by MERIZoC » Tue Jan 09, 2018 5:48 pm
by New Axiom » Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:00 pm
Zakuvia wrote:If you aren't imagining a chain gang of adorable old retirees building a wall with Fixodent and using their Hoverounds as tow trucks then you're not the NS I remember.
by New Axiom » Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:01 pm
The First Order of the Balance wrote:MERIZoC wrote:Not really.
They have a hard time dealing with the essential fact. Seeing yourself as an animal, and seeing that you share many of the same traits that animals do, has a tendency to do away with our pride. Essentially, there isn't much difference (physically) between me and a chimp.
There are many more than that.
Thats not quite how it works
Would they? Why is there a dichotomy between animal and "being"?
Yes and no. I'll start with no. people see animals as being a dumb, unsophisticated creature with no rights. We kill and eat a cow without any problem. If we admit to ourselves that we are just animals, the fear some people have is that it will degrade the nature of people. Now as far as beings go, you would not refer to a deer or a boar the term of a "being". Being carries some specific rights and it means you can not be killed without a single thought.
Essentially, I see it as a word game. What is a being but an animal ? Let's investigate humans and find the answers to our most pressing questions.
What?
As I have said before, there is people that have a hard time admitting were animals. Typical of those that do is the Creationists, who insist on God and Genesis as truth.
Zakuvia wrote:If you aren't imagining a chain gang of adorable old retirees building a wall with Fixodent and using their Hoverounds as tow trucks then you're not the NS I remember.
by New Vlada » Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:02 pm
by Fartsniffage » Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:08 pm
New Axiom wrote:The First Order of the Balance wrote:
As I have said before, there is people that have a hard time admitting were animals. Typical of those that do is the Creationists, who insist on God and Genesis as truth.
You’re assuming it’s a fact that we are animals, but in reality really the only trait we share with animals is our classification-mammals-and certain DNA markers we share. Really, nothing else.
by New Vlada » Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:23 pm
The First Order of the Balance wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
Social groups, communication, building, farming, tool use, getting intentionally drunk. All things we share with animals.
Yes. But you still need to eat, you have sex with the gender your attracted to and you still defecate. All animal things. You share 99% of the same DNA with chimps. Now we do DNA tests on children to discover who there father is. If chimps have 99% of the same DNA, that means that we are indeed related to them and in fact, as I see it, are animals.
by New Axiom » Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:28 pm
The First Order of the Balance wrote:New Axiom wrote:Did you just assume my preference of pronoun? I identify as an attack helicopter, thank you very much.
In all seriousness though, what?
I will use the definition of animals and being to make my point.
Animals: The definition of animals are members of the kingdom Animalia and are generally characterized by having a multicellular body, quick movement, specialized sense organs and the ability to get and digest food. Cats, dogs and elephants are each examples of animals.
Being: 1) Being is defined as the state of existing or living or something that exists. 2) all the physical and mental qualities that make up a person; personality
As you can see, the idea is spread that although animals can be described, they only can be described as they are made. However, since human beings have both language to describe whatever they feel, and we assume they have rights, they are protects while there is no sense of the protection or the right to be protected of an animal.
As I have said before, people who insist on this difference, like Creationist and others, are missing the point. Yes, we are beings because we can talk and we have rights. However, I think it is wrong to only describe animals as having obvious physical properties and downplaying the fact that animals like chimps are very close to us genetically.
My essential problem is that some animals, like chimps, have an I.Q of a two year old, yet we still kill them. However, if you served a two year of child for dinner, I am sure you would have problems.
Zakuvia wrote:If you aren't imagining a chain gang of adorable old retirees building a wall with Fixodent and using their Hoverounds as tow trucks then you're not the NS I remember.
by Fartsniffage » Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:34 pm
The First Order of the Balance wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
Social groups, communication, building, farming, tool use, getting intentionally drunk. All things we share with animals.
Yes. But you still need to eat, you have sex with the gender your attracted to and you still defecate. All animal things. You share 99% of the same DNA with chimps. Now we do DNA tests on children to discover who there father is. If chimps have 99% of the same DNA, that means that we are indeed related to them and in fact, as I see it, are animals.
( the chimp information can be found at http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/06/ ... -relatives)
by New Vlada » Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:35 pm
The First Order of the Balance wrote:-snip-
by Mushet » Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:36 pm
by Autumns » Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:41 pm
by Sela Vom » Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:43 pm
The First Order of the Balance wrote:Mushet wrote:We are animals, it is silly how obsessed people are in thinking we are so much better than all the others.
