Because there still might be information worth looking at. Otherwise, it can be debunked through reasoning instead of bias against the creator.
Advertisement
by Northern Davincia » Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:35 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Neutraligon » Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:37 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:
It kind of does?
If zed creator is an asshole with an agenda that's uncredible, then why should I watch zed documentary?
Because there still might be information worth looking at. Otherwise, it can be debunked through reasoning instead of bias against the creator.
by Uiiop » Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:38 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:
It kind of does?
If zed creator is an asshole with an agenda that's uncredible, then why should I watch zed documentary?
Because there still might be information worth looking at. Otherwise, it can be debunked through reasoning instead of bias against the creator.
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:39 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:
It kind of does?
If zed creator is an asshole with an agenda that's uncredible, then why should I watch zed documentary?
Because there still might be information worth looking at. Otherwise, it can be debunked through reasoning instead of bias against the creator.
by New Raffica » Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:40 pm
by Uiiop » Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:43 pm
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:Because there still might be information worth looking at. Otherwise, it can be debunked through reasoning instead of bias against the creator.
Even so, russian YT video, as with all youtube videos, are not good sources.
Even if he wasn't an apparent an asshole with an agenda that's uncredible.
by Northern Davincia » Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:45 pm
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:
Federal mail fraud is not child abuse or abuse of any kind.
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:Because there still might be information worth looking at. Otherwise, it can be debunked through reasoning instead of bias against the creator.
Even so, russian YT video, as with all youtube videos, are not good sources.
Even if he wasn't an apparent an asshole with an agenda that's uncredible.
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:46 pm
Uiiop wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:
Even so, russian YT video, as with all youtube videos, are not good sources.
Even if he wasn't an apparent an asshole with an agenda that's uncredible.
That's only lazy forum etiquette.
It's not like it's impossible for a view to link to sources and have good argument. It's just easier to assume all videos are shitposts since any quality can crop up.
by Internationalist Bastard » Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:52 pm
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Uiiop wrote:That's only lazy forum etiquette.
It's not like it's impossible for a view to link to sources and have good argument. It's just easier to assume all videos are shitposts since any quality can crop up.
Not impossible, but unlikely.
You kinda just learn to write off YT videos once you see people try to say that "Pizzagate was totz real!" or "The EU and the UN are run by actual satanists!".
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Thu Feb 15, 2018 8:01 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:
Federal mail fraud is not child abuse or abuse of any kind.
Do you not honestly consider it to be an abuse of power?
http://miami.cbslocal.com/2016/01/20/fm ... orruption/
He did a lot more than mail fraud.
Northern Davincia wrote:Neutraligon wrote:If the creator has a history of not telling the truth or of fudging the data why should they be believed at all?
If there is proof that the creator is lying on the subject of education, I think we would have seen it by now.The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:
Even so, russian YT video, as with all youtube videos, are not good sources.
Even if he wasn't an apparent an asshole with an agenda that's uncredible.
The video is on a Russian channel, yes, but the documentary was not made by Russians. If it is inaccurate, let us know.
by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Fri Feb 16, 2018 10:27 am
Northern Davincia wrote:LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Actually, "tout what's good enough for everyone else's kids as not being good enough for yours" is a context-sensitive statement. It doesn't require that it be "objectively" better (that depends on what you prioritize in education, obviously) just according to the very people advocating private schooling in the first place.
But even if it did, it'd only require comparison to how the USA is right now. Not to how it could be.
"Small" is a meaningless point. Yes, there are fewer people on whom to spend. There are also fewer people from whom to collect taxes, so the point is moot.
So what is it, then? Homogenity? Are you blaming America's problems with education on diversity?
1. Objectivity is irrelevant. If private schools provide something better, it is wrong to deny parents the chance to help their children.
2. Finland isn't grossly irresponsible with government spending as the US currently is. And yes, diversity poses unique challenges to education, because the greater the diversity, the more you must tailor education to suit every different group of people who come from different backgrounds and have different experiences. "One size fits all" is dangerous thinking.
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Emotional Support Crocodile, Europa Undivided, LOS MODERNOS LIBERALES, Simone Republic, Tillania, Turenia
Advertisement