SC Questions & Answers

by **Kuriko** » Tue Feb 19, 2019 12:13 pm

Blood Wine wrote:Is R3 specific enough to disallow "HEREBY, condemn Antifa." vs "HEREBY, condemns Antifa."

Unfortunately, no. It's still the same either way, despite the horrible grammar used.

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Tue Feb 19, 2019 12:15 pm

Blood Wine wrote:Is R3 specific enough to disallow "HEREBY, condemn Antifa." vs "HEREBY, condemns Antifa."

From the Compendium:

Ardchoille wrote:
in either WA chamber, if mis-spelling causes you to mis-state what you're trying to do, so that your proposal doesn't do what you say it does, it's ruled illegal. If, on the other hand, the mis-spelt word isn't essential to the understanding of the proposal, we don't kill it for that reason alone.

Unfortunately it can’t be junked for spelling.

by **Ransium** » Tue Feb 19, 2019 12:17 pm

We don’t moderate spelling/grammar that is (supposed to be) the WA’s job. The exception is if the mistake changes the meaning of the operative clause to make it not satisfy R3, but that is not the case here.

by **The Kingdom of Robertusaly** » Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:18 pm

Am I able to be a member of the security council?

by **Ransium** » Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:48 pm

If you’re part of the WA, which you are, you are part of the Security Council.

by **Hystaria** » Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:55 pm

Isnt secularism the opposite too religious(Cause the atheism rate and the devout thing)

but the numbers are so different. even though the graphs are the same but reversed.

is there a reason why?

by **Borovan entered the region as he** » Mon Feb 25, 2019 7:59 pm

Hystaria wrote:Isnt secularism the opposite too religious(Cause the atheism rate and the devout thing)

but the numbers are so different. even though the graphs are the same but reversed.

is there a reason why?

Wrong forum :eyebrow:

Secular isn't oppositie. Atheism is. Secular is just neutral or unsure of God exists.

by **Hystaria** » Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:50 pm

Borovan entered the region as he wrote:
Hystaria wrote:Isnt secularism the opposite too religious(Cause the atheism rate and the devout thing)

but the numbers are so different. even though the graphs are the same but reversed.

is there a reason why?

Wrong forum

Secular isn't opposite. Atheism is. Secular is just neutral or unsure of God exists.

I thought it meant the same cause in the NS when you click it shows an Atheism Rate under it, so thats why i was asking, also secular is a government/political thing. Agnostic is the word you're looking for.

Sorry for being in the wrong forum...

by **Borovan entered the region as he** » Mon Feb 25, 2019 11:01 pm

Hystaria wrote:
Borovan entered the region as he wrote:Wrong forum

Secular isn't opposite. Atheism is. Secular is just neutral or unsure of God exists.

I thought it meant the same cause in the NS when you click it shows an Atheism Rate under it, so thats why i was asking, also secular is a government/political thing. Agnostic is the word you're looking for.

Sorry for being in the wrong forum...

My mistake on mixing up the two. Secular would imply separate of church and state and no connection to religion. So it's like if you were to speak broadly of atheism they're synonymous. Also if you want to talk more on this you can create a thread on gp.

Also it's fine. Mistakes happen.

by **Early Collage** » Fri Mar 15, 2019 3:51 pm

How do you gain a higher position in the Security council? Why is it against the rules to ask for a higher position :?:

by **Marxist Germany** » Fri Mar 15, 2019 4:07 pm

Early Collage wrote:How do you gain a higher position in the Security council? Why is it against the rules to ask for a higher position

OOC: Because there are no positions in the security council

by **Soviet Liberal Union** » Sat Mar 16, 2019 6:07 am

Early Collage wrote:How do you gain a higher position in the Security council? Why is it against the rules to ask for a higher position

I think you meant moderator post. And you can ask, you'll just get automatically rejected

by **Borovan entered the region as he** » Sun Mar 17, 2019 1:36 pm

Early Collage wrote:How do you gain a higher position in the Security council? Why is it against the rules to ask for a higher position

There's no higher position. All WA members are in the Security council. The mods check legality of proposals but that's it.

If it's mod your asking, best way is to read this
viewtopic.php?f=16&t=85133

by **Zex Mafia** » Wed Apr 24, 2019 4:53 am

What happens to a nation that gets condemned by the WA?

by **Honeydewistania** » Wed Apr 24, 2019 4:55 am

Zex Mafia wrote:What happens to a nation that gets condemned by the WA?

A badge and nothing else

by **Bears Armed** » Wed Apr 24, 2019 6:19 am

A badge (which is a clickable link to the resolution) but nothing else.

by **Sargon Reman** » Tue May 21, 2019 7:04 am

OBSERVING that Woonsocket served an 11 month tenure as Minister of Immigration in the 10000 Islands, during which they guided regional recruiting policy and oversaw a population increase to an all-time regional population record for user created regions on November 17, 2011 with 2,200 nations, including receiving 17 different immigration awards and various distinctions including the 10000 Islands Immigration Medal of Honor,

Is mentioning UCRs legal? It seems like I saw it in other resolutions.

by **Lord Dominator** » Tue May 21, 2019 7:32 am

The only existing use of 'UCR' or 'user-created region' that I can find is the former is in the name of a conference in the Commend for Europeia.

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Tue May 21, 2019 8:24 am

Sargon Reman wrote:
OBSERVING that Woonsocket served an 11 month tenure as Minister of Immigration in the 10000 Islands, during which they guided regional recruiting policy and oversaw a population increase to an all-time regional population record for user created regions on November 17, 2011 with 2,200 nations, including receiving 17 different immigration awards and various distinctions including the 10000 Islands Immigration Medal of Honor,

Is mentioning UCRs legal? It seems like I saw it in other resolutions.

Must admit it always sounds like a 4(c) violation to me, but I can’t find a specific ruling to that effect. Might want an SC Mod to confirm or not.

by **Ransium** » Tue May 21, 2019 8:36 am

Using UCR to refer to regions is not legal, IMO. “Feeders and sinkers” is legal. UCR as a conference name in Commend Europia was legal, IMO.

by **Sargon Reman** » Sat May 25, 2019 2:12 pm

Would it work if I put "Founder-based region"?

by **Lord Dominator** » Sat May 25, 2019 2:14 pm

Saying 'a region not a Feeder or Sinker' would likely be a safer bet

by **Sargon Reman** » Sun May 26, 2019 10:31 am

Yeah but with the way its currently written that wouldn't work:

OBSERVING that Woonsocket served an 11 month tenure as Minister of Immigration in the 10000 Islands, during which they guided regional recruiting policy and oversaw a population increase to an all-time regional population record for user created regions on November 17, 2011 with 2,200 nations, including receiving 17 different immigration awards and various distinctions including the 10000 Islands Immigration Medal of Honor,

by **Marxist Germany** » Sun May 26, 2019 12:37 pm

Sargon Reman wrote:Yeah but with the way its currently written that wouldn't work:

OBSERVING that Woonsocket served an 11 month tenure as Minister of Immigration in the 10000 Islands, during which they guided regional recruiting policy and oversaw a population increase to an all-time regional population record for any region that is neither a feeder, nor a sinker on November 17, 2011 with 2,200 nations, including receiving 17 different immigration awards and various distinctions including the 10000 Islands Immigration Medal of Honor,

by **Sargon Reman** » Sun May 26, 2019 12:43 pm

Marxist Germany wrote:
Sargon Reman wrote:Yeah but with the way its currently written that wouldn't work:

Thank you for helping me through my brain freeze.

SC Questions & Answers

Security Council

Condemnations

Who is online