Right Wing Discussion Thread X: Pol's closed

[Hakons]

That's a wee bit harsh.

Eh, it's just self-preservation on a national scale.

A country, particularly a developed Western one, should only accept high-skill, desirable immigrants who are willing to fully assimilate. The rest are simply a charity case, and represent a net loss to the country. What little they offer is a population surplus, which frankly should be sought through tax credits and other incentives for having children, rather than importing one's surplus population from abroad.

Is it still charity if I specifically want Christian immigrants?

[Herskerstad]

>He thinks G*rmans can be made into good Romans

It's like you've learned nothing

C'mon, we know it was you who opened the gates for the barbarians, kraut.

Ceasar's brilliant senatorial reshuffle would never come back to stab him in the back now would it?

[Sanctissima]

Eh, it's just self-preservation on a national scale.

A country, particularly a developed Western one, should only accept high-skill, desirable immigrants who are willing to fully assimilate. The rest are simply a charity case, and represent a net loss to the country. What little they offer is a population surplus, which frankly should be sought through tax credits and other incentives for having children, rather than importing one's surplus population from abroad.

Is it still charity if I specifically want Christian immigrants?

To be honest, yes, albeit selective charity.

[Herskerstad]

Eh, it's just self-preservation on a national scale.

A country, particularly a developed Western one, should only accept high-skill, desirable immigrants who are willing to fully assimilate. The rest are simply a charity case, and represent a net loss to the country. What little they offer is a population surplus, which frankly should be sought through tax credits and other incentives for having children, rather than importing one's surplus population from abroad.

Is it still charity if I specifically want Christian immigrants?

Depends on really the terms posed on any immigrant and the situations. Charity would imply at least being willing to suffer a deficit on their behalf I would imagine.

[Herskerstad]

Is it still charity if I specifically want Christian immigrants?

To be honest, yes, albeit selective charity.

Universal immigration charity would be helluva expensive.

[Herskerstad]

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=437449

new thread.

[Sanctissima]

To be honest, yes, albeit selective charity.

Universal immigration charity would be helluva expensive.

Then turn the other cheek. :^)

Yes, it would. Actually, it would be akin to national suicide, given the ramifications.