by Alvecia » Thu Nov 23, 2017 7:20 am
by The New California Republic » Thu Nov 23, 2017 7:36 am
by Ransium » Thu Nov 23, 2017 7:39 am
by Godular » Thu Nov 23, 2017 8:59 am
by USS Monitor » Thu Nov 23, 2017 2:19 pm
Godular wrote:One question I have is whether Keshi’s posts are promoting illegal activity. He seems rather deadset on using extortion/blackmail to control people’s actions.
by Godular » Thu Nov 23, 2017 2:24 pm
USS Monitor wrote:Godular wrote:One question I have is whether Keshi’s posts are promoting illegal activity. He seems rather deadset on using extortion/blackmail to control people’s actions.
Could you point out the specific posts you're concerned about? I'm visiting family, and it's hard to concentrate on a thread trawl with people talking around me.
by Methodological Individualism » Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:08 pm
by USS Monitor » Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:12 pm
Methodological Individualism wrote:(Posting to this report as a participant in the reported discussion; will cease and desist if required)
To be fair, woeful ignorance of the law is not necessarily the same as openly advocating its violation. Continued discussion might benefit the individual in question, but especially lurking passersby who might read it too.
by Methodological Individualism » Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:18 pm
USS Monitor wrote:Methodological Individualism wrote:(Posting to this report as a participant in the reported discussion; will cease and desist if required)
To be fair, woeful ignorance of the law is not necessarily the same as openly advocating its violation. Continued discussion might benefit the individual in question, but especially lurking passersby who might read it too.
Can you link the specific post(s) this is referring to?
by NERVUN » Thu Nov 23, 2017 4:19 pm
Methodological Individualism wrote:USS Monitor wrote:
Can you link the specific post(s) this is referring to?
The individual in question seems to have opinions based on a questionable understanding of the law/questionable legal background:
viewtopic.php?p=32950242#p32950242
Prompting appropriate and useful response:
viewtopic.php?p=32950265#p32950265
Even if it doesn't sway the individual in question, other readers may appreciate theses sorts of insights (myself included, actually).
EDIT: This however is probably just nonsense:
viewtopic.php?p=32950861#p32950861
by Godular » Fri Nov 24, 2017 10:06 am
Republic of Keshiland wrote:Abortion records should be public for those who were not at risk of death from the pregnancy. Watch the numbers plummet if they inacted that also anti abortion legislation is in the Senate tax bill.https://www.google.ca/amp/s/m.huffpost. ... 0e18cb/amp
Republic of Keshiland wrote:Kernen wrote:
1. That's illegal. Records of abortions are medical documents, and therefore protected under various medical privacy laws. KNOW THE LAW.
2. What public interest is there in knowing who has had an abortion? What state interest is there in such data?
1. It should be repealed
2. It makes people less likely to get one out of shame or fear of what others will think
by Ransium » Fri Nov 24, 2017 10:25 am
by Godular » Fri Nov 24, 2017 12:59 pm
by Godular » Fri Nov 24, 2017 2:58 pm
Republic of Keshiland wrote:United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:It may not be violence, but it is definitely abuse and manipulation. You should feel shitty for supporting this.
Those who are capable of getting what they want (like a child coming to term) through mind games and intellect have a right to use it.
Republic of Keshiland wrote:United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:What the literal fuck? No. No, they do not. Let's turn it: a big, physically powerful man wants a woman to have sex with him, but she doesn't want to. So, he rapes her. He was capable of getting what he wanted. Did he have a right to?
That's different he is using physically force. Ability of the mind is okay to use not strength of the body.
by USS Monitor » Fri Nov 24, 2017 3:10 pm
by Godular » Fri Nov 24, 2017 3:15 pm
USS Monitor wrote:He's not advocating illegal activity. Suggesting that the law should be changed to allow something is not the same as advocating that people should ignore the law and commit crimes.
Trolling is more of a judgement call, but I don't see this as trolling. It's just an opinion that you don't agree with.
by USS Monitor » Fri Nov 24, 2017 3:19 pm
Godular wrote:USS Monitor wrote:He's not advocating illegal activity. Suggesting that the law should be changed to allow something is not the same as advocating that people should ignore the law and commit crimes.
Trolling is more of a judgement call, but I don't see this as trolling. It's just an opinion that you don't agree with.
I dunno... what he's saying is really close to rape apologism. I recall something about sincere beliefs not being sufficient excuse when it comes to something that inflames others so much.
by Godular » Fri Nov 24, 2017 3:20 pm
by USS Monitor » Fri Nov 24, 2017 3:23 pm
by Godular » Fri Nov 24, 2017 3:33 pm
Advertisement
Advertisement