Indeed. That's my point. If we admit the truth, we can start looking for more rational solutions to our problems. For instance, why do we do criminal things ? Now, I have a hard time believing it is because of "Original Sin" or that we are born sinners. Yet, if you listen to some people, that is there explanation.
by New Vlada » Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:45 pm
The First Order of the Balance wrote:
Indeed. That's my point. If we admit the truth, we can start looking for more rational solutions to our problems. For instance, why do we do criminal things ? Now, I have a hard time believing it is because of "Original Sin" or that we are born sinners. Yet, if you listen to some people, that is their explanation.
by Sela Vom » Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:49 pm
The First Order of the Balance wrote:
Please excuse me. It must have been my Original Sin, which I am guilty of even before I could think. But seriously, I advocate people that are Creationists to join the debate.
by The New California Republic » Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:51 pm
The First Order of the Balance wrote:Yet the fact remains that humans are animals. Many people would disagree with me.
by New Vlada » Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:55 pm
The First Order of the Balance wrote:Why do we kill ?
The First Order of the Balance wrote:Why does one person kill a person and then goes on to consume there flesh ?
The First Order of the Balance wrote:What causes a person to become a pedophile, and what can we do to cure it ?
The First Order of the Balance wrote:How can we stop war ?
by Aztlanta » Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:59 pm
The Federation of AZTLANTA
A socialist nation consisting of Mexico, California, and Central America, set in an alternate timeline in which Native American civilizations remained mostly isolated from colonial influence.
Aztlanta was founded by the Aztec peoples, and have since become a major player in global politics.
by Sela Vom » Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:01 pm
Humans often ( at least it hasn't been) show any concern for animals because they figure our they are mindless, emotionless, unfeeling creatures.
by New Vlada » Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:01 pm
The First Order of the Balance wrote:
Sure. Humans often ( at least it hasn't been) show any concern for animals because they figure our they are mindless, emotionless, unfeeling creatures. However, I have taken the stance that we are indeed animals ourselves, and if we treated humans like we treat animals, we would be in a world of hurt.
Admitting the truth to ourselves is the first thing we can do that will make us better. By admitting there is only a difference mentally and that some animals share our emotions and (to a limited degree) our thoughts, we can extend protection to them. I feel that killing a chimp should be a jail able act, seeing that you killed an intelligent, emotional animal. It does not matter if we make laws banning the killing of chimps for OUR sake, it matters if it is done for the CHIMPS sake.
Aztlanta wrote:Humans are sentient animals.
by The New California Republic » Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:01 pm
The First Order of the Balance wrote:However, I have taken the stance that we are indeed animals ourselves ... Admitting the truth to ourselves is the first thing we can do that will make us better.
by Sovaal » Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:02 pm
New Axiom wrote:The First Order of the Balance wrote:
As I have said before, there is people that have a hard time admitting were animals. Typical of those that do is the Creationists, who insist on God and Genesis as truth.
You’re assuming it’s a fact that we are animals, but in reality really the only trait we share with animals is our classification-mammals-and certain DNA markers we share. Really, nothing else.
by New Axiom » Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:03 pm
The First Order of the Balance wrote:Sela Vom wrote:
Exactly my point. Do you have a thought you want debated here, or an axe to grind against a phantom creationist adversary that you're shadow boxing?
And for what it's worth, for those who believe it, the doctrine original sin isn't related to why men sin, it's a stain inherited from man's first sin. Not related to this topic.
Edit typo
Sure. Humans often ( at least it hasn't been) show any concern for animals because they figure our they are mindless, emotionless, unfeeling creatures. However, I have taken the stance that we are indeed animals ourselves, and if we treated humans like we treat animals, we would be in a world of hurt.
Admitting the truth to ourselves is the first thing we can do that will make us better. By admitting there is only a difference mentally and that some animals share our emotions and (to a limited degree) our thoughts, we can extend protection to them. I feel that killing a chimp should be a jail able act, seeing that you killed an intelligent, emotional animal. It does not matter if we make laws banning the killing of chimps for OUR sake, it matters if it is done for the CHIMPS sake.
Zakuvia wrote:If you aren't imagining a chain gang of adorable old retirees building a wall with Fixodent and using their Hoverounds as tow trucks then you're not the NS I remember.
by New Axiom » Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:04 pm
Sovaal wrote:New Axiom wrote:
You’re assuming it’s a fact that we are animals, but in reality really the only trait we share with animals is our classification-mammals-and certain DNA markers we share. Really, nothing else.
Yep, totally don’t share traits such as organs, organ systems, cell structure, genetic structure, instincts...
Seriously, there’s a reason that Homo sapiens is classified in kingdom Animalia.
Zakuvia wrote:If you aren't imagining a chain gang of adorable old retirees building a wall with Fixodent and using their Hoverounds as tow trucks then you're not the NS I remember.
by New Axiom » Tue Jan 09, 2018 7:05 pm
The First Order of the Balance wrote:New Vlada wrote:there is always individual reasons for this sort of thing. self defence, homicidal tendencies, sadism, etc
i'm beginning to think you're just a nutter
You can understand why I feel like I do. I mean, it would be fine if you were starving. But in all the cases I have heard, the person had a sexual fetish for cannibalism. In fact, in one cases, the guy wanted to be eaten !
Zakuvia wrote:If you aren't imagining a chain gang of adorable old retirees building a wall with Fixodent and using their Hoverounds as tow trucks then you're not the NS I remember.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], IC-Water, Ifreann, Shearoa, Tiami
Advertisement