If I missed possible validity criteria for the issue or in option 2 let me know.
Also, considering the slightly altered title of 'Vets Vociferous Vocalize Voting Views', what do you think?
[title]Veterans Vocalize Voting Views
[desc]A new political action group, called "Voting with Valor", is advocating that only citizens actively serving in the military or who have been honorable discharged from the military be permitted to vote. The debate has become rather heated, with Voting with Valor supporters questioning why @@NAME@@'s unpatriotic, disgraceful, duty shirking citizens should be able to influence governance, and the opposition claiming this is an attempt to codify the rule of military-industrial complex over the democratic state. To clear your head from the controversy, you've decided to go on a early morning jog.
[validity]must be democracy, must have substantial military spending
[option]While jogging, you realize a drill sergeant and a platoon of cadets, each wearing a Voting with Valor pin, have begun jogging behind you. They begin a call-and-response jodie: "I don't know what I've been told, but non-veterans voting is far too bold. In order to vote one must be willing to make a sacrifice, voters should prove they're braver than mice. Veteran-only voting would be most wise, the positive effects may be a surprise. Honorable soldiers know the seriousness of war, unnecessary aggression you can be sure veteran's deplore. It would have one more benefit if I might say, you can bet soldiers would get better pay."
[effect]Veteran appreciation day and voting day are difficult to distinguish
[option validity]some group (women, men, gays, non-gays transsexuals, foreigners etc.) must not be allowed to serve in the military
[option]After you and the platoon separate, Bigtopian-born, bisexual, transsexual known only as Ryan jogs up to you, "All well and good, but so long as not everyone is allowed to serve in the military, then you're effectively disenfranchising parts of the electorate. If you're going to limit the vote to current and former soldiers, you must also let everyone serve in the military, too."
[effect]all are allowed to serve in @@NAME@@'s military and must do so if they want to vote
[option]As you begin your cool-down, @@RANDOMNAMEMALE@@, an out-of-shape voting rights activist, sidles up to you. "Look," he wheezes between gasps for air, "if we get into the business of saying which citizens get to vote, it's a slippery slope to dictatorship, no matter how noble the intentions. If you ask me, we need to limit the ability of the military and associated groups to lobby the legislature. I think lawmakers can already appreciate the importance of a well-functioning military without having an unimpeachable wheelchair-bound vet further pressuring them."
[effect]veterans are not allowed to take tours of @@CAPITAL@@ for fear of unfairly influencing the legislature
[option]As you begin your post-workout shower, you're chagrined to hear the voice of former psychologist and current Secretary of Veterans' Affairs on the other side of the shower curtain, "Pardon the interruption @@LEADER@@," she says, "but I must weigh in on this matter. I think you must understand the currently dysfunctional and co-dependent government-military relationship from which Voting with Valor members' feelings arise. The government must work to holistically empower current and former soldiers. Specifically, the situation might be remedied with increases to current pay; pensions for disabled vets; and the availability of physical and, of course, mental healthcare. I'm confident these changes would be effective cures to this current psychosis Voting with Valor represents.."
[effect]disabled veteran soldiers are @@NAME@@'s nouveau riche
But I've changed it.
