United States of Stalinia wrote:Wouldn't it be more wise to, instead of just repealing this resolution, propose a more adequate an detailed version?
DELEGATE-AMBASSADOR SMITH: "I was about to say something, but Ambassador Bell beat me to it."
Advertisement
by Tinhampton » Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:45 pm
United States of Stalinia wrote:Wouldn't it be more wise to, instead of just repealing this resolution, propose a more adequate an detailed version?
by Los Marcos » Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:59 pm
by Tinhampton » Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:07 pm
Los Marcos wrote:Repealing this act is a superfluous action. Instead a amendment to the original law must be enacted. Define what needs to be defined. Fix what needs to be fixed. and Clarify what isnt clarified. DO NOT fix what isnt broken. we do not need to repeal this. we need to modify it. Vote no.
by De Iskalde Brenningfjordene » Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:23 pm
by Wallenburg » Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:27 pm
De Iskalde Brenningfjordene wrote:Shouldn't we have a repeal and replace sort of measure? It's kind of like Obamacare in the RW. Yeah it sucks and needs to be gone, but you have to have a replacement plan. Shouldn't we have that plan ready to go and a part of this resolution so that there is no gap in quarantine protocol?
by United States of Stalinia » Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:52 pm
by Almonaster Nuevo » Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:56 pm
by Arkadian Nations » Thu Nov 03, 2016 4:06 pm
by Separatist Peoples » Thu Nov 03, 2016 4:31 pm
Arkadian Nations wrote:Seems somewhat nonsensical that there is no amendment system in place. It would make these proceedings much easier. I would call for legislation legalizing votes on amendments, and am happy to support such legislation upon debate.
Make Fetch Happen!
by Virginian Inquisitors » Thu Nov 03, 2016 4:35 pm
by Wallenburg » Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:45 pm
Almonaster Nuevo wrote:I would be a lot happier with this if there were a proposed replacement.
Arkadian Nations wrote:Seems somewhat nonsensical that there is no amendment system in place. It would make these proceedings much easier. I would call for legislation legalizing votes on amendments, and am happy to support such legislation upon debate.
by Excidium Planetis » Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:23 pm
United States of Stalinia wrote:Then let us emplace legislation that makes amendments legal, rather than re-writing everything from scratch
Arkadian Nations wrote:Seems somewhat nonsensical that there is no amendment system in place. It would make these proceedings much easier. I would call for legislation legalizing votes on amendments, and am happy to support such legislation upon debate.
Virginian Inquisitors wrote:I agree with other comments made here about an amendment system. However, in lieu of that, it is necessary to repeal and then replace a resolution with something better. I support the repeal.
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:You didn't know about Excidium? The greatest space nomads in the NS multiverse with a healthy dose (read: over 9000 percent) of realism?
Saveyou Island wrote:"Warmest welcomes to the Assembly, ambassador. You'll soon learn to hate everyone here."
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Digital Network Defence is pretty meh
News: AI wins Dawn Fleet election for High Counselor.
by The Atlae Isles » Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:43 am
by States of Glory WA Office » Fri Nov 04, 2016 3:43 pm
by Frustrated Franciscans » Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:56 am
by Umeria » Sat Nov 05, 2016 3:52 pm
Varvuk wrote:this is ridicolous, if this resolution was so bad written why did it came to our tables to vote, please make better resolutions otherwise we are just wasting time.
Frustrated Franciscans wrote:We are opposed to this repeal which we believe is merely nit picking.
by Potted Plants United » Sun Nov 06, 2016 5:28 am
Separatist Peoples wrote:"NOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPE!"
- Mr. Bell, when introduced to PPU's newest moving plant
by Zasnia » Sun Nov 06, 2016 6:04 pm
by Umeria » Sun Nov 06, 2016 6:08 pm
Zasnia wrote:I agree that there are loopholes in this resolution. However, this proposal though with its faults does improve the conditions for those which the act affects. Repealing the proposal and starting all from scratch again may not be the best idea. Make a proposal that is built on top of what 385 has completed, then repeal and put up the revised proposal.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement