by Donepuleopia » Fri Mar 24, 2017 2:34 am
by Achesia » Fri Mar 24, 2017 10:59 am
by Donepuleopia » Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 am
by Achesia » Sat Mar 25, 2017 5:39 am
Donepuleopia wrote:My plan is for the rebels to keep winning as the government declares martial law. I expect other countries to interfere, similar to how RL countries behave. With both overt and covert actions with conflicting goals and a varying degrees of reluctance for direct involvement.
Naturally, outside interference will have a big influence on the outcome.
by Donepuleopia » Sat Mar 25, 2017 10:20 am
by Achesia » Sun Mar 26, 2017 7:34 pm
Donepuleopia wrote:I imagine it unfolding like this. Some nations support the rebels, others support the government. They start out by sending money and then weapons, and finally military advisors. There would be a simultaneous effort to start peace talks, but they won't be successful.
Eventually one side sends in peacekeepers. However by this time the government will be too weak to stand on it's own. This time peace talks will start with the goal of creating a new government, in which the rebels take part.
Countries will choose which side to support based on their politics. Left wing governments will more likely support the government, and the right wing the rebels.
by Donepuleopia » Mon Mar 27, 2017 1:04 am
by Achesia » Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:09 am
Donepuleopia wrote:It is a hard left democracy. The governing party's top priority is social justice and recently established a Court of Human Rights. The court is concerned not so much with legal interpretation, but establishing human rights. The court can invalidate laws that violate human rights or mandate the Senate write new laws to protect rights. The Senate and President are elected, but certain parties are banned, and there are reserved seats for minorities and women.
The rebels have a mix of far right beliefs. The leaders are mostly influenced by Neoreactionary, which views all political reforms since the French Revolution, at best useless. They believe liberal democracy to be fundamentally flawed. They are post capitalist, autocratic, and anti-populist. Proposed government systems vary from hereditary monarchy to selling stock in the government, allowing stockholders to vote.
Their propaganda technique, mainly has consisted of discredited the government and getting it to betray its values. The government argues that government legitimacy comes from the people, but also believes that the government has strict ethics that must guide it.
The rebels argue, that the best government is one that is efficient and provides stability, security and prosperity.
by Gebeta » Mon Mar 27, 2017 7:24 am
Fleet Status
Alert 5
Alert 4
Alert 3 (Current Peacetime deployments)
Alert 2
Alert 1
by Gebeta » Mon Mar 27, 2017 4:00 pm
Fleet Status
Alert 5
Alert 4
Alert 3 (Current Peacetime deployments)
Alert 2
Alert 1
by Gebeta » Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:06 pm
Fleet Status
Alert 5
Alert 4
Alert 3 (Current Peacetime deployments)
Alert 2
Alert 1
by Donepuleopia » Mon Mar 27, 2017 11:34 pm
by Achesia » Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:26 am
Achesia wrote:Donepuleopia wrote:It is a hard left democracy. The governing party's top priority is social justice and recently established a Court of Human Rights. The court is concerned not so much with legal interpretation, but establishing human rights. The court can invalidate laws that violate human rights or mandate the Senate write new laws to protect rights. The Senate and President are elected, but certain parties are banned, and there are reserved seats for minorities and women.
The rebels have a mix of far right beliefs. The leaders are mostly influenced by Neoreactionary, which views all political reforms since the French Revolution, at best useless. They believe liberal democracy to be fundamentally flawed. They are post capitalist, autocratic, and anti-populist. Proposed government systems vary from hereditary monarchy to selling stock in the government, allowing stockholders to vote.
Their propaganda technique, mainly has consisted of discredited the government and getting it to betray its values. The government argues that government legitimacy comes from the people, but also believes that the government has strict ethics that must guide it.
The rebels argue, that the best government is one that is efficient and provides stability, security and prosperity.
Oh nice, so Monarchists. I can back them, my nation is a Monarchy and heavily supports other Monarchy's across the globe. So we could support these rebels with advisors, arms, and even militarily if you would like.
Is there a monarch they are trying to bring to power? Or has one mot been chosen yet?
Who do you want to win in the end?
by Donepuleopia » Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:36 am
by Achesia » Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:42 am
Donepuleopia wrote:I forgot to answer the question about the monarchy. There is no candidate at the moment. The rebels are themselves divided, only united in the war. If they were to win tomorrow, they wouldn't know how to rule. They are just now controlling enough territory where they have to create their own government.
Of course, if your nation was providing support then, that would give your nation a lot of influence.
by Impireacht » Tue Mar 28, 2017 8:43 am
by Achesia » Tue Mar 28, 2017 8:45 am
Impireacht wrote:Impireacht will start by simply supplying the rebels with equipment. Our intention in the war is ultimately to help the rebels win, but to then cause their collapse (expect plenty of Impirean Intelligence agents in the RP). After this, our hope is that the state will devolve into a state of anarchy with the lack of any central government, and we will be able to lay claim to some of what is left of the nation(s) in order to restore order and rebuild society as according to our own political ideals.
(Old Impireacht would have helped the government, but we've had a major red scare over the past year or so, fueled by many cold-war like conflicts with far-left nations, so at this point we won't really support anything left of 5.0 economic rating on the political compass...)
by Impireacht » Tue Mar 28, 2017 8:53 am
Achesia wrote:Impireacht wrote:Impireacht will start by simply supplying the rebels with equipment. Our intention in the war is ultimately to help the rebels win, but to then cause their collapse (expect plenty of Impirean Intelligence agents in the RP). After this, our hope is that the state will devolve into a state of anarchy with the lack of any central government, and we will be able to lay claim to some of what is left of the nation(s) in order to restore order and rebuild society as according to our own political ideals.
(Old Impireacht would have helped the government, but we've had a major red scare over the past year or so, fueled by many cold-war like conflicts with far-left nations, so at this point we won't really support anything left of 5.0 economic rating on the political compass...)
I already have the role of supplying/aiding and militarily supporting the rebels. They would be Achesian backed meant to install a Monarchy.
by Achesia » Tue Mar 28, 2017 8:56 am
Impireacht wrote:Achesia wrote:
I already have the role of supplying/aiding and militarily supporting the rebels. They would be Achesian backed meant to install a Monarchy.
You realize there can be more than one faction supporting the rebels, right? Especially when there are multiple factions of rebels... if our aid to the rebels angers you, you're welcome to come and settle your grievances on the battlefield. Otherwise, consider me a third faction.
by Impireacht » Tue Mar 28, 2017 8:59 am
Achesia wrote:Impireacht wrote:
You realize there can be more than one faction supporting the rebels, right? Especially when there are multiple factions of rebels... if our aid to the rebels angers you, you're welcome to come and settle your grievances on the battlefield. Otherwise, consider me a third faction.
Yes however as I recommended to the OP that my role would be that of uniting the rebels. I suppose your idea would fit into that, however I will wait to see what he has to say.
And no I do not start IC conflicts for OOC reasons, it is bad ettiequte.
by Achesia » Tue Mar 28, 2017 9:02 am
Impireacht wrote:Achesia wrote:
Yes however as I recommended to the OP that my role would be that of uniting the rebels. I suppose your idea would fit into that, however I will wait to see what he has to say.
And no I do not start IC conflicts for OOC reasons, it is bad ettiequte.
Well, I meant ICly if your government sees our support as an attempt to undermine your efforts, you could always start a conflict.
by Gebeta » Tue Mar 28, 2017 9:40 am
Fleet Status
Alert 5
Alert 4
Alert 3 (Current Peacetime deployments)
Alert 2
Alert 1
Advertisement
Return to International Incidents
Users browsing this forum: European Federal Union, Final Ground, Janpia
Advertisement