NATION

PASSWORD

Knowingly exposing others to HIV no longer a felony in Cali

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Kramania
Minister
 
Posts: 2836
Founded: Mar 14, 2017
Ex-Nation

Knowingly exposing others to HIV no longer a felony in Cali

Postby Kramania » Sat Oct 07, 2017 4:55 pm

Yep.

Additional sauce.

Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill Friday that lowers from a felony to a misdemeanor the crime of knowingly exposing a sexual partner to HIV without disclosing the infection.

The measure also applies to those who give blood without telling the blood bank that they are HIV-positive.

Modern medicine allows those with HIV to live longer lives and nearly eliminates the possibility of transmission, according to state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblyman Todd Gloria (D-San Diego), authors of the bill.

“Today California took a major step toward treating HIV as a public health issue, instead of treating people living with HIV as criminals,” Wiener said in a statement. “HIV should be treated like all other serious infectious diseases, and that’s what SB 239 does.”

Supporters of the change said the current law requires an intent to transmit HIV to justify a felony, but others noted cases have been prosecuted where there was no physical contact, so there was an argument intent was lacking.

Brown declined to comment on his action.

HIV has been the only communicable disease for which exposure is a felony under California law. The current law, Wiener argued, may convince people not to be tested for HIV, because without a test they cannot be charged with a felony if they expose a partner to the infection.

“We are going to end new HIV infections, and we will do so not by threatening people with state prison time, but rather by getting people to test and providing them access to care,” Wiener said.

Supporters of the bill said women engaging in prostitution are disproportionately targeted with criminal charges, even in cases where the infection is not transmitted.

Republican lawmakers including Sen. Joel Anderson of Alpine voted against the bill, arguing it puts the public at risk.

“I’m of the mind that if you purposefully inflict another with a disease that alters their lifestyle the rest of their life, puts them on a regimen of medications to maintain any kind of normalcy, it should be a felony,” Anderson said during the floor debate. “It’s absolutely crazy to me that we should go light on this.”

Anderson said the answer could be to extend tougher penalties to those who expose others to other infectious diseases.

So yeah, apparently Jerry Brown and his Democrat state legislature don't consider knowingly transmitting HIV to be a crime worthy of anything other than a misdemeanor charge. I don't really understand the point of doing this. It seems that it might only encourage people who have HIV to have sex without disclosing that they have it because the penalty isn't all that severe. And this will do literally nothing to lower the rate of HIV infection in California. In fact it seems like it might only exacerbate the problem.

Thoughts?
Last edited by Kramania on Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:03 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Watching my sanity slip away in my dreams

User avatar
The Alexanderians
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12558
Founded: Oct 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alexanderians » Sat Oct 07, 2017 4:57 pm

Hate to be the one to say this but can you offer more sources to strengthen the op? I like having more sources it's a better way to form arguments from.
Galloism wrote:Or we can go with feminism doesn't exist. We all imagined it. Collectively.
You can't fight the friction
Women belong in the kitchen
Men belong in the kitchen
Everyone belongs in the kitchen
Kitchen has food
I have brought dishonor to my gaming clan
Achesia wrote:Threads like this is why I need to stop coming to NSG....

Marethian Lupanar of Teladre wrote:A bright and cheerful mountain village of chapel-goers~

The Archregimancy wrote:
Hagia Sophia is best church.

Major-Tom wrote:Why am I full of apathy?

I'm just here to be the peanut gallery
уσυ нανєи'т gσт тнє fυℓℓ єffє¢т

User avatar
Kramania
Minister
 
Posts: 2836
Founded: Mar 14, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Kramania » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:01 pm

The Alexanderians wrote:Hate to be the one to say this but can you offer more sources to strengthen the op? I like having more sources it's a better way to form arguments from.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/07/health/california-hiv-bill-signed/index.html
Watching my sanity slip away in my dreams

User avatar
Shofercia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26485
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:01 pm

Are the Democrats seriously trying to not get reelected? Is this shit for real?
Ukraine - stop bombing innocent people! Pricks who burn other people alive should be punished.
The Roma are Human Beings, just like you and me.
WADA/IPC/IOC are begging Russia to form a strategic alliance with China. Perhaps it's time.
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.

(North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia! DonBass is De Facto Independent! Stand with NovoRossiya!
Tecumseh was a Real American
If you want to be act like a spoiler, remember:
The East Marches II wrote:It would be best to keep the fight over something meaningless rather than meaningful.

User avatar
Crockerland
Senator
 
Posts: 4148
Founded: Oct 15, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Crockerland » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:03 pm

Image

California is the laughingstock of the Union.

Unless they're doing this to intentionally turn people away from the Democrat party even more than they already have, in which case this is a very intelligent move.
Pro: National Liberalism, Jim Webb, Alternative power, Self-defense/gun rights (no compromise), Biodiesel, LGBT rights, Universal healthcare, Freedom of association, Constitutional carry, Conservationism
Anti: Islam, Scientology, Social "Justice", Armenian genocide denial, the UN, Unwinnable war with Syria


User avatar
Shofercia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26485
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:03 pm

Crockerland wrote:
California is the laughingstock of the Union.

Unless they're doing this to intentionally turn people away from the Democrat party even more than they already have, in which case this is a very intelligent move.


We're usually nowhere near that bad. But yeah, this fucking law is the laughing stock of the Union.
Ukraine - stop bombing innocent people! Pricks who burn other people alive should be punished.
The Roma are Human Beings, just like you and me.
WADA/IPC/IOC are begging Russia to form a strategic alliance with China. Perhaps it's time.
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.

(North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia! DonBass is De Facto Independent! Stand with NovoRossiya!
Tecumseh was a Real American
If you want to be act like a spoiler, remember:
The East Marches II wrote:It would be best to keep the fight over something meaningless rather than meaningful.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27102
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:07 pm

What a bunch of shit. Fucking terrible law.

User avatar
Herador
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5819
Founded: Mar 08, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Herador » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:18 pm

...why though?

At work so I can't go over the actual bill but was this legislation for this thing specifically or was it a consequence of a bill's wording?

Fucking dumb either way, but it would enter a whole new realm of retardation if it was stand alone.
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind"

I was angry once. Got married, sorta found god, moved from Best Coast to the other one and now I'm a whole new shitposter.

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:21 pm

Herador wrote:...why though?

At work so I can't go over the actual bill but was this legislation for this thing specifically or was it a consequence of a bill's wording?

Fucking dumb either way, but it would enter a whole new realm of retardation if it was stand alone.


Probably some really misguided effort to pay lip service to the LGBT movement.

Once you go sufficiently far down the ideological rabbit hole, few of one's actions can be rationally explained anymore.

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12793
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:21 pm

The march of sexual liberalism continues. Please kill me.
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts Eastern Orthodox Christian. Christian Agrarianist.
The Prayer of the Russians wrote:God, save the Tsar! To the glorious one, long days. Give on this earth! To the subduer of the proud, To the keeper of the weak To the comforter of everyone, Grant everything!
Yegor Ligachyov wrote:Public ownership unites, but private ownership disunites people's interests and indisputably causes social stratification of society.... For what purpose was perestroika started? For the purpose of most fully using the potential of socialism. Then does the sale of enterprises into private hands really promote the revealing of the possibilities inherent in the socialist system? No, it does not.

User avatar
The Alexanderians
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12558
Founded: Oct 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alexanderians » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:23 pm

Kramania wrote:
The Alexanderians wrote:Hate to be the one to say this but can you offer more sources to strengthen the op? I like having more sources it's a better way to form arguments from.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/07/health/california-hiv-bill-signed/index.html

Thank you good sir or madam. On my own I've seen some say on this too... Quite disturbing since from what I understand this is not the only thing that really should be considered a heinous crime that's getting downgraded...
Galloism wrote:Or we can go with feminism doesn't exist. We all imagined it. Collectively.
You can't fight the friction
Women belong in the kitchen
Men belong in the kitchen
Everyone belongs in the kitchen
Kitchen has food
I have brought dishonor to my gaming clan
Achesia wrote:Threads like this is why I need to stop coming to NSG....

Marethian Lupanar of Teladre wrote:A bright and cheerful mountain village of chapel-goers~

The Archregimancy wrote:
Hagia Sophia is best church.

Major-Tom wrote:Why am I full of apathy?

I'm just here to be the peanut gallery
уσυ нανєи'т gσт тнє fυℓℓ єffє¢т

User avatar
Albrenia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6978
Founded: Aug 18, 2017
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Albrenia » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:24 pm

Why...

I'm as much for 'sexual liberalism' as the next lefty, but intentionally infecting people with potentially deadly diseases should be a crime. Not telling people about it as you do so should be even more of a crime.

User avatar
Crockerland
Senator
 
Posts: 4148
Founded: Oct 15, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Crockerland » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:26 pm

Shofercia wrote:
Crockerland wrote:
California is the laughingstock of the Union.

Unless they're doing this to intentionally turn people away from the Democrat party even more than they already have, in which case this is a very intelligent move.


We're usually nowhere near that bad.

haha, that's a really good one.
Pro: National Liberalism, Jim Webb, Alternative power, Self-defense/gun rights (no compromise), Biodiesel, LGBT rights, Universal healthcare, Freedom of association, Constitutional carry, Conservationism
Anti: Islam, Scientology, Social "Justice", Armenian genocide denial, the UN, Unwinnable war with Syria


User avatar
Soyouso
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1515
Founded: May 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Soyouso » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:29 pm

I already lost my faith in humanity, you can't take anymore! NSG took all of it. All of it! Took everything I got, I tells ya!
OOC: Gradual factbook retcon continues, move along citizen. *absently puts gun to head*
Soyouso represents most of my beliefs. Soyouso has A S C E N D E D the chains of NStats, rewriting majority of factbooks.
"Check yourself before you Shrek yourself."

