Advertisement
by Imperium Anglorum » Thu Jul 12, 2018 4:09 pm
by Imperium Anglorum » Tue Jul 24, 2018 5:31 pm
by Wallenburg » Fri Dec 21, 2018 11:09 pm
by Wallenburg » Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:54 pm
by Imperium Anglorum » Tue Jan 08, 2019 6:07 pm
by The Northern Light » Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:25 pm
Home of the WADP, Planet Eras, and the Constibillocode!
by Nagatar Karumuttu Chettiar » Sat Jan 12, 2019 9:47 am
by Borovan3 » Sat Jan 12, 2019 1:15 pm
by Imperium Anglorum » Sat Jan 12, 2019 5:29 pm
Borovan3 wrote:I don't support indexing every submitted proposal when some are embarrassing only if they have reached queue or are good
by Lord Dominator » Sat Jan 12, 2019 7:28 pm
Borovan3 wrote:I don't support indexing every submitted proposal when some are embarrassing only if they have reached queue or are good
by Wallenburg » Fri Mar 15, 2019 8:15 pm
by United Calanworie » Fri Mar 12, 2021 11:01 pm
by Wallenburg » Sat Mar 13, 2021 10:54 am
Comfed wrote:This is a good idea.
by [violet] » Sat Mar 13, 2021 8:21 pm
by Merni » Sat Mar 13, 2021 8:59 pm
[violet] wrote:I'm not sure what Elu has/had in mind, but imo this isn't practical with our current system architecture. The entire WA has to remain resident in memory and is very slow to load and save itself--it does not use a database like dispatches do. Storing a thousand or so ex-proposals would increase the size of this WA object by an order of magnitude and create a significant performance drag.
So implementation requires a pretty fundamental rewrite of how the WA stores data.
by [violet] » Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:20 am
Merni wrote:So, even the 1000 or so (GA+SC+historical) passed resolutions stay in memory? If those are somehow stored, couldn't proposals be stored the same way?
by Eluvatar » Mon Dec 11, 2023 11:24 am
[violet] wrote:I'm not sure what Elu has/had in mind, but imo this isn't practical with our current system architecture. The entire WA has to remain resident in memory and is very slow to load and save itself--it does not use a database like dispatches do. Storing a thousand or so ex-proposals would increase the size of this WA object by an order of magnitude and create a significant performance drag.
So implementation requires a pretty fundamental rewrite of how the WA stores data.
by Fachumonn » Sun Mar 17, 2024 5:36 am
by Unibot III » Sun Mar 17, 2024 12:30 pm
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Imperium Anglorum » Sun Mar 17, 2024 3:01 pm
Unibot III wrote:Is it possible to have a different part of the site infrastructure scrap the relevant pages, filter for the proposal text or failed resolution, then index by proposal ID in a different, more flexible database? Essentially the whole operation, included the recorded proposals, would live in a database separate from the WA?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Pezzaro
Advertisement