[Title] By George!
[desc] Recent legislative elections have seen the dramatic rise of the @@DENONYM@@ Georgist Party, which is nearly identical to your party as far as policy comes, but splits off in its support of Georgist Market Socialism. Their leader, coincidentally named @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ George, wishes to meet with you.
[validity] Valid only for socialist nations that have elections for their legislature and allow political opposition to exist.
[option]The leader of the @@DEMONYMADJECTIVEINITIALS@@GP giddily approaches you, "Most gracious salutations, @@LEADER@@, I know that your party isn't too keen towards Market Socialism, but think of the opportunity you have here! Together we'd forge an outstanding grand coalition in parliament and could revolutionize the future of @@NAME@@ for decades to come! Market Socialism fits perfectly into Marxist ideology, it shouldn't be too big of a shift on the status quo.
[effects]the country is increasingly decried as practicing "Socialism with @@DENONYM characteristics@@"
[option] As Mr.George leaves your office, your skeptical parliament minister looks up from his newspaper, "We shouldn't risk our national economic values over a majority; we can safely form a majority without their numbers, and maintain our economic ideals, too. I'd say it shows much more strength for us to remain stagnant with our economic policy. Plus, they can be a genuine opposition party. That'll please those capitalist imperialists who keep decrying our revolution as undemocratic.
[effects]the ruling party is pushed into increasingly perilous coalitions to uphold planned economics.
[option]Saul @@RANDOMLASTNAME@@, your charismatic lawyer, comes waltzing in, "You're kidding; we have an opportunity to take real action for the future of our party! You know why these Georgists are attracting so many to the ballot? Because they preach a new revolutionary message; A mixture of socialist equality and relief for the human desire for greed, I mean, uh, competition. Let's face it, as it stands, we're going to be looking like the "conservative" party if they keep getting traction, so why not adapt some moderate reforms of theirs siphon their vote? If we just tap into some of the core elements of our opposition's party positions, we could become a more diverse party ourselves and never have to rely on unstable coalitions in the future!
[effects]the all-encompassing ruling party is at constant risk of splitting between its hundreds of opposing viewpoints
[desc] Recent legislative elections have seen the dramatic rise of the @@DENONYM@@ Georgist Party, which is nearly identical to your party as far as policy comes, but splits off in its support of Georgist Market Socialism. Their leader, coincidentally named @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ George, wishes to meet with you.
[validity] Valid only for socialist nations that have elections for their legislature and allow political opposition to exist.
[option]The leader of the @@DEMONYMADJECTIVEINITIALS@@GP giddily approaches you, "Most gracious salutations, @@LEADER@@, I know that your party isn't too keen towards Market Socialism, but think of the opportunity you have here! Together we'd forge an outstanding grand coalition in parliament and could revolutionize the future of @@NAME@@ for decades to come! Market Socialism fits perfectly into Marxist ideology, it shouldn't be too big of a shift on the status quo.
[effects]the country is increasingly decried as practicing "Socialism with @@DENONYM characteristics@@"
[option] As Mr.George leaves your office, your skeptical parliament minister looks up from his newspaper, "We shouldn't risk our national economic values over a majority; we can safely form a majority without their numbers, and maintain our economic ideals, too. I'd say it shows much more strength for us to remain stagnant with our economic policy. Plus, they can be a genuine opposition party. That'll please those capitalist imperialists who keep decrying our revolution as undemocratic.
[effects]the ruling party is pushed into increasingly perilous coalitions to uphold planned economics.
[option]Saul @@RANDOMLASTNAME@@, your charismatic lawyer, comes waltzing in, "You're kidding; we have an opportunity to take real action for the future of our party! You know why these Georgists are attracting so many to the ballot? Because they preach a new revolutionary message; A mixture of socialist equality and relief for the human desire for greed, I mean, uh, competition. Let's face it, as it stands, we're going to be looking like the "conservative" party if they keep getting traction, so why not adapt some moderate reforms of theirs siphon their vote? If we just tap into some of the core elements of our opposition's party positions, we could become a more diverse party ourselves and never have to rely on unstable coalitions in the future!
[effects]the all-encompassing ruling party is at constant risk of splitting between its hundreds of opposing viewpoints
[Title] By George!
[desc] Recent legislative elections have seen the dramatic rise of the @@DENONYM@@ Georgist Party, a party nearly identical to your party as far as policy comes, but differs in its support of Georgism and Market Socialism. Their leader, coincidentally named @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ George, wishes to meet with you.
