I believe Hugo Boss is out of the uniform business for the most part these days, but they do have an impeccable design reputation on that front if you were to request some sketches...
Advertisement
by Senkaku » Thu Jan 04, 2018 12:51 am
by Soufrika » Thu Jan 04, 2018 1:02 am
by Torrocca » Thu Jan 04, 2018 1:07 am
by Torrocca » Thu Jan 04, 2018 1:13 am
by Torrocca » Thu Jan 04, 2018 1:20 am
by MGTOWia » Thu Jan 04, 2018 11:14 am
Liriena wrote:MGTOWia wrote:
"Atrocity"? Talk about chud-level discourse. Not to mention a massive trivialization of the term "atrocity".
It doesn't really work when a /pol/ster says it. You're going to need to find your own cool words and stop stealing ours.MGTOWia wrote:The genocide of Christians in the Middle East at the hands of ISIS and its ilk is an atrocity.
Oooooh, you got to the fallacy of relative privation fast.
Here's a little bit of wokeness for you: two horrible things can be atrocities without being equally horrible. An atrocity is not negated simply because another one has more casualties. That's not rational.
Liriena wrote:MGTOWia wrote:The 3/5 Compromise was exactly that. COMPROMISE. And one that eventually disappeared with the end of slavery. Which refusal to enact the compromise likely would have prolonged. So what was the "atrocity" again?
The continued dehumanization of countless innocent people. Oh, it was "kinder" dehumanization, sure, and more "pragmatic" too.
by Conserative Morality » Thu Jan 04, 2018 11:17 am
MGTOWia wrote:Liriena wrote:It doesn't really work when a /pol/ster says it. You're going to need to find your own cool words and stop stealing ours.
Oooooh, you got to the fallacy of relative privation fast.
Here's a little bit of wokeness for you: two horrible things can be atrocities without being equally horrible. An atrocity is not negated simply because another one has more casualties. That's not rational.
"Wokeness"? Spare me the SJW jargon. I'm not "negating" one atrocity "because another one has more casualties." I'm denying that the 3/5 Compromise was an "atrocity" at all. You are conflating the 3/5 Compromise, which dealt with Congressional representation and was indirectly an anti-slavery measure, with the institution of slavery itself, and claiming that since slavery was bad, so was the compromise. That's not rational.
by Jerzylvania » Thu Jan 04, 2018 11:33 am
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-reasons-trumps-rise-that-no-one-talks-about/
So according to this, it's more so rural districts (than "red states") that voted Trump.
It talks about rural America being forgotten and ignored... so was Atlantic Canada, you wouldn't see them vote anyone like Trump.
Why, then, should rural districts be entitled to urban money after screwing over urban America? Is there any way to rearrange the USA so as to treat rural America as a new country and urban America as a collection of city-states?
by Liriena » Thu Jan 04, 2018 11:38 am
MGTOWia wrote:Liriena wrote:It doesn't really work when a /pol/ster says it. You're going to need to find your own cool words and stop stealing ours.
Oooooh, you got to the fallacy of relative privation fast.
Here's a little bit of wokeness for you: two horrible things can be atrocities without being equally horrible. An atrocity is not negated simply because another one has more casualties. That's not rational.
"Wokeness"? Spare me the SJW jargon.
MGTOWia wrote:would have just waved your hands and, voila! Slavery would have disappeared, because you wanted it to.
MGTOWia wrote:Btw: here's some "wokeness" for you. Slavery was imposed on the American colonies by the British.
MGTOWia wrote:It took us 87+ years to get rid of it, through the efforts of many men far better than you or me and only after much violence and bloodshed.
MGTOWia wrote:Oh, and who brought the first civil case in which a court recognized lifetime slavery? Anthony Johnson. Born Antonio. In Angola. A black man. And himself a former slave. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Johnson_(colonist) So while you're righteously slinging guilt at people over slavery, send some to the ones who got it going.
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Jerzylvania » Fri Jan 05, 2018 4:40 pm
by MGTOWia » Fri Jan 05, 2018 5:15 pm
Liriena wrote: So, what else do you have, slavery apologist?
by MGTOWia » Fri Jan 05, 2018 5:21 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:
UGH, they wanted to grind up all the kittens into a smoothie but we only let them grind HALF the kittens into a smoothie. Don't you see how good grinding half the kittens into a smoothie is? smh it's like these people don't even understand the benefits of half of all the world's kittens being ground up into smoothies.
by Torrocca » Fri Jan 05, 2018 5:27 pm
MGTOWia wrote:Liriena wrote: So, what else do you have, slavery apologist?
Nothing says "rational" like throwing the "slavery apologist" pejorative around at random people in a relatively serious political discussion.
About what I'd expect from the left end of the political spectrum. When your arguments are exposed as specious, invent some inflammatory accusation, without the slightest factual basis and preferably including the race card, and expect to intimidate your opponent.
As to "what else" I have: for you, nothing. In trying to get through to you, the term "neutronium" comes to mind. Have a blissful life.
MGTOWia wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:
UGH, they wanted to grind up all the kittens into a smoothie but we only let them grind HALF the kittens into a smoothie. Don't you see how good grinding half the kittens into a smoothie is? smh it's like these people don't even understand the benefits of half of all the world's kittens being ground up into smoothies.
Please.
What, exactly, would have been your solution? And how would it have worked? And how would it have NOT led to even worse results?
Moral posturing is no substitute for reasoned policy.
by The Parkus Empire » Fri Jan 05, 2018 5:30 pm
by Torrocca » Fri Jan 05, 2018 5:31 pm
by The Parkus Empire » Fri Jan 05, 2018 5:34 pm
by Torrocca » Fri Jan 05, 2018 5:35 pm
The Parkus Empire wrote:Torrocca wrote:
By being a default state, does it not therefore become an imposed chain by extension, particularly when it could become anything but the default state?
No, and it will always be the default state. You never come out of the womb holding bags of money, it always has to be furnished you. Chains are something furnished against you.
by Liriena » Fri Jan 05, 2018 7:40 pm
MGTOWia wrote:Nothing says "rational" like throwing the "slavery apologist" pejorative around at random people in a relatively serious political discussion.
MGTOWia wrote:About what I'd expect from the left end of the political spectrum. When your arguments are exposed as specious, invent some inflammatory accusation, without the slightest factual basis and preferably including the race card, and expect to intimidate your opponent.
MGTOWia wrote:As to "what else" I have: for you, nothing. In trying to get through to you, the term "neutronium" comes to mind. Have a blissful life.
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Jerzylvania » Sat Jan 06, 2018 9:04 am
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-reasons-trumps-rise-that-no-one-talks-about/
So according to this, it's more so rural districts (than "red states") that voted Trump.
It talks about rural America being forgotten and ignored... so was Atlantic Canada, you wouldn't see them vote anyone like Trump.
Why, then, should rural districts be entitled to urban money after screwing over urban America? Is there any way to rearrange the USA so as to treat rural America as a new country and urban America as a collection of city-states?
by Tekeristan » Wed Feb 28, 2018 12:32 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Experina, The Archregimancy, The Lone Alliance, Unmet Player, Vassenor
Advertisement