NATION

PASSWORD

Beta 011: Average Disposable Incomes (New)

Bug reports, general help, ideas for improvements, and questions about how things are meant to work.
User avatar
[violet]
Site Admin
 
Posts: 14052
Founded: Antiquity

Beta 011: Average Disposable Incomes (New)

Postby [violet] » Tue Nov 14, 2017 8:03 pm

Beta 011: Average Disposable Incomes (New)

Proposed Change: This would be a new World Census scale that measures average incomes after tax. For comparison purposes, pre-tax incomes are shown as "Current." Nations with no income tax show identical pre- and post-tax incomes, while nations with 100% tax rates show 0 income.
Last edited by [violet] on Tue Nov 14, 2017 8:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Fauxia
Senator
 
Posts: 3923
Founded: Dec 22, 2016
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Fauxia » Tue Nov 14, 2017 8:20 pm

Hell yes. This is a great idea. Although, would this eliminate the pre-taxation income? I mean, it’s simple math, but most don’t want to do it probably.
Don’t pick a fight with me, I am proficient with the weapon to which all shall fall in NationStates... inactivity.
Not the similarly named Feux.
Reploid Productions wrote:Unfortunately, Max still won't buy the mods elite ninja assassin squads to use, so... no such luck.

User avatar
Drasnia
Minister
 
Posts: 2439
Founded: Feb 02, 2012
Anarchy

Postby Drasnia » Tue Nov 14, 2017 8:23 pm

Finally a reason to have a 0% tax rate. Thanks [v]!
Ransium: 911 is my worst ranked issue I’ve edited
Ransium: 777 is my second worst
Ransium: I shouldn’t edit your issues

User avatar
[violet]
Site Admin
 
Posts: 14052
Founded: Antiquity

Postby [violet] » Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:30 pm

Fauxia wrote:would this eliminate the pre-taxation income?

No, this would be a brand new World Census ranking, not a replacement for "Average Income."

User avatar
Caelapes
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1489
Founded: Apr 30, 2007
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Caelapes » Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:38 pm

[violet] wrote:
Fauxia wrote:would this eliminate the pre-taxation income?

No, this would be a brand new World Census ranking, not a replacement for "Average Income."

Could there be a corresponding opposite census for “most services provided by the state” for nations that have a high “average income” that is, as shown by this new census, entirely provided in the form of services like healthcare and education and not actual wages? I’m top 3% in the world for average “income” but that’s expressed entirely through services and not through a paycheck.
     
The Rose Commune of Caelapes
Ego vero custos fratris mei sum.
aka Misley

User avatar
Consular
Minister
 
Posts: 2983
Founded: Apr 10, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Consular » Tue Nov 14, 2017 11:11 pm

As long as it doesn't override average income and is just a new category I think its good.

Seems to be working as intended for me, in that disposable income is almost none.

User avatar
Aclion
Minister
 
Posts: 2800
Founded: Apr 12, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Aclion » Wed Nov 15, 2017 1:36 am

Oh yes please. ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ

Caelapes wrote:Could there be a corresponding opposite census for “most services provided by the state” for nations that have a high “average income” that is, as shown by this new census, entirely provided in the form of services like healthcare and education and not actual wages? I’m top 3% in the world for average “income” but that’s expressed entirely through services and not through a paycheck.

The different services governments provide already have their own stats, mostly.
Last edited by Aclion on Wed Nov 15, 2017 1:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
How to travel to london from afar.
The left-right spectrum; an analogy.
XKI: Recruiter, TITO member
TEP: WA Executive Staff member
Forest: Cartographer
Oatland: Caesar, Cartographer

User avatar
Merconitonitopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1448
Founded: Jul 29, 2013
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Merconitonitopia » Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:08 am

surprised I never thought of this myself. now that's it been brought it up it makes a lot of sense that this should be included. this is especially useful as otherwise there is no reason to care about how high or low taxes are realistically speaking, while this rewards lower taxes and punishes higher taxes to balance things out somewhat.

as a nation with 100.0% tax rate, my citizens will now make earn an impressive annual disposable income of $0.00.
Caelapes wrote:Could there be a corresponding opposite census for “most services provided by the state” for nations that have a high “average income” that is, as shown by this new census, entirely provided in the form of services like healthcare and education and not actual wages? I’m top 3% in the world for average “income” but that’s expressed entirely through services and not through a paycheck.

This is already expressed collectively in government size and taxation, and individual services already have their own stats.

If you mean a stat representing the $$$ subtracted from income by tax though I would support this. eg. a nation with $100,000 avg. income with 80.0% tax rate would = $20,000 disposable income and $80,000 per capita gov't expenditure.

I'm not sure how this would work with black market, but black market is already not considered it seems.
Actually that's a good point. [v], my citizens make no disposable income due to 100% tax rate. Yet, two-thirds of my economy is constituted of black market activity. Is this implying people involved in the black market turn in all of their revenue from their illegal activities in to the government? If so, that is very, uh, patriotic.
Land and Kingdom of Merconites
Fear God and keep His Commandments

User avatar
Merconitonitopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1448
Founded: Jul 29, 2013
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Merconitonitopia » Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:16 am

On second thought, realistically applying black market as outside of government control and thus not subject to taxation would completely fuck up half of my rankings, so forget I ever mentioned it. :L
Land and Kingdom of Merconites
Fear God and keep His Commandments

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 16496
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Capitalizt

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:42 am

This one has been on my wishlist forever. Thanks for looking to implement.

The betatesting page is a little misleading, suggesting that Average Income itself is going to change, but it looks technically solid, certainly.

User avatar
Caelapes
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1489
Founded: Apr 30, 2007
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Caelapes » Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:03 am

Aclion wrote:The different services governments provide already have their own stats, mostly.

Right, but those stats don’t directly represent the amount of funds being spent per capita to provide those services.
     
The Rose Commune of Caelapes
Ego vero custos fratris mei sum.
aka Misley

User avatar
Trotterdam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6731
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:55 am

Shouldn't Welfare count towards disposable incomes?

Merconitonitopia wrote:I'm not sure how this would work with black market, but black market is already not considered it seems.
Actually that's a good point. [v], my citizens make no disposable income due to 100% tax rate. Yet, two-thirds of my economy is constituted of black market activity. Is this implying people involved in the black market turn in all of their revenue from their illegal activities in to the government? If so, that is very, uh, patriotic.
This is also a good point.

User avatar
Aclion
Minister
 
Posts: 2800
Founded: Apr 12, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Aclion » Wed Nov 15, 2017 1:05 pm

Caelapes wrote:
Aclion wrote:The different services governments provide already have their own stats, mostly.

Right, but those stats don’t directly represent the amount of funds being spent per capita to provide those services.

Oh that's a good point. We only have total now.

Trotterdam wrote:Shouldn't Welfare count towards disposable incomes?

Another good point. Building on that, should healthcare policy affect it? I mean if you're paying for your own healthcare that's going to eat into your disposable income quite a bit(I know, I've been there), but if healthcare is paid for by the state via taxes then it wouldn't. Similar arguments could be raised for education, or even law enforcement.

and this is why you never give a mouse a cookie
Last edited by Aclion on Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
How to travel to london from afar.
The left-right spectrum; an analogy.
XKI: Recruiter, TITO member
TEP: WA Executive Staff member
Forest: Cartographer
Oatland: Caesar, Cartographer

User avatar
Merconitonitopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1448
Founded: Jul 29, 2013
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Merconitonitopia » Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:42 pm

Aclion I think you are misunderstanding. Disposable income is not income after expenses, it is income after taxes.

That is true Trot. Welfare does not take $ from the populace for the gov't to spend, it takes it from one group to another and gives it to them as income. Perhaps welfare should only account for a small % of disposable income lost to account for the costs of running and managing the system.
Land and Kingdom of Merconites
Fear God and keep His Commandments

User avatar
Caelapes
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1489
Founded: Apr 30, 2007
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Caelapes » Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:49 pm

I'd argue that "welfare" in countries like Caelapes would not take the form of wages but would refer to resources used to directly provide for the sheltering and feeding of its citizens. "To each according to their need" doesn't mean the state is writing a check for people to turn around and give back to the state to receive those services. I don't think that welfare necessarily needs to be included in disposable income.

Merconitonitopia wrote:Actually that's a good point. [v], my citizens make no disposable income due to 100% tax rate. Yet, two-thirds of my economy is constituted of black market activity. Is this implying people involved in the black market turn in all of their revenue from their illegal activities in to the government? If so, that is very, uh, patriotic.

a per-capita ranking of the black market would be awesome, although I recognize that it's outside the realm of this particular beta. I've kept my black market down to 0.01% of my total economy (a per-capita equivalent of $28.62), but because this is an old nation with a lot of citizens, I'm ranked in the top 40% of the world for black market size. Having rankings for disposable income that includes black market or having a separate per-capita black market income ranking would be very nice.
     
The Rose Commune of Caelapes
Ego vero custos fratris mei sum.
aka Misley

User avatar
Trotterdam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6731
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:04 pm

Aclion wrote:
Caelapes wrote:Right, but those stats don’t directly represent the amount of funds being spent per capita to provide those services.
Oh that's a good point. We only have total now.
No, those values are per capita, or at least something that doesn't change as your nation size increases.

Aclion wrote:
Trotterdam wrote:Shouldn't Welfare count towards disposable incomes?

Another good point. Building on that, should healthcare policy affect it? I mean if you're paying for your own healthcare that's going to eat into your disposable income quite a bit(I know, I've been there), but if healthcare is paid for by the state via taxes then it wouldn't. Similar arguments could be raised for education, or even law enforcement.
Well, I'd say privately-purchased healthcare comes from disposable income. I mean, you have the choice of not paying for the healthcare and staying sick, if you want. It's your money.

It might not be a very attractive choice, but so long as you have the choice, I think it counts as disposable income.

"Income after deducting necessary expenses" would require a definition of what's "necessary expenses", a category which keeps going up as standards of life improve and greater and greater luxuries (clean running water, electricity, internet connection...) start being taken for granted as something that everyone needs to have.

Caelapes wrote:I'd argue that "welfare" in countries like Caelapes would not take the form of wages but would refer to resources used to directly provide for the sheltering and feeding of its citizens. "To each according to their need" doesn't mean the state is writing a check for people to turn around and give back to the state to receive those services. I don't think that welfare necessarily needs to be included in disposable income.
Welfare can take multiple forms, and at least some issues appear to assume the form where you're giving people money to do with as they wish. Unfortunately I don't think the game can distinguish the fine details here, it just sees you as having more or less welfare rather than different types.

User avatar
Merconitonitopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1448
Founded: Jul 29, 2013
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Merconitonitopia » Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:20 pm

Yes, that is true. I think that welfare would mean a very different thing in different countries.

Example:
In the United States, a deeply capitalistic economy, the gov't simply grabs $$$ from one demographic and dumps it on another.
While in a typical socialist utopia, the state would simply provide these necessities outright akin to breadlines.

It should then, perhaps, be determined by whether or not a nation's economy is dominated by the private sector or public sector, and to what extent that is so.



Trotterdam -- again, disposable income is income after taxes. we already have a working definition with Acilion's proposition does not adhere to.
Land and Kingdom of Merconites
Fear God and keep His Commandments

User avatar
Aclion
Minister
 
Posts: 2800
Founded: Apr 12, 2016
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Aclion » Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:43 pm

Trotterdam wrote:
Aclion wrote:Oh that's a good point. We only have total now.
No, those values are per capita, or at least something that doesn't change as your nation size increases.

Huh, shows how often I check those stats. :P

Trotterdam wrote:
Aclion wrote:Another good point. Building on that, should healthcare policy affect it? I mean if you're paying for your own healthcare that's going to eat into your disposable income quite a bit(I know, I've been there), but if healthcare is paid for by the state via taxes then it wouldn't. Similar arguments could be raised for education, or even law enforcement.
Well, I'd say privately-purchased healthcare comes from disposable income. I mean, you have the choice of not paying for the healthcare and staying sick, if you want. It's your money.

It might not be a very attractive choice, but so long as you have the choice, I think it counts as disposable income.

"Income after deducting necessary expenses" would require a definition of what's "necessary expenses", a category which keeps going up as standards of life improve and greater and greater luxuries (clean running water, electricity, internet connection...) start being taken for granted as something that everyone needs to have.

You could make the same argument for whatever a particular welfare program is providing. Though I think apparently we've confused disposable income with discretionary income.
Last edited by Aclion on Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:35 pm, edited 3 times in total.
How to travel to london from afar.
The left-right spectrum; an analogy.
XKI: Recruiter, TITO member
TEP: WA Executive Staff member
Forest: Cartographer
Oatland: Caesar, Cartographer

User avatar
United Massachusetts
Minister
 
Posts: 2056
Founded: Jan 17, 2016
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby United Massachusetts » Wed Nov 15, 2017 6:14 pm

It's interesting to say the least. It'll make me sad, but is probably a good addition.

Could we have income after expenses?
United Massachusetts
World Assembly Mission

Pro-Life Social Democratic Catholic
Ambassador: Bishop Alexander Pierce

WA Affairs Minister, The East Pacific
Assistant: Father Carl Sullivan

Fmr. President, Right to Life
Queen Yuno wrote:You have a very contradictory rep yourself, [UM].
Sanctaria wrote:We get it. You're pro-life.
Davelands wrote:(UM tries to slip another one by)
Wallenburg wrote:You've got to be the most ignorant person on this Discord.
Davelands wrote:Remember that United Mass is extremely on the religious right side. Look for hidden gotcha's for later. He is playing a long game with proposals...
"Stat crux dum volvitur orbis"
"The Cross is steady while the world is turning"


User avatar
Merconitonitopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1448
Founded: Jul 29, 2013
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Merconitonitopia » Wed Nov 15, 2017 6:45 pm

United Massachusetts wrote:It's interesting to say the least. It'll make me sad, but is probably a good addition.

Could we have income after expenses?

it would be difficult to calculate but a discretionary income would be an interesting stat. that said, let's just take it one at a time for now. this thread is for disposable income.
Land and Kingdom of Merconites
Fear God and keep His Commandments

User avatar
American MapleStory
Diplomat
 
Posts: 601
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Anarchy

Postby American MapleStory » Sun Nov 26, 2017 11:21 pm

Very good idea! We need this because a 200,000 before tax income with 80% taxes is not the same as 200,000 with 15% taxes!
Largest Metropolitans In ROM
Henesys
Leafre
Ludi
Perion
Kerning City
Ellinia
Lith Harbor
Nautilius
Ariant
Magatia
El Nath
Rien
Ereve
New Leaf City
Crimsonwood Keep
Orbis
Oros
Cras
Kokonia
Moonplace

DEFCON: 5 4 3 2 1 0
Economic Left/Right: +8.77
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: +3.67

User avatar
Western Sammarin
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: Feb 05, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Western Sammarin » Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:07 am

As someone who runs a nation >90% taxation, and have been wondering about the generous perception given by large incomes pre-tax, this seems like a perfect idea.
His Royal Majesty King Edward III
Monarch of the Kingdom of Western Sammarin
Representing those states in free association:

User avatar
Raventsvo
Envoy
 
Posts: 343
Founded: Apr 27, 2015
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Raventsvo » Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:20 am

ummm
Image

I oppose this change
Gay
Australian
Titoist

-Expansive OOC Player Factbook
-Flags Made By The Player (link fixed!)
-Personal Gulag

TGs are welcome!


Regional tumour of the International Northwestern Union

Al Imaru wrote:Podgotov'te svoy anys dlya Vtorzheniya? And what does that mean? The only word I know in that is для, which means for. The rest is nonsense, just as he promised.

User avatar
Drasnia
Minister
 
Posts: 2439
Founded: Feb 02, 2012
Anarchy

Postby Drasnia » Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:49 am

Raventsvo wrote:ummm


I oppose this change

You have a 99.5% tax rate. Of course your people aren't going to have much disposable income. If you want to improve the stat, lower your taxes.
Ransium: 911 is my worst ranked issue I’ve edited
Ransium: 777 is my second worst
Ransium: I shouldn’t edit your issues

User avatar
Caracasus
Issues Editor
 
Posts: 6181
Founded: Apr 23, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Caracasus » Mon Nov 27, 2017 1:24 am

Can't say I am against this... but I wonder if it might not be an idea to examine some of the underlying issues with tax and how it is modeled first?
As an editor I seam to spend an awful lot of thyme going threw issues and checking that they're no oblivious errars. Its a tough job but someone's got too do it!



Issues editor, not a moderator.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Technical

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Kranostav, Miss Bad Life Choices

Advertisement

Remove ads