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:30 pm

Albrenia wrote:Why...

I'm as much for 'sexual liberalism' as the next lefty, but intentionally infecting people with potentially deadly diseases should be a crime. Not telling people about it as you do so should be even more of a crime.

Progress. Some weirdos even think STDs should be a source of pride, and asking your partner about them is shaming them.
Last edited by The Parkus Empire on Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53805
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:30 pm

Crockerland wrote:
Shofercia wrote:
We're usually nowhere near that bad.

haha, that's a really good one.

Well, a couple of those are really great. the $15/hr minimum wage reflects the high cost of living in california, the judge striking down the high capacity magazine ban is good too, and state's rights people oughtta be happy at California refusing to assist in the enforcement of federal law. I remember them cheering when states refused to expand medicaid.

This is the same thing, right? Right?
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:32 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:The march of sexual liberalism continues. Please kill me.

Remember how demonic possession is ultimately about harming or killing the possessed?
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15412
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:33 pm

While it looks really bad on face value, they specifically stated they were doing this, not because they thought it was okay to expose others to HIV, but because the law was being implemented in a discriminatory manner and may have even been worsening the danger it posed by discouraging people from seeking testing. As they said, HIV is the only disease that currently carries criminal penalties for its spread, and those targeted are disproportionately LGBT and poor, and particularly female prostitutes. Additionally, it has been found that intention in many of these cases were hard to verify, as well as determining if the accused were even the ones responsible for the prosecutor getting infected. The law isn't working, and as they said, actively discouraging people from undergoing testing out of fear of potential prosecution. This is not about the principle of the issue (which still has penalties for willful infection), but on looking at the failures of the previous policy and trying to implement something that may be more effective at promoting public safety and ending selective application of the law.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Pansexual, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Crockerland
Senator
 
Posts: 4148
Founded: Oct 15, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Crockerland » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:38 pm

Galloism wrote:
Crockerland wrote:haha, that's a really good one.

Well, a couple of those are really great. the $15/hr minimum wage reflects the high cost of living in california,

Which will obviously increase if businesses are forced to pay their lowest paid workers 15$ an hour.
Galloism wrote:the judge striking down the high capacity magazine ban is good too,

The ban was the problem.
Galloism wrote:and state's rights people oughtta be happy at California refusing to assist in the enforcement of federal law. I remember them cheering when states refused to expand medicaid.

This is the same thing, right? Right?

I don't think refusing to assist in the arrest of criminals and refusing to expand a healthcare program are really the same thing, not that anyone actually supports states' rights as a position unless they are on the same side of the argument as the states.
Pro: National Liberalism, Jim Webb, Alternative power, Self-defense/gun rights (no compromise), Biodiesel, LGBT rights, Universal healthcare, Freedom of association, Constitutional carry, Conservationism
Anti: Islam, Scientology, Social "Justice", Armenian genocide denial, the UN, Unwinnable war with Syria


User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:41 pm

Threlizdun wrote:While it looks really bad on face value, they specifically stated they were doing this, not because they thought it was okay to expose others to HIV, but because the law was being implemented in a discriminatory manner and may have even been worsening the danger it posed by discouraging people from seeking testing. As they said, HIV is the only disease that currently carries criminal penalties for its spread, and those targeted are disproportionately LGBT and poor, and particularly female prostitutes. Additionally, it has been found that intention in many of these cases were hard to verify, as well as determining if the accused were even the ones responsible for the prosecutor getting infected. The law isn't working, and as they said, actively discouraging people from undergoing testing out of fear of potential prosecution. This is not about the principle of the issue (which still has penalties for willful infection), but on looking at the failures of the previous policy and trying to implement something that may be more effective at promoting public safety and ending selective application of the law.


A lot of speculation and lives being gambled with to fight bigotry here.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Improved werpland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1109
Founded: May 02, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Improved werpland » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:42 pm

https://www.lambdalegal.org/blog/20170515_updating-hiv-criminal-laws-will-improve-public-health
SB 239 does not change California law with respect to disclosure of a person’s HIV status.

Current law does not require disclosure of one’s HIV-positive status prior to sexual activity. While it is true that the current HIV exposure statute applies only if the person did not disclose their HIV-positive status; mere nondisclosure isn’t a violation of the law. Rather, the person must also act with the specific intent to transmit HIV.

SB 239 would not change that.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53805
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:46 pm

Crockerland wrote:
Galloism wrote:Well, a couple of those are really great. the $15/hr minimum wage reflects the high cost of living in california,

Which will obviously increase if businesses are forced to pay their lowest paid workers 15$ an hour.


