
Member of the following Alliances
IATA Member
Full Member of the International Space Agency

CANON UPDATE (OOC):
I have given this a lot of thought and I have decided to do some major changes to the Walosian History Canon.

The largest change that I will be doing is the removal of the “Walosian-Khelsharian War of 2009” and the following abdication of Empress Liat as well as the removal of the character Liat completely. The reason why is because I have developed my nation into a more realistic fashion during the 2014-2015 era and after reviewing older post I see that the war and abdication of Liat is both unrealistic, doesn’t fit with the overall nation and is simply unprofessional.

User avatar
Tinhampton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13700
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tinhampton » Mon Jul 16, 2018 6:55 am

In short:
  • United Conservative Party (UCP) - conservatism. Formed from the ashes of the Conservative Union in 1959, after the Communist takeover.
  • Social Democratic List (SDL) - social democracy to liberalism. Formed from the ashes of the Left and Labour Party in 1959, after the Communist takeover.
  • Tinhamptonian Libertarian Party (TLP) - libertarianism. Has ridden off the UKIP wave plus a desire for personal freedoms (and threats to then-Mayor Lydia Anderson's job), even if seemingly briefly. Splintered from the UCP in 1994, with three AMs.
  • Free Democratic Party (FDP) - centrism. Formed from the ashes of the Democratic Party in 1959, after the Communist takeover.
  • Green-Environmentalist Party (G-EP) - environmentalism. A merger between the two fledgling green parties of the time, the Green Party and the Environmentalist Party (independent and a SDL splinter respectively), in 1977.
  • Equal Rights Party (ERP) - feminism. Formed in 1969.
  • Solidarity with Immigrants Party - pro-immigration. Splintered from the SDL in 1989, with two AMs.
  • Humanist and Secularist Party (HSP) - secularism. Formed in 1979.
  • Seriously Serious Party (SSP) - joke party. Formed in 1983.
  • Tinhampton First Party (T1P) - far-right, pro-religion. Splintered from the UCP in 1968, with four AMs.
  • the Miners' Party (MP) - miners' interests. Formed in 1974.
  • the Pirate Party (PP) - typical pirate party, mainly libertarian-leaning on the internet. Formed in 2005.
  • Death to the State (DEATS) - ancom party; some have questioned as to whether they are a joke party. Formed in 1984.
  • Smaller/single-issue parties - Concerned Families Party (2001-date), Fluoride-Free Tinhampton (1994-date), Reparations Party (most controversially; never won a seat; 1989-1997), International Focus Party (IntFed; 1963-2015), Tinhampton Union of Sovereignty (NatSov; 1965-date; still exists but only garners about a hundred votes or so every year, despite claiming a seat in 2013), etc.
    In addition, there have been several defunct parties. To name two of the more notable: The Christian Democratic Party (led by Celia Bauer) attempted to present itself as a hybrid of T1P's religious focus and UCP's mild conservatism, and did see success in the late 80s and early 90s (to the extent where Bauer was even awarded the job of Minister for Business Standards back in '92), but the party jumped ship to the main UCP in 1994.
    Meanwhile, KUMBAYA! was a more harmony-focused party whose ultimate aim was to integrate Tinhampton with the (old) United Nations to enjoy "global harmonised standards", but was exposed after then-Education Secretary Lydia Anderson ordered an investigation into the party's infiltration of schools in May 2002 (which led to St. Margaret's Catholic School, Anderson's alma mater, to declare independence from Tinhampton for two weeks in protest); the party was forcibly dissolved in October, but not proscribed.
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 329,537): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578, SC#374, GA#582, SC#375, GA#589, GA#590, SC#382, SC#385*, GA#597, GA#607, SC#415, GA#647, GA#656, GA#664, GA#671, GA#674, GA#675, GA#677, GA#680, Issue #1580, GA#682, GA#683, GA#684, GA#692, GA#693, GA#715
The rest of my CV: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; *author of the most popular SC Res. ever; anti-NPO cabalist in good standing; 48yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate ~ currently reading The World by Simon Sebag Montefiore

User avatar
Crylante
Diplomat
 
Posts: 957
Founded: Dec 06, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Crylante » Mon Jul 16, 2018 9:15 am

  • Socialist Party - Social democrats.
  • Reform Party - Centre-right liberals.
  • Farmers' Party - Moderate conservatives with a rural focus.
  • Truathi Party - Religious-based humanistic social conservatives.
  • Green Party - Left-of-centre environmentalists.
  • People's Party - Left-leaning liberals.
  • The Left - Broad anti-capitalist coalition with New Left focus.
  • Forefathers' Party - Traditionalists advocating secession of the Finnish areas.
  • Let's Go, Crylante! - Left-leaning populists.
  • Alydian Democrats - Religious liberal conservatives.
  • Lillehavn Independents - Regional affiliate of the Socialist Party in Lillehavn.
  • New Socialist Party - Third Way splinter from the Socialist Party.
  • Alliance for the East - One-nation conservatives advocating secession of Danish areas.
  • Party for Crylantians - Far-right pan-Crylantian nationalists.
And a fair few more minor parties.
Last edited by Crylante on Mon Jul 16, 2018 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Crylantian Federation
Social democratic confederation of Latin-Danes, Danes and Finns.
IIWiki
Democratic socialist, green and British federalist
Economic Left/Right: -6.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.18

User avatar
Wosrac
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 61
Founded: Mar 14, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Wosrac » Mon Jul 16, 2018 9:45 am

Current Seated Parties:

The Traditionalist Party - Conservative and indifferent to the military. Skeptical of international organisations and in favour of the Monarch remaining influential in Politics.
The Liberal Party - Left leaning and indifferent to the military. Seeks to increase Wosrac's international influence by international organisation. Indifferent to Monarch's Power.
The Wosrac National Party - Nationalist and Pro-Military. Openly critical of international organisations and in favour of the Monarch remaining powerful in Politics. Wish to have controlled immigration.
The Abolitionist Party - Socialist and Pro-Military. Wishes to start own international organisation and in favour of abolishing the Monarchy. Against controlled immigration.
Ellyn Independence Party - Seek independence for the Ellyn Isles. Indifferent to international organistations and the Wosracan Monarchy.

Unseated But Registered Parties:


The Environmentalist Party - Liberal and slightly anti-military. Pro-International organisations. Wishes to reduce Monarch's power.
The Wosracan Communist Party - Leninist Communist and indifferent to the military. Seeks to form a union of similar minded nations. Seeks abolition of the Monarchy.
The Absolutists - Absolute Monarchists and Pro-Jingoism. Seeks to expand Wosrac and defeat Ambrose in a war. Seeks far increased powers of the Monarch.

https://i.imgur.com/gSF7zVu.png
Last edited by Wosrac on Mon Jul 16, 2018 10:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Kingdom Of Wosrac
Current Monarch: Queen Amelia I
Current Agenda: Preparing For Election
Current Wars: -
Defcon:[5] 4 3 2 1

User avatar
Van Hool Islands
Diplomat
 
Posts: 744
Founded: Nov 12, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Van Hool Islands » Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:46 pm

Government coalition
Image
Progressive Party - The Progressive Party are a progressive political party in the Van Hool Islands. The party was founded in 1949 after a merger of the original Liberal party and the Whig party. The party is officially only "progressive" in nature, and it's policies vary from leader to leader. The party has elements of democratic socialism, trade unionism (though unlike most other left wing parties in the world there are no formal union ties), social democracy, green politics, pirate politics, Nordic social democracy, e-democracy, and social liberalism. There also existed a national liberal wing until the 1990s, when most national liberals switched support to parties like the National Liberal Party, and the modern Liberal Party.