[validity] Valid only for socialist nations that have elections for their legislature and allow political opposition to exist.
[option]The leader of the @@DEMONYMADJECTIVEINITIALS@@GP giddily approaches you, "Most gracious salutations, @@LEADER@@, I know that your party is keen on upholding our planned economy, but think of the opportunity you have here! Together we'd forge an outstanding grand coalition in parliament and could revolutionize the future of @@NAME@@ for decades to come! All we suggest with Market Socialism is to end the planned economy of @@NAME@@ while also keeping the means of production democratic; Markets can distribute resources just as well, and such would allow for competition to exist between worker' co-ops, and so much stress would be removed from the government if it weren't forced to constantly calibrate the economy. Is that really too radical from the status quo? Come on, @@LEADER@@, let's form ourselves a grand coalition, the future of @@NAME@@ can be shaped for the better, together.
[effects]the country is increasingly decried as practicing "Socialism with @@DENONYM characteristics@@"
[option] As Mr.George leaves your office, your skeptical parliament minister looks up from his newspaper, "We shouldn't risk our national economic values over a majority; we can safely form a majority without their numbers, and maintain our strong and stable planned economy for the good of all workers in our great nation. I'd say it shows much more strength for us to remain stagnant with our economic policy than to fold to radicals all over a coalition. Plus, they can be a genuine opposition party. That'll please those capitalist imperialists who keep decrying our revolution as undemocratic.
[effects]the ruling party is pushed into increasingly perilous coalitions to uphold planned economics.
[option]Saul @@RANDOMLASTNAME@@, your charismatic lawyer, comes waltzing in, "You're kidding; we have an opportunity to take real action for the future of our party! You know why Comrade George over here is attracting so many to the ballot? Because he's preaching a new and revolutionary message; A mixture of socialist equality and relief for the human desire for greed, I mean, uh, competition. Let's face it, as it stands, we're going to be looking like the conservative party as far as the far-left is concerned if they keep gaining traction and if we don't take action, so why not adapt some moderate reforms of theirs siphon their vote? If we just tap into some of the core elements of our opposition's party positions, we could massively increase our party's political diversity. We'd attract swing seats, moderate politicians, undecided voter, and best of all never have to rely on unstable coalitions in the future. So what if our party is split up into numerous camps? We'd always hold an outright majority."
[effects]the all-encompassing ruling party is at constant risk of splitting between its dozens of factions
[desc] Recent legislative elections have seen the dramatic rise of the @@DENONYM@@ Georgist Party, a party nearly identical to your party as far as policy comes, but differs in its support of Georgism and Market Socialism. Their leader, coincidentally named @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ George, wishes to meet with you.
[validity] Valid only for socialist nations that have elections for their legislature and allow political opposition to exist.
[option]The leader of the @@DEMONYMADJECTIVEINITIALS@@GP giddily approaches you, "Most gracious salutations, @@LEADER@@, I know that your party is keen on upholding our planned economy, but think of the opportunity you have here! Together we'd forge an outstanding grand coalition in parliament and could revolutionize the future of @@NAME@@ for decades to come! All we suggest with Market Socialism is to end the planned economy of @@NAME@@ while also keeping the means of production democratic; Markets can distribute resources just as well, and such would allow for competition to exist between worker' co-ops, and so much stress would be removed from the government if it weren't forced to constantly calibrate the economy. Is that really too radical from the status quo? Come on, @@LEADER@@, let's form ourselves a grand coalition, the future of @@NAME@@ can be shaped for the better, together.
[effects]the country is increasingly decried as practicing "Socialism with @@DENONYM characteristics@@"
[option] As Mr.George leaves your office, your skeptical parliament minister looks up from his newspaper, "We shouldn't risk our national economic values over a majority; we can safely form a majority without their numbers, and maintain our strong and stable planned economy for the good of all workers in our great nation. I'd say it shows much more strength for us to remain stagnant with our economic policy than to fold to radicals all over a coalition. Plus, they can be a genuine opposition party. That'll please those capitalist imperialists who keep decrying our revolution as undemocratic.
[effects]the ruling party is pushed into increasingly perilous coalitions to uphold planned economics.