Not as much as you'd think.

The estimate back in the day was that doubling the minimum wage would raise the price of a big mac by about 20 cents (about an 8% increase).

I haven't looked recently, but it probably hasn't changed all that much.
Galloism wrote:the judge striking down the high capacity magazine ban is good too,

The ban was the problem.


Agreed.

Galloism wrote:and state's rights people oughtta be happy at California refusing to assist in the enforcement of federal law. I remember them cheering when states refused to expand medicaid.

This is the same thing, right? Right?

I don't think refusing to assist in the arrest of criminals and refusing to expand a healthcare program are really the same thing, not that anyone actually supports states' rights as a position unless they are on the same side of the argument as the states.


Well, it kinda is. California is basically saying it will not expend money to enforce federal law. Medicaid expansion was a federal law. SCOTUS ruled, essentially, that the state could not be forced to spend money to enforce federal law.

So, logical course of the argument applies here.

Regarding state's rights - yeah, kinda. Nobody believes it's state's rights unless they disagree with whatever the Fed is doing. Which means that nobody really believes it at all. It's an excuse.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Kramania
Minister
 
Posts: 2836
Founded: Mar 14, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Kramania » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:48 pm

Improved werpland wrote:https://www.lambdalegal.org/blog/20170515_updating-hiv-criminal-laws-will-improve-public-health
SB 239 does not change California law with respect to disclosure of a person’s HIV status.

Current law does not require disclosure of one’s HIV-positive status prior to sexual activity. While it is true that the current HIV exposure statute applies only if the person did not disclose their HIV-positive status; mere nondisclosure isn’t a violation of the law. Rather, the person must also act with the specific intent to transmit HIV.

SB 239 would not change that.

Yes, the penalty is being lowered from a felony to a misdemeanor.

I believe I already stated as much in my OP.
Watching my sanity slip away in my dreams

User avatar
Kramania
Minister
 
Posts: 2836
Founded: Mar 14, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Kramania » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:49 pm

Galloism wrote:
Crockerland wrote:
Which will obviously increase if businesses are forced to pay their lowest paid workers 15$ an hour.


Not as much as you'd think.

The estimate back in the day was that doubling the minimum wage would raise the price of a big mac by about 20 cents (about an 8% increase).

I haven't looked recently, but it probably hasn't changed all that much.

The ban was the problem.


Agreed.

I don't think refusing to assist in the arrest of criminals and refusing to expand a healthcare program are really the same thing, not that anyone actually supports states' rights as a position unless they are on the same side of the argument as the states.


Well, it kinda is. California is basically saying it will not expend money to enforce federal law. Medicaid expansion was a federal law. SCOTUS ruled, essentially, that the state could not be forced to spend money to enforce federal law.

So, logical course of the argument applies here.

Regarding state's rights - yeah, kinda. Nobody believes it's state's rights unless they disagree with whatever the Fed is doing. Which means that nobody really believes it at all. It's an excuse.

California needs to be broken up into new states so that San Francisco and Sacramento can no longer punish the rest of the state with uncontrolled liberalness.
Watching my sanity slip away in my dreams

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15412
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:49 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:While it looks really bad on face value, they specifically stated they were doing this, not because they thought it was okay to expose others to HIV, but because the law was being implemented in a discriminatory manner and may have even been worsening the danger it posed by discouraging people from seeking testing. As they said, HIV is the only disease that currently carries criminal penalties for its spread, and those targeted are disproportionately LGBT and poor, and particularly female prostitutes. Additionally, it has been found that intention in many of these cases were hard to verify, as well as determining if the accused were even the ones responsible for the prosecutor getting infected. The law isn't working, and as they said, actively discouraging people from undergoing testing out of fear of potential prosecution. This is not about the principle of the issue (which still has penalties for willful infection), but on looking at the failures of the previous policy and trying to implement something that may be more effective at promoting public safety and ending selective application of the law.


A lot of speculation and lives being gambled with to fight bigotry here.

Lives are already gambled with when the laws in question are disproportionately used against against the powerless. Public health policies necessitate engagement with the hardest hit communities, not continuation of a legacy of criminalization. The current laws are not working. This is an attempt to actually direct them towards something that can compliment health campaigns directed by the affected communities, rather than hampering such efforts through criminal action.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Pansexual, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

Next

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dawlat-i-Aliya, Dogmeat, Essu Beti, Fartsniffage, Firaxin, Freezic Vast, Galloism, Geneviev, Greater Arab State, Grinning Dragon, Jolthig, Khabarovsk Kray, Kowani, Kubumba Tribe, Scomagia, The Lone Alliance, The Rapture Republic, United Muscovite Nations, Valgora

Remove ads