Galloism wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:The interesting thing about this conversation is that publishing the name and the crime of the accused is protection for the accused. This way they do not disappear into the night and fog. And the proceedings can be followed by the public to ensure a fair process.
Arguably, we could devise a system where it's the choice of the defense.
You don't even need a specific system for that - just add "unless authorised by the defendant or their representative" to whatever legislation you're drafting. That way all a newspaper needs is a letter or something from their lawyer saying it's OK.