[option]Saul @@RANDOMLASTNAME@@, your charismatic lawyer, comes waltzing in, "You're kidding; we have an opportunity to take real action for the future of our party! You know why Comrade George over here is attracting so many to the ballot? Because he's preaching a new and revolutionary message; A mixture of socialist equality and relief for the human desire for greed, I mean, uh, competition. Let's face it, as it stands, we're going to be looking like the conservative party as far as the far-left is concerned if they keep gaining traction and if we don't take action, so why not adapt some moderate reforms of theirs siphon their vote? If we just tap into some of the core elements of our opposition's party positions, we could massively increase our party's political diversity. We'd attract swing seats, moderate politicians, undecided voter, and best of all never have to rely on unstable coalitions in the future. So what if our party is split up into numerous camps? We'd always hold an outright majority."
[effects]the all-encompassing ruling party is at constant risk of splitting between its dozens of factions
[Title] By George!
[desc] Recent legislative elections have seen the dramatic rise of the @@DENONYM@@ Georgist Party, a party nearly identical to your party as far as policy comes, but differs in its support of Georgism and Market Socialism. Their leader, coincidentally named @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ George, wishes to meet with you.
[validity] Valid only for socialist nations that have elections for their legislature and allow political opposition to exist.
[option]The leader of the @@DEMONYMADJECTIVEINITIALS@@GP giddily approaches you, "Most gracious salutations, @@LEADER@@, I know that your party is keen on upholding our planned economy, but think of the opportunity you have here! Together we'd forge an outstanding grand coalition in parliament and could revolutionize the future of @@NAME@@ for decades to come! All we suggest with Market Socialism is to end the planned economy of @@NAME@@ while keeping the means of production democratic; Well regulated markets can distribute resources better than government planning, and it would also allow for competition to exist between worker' co-ops. Imagine how much stress could be removed from the government if it weren't forced to constantly calibrate the economy? Come on, @@LEADER@@, let's form ourselves a grand coalition for the future of @@NAME@@'s workers! @@SLOGAN@@!
[effects]the nation finds itself constantly on the defense over the market's place in the revolution
[option] As Mr.George leaves your office, your skeptical parliament minister looks up from his newspaper, "We shouldn't risk our economic values over a majority; we can safely form a government without their seats and maintain our planned economy for the equal good of all workers in our great nation. I'd say it shows much more strength for us to remain stagnant with our economic policy than to fold to radicals all over a coalition when we have other options to turn to. Plus, they can be a genuine opposition party in the legislature, that'll show those imperialists who decry our revolution as undemocratic. There's nothing wrong with the status quo, @@LEADER@@, let's just keep the revolution planned out.
[effects]the ruling party is pushed into increasingly perilous coalitions to uphold its beloved planned economy
[option]Saul @@RANDOMLASTNAME@@, your charismatic lawyer, comes waltzing in, "You're kidding; we have an opportunity to take real action for the future of our party! You know why Comrade George over here is winning so many seats? Because he's preaching a new and revolutionary message; A mixture of socialist equality and relief for the human desire for greed, I mean, uh, competition. Let's face it, as it stands, we're going to be looking like the conservative party as far as the far-left is concerned if we remain so stagnant, so why not adapt some moderate reforms of theirs siphon their vote? If we just tap into some of the core elements of smaller parties, we could massively increase our party's political diversity. Think about it, we'd never have the mark of a stagnant and unmoving conservative bloc, but a revolutionary, all-inclusive union! We'd attract swing seats, moderate politicians, young people, and the all-mighty undecided voter. Best of all, we'd never have to rely on unstable coalitions in the future! So what if our party would be less uniform in nature? We'd always hold an outright majority!"
[effects]the all-encompassing ruling party is at constant risk of splitting between its dozens of factions
[desc] Recent legislative elections have seen the dramatic rise of the @@DENONYM@@ Georgist Party, a party nearly identical to your party as far as policy comes, but differs in its support of Georgism and Market Socialism. Their leader, coincidentally named @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ George, wishes to meet with you.
[validity] Valid only for socialist nations that have elections for their legislature and allow political opposition to exist.
[option]The leader of the @@DEMONYMADJECTIVEINITIALS@@GP giddily approaches you, "Most gracious salutations, @@LEADER@@, I know that your party is keen on upholding our planned economy, but think of the opportunity you have here! Together we'd forge an outstanding grand coalition in parliament and could revolutionize the future of @@NAME@@ for decades to come! All we suggest with Market Socialism is to end the planned economy of @@NAME@@ while keeping the means of production democratic; Well regulated markets can distribute resources better than government planning, and it would also allow for competition to exist between worker' co-ops. Imagine how much stress could be removed from the government if it weren't forced to constantly calibrate the economy? Come on, @@LEADER@@, let's form ourselves a grand coalition for the future of @@NAME@@'s workers! @@SLOGAN@@!
[effects]the nation finds itself constantly on the defense over the market's place in the revolution
[option] As Mr.George leaves your office, your skeptical parliament minister looks up from his newspaper, "We shouldn't risk our economic values over a majority; we can safely form a government without their seats and maintain our planned economy for the equal good of all workers in our great nation. I'd say it shows much more strength for us to remain stagnant with our economic policy than to fold to radicals all over a coalition when we have other options to turn to. Plus, they can be a genuine opposition party in the legislature, that'll show those imperialists who decry our revolution as undemocratic. There's nothing wrong with the status quo, @@LEADER@@, let's just keep the revolution planned out.
[effects]the ruling party is pushed into increasingly perilous coalitions to uphold its beloved planned economy
[option]Saul @@RANDOMLASTNAME@@, your charismatic lawyer, comes waltzing in, "You're kidding; we have an opportunity to take real action for the future of our party! You know why Comrade George over here is winning so many seats? Because he's preaching a new and revolutionary message; A mixture of socialist equality and relief for the human desire for greed, I mean, uh, competition. Let's face it, as it stands, we're going to be looking like the conservative party as far as the far-left is concerned if we remain so stagnant, so why not adapt some moderate reforms of theirs siphon their vote? If we just tap into some of the core elements of smaller parties, we could massively increase our party's political diversity. Think about it, we'd never have the mark of a stagnant and unmoving conservative bloc, but a revolutionary, all-inclusive union! We'd attract swing seats, moderate politicians, young people, and the all-mighty undecided voter. Best of all, we'd never have to rely on unstable coalitions in the future! So what if our party would be less uniform in nature? We'd always hold an outright majority!"
[effects]the all-encompassing ruling party is at constant risk of splitting between its dozens of factions
[Title] By George!
[desc] Recent legislative elections have seen the dramatic rise of the @@DENONYM@@ Georgist Union, a political bloc nearly identical to yours as far as policy comes, but differs in its support of Georgism and Market Socialism. Owing their spike in popularity to the planned economy's inefficiency to distribute enough goods during the last major national holiday, their leader wishes to meet with you.
[validity] Valid only for socialist nations that have elections for their legislature and allow political opposition to exist. Also not for nations with holidays?
[option]The leader of the movement, George S. Tax, giddily approaches you, "Greetings, @@LEADER@@! I come here seeking a greater future for our great nation. Both our factions support the greater socialist dream, let's make that clear. But let's face it, our inefficient planned economy really messed up this time. Those poor kids on holiday going without baked beans and all. I propose that in our forming of a coalition, that we seek to phase out our strict planned economy with a regulated, orthodox market socialist economy. Think about all the possibilities! We efficiently see resources distributed whilst also upholding the international socialist ideal! We'd never have to deal with a national pomegranate seed shortage ever again, and we'd forge a stronger, more stable @@NAME@@ in the process!"
[effects]the nation finds itself constantly on the defense over the market's place in socialism
[option] As Mr.Tax leaves your office, your skeptical legislature minister looks up from his grey newspaper, eyebrows arched, "We shouldn't risk our economic values over a majority; we can safely form a government without their seats and maintain our planned economy for the equal good of all workers in our great nation. This holiday fumble was a minor inconvenience! Those kids got their baked beans and pomegranate seeds after no more than 40 hours! I'd say it shows much more strength for us to remain stagnant with our economic policy than to fold to radicals all over a coalition when we have other movements to turn to. Lastly, they can be a genuine opposition party in the legislature, that'll show those imperialists who accuse us of repression!"
[effects]the ruling party is pushed into increasingly perilous coalitions to uphold its beloved planned economy
[option]Saul @@RANDOMLASTNAME@@, your charismatic lawyer, waltzes in, "You're kidding; we have an opportunity to take real action for the survival of socialism here and you're going to listen to this fossil? You know why Comrade George over here is winning so many seats? Because our planned economy is an utter slog! How the hell aren't we able to distribute, what was it, baked beans? We gain nothing from stagnancy, but alternatively, should we adopt some moderate positions of theirs and other blocs into our faction platform, we'd attract near every shade of red throughout @@NAME@@. For the future of our faction, we must leave such hardliners in the dust. If we succeed in this, and invest a bit more in our whips, we'd always hold an outright majority, even if we'd be a notch less uniform.'
