Advertisement
by Almonaster Nuevo » Thu Aug 24, 2017 1:13 am
by States of Glory » Thu Aug 24, 2017 7:10 am
Almonaster Nuevo wrote:So the argument runs "the bad guys like being called bad, so we should pretend that all the bad shit they did never happened"?
by Fauxia » Thu Aug 24, 2017 12:43 pm
It's not that condemnations are regarded as badges by raiders, it's that that's what they are. It's a recognition of excellence at being evil within the binds of the rules. If there is anyone who didn't obey the rules, it's General HalconesAlmonaster Nuevo wrote:So the argument runs "the bad guys like being called bad, so we should pretend that all the bad shit they did never happened"?
I don't buy it. Whatever their attitude, the condemnation serves as a warning to other nations.
Opposed.
by Victores » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:17 pm
by Lainerbrook » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:30 pm
by Kaboomlandia » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:19 am
Reversla wrote:Does the result of this vote even matter? The nation that is currently being condemned is kinda . . . well, dead, as far as I can tell.
by Almonaster Nuevo » Fri Aug 25, 2017 11:00 am
States of Glory wrote:Almonaster Nuevo wrote:So the argument runs "the bad guys like being called bad, so we should pretend that all the bad shit they did never happened"?
No, it's "the bad guys cheated their way to being called bad, so the most appropriate punishment is to pretend that all the bad stuff they did never happened". I didn't realise that you supported cheats who are now Delete-on-Sight.
by States of Glory » Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:51 pm
Almonaster Nuevo wrote:States of Glory wrote:No, it's "the bad guys cheated their way to being called bad, so the most appropriate punishment is to pretend that all the bad stuff they did never happened". I didn't realise that you supported cheats who are now Delete-on-Sight.
Ooh - bad faith snark. Way to overreach.
Almonaster Nuevo wrote:It is because (s)he is a cheat that (s)he should be condemned.
Almonaster Nuevo wrote:If we can't condemn someone "because publicity", then the whole point of a condemn is lost.
by Serrus » Fri Aug 25, 2017 4:43 pm
Eastern Raarothorgren wrote:News websites are good and reasonable soruces of information or they would not be on the internet if they were saying things that were incorrect.
Keshiland wrote:I am yes arguing that the 1st 4 are not binding to the states and yes I know that in most Republican states they would ban the freedom of religion and the freedom of essembally but I don't live there and I hate guns!
by Ransium » Fri Aug 25, 2017 4:50 pm
Serrus wrote:Query: Can I have some more OOC info on Predator, out of curiosity?
by Raionitu » Fri Aug 25, 2017 5:24 pm
Almonaster Nuevo wrote:States of Glory wrote:No, it's "the bad guys cheated their way to being called bad, so the most appropriate punishment is to pretend that all the bad stuff they did never happened". I didn't realise that you supported cheats who are now Delete-on-Sight.
Ooh - bad faith snark. Way to overreach.
It is because (s)he is a cheat that (s)he should be condemned. If we can't condemn someone "because publicity", then the whole point of a condemn is lost.
Koth wrote:you guys are cool, like lately ive been watching the overal state of the raider world and been like,"ew", but you guys are very not ew
Reppy wrote:Swearing is just fucking fine on this goddamn fucking forum.
Aguaria Major wrote:The Black Hawks is essentially a regional equivalent of Heath Ledger's Joker: they just want to watch the world burn
Frisbeeteria wrote:Please stop.Please.
Souls wrote:Hi, I'm Souls. Have you embraced our lord and savior , Piling yet?
Souls wrote:Note to self: Watch out for Rai in my bedroom
Altinsane wrote:Me, about every suspiciously helpful newb I meet: "It's probably Rai."
Lord Dominator wrote:Koth is a drunken alternate personality of yours
by Mark onia » Sat Aug 26, 2017 1:44 am
by Epicus Communis » Sat Aug 26, 2017 2:55 am
Mark onia wrote:Regardless of how it is perceived by the nation condemned, a condemnation serves to say that behaviour is wrong. Repealing a condemnation sends mixed messages and no longer serves as a warning for others. For this reason mark_onia urges honorable members to vote against this repeal and any similar repeals in future.
by Kanglia » Sat Aug 26, 2017 1:37 pm
by Wrapper » Mon Aug 28, 2017 4:17 am
Repeal "Condemn General Halcones" was passed 11,836 votes to 1,767.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement