The East Marches II wrote:You are basically a tankie, you ought to appreciate that point of view.
by United Islamic Commonwealth » Sat Dec 16, 2017 1:57 pm
The East Marches II wrote:You are basically a tankie, you ought to appreciate that point of view.
by The East Marches II » Sat Dec 16, 2017 3:25 pm
Alsheb wrote:Tankie only in the meaning of Marxist-Leninist, not as in I actually love tanks or military prowess in and of itself, no.
by United Islamic Commonwealth » Sat Dec 16, 2017 3:34 pm
by USS Monitor » Sat Dec 16, 2017 3:46 pm
by United Islamic Commonwealth » Sat Dec 16, 2017 3:48 pm
USS Monitor wrote:Not actionable.
AFAIK, "tankie" is one of those slurs like "feminazi" or "SJW" that has legitimate uses because it has a useful ideological meaning and the derogatory connotations are relatively mild. It may be enough to push a post over the line if there are other problems, but it isn't actionable on its own.
by The East Marches II » Sat Dec 16, 2017 4:04 pm
United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:USS Monitor wrote:Not actionable.
AFAIK, "tankie" is one of those slurs like "feminazi" or "SJW" that has legitimate uses because it has a useful ideological meaning and the derogatory connotations are relatively mild. It may be enough to push a post over the line if there are other problems, but it isn't actionable on its own.
I thought, following in the khafir logic, slurs were actionable, but it is not actionable to call someone "essentially a tankie" without basis?
by United Islamic Commonwealth » Sat Dec 16, 2017 4:09 pm
by USS Monitor » Sat Dec 16, 2017 4:16 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Mavenu
Advertisement