[effects]the all-encompassing ruling party is at constant risk of splitting between its dozens of factions
[desc] Recent legislative elections have seen the dramatic rise of the @@DENONYM@@ Georgist Union, a political bloc nearly identical to yours as far as policy comes, but differs in its support of Georgism and Market Socialism. Owing their spike in popularity to the planned economy's inefficiency to distribute enough goods during the last major national holiday, their leader wishes to meet with you.
[validity] Valid only for socialist nations that have elections for their legislature and allow political opposition to exist. Also not for nations with holidays?
[option]The leader of the movement, George S. Tax, giddily approaches you, "Greetings, @@LEADER@@! I come here seeking a greater future for our great nation. Both our factions support the greater socialist dream, let's make that clear. But let's face it, our inefficient planned economy really messed up this time. Those poor kids on holiday going without baked beans and all. I propose that in our forming of a coalition, that we seek to phase out our strict planned economy with a regulated, orthodox market socialist economy. Think about all the possibilities! We efficiently see resources distributed whilst also upholding the international socialist ideal! We'd never have to deal with a national pomegranate seed shortage ever again, and we'd forge a stronger, more stable @@NAME@@ in the process!"
[effects]the nation finds itself constantly on the defense over the market's place in socialism
[option] As Mr.Tax leaves your office, your skeptical legislature minister looks up from his grey newspaper, eyebrows arched, "We shouldn't risk our economic values over a majority; we can safely form a government without their seats and maintain our planned economy for the equal good of all workers in our great nation. This holiday fumble was a minor inconvenience! Those kids got their baked beans and pomegranate seeds after no more than 40 hours! I'd say it shows much more strength for us to remain stagnant with our economic policy than to fold to radicals all over a coalition when we have other movements to turn to. Lastly, they can be a genuine opposition party in the legislature, that'll show those imperialists who accuse us of repression!"
[effects]the ruling party is pushed into increasingly perilous coalitions to uphold its beloved planned economy
[option]Saul @@RANDOMLASTNAME@@, your charismatic lawyer, waltzes in, "You're kidding; we have an opportunity to take real action for the survival of socialism here and you're going to listen to this fossil? You know why Comrade George over here is winning so many seats? Because our planned economy is an utter slog! How the hell aren't we able to distribute, what was it, baked beans? We gain nothing from stagnancy, but alternatively, should we adopt some moderate positions of theirs and other blocs into our faction platform, we'd attract near every shade of red throughout @@NAME@@. For the future of our faction, we must leave such hardliners in the dust. If we succeed in this, and invest a bit more in our whips, we'd always hold an outright majority, even if we'd be a notch less uniform.'
[effects]the all-encompassing ruling party is at constant risk of splitting between its dozens of factions
[Title] By George!
[desc] Recent legislative elections have seen the dramatic rise of the @@DEMONYMADJECTIVE@@ Georgist Union, a political bloc nearly identical to yours, but differs in its support of Georgism and Market Socialism. Owing their spike in popularity to the planned economy's inefficiency to distribute enough goods during the last major national holiday, their leader wishes to meet with you.
[validity] Valid only for socialist nations that have elections for their legislature and allow political opposition to exist. Also not for nations with no holidays?
[option]The leader of the movement, George S. Tax, giddily approaches you. "Greetings, @@LEADER@@! I come here coalition hunting for the greater socialist dream. A dream free of the repressive planned economy! Our bloc seeks to phase out the strict planned economy with a regulated, orthodox, market socialist one. We'd efficiently see resources distributed by a genuinely democratic marketplace whilst also upholding the international socialist ideal!"
[effects]the nation's diplomats are best friends with janitors at international socialist conferences (or: the nation has become a running joke at socialist conventions)
[option] As Mr.Tax leaves your office, your skeptical legislature minister looks up from his newspaper. "We shouldn't risk our economic values over a majority; we can safely form a government without their seats and maintain our planned economy for the equal good of all our workers. I'd say it shows much more strength for us to remain stagnant with our economic policy than to fold to radicals over a needless coalition. It might grow harder to find willing partners, but it shouldn't be too big a problem."
[effects]the ruling party is pushed into increasingly perilous coalitions to uphold its beloved planned economy
[option]Saul @@RANDOMLASTNAME@@, your charismatic lawyer, bursts through the door. "You know why Comrade George out there is winning so many seats? Because our planned economy is an utter slog! How the hell aren't we able to distribute, what was it, baked beans? If we adopt some moderate positions of other blocs into our faction platform, we'd attract near every shade of red throughout @@NAME@@. If we do this and invest a bit more in our whips, we'd always hold an outright majority, even if we'd be a notch less uniform.'
[effects]the domineering ruling party is at constant risk of splitting between its dozens of factions
[desc] Recent legislative elections have seen the dramatic rise of the @@DEMONYMADJECTIVE@@ Georgist Union, a political bloc nearly identical to yours, but differs in its support of Georgism and Market Socialism. Owing their spike in popularity to the planned economy's inefficiency to distribute enough goods during the last major national holiday, their leader wishes to meet with you.
[validity] Valid only for socialist nations that have elections for their legislature and allow political opposition to exist. Also not for nations with no holidays?
[option]The leader of the movement, George S. Tax, giddily approaches you. "Greetings, @@LEADER@@! I come here coalition hunting for the greater socialist dream. A dream free of the repressive planned economy! Our bloc seeks to phase out the strict planned economy with a regulated, orthodox, market socialist one. We'd efficiently see resources distributed by a genuinely democratic marketplace whilst also upholding the international socialist ideal!"
[effects]the nation's diplomats are best friends with janitors at international socialist conferences (or: the nation has become a running joke at socialist conventions)
[option] As Mr.Tax leaves your office, your skeptical legislature minister looks up from his newspaper. "We shouldn't risk our economic values over a majority; we can safely form a government without their seats and maintain our planned economy for the equal good of all our workers. I'd say it shows much more strength for us to remain stagnant with our economic policy than to fold to radicals over a needless coalition. It might grow harder to find willing partners, but it shouldn't be too big a problem."
[effects]the ruling party is pushed into increasingly perilous coalitions to uphold its beloved planned economy
[option]Saul @@RANDOMLASTNAME@@, your charismatic lawyer, bursts through the door. "You know why Comrade George out there is winning so many seats? Because our planned economy is an utter slog! How the hell aren't we able to distribute, what was it, baked beans? If we adopt some moderate positions of other blocs into our faction platform, we'd attract near every shade of red throughout @@NAME@@. If we do this and invest a bit more in our whips, we'd always hold an outright majority, even if we'd be a notch less uniform.'
[effects]the domineering ruling party is at constant risk of splitting between its dozens of factions
[Title] By George!
[desc] In legislative elections, your party lost numerous seats to the @@DEMONYMADJECTIVE@@ Georgist Union, unique in its support for the phase into a supply and demand driven Orthodox Market Socialist economy. Their massive drive in numbers is attributed to their successful criticism of the planned economy's recent failure to distribute baked beans during a recent holiday season.
[validity] Valid only for socialist nations that have elections for their legislature and allow political opposition to exist. Also not for nations with no holidays?
[option]The leader of the movement, George S. Tax, giddily approaches you. "@@LEADER@@, I'm coalition hunting for the greater socialist dream. A dream free of the repressive planned economy! We seek to phase out the strict planned economy with a regulated, orthodox, market socialist one. We'd mix supply and demand with social means of production and have a genuinely democratic marketplace whilst also upholding the international socialist ideal!"
[effects]the nation's diplomats are best friends with janitors at international socialist conferences (or: the nation has become a running joke at socialist conventions)
[option] Your skeptical legislature minister looks up from his newspaper. "We shouldn't risk our economic values over a majority; we can safely form a government without them and maintain our worker-oriented planned economy. It shows much more strength for us to remain stagnant than to fold to radicals. It might grow harder to find willing partners, but we've lasted this long, it shouldn't be too hard."
[effects]the ruling party is pushed into increasingly perilous coalitions to uphold its beloved planned economy
[option]Saul @@RANDOMLASTNAME@@, your charismatic lawyer, bursts through the door. "You know why Comrade George out there is winning so many seats? You tell me! How the hell aren't we able to distribute baked beans? We adopt some moderate positions of other blocs into our faction platform, we'd attract near every shade of red throughout @@NAME@@. Do this and invest a bit more in our whips and we'd always hold an outright majority, even if we'd be a notch less uniform."
[effects]the domineering ruling party is at constant risk of splitting between its dozens of factions
)