NATION

PASSWORD

[SUBMITTED] Government And CO

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.
User avatar
Nation of Quebec
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8217
Founded: Jan 19, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

[SUBMITTED] Government And CO

Postby Nation of Quebec » Fri Mar 24, 2017 4:27 pm

[title]Government And CO

[desc]Earlier this week, several people were sickened by carbon monoxide poisoning while waiting in a long line at a government office in downtown @@CAPITAL@@. Fortunately nobody was killed, but the incident has prompted calls for the government to install carbon monoxide detectors in its buildings and better regulate safety standards.

[validity]All

[option]"The government should be thanking it's lucky stars that there were no permanent injuries," notes government lawyer, @@RANOMNAME@@, who is relieved that nobody has decided to sue yet. "In order to abate public outcry, we need to make sure this doesn't happen again. We must install carbon monoxide detectors in every single government building in @@NAME@@, and provide government employees with the proper safety training. It may be a bit of an expense, but surely that beats a class action lawsuit, yes?"
[effect]people accuse the government of being in bed with Big Safety

[option]"Why stop at government buildings? These detectors should be installed everywhere!" enthuses your worrywort Public Safety Minister, after checking the various detectors in your office. "We need to install these detectors in schools, places of business, and even people's homes. Carbon monoxide is a threat that needs to be taken seriously. Some people may not like this being mandatory, but safety knows no price tag. After all, people spend hundreds of @@CURRENCY@@s on home security systems. The only thing that's different is that we're offering this free of charge."
[effect]conspiracy theorists allege that the government is spying on them through their carbon monoxide detectors

[option]"So once again the government is trying to solve a problem it created," complains anti-government conspiracy theorist, @@RANDOMNAME@@, setting off your sarcasm detector. "The last thing we need is the government going into people's homes and installing these things. For all we know you're planting listening devices in them! If the people want these detectors, they'll go out and buy them themselves. How about the government sticks its big nose out of things for once?"
[effect]one of the biggest killers in @@NAME@@ can't even be seen

[options]"Sounds like the problem is the buildings, not some gas," chimes in contractor @@RANDOMNAME@@. "Have you seen the state of some of these buildings? The Public Affairs building is older than you are! We need to tear down these decrepit monstrosities, and replace them with new technological marvels that can eliminate poisonous gasses before they're a threat! Will it be expensive and inconvenient? Yes, but think of how fancy and safe your new office will be!"
[effect]@@LEADER@@'s new office is the envy of many foreign leaders in @@REGION@@
Last edited by Nation of Quebec on Mon Apr 10, 2017 6:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Canadian, Left-of-Center, Cynic
Proud Atheist and Geek
All WA matters are handled by my WA puppet state of Velkia and the Islands
Please don't send me unsolicited telegrams.

User avatar
Australian rePublic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27179
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Australian rePublic » Fri Mar 24, 2017 5:08 pm

Nice issue but,

|Just curious, how does carbon monoxide get into buildings?

Also, there is a law in Australia, that says all new houses (I don't know about other buildings) must be built with a fire alarm, but old buildings don't have to be retrofitted. I wonder if that could work as an option
Hard-Core Centrist. Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right.
All in-character posts are fictional and have no actual connection to any real governments
You don't appreciate the good police officers until you've lived amongst the dregs of society and/or had them as customers
From Greek ancestry Orthodox Christian
Issues and WA Proposals Written By Me |Issue Ideas You Can Steal
I want to commission infrastructure in Australia in real life, if you can help me, please telegram me. I am dead serious

User avatar
A Humanist Resurrection
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 198
Founded: Mar 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Resurrection » Fri Mar 24, 2017 5:45 pm

Australian Republic wrote:Just curious, how does carbon monoxide get into buildings?


Faulty natural gas burners (in appliance pilot lights, propane lamp lighting, oven and stove burners, hot water heaters). Large vehicles (delivery trucks, etc) left running right outside open windows or ventilation system intakes. In some volcanic areas, you just need to put your building in a relatively low-lying spot of land.

Went camping in California once, and the local topographical map had hundreds of little red zones marked on it where if you lie down long enough to sleep, it'll probably be permanent. And if you smell rotten eggs, you're probably having a bad day. :shock:
Last edited by A Humanist Resurrection on Fri Mar 24, 2017 5:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Australian rePublic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27179
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Australian rePublic » Fri Mar 24, 2017 7:07 pm

A Humanist Resurrection wrote:
Australian Republic wrote:Just curious, how does carbon monoxide get into buildings?


Faulty natural gas burners (in appliance pilot lights, propane lamp lighting, oven and stove burners, hot water heaters). Large vehicles (delivery trucks, etc) left running right outside open windows or ventilation system intakes. In some volcanic areas, you just need to put your building in a relatively low-lying spot of land.