The party's current leader is Ariella Aitken, who is also currently serving as the eighth Prime Minister of the Van Hool Islands. Most of the party's support base has been Dutch-speaking, although recently the party has experienced a surge of support from English-speaking voters due to Aitken's leadership and general dissatisfaction with the Labour Party. The party was known as the Progressive Liberal Party from 1949 to 1995 when it changed to it's current name.
Image
Labour Party - The Labour Party is a centre-left social democratic/democratic sociallist party in the Van Hool Islands. The party considers itself the main force for the English-speaking left in the Islands, and has produced one Prime Minister, Garret Rooiakker, and one colonial Premier, Peter St. Marten. The party, unlike the Progressives, has deep-rooted and formal ties to trade unionism in the Islands, and considers trade unionism one of it's main policies. Founded in 1924, the party is one of the oldest in the country. The party's current leader is Martin Carlisle, who also serves as the Deputy Prime Minister
Image
Green Left Party - The Green Left Party are a green and social democratic party in the Van Hool Islands. The party espouses environmentalism, equality, feminism, and non-interventionism as some of it's main policies. The party was founded in 1998 as a merger between the original Green-Left and the Green Independent Alliance. The party was known as the Green Party from founding until 2017 when it's name changed to it's current name. The party currently has two co-leaders, Petra Van Andel and Warren Wyatt.
Image
Social Alliance - The Social Alliance are a left-wing political party in the Van Hool Islands. The party is officially democratic socialist, taking inspiration from Nordic socialist movements, and also espouses feminism, animal rights, anti-fascism, and non-interventionism as some of it's other main policies. The party has had some formal ties to trade unions in the past, but since the 1990s those ties have mostly been informal. The current leader is Ariana Barret, who at 25 is the youngest major party leader in the country's history. The party was known as the Socialist Party before 2018 when it merged with the Social Forum and was renamed to it's current name.
Image
Unity Party - The Unity Party is a social liberal and radical centrist political party in the Van Hool Islands. It was founded in 2017 by former Conservative MP Gabriëlle Akkermans, who was dissatisfied with the path the Conservatives were taking under then leader Jan Joiner, and also cited dissatisfaction with their treatment of LGBT groups, as Akkermans is a lesbian herself. Akkermans remains the only elected representative for the party.
Opposition coalition
Image
Conservative Party - The Conservative Party is a centre-right political party in the Van Hool Islands. The party considers itself a big-tent party of the Dutch-speaking right, with elements of monarchism, ruralism, federalism, Christian conservatism, and liberal conservatism all present in the party. The current leader is Lennart Krantz, who also serves as the leader of the Opposition. The Conservatives and their predecessor party, the Progressive Conservatives, have spent more time in power than any other party in the country.
Image
National Party - The National Party is a centre-right political party in the Van Hool Islands. The party is often associated with ruralism, agrarianism, libertarianism, liberal conservatism, federalism, and formerly the social credit movement. The party was formerly confined to rural ridings, but has since become the dominant English-speaking political party in both rural and urban areas. The current leader is Jarvis Grant.
Image
Liberal Party - The Liberal Party is a centrist to centre-right political party in the Van Hool Islands. The party was founded in 2000 when it split from the Progressive Conservatives. The party is officially liberal, and considers itself a more right wing alternative to the other major liberal party in the country, the Progressives. The party is currently led by Viona Church. The party has produced one Prime Minister, Ivan Van Den Andel, who served as PM from 2005 to 2011.
Image
Van Hool Democrats - The Van Hool Democrats are a libertarian and classical liberal political party in the Van Hool Islands. The party was founded in 2010 after the dissolution of the Liberal Democratic Party, and was known as simply the Democrats until 2017. The party considers the current Van Hool political system to be broken, and that significant reforms to protect individual rights and freedoms are necessary. The party supports the implementation of Swiss-style direct democracy, and also supports gun rights, e-democracy, and opposes organisations such as the Pacific Islands Forum, APEC, and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and urges withdrawal from all three. The party is currently led by Anna Dijkstra.
Image
Christian Democratic Party - The Christian Democratic Party are a Christian democratic political party in the Van Hool Islands. The party was inspired by both the Dutch CDA and the original Christian Democratic Party which was dissolved in the 1920s. The party's support base comes from both Dutch-speaking Catholics and Protestants alike, although the party focuses more on Protestant voters. The party considers itself to be "Christian liberal" and espouses tolerance, equality, and Christian values as official policies and criticises the "exclusionary" Christian conservatism of some Conservatives and Nationals. The party is currently led by Esmée Vergoossen.
Image
Social Credit Party - The Social Credit Party is a socially conservative and populist political party in the Van Hool Islands. The party espouses social credit economic theory as it's main policy, and advocates for agrarianism, provincial rights, and social conservatism. The party was founded in 2018, and currently has 2 sitting MPs, both formerly of the National party.
No coalition
Image
Freedom Party - The Freedom Party are a far-right national conservative political party in the Van Hool Islands. The party has drawn both significant criticism and support for it's openly inflammatory policies when it comes to immigration, particularly by Asians and Muslims. The party urges a complete freeze on immigration, and an eventual complete ban of Islam. The party has been compared to European right-wing parties like Alternative for Germany, the Swedish Democrats, the Dutch Party for Freedom, or the French National Front, or the Australian One Nation party. The party has three elected representatives, but is part of neither coalition in the House of Commons, due to both coalitions condemning the party. The party has been said to have neo-Nazi and openly white supremacist ties, but these have been denied by the party. The current leader is Rutger Alberdingk.
Anita Chow of the Socialist Party of Banduria
Co-admin of the NS Parliament

User avatar
House Quark
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: May 04, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby House Quark » Wed Jul 18, 2018 2:10 am

Image
United Traditionalist Party - The United Traditionalist Party is traditionalist conservative party. Currently lead by Gann, the UTP was formed from the original Ferengi rebellion that created the House of Quark. Known for their crony capitalist, anti-feminist, social conservative views. For a long time they were the main parties in House Quark, having three former Leaders of House Quark. They are made up of mostly Ferengi, and veterans of the Ferengi Civil War.

Image
Brotherhood Of Honor - The Brotherhood Of Honor is a religious conservative party. Currently lead by Yeto of House Maltz, they were formed to uphold the traditions and honor of the Klingon ways by the former leader of the military Maltz of House Maltz. They believe in the warrior's code, and have a hardline view of what honor is and how it should be upheld. Their members are mostly Klingon and and tend to be part of the military.

Image
New Wave Party - New Wave Party is a libertarian party. Currently lead by Ozarrot, NWP was formed by the first generation born in House Quark to be more business savvy. The New Wave support Egalitarianism, free market capitalism, and protection of individual rights. They are mostly made up of young Ferengi and Klingon citizens. The current Grand Nagus, the nations leader, is part of the New Wave Party.


Image
Sompek's Children - Sompek's Children are a pro mercenary party. Currently lead by Vang of House Vang, after the mercenary boom that came from the House of Quark, it was put together to represent the mercenaries. The party is named after Klingon Emporer Sompek. They are pro mercenary, pro expansion, pro war, and environmentalists party. It is most populated by Klingon and a sec of Ferengi called Eliminators, most hum are mercenary.

Image
True Change Movement - The True Change Movement are a socialist party. Currently lead by Hota, they were recently formed and have yet to gain traction. Unfortunately for them, socialism has a negative stigma in the House of Quark. Many non-public figures who are supporters hide their political view, because many employers won't hire them due to a perceived lack of business knowledge. They support worker's rights, pro Ferengi Alliance, feminism, and socialism.

Image
Whirlwind Party - The Whirlwind Party are a centerist party. Currently lead by Klang of House Klang, formed on the belief of the original House Grilka. They support pro-immigration, non-intervention, pro-military, education reform, and criminal reform. Most Whirlwind supporter are noncombat Klingons. They are the only majority Klingon party to have a member become a Grand Nagus.

User avatar
Freezic Vast
Minister
 
Posts: 3219
Founded: Jul 30, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Freezic Vast » Wed Jul 18, 2018 10:04 am

Labour:Center-Left leaning social liberals/democrats, favors government regulation and nationalization, and higher taxation and welfare, currently in government.
Conservatives: Center-Right leaning fiscal conservatives/moderates favors deregulation and privatization and lower taxation, currently the official opposition.
Reformists: Centrist party, favors political reforms in almost everyway
Republicans: Right leaning party, in favor of a Senate and an end to the Monarchy.
Greens: Left-leaning party, in favor of environmental regulations, cutting carbon emissions and higher taxation.
Socialists: Far left leaning party, favors more government regulation and empowerment of the state and public property.
Nationalists: Far right leaning party, favors controlled immigration, extreme conservative viewpoints and a one culture ethno-state.
20 year old, male from Pennsylvania and proud of it. Love sports like football, baseball and hockey, enjoy video games and TV. Music is love, music is life. I'm bi and conservative.
Nothing Breaks Like A Heart by Mark Ronson ft. Miley Cyrus
Tired, and bored, need sleep.

User avatar
Halend
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 44
Founded: Jul 13, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Halend » Wed Jul 18, 2018 2:50 pm

Reformed Socialist Party: Incumbent. After the civil war that overthrew the previous Stalinist government, the new leaders wanted a party that embodied socialism without oppression. They ended up creating a a social democratic system, and have held that platform to this day.

Centrists: The primary opposition party, practicing a center to center right platform that places emphasis on the benefits of getting with the rest of the world and following a neoliberal system. They also appeal to the country's right wing, as they are the farthest right of the offical parties and often advocate for that base.

Communist Party: Stalinists who would like to see a return to the previous regime, arguing that it was more stable and stronger-willed. Combines Marxist-Leninist ideas with nationalistic fervor to create its own unique ideology, which it calls "Halendian-focused Marxism". It's always been a dark horse, but performs surprisingly well at times.

Minority Front: Just as it sounds, this party represents the nation's minorities, mainly the indigenous tribes and the LGBTQ+ community. It's surprisingly powerful, but almost always forms a coalition with the RSP.

Radiant Party: The smallest of the electorally viable parties, the Radiant Party is a far left Christian party that advocates for decentralization and religious syndaclism. It only ever manages a few seats at most and coalitions with the RSP generally.
SOLIDARITY FOR ALL TIME
The United Socialist States of Halend

An island nation in the East Pacific mainly inspired by Japan, the US, China, Scandinavia and the Tropico games. Large military and likes to project power, but domestically mediocre. The current prime minister is Toshi Funaki--if in doubt on who to address, go with him. RP population is 51 million.

NEWSWIRE--2018 ELECTION

User avatar
Aikoland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1958
Founded: Dec 22, 2011
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Aikoland » Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:00 pm

Her Majesty's Government
Aikoland Conservatives (105 seats): The Aikoland Conservatives are a right-wing socially and fiscally conservative political party. They also adhere to a mild form of Aikoland nationalism and are against the United Nations and want to withdraw the country from the organization. The party is also a strong supporter of the Royal Military and plans to increase military funding. The current Prime Minister, Song Eun-Bi, is a member of the Aikoland Conservatives.

National Party of Aikoland (97 seats): The National Party of Aikoland is a center-right party that is mildly socially conservative and fully fiscally conservative. Like the Aikoland Conservatives, they are supporters of the Royal Military but unlike them, they are not fully anti-UN, merely skeptical of the organization.

Her Majesty's Official Opposition
Liberal Democratic Party (89 seats): The Liberal Democratic Party is a center-left socially democratic party. They support raising taxes on the rich in order to fund improvements to Aikoland's welfare system.

Aikoland Labor Party (77 seats): The Aikoland Labor Party is a left-wing democratic socialist party. They are strong supporters of the redistrubution of wealth and desire for a 95% top tax rate on the highest income bracket. The party is also strongly pacifist and wants to reform the Royal Military as the Royal Self-Defense Force.

Other Parties
Aikoland Republican Party (1 seat): The Aikoland Republican Party is a center-left party that officially espouses their desire to see the monarchy dissolved and replaced with a republic. The party is also a social democratic party and often votes with the LDP. They are strongly anti-military and their party platform for the transitioning of Aikoland to a republic includes the complete dissolution of the military and a declaration of permanent neutrality in foreign affairs.

Party of Nationalist Aikolanders (6 seats): The Party of Nationalist Aikolanders is a far-right nationalist political party. The party is socially conservative, anti-UN, and anti-immigration. They desire to close the Aikoland borders from all non-Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese nationals with a gradual deportation of any people not from those ethnic groups already living within the nation. There is a very strong religious element within the party who also desire for Aikoland to become a Christian nation, although it is not part of the official party platform.
♥ L'Empire d'Aikoland ♥
Trois États, Une Impératrice
Official Flag|Factbook|Q&A
The middle character in my flag is a boy
A small Francophone nation located on a group of islands to the south of France. Primary territory of the nation consists of three main islands, the states as described in our national motto, along with smaller less populated islands surrounding them.
Official Nation Name: The Empire of Aikoland
Government Type: Parliamentary constitutional monarchy
Head of State: Empress Élisabeth IV
Head of Government: Prime Minister Mélodie Bélanger
Population: 6.07 million (2023 estimate)
Official Language: French
Current Year: 2023

User avatar
Bruke
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8278
Founded: Nov 21, 2017
Ex-Nation

Brukean Political Parties

Postby Bruke » Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:19 pm

Image



The Royalist Party is the nation's oldest political party. It was founded in the 1870s, when republican activists called for the end of the monarchy. A referendum was held to decide the matter, pitting them against supporters of the monarchy. Those who were monarchists; the nobles and church leaders, formed the Monarchist Association, or MA. The MA launched a successful campaign to change Bruke from an absolute monarchy, to a constitutional and elected one. Following the successful campaign, the MA petitioned the King to be allowed to form a political party to compete in elections for seats in the newly created Parliament. Seizing the opportunity, the King not only granted their request but changed the structure of the legislature to guarantee them political power. He created an upper house, the House of Nobles, whose members would be appointed by him and serve for life. Along with the party's considerable resources, this gave the Royalist Party a considerable advantage over others, and so it was the only viable political party for more than half a century. Since only educated people could fill government positions, and since the nobility along with the business elite tended to be highly educated, they served as Prime Ministers, in the Cabinet, and in the civil service. This trend allowed them to remain one of the two major political parties even after the end of de-facto one party rule in 1934. However, this history left the party leadership very cautious and committed to its traditional positions of free markets, international outreach, and social conservatism. This angered both working-class voters and socially moderate middle class and wealthy voters, each of whom split off to form the National and Liberal Parties, respectively, in 2007. The Royalist Party still has kept its core coalition of churchgoers, civil servants, and business-people.


Image



The Social Democratic Party was formed in the 1930s in the aftermath of the Great Depression. Its original base of support was a coalition of organized labor and the middle class. Their platform, then as with today, centered around the creation of a welfare state and the implementation of liberal social reforms. As the economy grew over the decades, there began to a tension between the upper middle class voters and the rest of the party's base. This divide widened over the decades, as union leaders began to agitate for more protectionism and regulation of the economy. This created a rift between them and the party leaders, who were upper middle class and had benefited from globalization, free trade, and deregulation. Young people called for income redistribution, in addition to progressive social and economic policies. This led to a collapse in the SD coalition, and the formation of the Progressive Party in 2009. Working-class voters flocked to the older but until then politically marginalized People's Party of the Republic. Despite this, the Social Democratic Party remains one of the two major political parties because it retains support among the upper and to a lesser extent, the middle class.


Image



The People's Party of the Republic was founded in 1985 as the political arm of the People's Revolutionary Front, a communist rebel group. With the support of the then-communist government of Western Section, it sought to spark a communist revolution that would end the monarchy and radically transform the economy and society from a capitalist and conservative one to a socialist and "liberated" one. After the end of communism in Western Section, and the defeat of other leftist regimes in West America, the party was faced with an existential crisis. The party leadership cut ties with the PRF, but otherwise carried on as before. It remained marginalized due to this history. The split within the Social Democratic Party gave the PPR a chance to reinvent itself. It rewrote its platform to focus on protection for domestic industry, regulation of the economy to protect workers, and a greater role for state-run companies. This allowed it to capture the working class vote from the Social Democrats. An ongoing controversy in the party is the role of social issues. Officially, the party takes no stance on social issues, allowing members to vote their conscience. This allows them to have the broadest possible appeal to the working class. Recently, the party has called for a shift towards a decentrally-planned economy, where cooperatives and other grassroots bodies would use information technology to coordinate production and other tasks.


Image



The Liberal Party was formed as a response to the perceived intolerance of the Royalists. Libertarian conservatives had long argued for a more socially liberal, or at least, socially moderate party. When their demands were not met, they struck out on their own in 2007. The party is generally anti-war and promotes limited government interference in the social and economic spheres. Libertarian-leaning voters, especially business types, and the fiscally moderate, left-leaning upper middle class form this party's base of support.


Image



The National Party broke off from the Royalist Party in 2007. This was the culmination of long standing tensions between the hawkish, ultraconservative wing and the less hawkish, more moderate wing. At its peak, the Nationalists received support from almost a quarter of the Royalist membership. Today, its core coalition consists of pensioners and veterans of law enforcement and the military, along with working-class voters. The party is notable for its sometimes xenophobic and ultra-nationalist rhetoric.


Image



The Progressive Party was spun off from the Social Democrats in 2009. Prior to that, most of its members were part of the Brukean Progressive League, an activist group that sought to pull the SD Party more to the left. Its supporters are overwhelmingly young people, as reflected in its platform. They call for government support for education, environmental and consumer protections, and the promotion of social and economic justice.


The different parties have different ideological leanings.

Royalist Party: socially and fiscally conservative

Liberal Party: socially moderate, fiscally conservative

National Party: socially conservative, fiscally populist

Progressive Party: socially and fiscally liberal

Social Democratic Party: socially liberal, fiscally moderate

People's Party of the Republic: socially populist, fiscally liberal

Populist means supporting policies that appeal to the broadest amount of people.

A chart outlining general political orientations:

Image

This leads to different coalitions on different issues.

On fiscal issues:

Royalists and Liberals are conservative

Social Democrats are moderate

PPR and Progressives are liberal

National Party is populist

On social issues:

Royalists and National Party are conservative

Liberals are moderate

Social Democrats and Progressives are liberal

PPR is populist

In general, there are always two parties each that are liberal or conservative, one party which is moderate, and one party which is populist, on any given issue. Moderates will aim to reconcile liberal and conservative policies, while populists will support whichever is popular or politically advantageous.
Last edited by Bruke on Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:20 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Darussalam
Minister
 
Posts: 2520
Founded: May 15, 2012
Anarchy

Postby Darussalam » Wed Jul 18, 2018 9:07 pm

Mass politics are heavily discouraged and repressed, and thus formalized political parties in modern sense do not exist in Darussalam.
The Eternal Phantasmagoria
Nation Maintenance
A Lovecraftian (post?-)cyberpunk Galt's Gulch with Arabian Nights aesthetics, posthumanist cults, and occult artificial intellects.

