NATION

PASSWORD

Beta 011: Average Disposable Incomes (New)

Bug reports, general help, ideas for improvements, and questions about how things are meant to work.
User avatar
[violet]
Site Admin
 
Posts: 13386
Founded: Antiquity

Beta 011: Average Disposable Incomes (New)

Postby [violet] » Tue Nov 14, 2017 8:03 pm

Beta 011: Average Disposable Incomes (New)

Proposed Change: This would be a new World Census scale that measures average incomes after tax. For comparison purposes, pre-tax incomes are shown as "Current." Nations with no income tax show identical pre- and post-tax incomes, while nations with 100% tax rates show 0 income.
Last edited by [violet] on Tue Nov 14, 2017 8:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Fauxia
Minister
 
Posts: 2203
Founded: Dec 22, 2016
Capitalizt

Postby Fauxia » Tue Nov 14, 2017 8:20 pm

Hell yes. This is a great idea. Although, would this eliminate the pre-taxation income? I mean, it’s simple math, but most don’t want to do it probably.
Warden. The only person who posts on GP, GA, NSG, and GI
Ambassador: Benedict Corwin, Intern: Nicholas Cantor (Nick)
Right-leaning Libertarian. Pro: capitalism, gun rights, life, and you can probably guess what else a right-libertarian likes. Anti Democratic Party, alt-right, SJW, BLM, communism, socialism, you

User avatar
Drasnia
Minister
 
Posts: 2230
Founded: Feb 02, 2012
Anarchy

Postby Drasnia » Tue Nov 14, 2017 8:23 pm

Finally a reason to have a 0% tax rate. Thanks [v]!

User avatar
[violet]
Site Admin
 
Posts: 13386
Founded: Antiquity

Postby [violet] » Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:30 pm

Fauxia wrote:would this eliminate the pre-taxation income?

No, this would be a brand new World Census ranking, not a replacement for "Average Income."

User avatar
Caelapes
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1290
Founded: Apr 30, 2007
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Caelapes » Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:38 pm

[violet] wrote:
Fauxia wrote:would this eliminate the pre-taxation income?

No, this would be a brand new World Census ranking, not a replacement for "Average Income."

Could there be a corresponding opposite census for “most services provided by the state” for nations that have a high “average income” that is, as shown by this new census, entirely provided in the form of services like healthcare and education and not actual wages? I’m top 3% in the world for average “income” but that’s expressed entirely through services and not through a paycheck.
  ✿   
The Rose Commune of Caelapes
Ego vero custos fratris mei sum.
aka Misley

User avatar
Consular
Minister
 
Posts: 2421
Founded: Apr 10, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Consular » Tue Nov 14, 2017 11:11 pm

As long as it doesn't override average income and is just a new category I think its good.

Seems to be working as intended for me, in that disposable income is almost none.

User avatar
Aclion
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1626
Founded: Apr 12, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Aclion » Wed Nov 15, 2017 1:36 am

Oh yes please. ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ

Caelapes wrote:Could there be a corresponding opposite census for “most services provided by the state” for nations that have a high “average income” that is, as shown by this new census, entirely provided in the form of services like healthcare and education and not actual wages? I’m top 3% in the world for average “income” but that’s expressed entirely through services and not through a paycheck.

The different services governments provide already have their own stats, mostly.
Last edited by Aclion on Wed Nov 15, 2017 1:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
World Assembly Delegate: Celice Leclère
Oatland Cartographer, Delegate and Caesar
Author of Oatland's Constitution
How to travel to london from afar.
The left-right spectrum; an analogy.

User avatar
Merconitonitopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1068
Founded: Jul 29, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Merconitonitopia » Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:08 am

surprised I never thought of this myself. now that's it been brought it up it makes a lot of sense that this should be included. this is especially useful as otherwise there is no reason to care about how high or low taxes are realistically speaking, while this rewards lower taxes and punishes higher taxes to balance things out somewhat.

as a nation with 100.0% tax rate, my citizens will now make earn an impressive annual disposable income of $0.00.
Caelapes wrote:Could there be a corresponding opposite census for “most services provided by the state” for nations that have a high “average income” that is, as shown by this new census, entirely provided in the form of services like healthcare and education and not actual wages? I’m top 3% in the world for average “income” but that’s expressed entirely through services and not through a paycheck.

This is already expressed collectively in government size and taxation, and individual services already have their own stats.

If you mean a stat representing the $$$ subtracted from income by tax though I would support this. eg. a nation with $100,000 avg. income with 80.0% tax rate would = $20,000 disposable income and $80,000 per capita gov't expenditure.

I'm not sure how this would work with black market, but black market is already not considered it seems.
Actually that's a good point. [v], my citizens make no disposable income due to 100% tax rate. Yet, two-thirds of my economy is constituted of black market activity. Is this implying people involved in the black market turn in all of their revenue from their illegal activities in to the government? If so, that is very, uh, patriotic.
All Under the Sun

i mostly care about minmaxing stats + i wrote an issue one time

User avatar
Merconitonitopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1068
Founded: Jul 29, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Merconitonitopia » Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:16 am

On second thought, realistically applying black market as outside of government control and thus not subject to taxation would completely fuck up half of my rankings, so forget I ever mentioned it. :L
All Under the Sun

i mostly care about minmaxing stats + i wrote an issue one time

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 10941
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:42 am

This one has been on my wishlist forever. Thanks for looking to implement.

The betatesting page is a little misleading, suggesting that Average Income itself is going to change, but it looks technically solid, certainly.
Editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people.

User avatar
Caelapes
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1290
Founded: Apr 30, 2007
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Caelapes » Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:03 am

Aclion wrote:The different services governments provide already have their own stats, mostly.

Right, but those stats don’t directly represent the amount of funds being spent per capita to provide those services.
  ✿   
The Rose Commune of Caelapes
Ego vero custos fratris mei sum.
aka Misley

User avatar
Trotterdam
Senator
 
Posts: 4330
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:55 am

Shouldn't Welfare count towards disposable incomes?

Merconitonitopia wrote:I'm not sure how this would work with black market, but black market is already not considered it seems.
Actually that's a good point. [v], my citizens make no disposable income due to 100% tax rate. Yet, two-thirds of my economy is constituted of black market activity. Is this implying people involved in the black market turn in all of their revenue from their illegal activities in to the government? If so, that is very, uh, patriotic.
This is also a good point.

User avatar
Aclion
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1626
Founded: Apr 12, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Aclion » Wed Nov 15, 2017 1:05 pm

Caelapes wrote:
Aclion wrote:The different services governments provide already have their own stats, mostly.

Right, but those stats don’t directly represent the amount of funds being spent per capita to provide those services.

Oh that's a good point. We only have total now.

Trotterdam wrote:Shouldn't Welfare count towards disposable incomes?

Another good point. Building on that, should healthcare policy affect it? I mean if you're paying for your own healthcare that's going to eat into your disposable income quite a bit(I know, I've been there), but if healthcare is paid for by the state via taxes then it wouldn't. Similar arguments could be raised for education, or even law enforcement.

and this is why you never give a mouse a cookie
Last edited by Aclion on Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
World Assembly Delegate: Celice Leclère
Oatland Cartographer, Delegate and Caesar
Author of Oatland's Constitution
How to travel to london from afar.
The left-right spectrum; an analogy.

User avatar
Merconitonitopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1068
Founded: Jul 29, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Merconitonitopia » Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:42 pm

Aclion I think you are misunderstanding. Disposable income is not income after expenses, it is income after taxes.

That is true Trot. Welfare does not take $ from the populace for the gov't to spend, it takes it from one group to another and gives it to them as income. Perhaps welfare should only account for a small % of disposable income lost to account for the costs of running and managing the system.
All Under the Sun

i mostly care about minmaxing stats + i wrote an issue one time

User avatar
Caelapes
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1290
Founded: Apr 30, 2007
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Caelapes » Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:49 pm

I'd argue that "welfare" in countries like Caelapes would not take the form of wages but would refer to resources used to directly provide for the sheltering and feeding of its citizens. "To each according to their need" doesn't mean the state is writing a check for people to turn around and give back to the state to receive those services. I don't think that welfare necessarily needs to be included in disposable income.

Merconitonitopia wrote:Actually that's a good point. [v], my citizens make no disposable income due to 100% tax rate. Yet, two-thirds of my economy is constituted of black market activity. Is this implying people involved in the black market turn in all of their revenue from their illegal activities in to the government? If so, that is very, uh, patriotic.

a per-capita ranking of the black market would be awesome, although I recognize that it's outside the realm of this particular beta. I've kept my black market down to 0.01% of my total economy (a per-capita equivalent of $28.62), but because this is an old nation with a lot of citizens, I'm ranked in the top 40% of the world for black market size. Having rankings for disposable income that includes black market or having a separate per-capita black market income ranking would be very nice.
  ✿   
The Rose Commune of Caelapes
Ego vero custos fratris mei sum.
aka Misley

User avatar
Trotterdam
Senator
 
Posts: 4330
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:04 pm

Aclion wrote:
Caelapes wrote:Right, but those stats don’t directly represent the amount of funds being spent per capita to provide those services.
Oh that's a good point. We only have total now.
No, those values are per capita, or at least something that doesn't change as your nation size increases.

Aclion wrote:
Trotterdam wrote:Shouldn't Welfare count towards disposable incomes?

Another good point. Building on that, should healthcare policy affect it? I mean if you're paying for your own healthcare that's going to eat into your disposable income quite a bit(I know, I've been there), but if healthcare is paid for by the state via taxes then it wouldn't. Similar arguments could be raised for education, or even law enforcement.
Well, I'd say privately-purchased healthcare comes from disposable income. I mean, you have the choice of not paying for the healthcare and staying sick, if you want. It's your money.

It might not be a very attractive choice, but so long as you have the choice, I think it counts as disposable income.

"Income after deducting necessary expenses" would require a definition of what's "necessary expenses", a category which keeps going up as standards of life improve and greater and greater luxuries (clean running water, electricity, internet connection...) start being taken for granted as something that everyone needs to have.

Caelapes wrote:I'd argue that "welfare" in countries like Caelapes would not take the form of wages but would refer to resources used to directly provide for the sheltering and feeding of its citizens. "To each according to their need" doesn't mean the state is writing a check for people to turn around and give back to the state to receive those services. I don't think that welfare necessarily needs to be included in disposable income.
Welfare can take multiple forms, and at least some issues appear to assume the form where you're giving people money to do with as they wish. Unfortunately I don't think the game can distinguish the fine details here, it just sees you as having more or less welfare rather than different types.

User avatar
Merconitonitopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1068
Founded: Jul 29, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Merconitonitopia » Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:20 pm

Yes, that is true. I think that welfare would mean a very different thing in different countries.

Example:
In the United States, a deeply capitalistic economy, the gov't simply grabs $$$ from one demographic and dumps it on another.
While in a typical socialist utopia, the state would simply provide these necessities outright akin to breadlines.

It should then, perhaps, be determined by whether or not a nation's economy is dominated by the private sector or public sector, and to what extent that is so.



Trotterdam -- again, disposable income is income after taxes. we already have a working definition with Acilion's proposition does not adhere to.
All Under the Sun

i mostly care about minmaxing stats + i wrote an issue one time

User avatar
Aclion
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1626
Founded: Apr 12, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Aclion » Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:43 pm

Trotterdam wrote:
Aclion wrote:Oh that's a good point. We only have total now.
No, those values are per capita, or at least something that doesn't change as your nation size increases.

Huh, shows how often I check those stats. :P

Trotterdam wrote:
Aclion wrote:Another good point. Building on that, should healthcare policy affect it? I mean if you're paying for your own healthcare that's going to eat into your disposable income quite a bit(I know, I've been there), but if healthcare is paid for by the state via taxes then it wouldn't. Similar arguments could be raised for education, or even law enforcement.
Well, I'd say privately-purchased healthcare comes from disposable income. I mean, you have the choice of not paying for the healthcare and staying sick, if you want. It's your money.

It might not be a very attractive choice, but so long as you have the choice, I think it counts as disposable income.

"Income after deducting necessary expenses" would require a definition of what's "necessary expenses", a category which keeps going up as standards of life improve and greater and greater luxuries (clean running water, electricity, internet connection...) start being taken for granted as something that everyone needs to have.

You could make the same argument for whatever a particular welfare program is providing. Though I think apparently we've confused disposable income with discretionary income.
Last edited by Aclion on Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:35 pm, edited 3 times in total.
World Assembly Delegate: Celice Leclère
Oatland Cartographer, Delegate and Caesar
Author of Oatland's Constitution
How to travel to london from afar.
The left-right spectrum; an analogy.

User avatar
United Massachusetts
Diplomat
 
Posts: 845
Founded: Jan 17, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby United Massachusetts » Wed Nov 15, 2017 6:14 pm

It's interesting to say the least. It'll make me sad, but is probably a good addition.

Could we have income after expenses?
United Massachusetts
Former Foreign Minister and Senator, Current Director of News in Right to Life
Pro-Life, Catholic Social Democrat
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.
-Dwight Eisenhower

The greatest destroyer of peace is abortion because if a mother can kill her own child, what is left for me to kill you and you to kill me? There is nothing between.
-Mother Theresa

Queen Yuno wrote:You have a contradictionary rep yourself [, United Massachusetts].

User avatar
Merconitonitopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1068
Founded: Jul 29, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Merconitonitopia » Wed Nov 15, 2017 6:45 pm

United Massachusetts wrote:It's interesting to say the least. It'll make me sad, but is probably a good addition.

Could we have income after expenses?

it would be difficult to calculate but a discretionary income would be an interesting stat. that said, let's just take it one at a time for now. this thread is for disposable income.
All Under the Sun

i mostly care about minmaxing stats + i wrote an issue one time


Remove ads

Return to Technical

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Caelapes, Chukstik Illahi, Courelli, Dytarma, Tyrian Federated States

Remove ads