by Chinevion » Mon May 15, 2017 8:43 am
by Vassenor » Mon May 15, 2017 8:46 am
Chinevion wrote:I want to hear your opinion residents of NSG, I think they are a borderline terrorist group, but i can see why other people think differently, So what do you guys think.
by Washington Resistance Army » Mon May 15, 2017 8:49 am
by Community Values » Mon May 15, 2017 8:51 am
by Delmonte » Mon May 15, 2017 8:52 am
The Batorys wrote:The Delmontese like money, yeah, but they also like to throw down.
[b][color=#0000FF][background=red]United in Opposition to [url=http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?t=303025]Liberate Haven[/url][/background][/color][/b]
[color=#FF0000][b]Mallorea and Riva should [url=http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=303090]resign[/url][/b][/color]
by Socialist Nordia » Mon May 15, 2017 8:53 am
by The Alma Mater » Mon May 15, 2017 8:55 am
by Chinevion » Mon May 15, 2017 8:56 am
Delmonte wrote:Well, they're not really a united, governed group. So they can't "be terrorists". But if parts of them engage in terrorist activity and organize it then yes, they are terrorists.
But Antifa doesn't have membership requirements (i.e. I could be Antifa just by saying I am) so you can't say they're all terrorists.
by Tekeristan » Mon May 15, 2017 8:56 am
by Delmonte » Mon May 15, 2017 8:59 am
Chinevion wrote:Delmonte wrote:Well, they're not really a united, governed group. So they can't "be terrorists". But if parts of them engage in terrorist activity and organize it then yes, they are terrorists.
But Antifa doesn't have membership requirements (i.e. I could be Antifa just by saying I am) so you can't say they're all terrorists.
True, I would defiantly say not all of them are violent.
The Batorys wrote:The Delmontese like money, yeah, but they also like to throw down.
[b][color=#0000FF][background=red]United in Opposition to [url=http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?t=303025]Liberate Haven[/url][/background][/color][/b]
[color=#FF0000][b]Mallorea and Riva should [url=http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=303090]resign[/url][/b][/color]
by Chinevion » Mon May 15, 2017 9:02 am
Delmonte wrote:Chinevion wrote:True, I would defiantly say not all of them are violent.
Even if they were, it's an issue of self-selection. If all that is required to be a part of a group is to say "I am part of the group." you can't really paint them at all. If there was a wing of ANTIFA's movement that had membership requirements, screened people, had rigid rules, leadership, etc. They could potentially be terrorists/a terrorist group. Because it's more than just self selection.
by The Sauganash Union » Mon May 15, 2017 9:07 am
by Crockerland » Mon May 15, 2017 9:23 am
by The Emerald Legion » Mon May 15, 2017 9:26 am
by Jovian Socialist Republic » Mon May 15, 2017 9:26 am
by Edding » Mon May 15, 2017 9:33 am
by Sanctissima » Mon May 15, 2017 9:40 am
by Edding » Mon May 15, 2017 9:47 am
Sanctissima wrote:They're Communists, Anarchists and other radicals.
Be they terrorists or not, they should under no circumstances be tolerated.
by Chinevion » Mon May 15, 2017 9:58 am
Edding wrote:They probably consider themselves revolutionaries, which would overlap with terrorism a good bit, but they're so hilariously bad at it that we get spectacles like Berkeley.
Eventually, between them A)graduating, B)Getting a job, or C) "Nazis" punching back, their revolutionary operations will come to an end and they will be a footnote in history.
by Conserative Morality » Mon May 15, 2017 9:59 am
by The Emerald Legion » Mon May 15, 2017 10:02 am
Conserative Morality wrote:Rioters.
by Republic of China Pacific States » Mon May 15, 2017 10:04 am
by Neu Leonstein » Mon May 15, 2017 10:06 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Eahland, Kannap, Kostane, Neanderthaland, New Temecula, Oceanic Socialist Republics, Rusza, Sarolandia, South Neviersia, Statesburg, The Vooperian Union, Trollgaard, Verkhoyanska, Zantalio
Advertisement