Went camping in California once, and the local topographical map had hundreds of little red zones marked on it where if you lie down long enough to sleep, it'll probably be permanent. And if you smell rotten eggs, you're probably having a bad day. :shock:

I see
Hard-Core Centrist. Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right.
All in-character posts are fictional and have no actual connection to any real governments
You don't appreciate the good police officers until you've lived amongst the dregs of society and/or had them as customers
From Greek ancestry Orthodox Christian
Issues and WA Proposals Written By Me |Issue Ideas You Can Steal
I want to commission infrastructure in Australia in real life, if you can help me, please telegram me. I am dead serious

User avatar
A Humanist Resurrection
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 198
Founded: Mar 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Resurrection » Fri Mar 24, 2017 10:49 pm

Nation of Quebec wrote:[desc]Earlier this week, several people were sickened by carbon monoxide poisoning while waiting in a long line at a government office in downtown @@CAPITAL@@. Fortunately nobody was killed, but the incident has prompted calls for the government to install carbon monoxide detectors in its buildings and better regulate safety standards.


Anyway, only suggestion I've got at the moment is to describe where the CO came from to begin with. If government was negligent in keeping its natural gas powered listening devices properly cleaned and maintained, it might play into option three a bit better ("government created this problem to begin with!").

User avatar
Trotterdam
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10541
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Fri Mar 24, 2017 11:07 pm

A Humanist Resurrection wrote:Anyway, only suggestion I've got at the moment is to describe where the CO came from to begin with. If government was negligent in keeping its natural gas powered listening devices properly cleaned and maintained, it might play into option three a bit better ("government created this problem to begin with!").
Of course, this would lead to someone suggesting that if you just installed better burners (or electric heating, etc.) that are certified to not produce carbon monoxide to begin with, you wouldn't need to bother with detectors which can only alert you to a problem after it's already halfway to too late. That's kinda what the last option in the current draft sounds like, but not exactly.

User avatar
A Humanist Resurrection
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 198
Founded: Mar 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Resurrection » Fri Mar 24, 2017 11:15 pm

Trotterdam wrote:Of course, this would lead to someone suggesting that if you just installed better burners (or electric heating, etc.) that are certified to not produce carbon monoxide to begin with, you wouldn't need to bother with detectors which can only alert you to a problem after it's already halfway to too late. That's kinda what the last option in the current draft sounds like, but not exactly.


All natural gas burners produce CO, since you're burning hydrocarbons. Dirty gunked up burners lead to inefficient/incomplete combustion, and thus potentially dramatically more CO production. But there is no such thing as "certified not to produce" in this area. The best you can do is "produced so slowly, natural air circulation can more than handle it (but you should have detectors in every room anyway, or you're asking for it)."
Last edited by A Humanist Resurrection on Fri Mar 24, 2017 11:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23651
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:37 pm

A Humanist Resurrection wrote:
Nation of Quebec wrote:Anyway, only suggestion I've got at the moment is to describe where the CO came from to begin with. If government was negligent in keeping its natural gas powered listening devices properly cleaned and maintained, it might play into option three a bit better ("government created this problem to begin with!").


To my mind, this level of extra detail is the sort of thing that can make an issue more unwieldy / less readable without making it any more entertaining. Sometimes it's best to keep it simple, and to not explain every bit of background. Of course, a sense of story is always nice, so if the explanation for why there's a CO excess can be done in a way that evokes an amusing mental image or funny story, then that works.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
A Humanist Resurrection
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 198
Founded: Mar 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Resurrection » Sat Mar 25, 2017 4:18 pm

Candlewhisper Archive wrote:To my mind, this level of extra detail is the sort of thing that can make an issue more unwieldy / less readable without making it any more entertaining. Sometimes it's best to keep it simple, and to not explain every bit of background. Of course, a sense of story is always nice, so if the explanation for why there's a CO excess can be done in a way that evokes an amusing mental image or funny story, then that works.


It should of course be amusing or funny. But deciding what to do about a building full of CO sort of implies/requires knowing why its full of CO. Not really a matter of explaining every bit, so much as explaining more than just "something totally random happened today."

The author only really needs to add "due to a malfunctioning central heater" or something similar.
Last edited by A Humanist Resurrection on Sat Mar 25, 2017 4:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Nation of Quebec
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8217
Founded: Jan 19, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Nation of Quebec » Tue Mar 28, 2017 4:15 pm

I think I'd prefer to leave out the scientific detail for this issue and keep it so that the layperson can understand it.
Canadian, Left-of-Center, Cynic
Proud Atheist and Geek
All WA matters are handled by my WA puppet state of Velkia and the Islands
Please don't send me unsolicited telegrams.


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads