by The Lefty Sinisters » Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:04 pm
by The Lefty Sinisters » Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:08 pm
by Carlotopia » Thu Mar 04, 2010 6:01 pm
by South Norwega » Fri Mar 05, 2010 1:41 am
by Former Principalities » Fri Mar 05, 2010 1:49 am
by The Most Glorious Hack » Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:27 am
by Collective Systems » Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:57 am
by Reich1 » Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:04 am
by Collective Systems » Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:06 am
by Topid » Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:44 pm
Reich1 wrote:OK. I am not supposed to ask you question as you are asking us but still.......
Why do you want to take your state to total destruction by making it Anarchy?
by Reich1 » Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:09 am
Topid wrote:Reich1 wrote:OK. I am not supposed to ask you question as you are asking us but still.......
Why do you want to take your state to total destruction by making it Anarchy?
Look at Hack's stats above you, his economy is way better than mine, and he's an anarchy. So I'd say the nation isn't turned to 'total destruction' when it becomes an anarchy, it appears to do just fine in some cases.
by South Norwega » Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:28 am
Reich1 wrote:Topid wrote:Reich1 wrote:OK. I am not supposed to ask you question as you are asking us but still.......
Why do you want to take your state to total destruction by making it Anarchy?
Look at Hack's stats above you, his economy is way better than mine, and he's an anarchy. So I'd say the nation isn't turned to 'total destruction' when it becomes an anarchy, it appears to do just fine in some cases.
Hack's economy is better than yours but far behind than mine and I am not even in far right; opposite of Anarchy. And his economy is better than yours cos he's been in NS for a long-long time. I am in NS from 3 months and still I have a far-good economy than his. So see! his economy is not so good as you think.
by Reich1 » Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:47 am
South Norwega wrote:Reich1 wrote:Topid wrote:Reich1 wrote:OK. I am not supposed to ask you question as you are asking us but still.......
Why do you want to take your state to total destruction by making it Anarchy?
Look at Hack's stats above you, his economy is way better than mine, and he's an anarchy. So I'd say the nation isn't turned to 'total destruction' when it becomes an anarchy, it appears to do just fine in some cases.
Hack's economy is better than yours but far behind than mine and I am not even in far right; opposite of Anarchy. And his economy is better than yours cos he's been in NS for a long-long time. I am in NS from 3 months and still I have a far-good economy than his. So see! his economy is not so good as you think.
Say what?
http://nseconomy.thirdgeek.com/nseconom ... ion=Reich1
http://nseconomy.thirdgeek.com/nseconom ... rious+Hack
More than double, in GDP Per Capita.
Here they are side by side:
http://nstracker.org/index.php?nation=r ... =&nation6=
by Greater Minangkabau » Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:54 am
by South Norwega » Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:47 am
Reich1 wrote:South Norwega wrote:Reich1 wrote:Topid wrote:Reich1 wrote:OK. I am not supposed to ask you question as you are asking us but still.......
Why do you want to take your state to total destruction by making it Anarchy?
Look at Hack's stats above you, his economy is way better than mine, and he's an anarchy. So I'd say the nation isn't turned to 'total destruction' when it becomes an anarchy, it appears to do just fine in some cases.
Hack's economy is better than yours but far behind than mine and I am not even in far right; opposite of Anarchy. And his economy is better than yours cos he's been in NS for a long-long time. I am in NS from 3 months and still I have a far-good economy than his. So see! his economy is not so good as you think.
Say what?
http://nseconomy.thirdgeek.com/nseconom ... ion=Reich1
http://nseconomy.thirdgeek.com/nseconom ... rious+Hack
More than double, in GDP Per Capita.
Here they are side by side:
http://nstracker.org/index.php?nation=r ... =&nation6=
Thriving is NOT better than All-Consuming.
by Greater Weedania » Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:53 am
The Lefty Sinisters wrote:I try to make my nation as free as possible but it says left-leaning college state. It's hard to tell which choice in the issues will make my nation go more left.
Please help. If I have to make a new nation, fine, but I just want an anarchy really bad.
Martaz wrote:Sweden population is 50% muslim and 50% atheist thanks to your fucking socialism
by RichardIII » Sat Nov 28, 2015 3:45 am
Collective Systems wrote:It is ultimate libertarianism, far left. Just like the far right is total control.
It's just another political viewpoint.
by Kaievia » Sat Nov 28, 2015 3:47 am
by Cora II » Sat Nov 28, 2015 4:01 am
by Kraylandia » Sat Nov 28, 2015 4:02 am
Cora II wrote:Gravedig and an anarchic act! (Anarchy in action won't remove the responsibility set by the rules)
When creating the anarchy on arrival, choose 'anarchic' government style, and leave all 8 questions blank.
However, read terms&conditions. Proceed!
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Commune of Prosperity, Lythusia, Quebecshire, The Ever-Wanderer, Varanius, Vleerian, Vorkat
Advertisement