User avatar
Zeganas
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1187
Founded: Jul 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zeganas » Thu Jul 19, 2018 3:30 pm

Currently the 10 largest political parties in Zeganas are, by seats in the chamber of representation

Social Democratic Party - center-left - 463
United Republican Party - center-right - 420
Centrist Party - center - 129
Liberty Party - libertarian - 114
Conservative Party - right wing - 45
Green Party - left wing - 5
Technological People's Party - far left - 0
People's Front - socialist - 0
Worker's Party - left wing - 0
Salisaro Nativist Party - far right - 0

Image
Last edited by Zeganas on Thu Jul 19, 2018 3:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My main IC factbook
My solar system factbook
My 4 sapient races/species factbook
INFJ (maybe), american, libertarian-left, worldbuilder, love music
I don't use NS stats.

User avatar
Great Nortend
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1562
Founded: Jul 08, 2017
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Great Nortend » Fri Jul 20, 2018 6:59 am

There are three main political parties in Great Nortend. These are the Company of Scodeliers (Scodes), the Nortan Conservative Party (Conservatives) and the Drougher Party (Droughs). The first two form the Scodes and Conservatives Coalition, and are the current party in power. These parties mostly came into being during the 18th and 19th centuries.

The Scodes originated as the supporters of the Earl of Scode during the 18th century's great political crisis of the 18th century, the Olnite Matter. Put simply, Queen Mary I desired to marry Stuart Oln, Earl of Scode. Stuart was of the Cardo-Catholic branch of the Church of Nortend, which maintained the traditions of the church even after the split with Rome. Queen Mary had thitherto shewn a more Protestant leaning in her faith, declaring the suspension of the initiation of any novices to religious establishments. A fierce political war grew, between the Scodes who approved of the marriage and the Droughers (people who wished to drough (draw) her away from the marriage. Ultimately, Mary I married Stuart Oln and the Company of Scodeliers came to dominance in the Houses of Commons.

Originally, the main base of the Scodeliers were the upper and middling classes of the country, who desired the retention of their traditional religious customs and resented the disruption the Protestant revolution would cause to their way of life. In many ways, this has continued to be the company's main supporter base. The Droughs, on the other hand, mainly drew their supporters from the towns and boroughs. Such towns were captivated by the Protestant idealism perpeptuated by street preachers and other sources, and welcomed the new, more Protestant, Church. Nowadays, supporters of the Droughs form a large part of the working class, especially in the more industrial North. Also well-represented still are townsfolk and burgesses. Nowadays, the two parties are quite similar however their religious backgrounds still form a large part of their ideology, with the so called 'Low Church' supporting the Droughs and the 'High Church' supporting the Scodes. The Droughs now tend towards the centre whilst the Scodes are firmly in the authoritarian right.

The Conservative Party developed in the 20th century as an alternative to the Droughs for those of either the Low or High churches but still desiring a strong governance and society. It forms a coalition with the Scodes, running candidates in some borough constitutencies whilst the Scodes run candidates in the rural constituencies and secondary candidates in boroughs. Some borough seats are contested by the Scodes solely, the most prominent being that of Limmes, Sulhampton and Morneck, being held by the Deputy Prime Minister, the Assistant to the Postmaster-General and the Secretary at War respectively.
Last edited by Great Nortend on Fri Sep 28, 2018 10:18 am, edited 2 times in total.
News from Great Nortend : https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=417866
Diplomacy, Consulates &c. : https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=417865

This nation is an exaggerated representation of my personal views in most areas.

User avatar
Riwen
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: Jul 20, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Riwen » Fri Jul 20, 2018 7:10 am

In Riwen only 5 political parties are the limit for represent in Parliament. there are:
1. National Riwen
2. Socialist Riwen
3. Liberal
4. Nature for Riwen
5. Communist Left


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Wochaystein

Advertisement

Remove ads