by Mahdistan » Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:59 pm
by Socio Polor » Mon Jan 16, 2017 4:21 pm
by Trotterdam » Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:09 am
Can you link a source for that?Socio Polor wrote:I'm not sure if you know this but in RL they really are planning on coming out with a device that can record dreams sometime in the future. Really interesting issue you have here
by USS Monitor » Tue Jan 17, 2017 1:18 am
by Mahdistan » Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:58 pm
Trotterdam wrote:The spelling is pretty good too, the only nits I can find right now are that "capitalizeSocio Polor wrote:I'm not sure if you know this but in RL they really are planning on coming out with a device that can record dreams sometime in the future. Really interesting issue you have hered" in the description should have the "d" removed, and the second option is missing a closing quote.
USS Monitor wrote:If you can read people's dreams, it probably wouldn't be a huge step to use the same technology to record things that people experience while awake. That would have interesting applications for government surveillance. Even in nations that aren't Orwellian dictatorships and wouldn't use it as surveillance on ordinary citizens, it could be used to make sure government agents and police officers are not abusing their authority.
As written, I think the 2nd option is unrealistic, because what people dream about is not necessarily a reflection of what they want.
by Australian rePublic » Tue Jan 17, 2017 1:39 pm
by Mahdistan » Tue Jan 17, 2017 2:14 pm
Australian Republic wrote:I know that status qjo options are a no-no, but what about an option where evryone is free to record there dreams, and everyone is free to do whatever they want with that film, and the police only investigate with a warrant, you know-just like a regular video camera
by Trotterdam » Tue Jan 17, 2017 3:14 pm
by The United Providences of Perland » Tue Jan 17, 2017 3:31 pm
by Mahdistan » Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:08 pm
Trotterdam wrote:I kinda interpreted that as being what the third option is about - the government doesn't force you to record your dreams (even with a search warrant), but you can still purchase that as a commercial service if you want to (with implied possibility of abuse of power by the service-provider to give it a downside).
The United Providences of Perland wrote:My fear is that this is too high tech for most nations...
by Australian rePublic » Tue Jan 17, 2017 8:53 pm
Mahdistan wrote:Australian Republic wrote:I know that status qjo options are a no-no, but what about an option where evryone is free to record there dreams, and everyone is free to do whatever they want with that film, and the police only investigate with a warrant, you know-just like a regular video camera
That was the direction I was going with the first option; I'll edit it to express that more.
by Mahdistan » Tue Jan 17, 2017 9:36 pm
by Australian rePublic » Tue Jan 17, 2017 11:37 pm
Mahdistan wrote:Australian Republic wrote:Yea, I got that, but why is it linked to mental illness?
I figured that'd be the most useful application for a technology like that; doctors being able to investigate mental issues and trauma through dreams, when the mind would be the most vulnerable. Option 3 would just leave it open as entertainment for individuals.
by Trotterdam » Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:29 am
by Bedetopia » Wed Jan 18, 2017 4:04 am
Trotterdam wrote:That said, NationStates does already have several superscience elements in issues. If dream-reading technology is accepted as existing, then the dilemma presented by this issue is quite valid and the spread of options is good. The main question is whether the editors think that allowing this technology into NationStates canon is a good idea, and I have no real opinion on that - I think this issue is well-written and presents an interesting dilemma, but I can also see such technology being rather disruptive to the standard narrative.
by Australian rePublic » Wed Jan 18, 2017 4:56 am
by Australian rePublic » Wed Jan 18, 2017 5:05 am
by Drasnia » Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:26 pm
Bedetopia wrote:Trotterdam wrote:That said, NationStates does already have several superscience elements in issues. If dream-reading technology is accepted as existing, then the dilemma presented by this issue is quite valid and the spread of options is good. The main question is whether the editors think that allowing this technology into NationStates canon is a good idea, and I have no real opinion on that - I think this issue is well-written and presents an interesting dilemma, but I can also see such technology being rather disruptive to the standard narrative.
This raises an interesting point. What if once there are enough issues a tech level option could be added so that you can choose if you want PT (nobility ranks for example) and FT (vats for example) issues? This could also open the gates to a whole new stream of issues directed at those tech levels, things that would let players feel like real old-fashioned kings or galactic conquerors.
As for the issue itself, I also think option 2 is the only problematic one for the reasons given above. Lucid dreaming is too rare, dreams are random elements thrown together in a chaotic manner. I suggest that you replace it with a crazy military scientist planning to improve it so that you can go full-on Sybil System, but that's just as ridiculous.
by Mahdistan » Wed Jan 18, 2017 2:36 pm
Australian Republic wrote:What about an advertiser who wants to use the technology for marketing, like in Futurama?
Australian Republic wrote:Mahdistan wrote:I figured that'd be the most useful application for a technology like that; doctors being able to investigate mental issues and trauma through dreams, when the mind would be the most vulnerable. Option 3 would just leave it open as entertainment for individuals.
Yea, but say for example, I, for whatever reason wanted to remember my dream, why would I need to go through a physcologist?
by Mahdistan » Wed Jan 18, 2017 2:43 pm
Bedetopia wrote:As for the issue itself, I also think option 2 is the only problematic one for the reasons given above. Lucid dreaming is too rare, dreams are random elements thrown together in a chaotic manner. I suggest that you replace it with a crazy military scientist planning to improve it so that you can go full-on Sybil System, but that's just as ridiculous.Trotterdam wrote:That said, NationStates does already have several superscience elements in issues. If dream-reading technology is accepted as existing, then the dilemma presented by this issue is quite valid and the spread of options is good. The main question is whether the editors think that allowing this technology into NationStates canon is a good idea, and I have no real opinion on that - I think this issue is well-written and presents an interesting dilemma, but I can also see such technology being rather disruptive to the standard narrative.
by Trotterdam » Wed Jan 18, 2017 4:13 pm
Dream-writing is, of course, a completely different technology from dream-reading. I don't know how much more research it would take, but maybe it would be better for a follow-up issue.Mahdistan wrote:I will rewrite it, although I have another idea for it; instead, the advisor suggesting to insert dreams, as opposed to just monitoring.
by Mahdistan » Wed Jan 18, 2017 8:25 pm
Trotterdam wrote:Dream-writing is, of course, a completely different technology from dream-reading. I don't know how much more research it would take, but maybe it would be better for a follow-up issue.Mahdistan wrote:I will rewrite it, although I have another idea for it; instead, the advisor suggesting to insert dreams, as opposed to just monitoring.
Dream-writing could again have multiple uses: giving everyone patriotic dreams to promote loyalty, companies inserting advertisements into people's dreams (as per Australian Republic), entertainment use as an effective virtual reality to allow you to experience adventures in the first person, etc.
by Mahdistan » Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:30 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement