NATION

PASSWORD

DRAFT: Protocol on Peaceful Nuclear Explosions

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Gogol Transcendancy
Envoy
 
Posts: 213
Founded: Jun 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

DRAFT: Protocol on Peaceful Nuclear Explosions

Postby Gogol Transcendancy » Fri Nov 24, 2017 1:19 pm

Protocol on Peaceful Nuclear Explosions
Category: Environmental | Area of Effect: All Businesses | Proposed by: Gogol Transcendancy

The General Assembly:

Aware of the numerous potential benefits of Peaceful Nuclear Explosions (PNEs), in roles including space propulsion, earth moving and fusion energy production,

Noting that nuclear explosions, especially those with a fission component, release large amounts of high-level radioactive wastes, which can lead to long lasting contamination of biospheres,

Defines, for the purposes of this resolution, "Peaceful Nuclear Explosions" as any nuclear detonations conducted for non-military purposes,

Requires nations that conduct Peaceful Nuclear Explosions to conduct them in a manner which prevents the release of any radiological material into a biosphere if it is possible to do so.

Further Requires Nations to minimize the amount of radiation released per ton of explosive yield as much as is economically feasible if radioactive release into a biosphere is unavoidable.

Establishes the following rules for the conduction of all PNEs:
  1. All PNEs must be thoroughly and fully supervised to ensure compliance with WA regulations
  2. All PNEs be conducted so that the aftereffects of such tests do not directly affect other nations without their previous and explicit permission
  3. All WA nations be able to quickly and efficiently clean up fallout from PNEs
  4. All WA nations take as many precautions as necessary to ensure the absence of unnecessary death or injury due to PNEs;
Expands the role of the Nuclear Testing Oversight Agency (NTOA) to:
  1. Ensure the compliance of member states with WA regulations
  2. To create guidelines for the cleanup of areas following nuclear tests - Until such time as the NTOA shall establish such guidelines pertaining to environmental cleanup, all nations that conduct PNEs must perform adequate cleanup so that background radiation is returned to within 25% of levels present before the PNE
  3. To supervise PNEs upon invitation from nations conducting them
Clarifies that the policy laid out in this resolution does not apply to the use of nuclear weapons in a military role.
Last edited by Gogol Transcendancy on Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:46 pm, edited 4 times in total.


Type 6.7 Civilization

About me:
Economic Left/Right: -3.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.74
Pro: Social Democracy, Free Trade, Agnosticism, reasonable atheism/theism, nuclear power, social freedom, space exploration
Against: Libertarianism, tankie communism, extreme nationalism/alt-right, climate change denial, scientism

User avatar
Slavonia and Srijem
Attaché
 
Posts: 80
Founded: Nov 02, 2016
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Slavonia and Srijem » Fri Nov 24, 2017 2:38 pm

i think this condtradicts several GA resolutions about weapons. :blink:

User avatar
Gogol Transcendancy
Envoy
 
Posts: 213
Founded: Jun 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Gogol Transcendancy » Fri Nov 24, 2017 2:49 pm

Slavonia and Srijem wrote:i think this condtradicts several GA resolutions about weapons. :blink:

This resolution doesn't deal with nuclear weapons.


Type 6.7 Civilization

About me:
Economic Left/Right: -3.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.74
Pro: Social Democracy, Free Trade, Agnosticism, reasonable atheism/theism, nuclear power, social freedom, space exploration
Against: Libertarianism, tankie communism, extreme nationalism/alt-right, climate change denial, scientism

User avatar
States of Glory WA Office
Minister
 
Posts: 2105
Founded: Jul 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby States of Glory WA Office » Sat Nov 25, 2017 8:29 am

Gogol Transcendancy wrote:Requires Nations to conduct Peaceful Nuclear Explosions in a manner which prevents the release of any radiological material into a biosphere if it is possible to do so.

Neville: As currently worded, this clause requires member states to conduct explosions whether they want to or not.
Ambassador: Neville Lynn Robert
Assistant: Harold "The Clown" Johnson
#MakeLegislationFunnyAgain

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Sat Nov 25, 2017 8:40 am

OOC: And exactly how does a "peaceful" nuclear explosion differ from exploding a nuclear warhead? Or would this proposal ban converting existing warheads for peaceful uses? You may want to define the explosive too, not just the intention of the explosion.

Generally speaking, a nuclear explosion is a bomb going off. Just because you don't want to call it a bomb, doesn't make it not-a-bomb. (Especially as at least the existing RL types are actual bombs, with explosives being used to set off the nuclear reaction, and fusion bombs contain a fission bomb as the "charge", which sets off the fusion reaction.)

Also, I suggest checking clauses 6-8 of GA #330, Nuclear Testing Protocol. They seem to be applicable to what you're trying to do here.
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Aclion
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6249
Founded: Apr 12, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Aclion » Sat Nov 25, 2017 3:50 pm

Araraukar wrote:OOC: And exactly how does a "peaceful" nuclear explosion differ from exploding a nuclear warhead?

OOC: Purpose. See: the defining clause.
A popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps both. - James Madison.

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Sat Nov 25, 2017 10:57 pm

Aclion wrote:
Araraukar wrote:OOC: And exactly how does a "peaceful" nuclear explosion differ from exploding a nuclear warhead?

OOC: Purpose. See: the defining clause.

OOC: Answer the other question, too, please, since it's related:
Araraukar wrote:OOC: And exactly how does a "peaceful" nuclear explosion differ from exploding a nuclear warhead? Or would this proposal ban converting existing warheads for peaceful uses?
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Gogol Transcendancy
Envoy
 
Posts: 213
Founded: Jun 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Gogol Transcendancy » Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:50 pm

Araraukar wrote:
Aclion wrote:OOC: Purpose. See: the defining clause.

OOC: Answer the other question, too, please, since it's related:
Araraukar wrote:OOC: And exactly how does a "peaceful" nuclear explosion differ from exploding a nuclear warhead?

The nuclear explosion is not conducted for the purpose of attaining any military objectives.
Or would this proposal ban converting existing warheads for peaceful uses?

No.
States of Glory WA Office wrote:
Gogol Transcendancy wrote:Requires Nations to conduct Peaceful Nuclear Explosions in a manner which prevents the release of any radiological material into a biosphere if it is possible to do so.

Neville: As currently worded, this clause requires member states to conduct explosions whether they want to or not.

Fixed.


Type 6.7 Civilization

About me:
Economic Left/Right: -3.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.74
Pro: Social Democracy, Free Trade, Agnosticism, reasonable atheism/theism, nuclear power, social freedom, space exploration
Against: Libertarianism, tankie communism, extreme nationalism/alt-right, climate change denial, scientism


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: The Overmind

Advertisement

Remove ads