by Germany and Prussia » Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:02 pm
by NERVUN » Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:15 pm
by Pope Joan » Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:46 pm
by Sovaal » Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:51 pm
by Xuswaycia » Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:53 pm
by Sovaal » Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:54 pm
by Shaggtopia » Mon Jan 15, 2018 5:02 pm
by United Muscovite Nations » Mon Jan 15, 2018 5:04 pm
by Dooom35796821595 » Mon Jan 15, 2018 5:09 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Given how extremely expensive it is to move cargo into space, I can't really see a way in which such a thing would ever be feasible.
by United Muscovite Nations » Mon Jan 15, 2018 5:12 pm
by Dooom35796821595 » Mon Jan 15, 2018 5:14 pm
by United Muscovite Nations » Mon Jan 15, 2018 5:19 pm
Dooom35796821595 wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:A space elevator would face the same issues, and would probably be more expensive to build, if not outright impossible.
Actually a space elevator could reduce the cost of moving cargo by 95-99%, quickly paying off the initial construction costs. Most issues would end up political rather then economic or practical.
by Luziyca » Mon Jan 15, 2018 5:31 pm
by Dooom35796821595 » Mon Jan 15, 2018 5:31 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Dooom35796821595 wrote:
Actually a space elevator could reduce the cost of moving cargo by 95-99%, quickly paying off the initial construction costs. Most issues would end up political rather then economic or practical.
The initial construction costs would be immense (it would have to be hundreds of times larger than the largest building), would require massive amounts of space construction crews and equipment on a never-before-seen scale, etc. I don't know where you're getting that number from, nor do I think you've thought through the challenges. For example: how fast would a space elevator go?
by United Muscovite Nations » Mon Jan 15, 2018 5:51 pm
Dooom35796821595 wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:The initial construction costs would be immense (it would have to be hundreds of times larger than the largest building), would require massive amounts of space construction crews and equipment on a never-before-seen scale, etc. I don't know where you're getting that number from, nor do I think you've thought through the challenges. For example: how fast would a space elevator go?
Most of the length would actually just be a cable, since no steel structure can be built higher then 1.5KM, but costs would likley be in the tens of billions. But the long term benefits could be worth trillions, so a good investment.
As for speed, it would likley take several days for the elevator to reach orbit, but it may be able to go faster f there are people on board.
by Fartsniffage » Mon Jan 15, 2018 6:01 pm
Xuswaycia wrote:How I see the moon is as a massive shipyard and industrial center. The low gravity is perfect for shipbuilding, and without oxygen and moisture no rust can degrade your industry. With an industrialized moon Mars is definitely a possibility if we can terraform it.
by Xuswaycia » Mon Jan 15, 2018 6:03 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Xuswaycia wrote:How I see the moon is as a massive shipyard and industrial center. The low gravity is perfect for shipbuilding, and without oxygen and moisture no rust can degrade your industry. With an industrialized moon Mars is definitely a possibility if we can terraform it.
A Mars that we can live on is way beyond what we can do at the moment. An atmosphere we can breathe is maybe within our current science, a global magnetic field is not.
by Dooom35796821595 » Mon Jan 15, 2018 6:08 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Dooom35796821595 wrote:
Most of the length would actually just be a cable, since no steel structure can be built higher then 1.5KM, but costs would likley be in the tens of billions. But the long term benefits could be worth trillions, so a good investment.
As for speed, it would likley take several days for the elevator to reach orbit, but it may be able to go faster f there are people on board.
For it to actually be worth it, it would have to be much longer than just orbit.
by The Widening Gyre » Mon Jan 15, 2018 6:09 pm
by Dooom35796821595 » Mon Jan 15, 2018 6:15 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Xuswaycia wrote:How I see the moon is as a massive shipyard and industrial center. The low gravity is perfect for shipbuilding, and without oxygen and moisture no rust can degrade your industry. With an industrialized moon Mars is definitely a possibility if we can terraform it.
A Mars that we can live on is way beyond what we can do at the moment. An atmosphere we can breathe is maybe within our current science, a global magnetic field is not.
by United Muscovite Nations » Mon Jan 15, 2018 6:17 pm
Dooom35796821595 wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:For it to actually be worth it, it would have to be much longer than just orbit.
Orbit is a long space, from 2,000 KM to 35,000 KM or more. But once in high orbit it would be easier to move further out, or to the moon with thrusters. It would also probably be easier to get higher speed on the elevator due to lack of gravity and air resistance.
by Dazchan » Mon Jan 15, 2018 6:18 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Dooom35796821595 wrote:
Orbit is a long space, from 2,000 KM to 35,000 KM or more. But once in high orbit it would be easier to move further out, or to the moon with thrusters. It would also probably be easier to get higher speed on the elevator due to lack of gravity and air resistance.
But, see, then we're having to build things like docks up there too, which would hugely multiply construction costs. Moreover, even with a huge reduction in the cost of transport, it's still extremely expensive (e.g. $500 per kilogram of cargo is one estimate).
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Albertstadt, Einaro, Ineva, Infected Mushroom, Keltionialang, Kostane, Luziyca, New Temecula, Spirit of Hope, Statesburg, Tesseris, Tiami, Tungstan, Verkhoyanska
Advertisement