Advertisement
by Frustrated Franciscans » Fri Jun 12, 2015 12:33 pm
by RiderSyl » Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:42 am
Kanaia wrote:Are we really taking away Uni's badge?
by Kanaia » Sun Jun 14, 2015 8:29 am
[violet] wrote:Never underestimate the ability of admin to do nothing.
by Benevolent Thomas » Sun Jun 14, 2015 8:50 am
Kanaia wrote:I'm well aware of the reasons. I believe I voted against the resolution in the first place, something I was here for and you were not. Let's not pretend that this is anything other than a personal vendetta by one player against another, or perhaps several players against another.
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.
by Nemeth » Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:57 pm
Kanaia wrote:I'm well aware of the reasons. I believe I voted against the resolution in the first place, something I was here for and you were not. Let's not pretend that this is anything other than a personal vendetta by one player against another, or perhaps several players against another.
by Benevolent Thomas » Sun Jun 14, 2015 3:02 pm
Cormac Pendrake
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.
by Benevolent Thomas » Sun Jun 14, 2015 4:17 pm
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.
by Kanaia » Sun Jun 14, 2015 4:52 pm
Nemeth wrote:Kanaia wrote:I'm well aware of the reasons. I believe I voted against the resolution in the first place, something I was here for and you were not. Let's not pretend that this is anything other than a personal vendetta by one player against another, or perhaps several players against another.
Was it a personal vendetta when you voted against the resolution in the first place? I'm trying to determine why this is definitely a personal vendetta, in your view, now, but voting against it when it was first proposed wasn't a personal vendetta.
For the record, there is no personal vendetta involved here. Many of the things for which Unibot was commended a) weren't accurate in the first place, or b) have been rendered non-commendable due to events that have transpired since then (e.g., his abandonment of Eastern Islands of Dharma). Most importantly, Unibot II existed at the time of commendation and doesn't exist anymore, because it was deleted for site rules violations. Those who so egregiously violate site rules that their main nations get deleted not only once, but twice, shouldn't remain commended. You can call that a personal vendetta if you want, but I would call it common sense.
[violet] wrote:Never underestimate the ability of admin to do nothing.
by Nemeth » Sun Jun 14, 2015 5:57 pm
Kanaia wrote:1. Voting against a resolution =/= drafting and putting a repeal forward with little or no community input. Additionally, I lack an extensive personal history with Uni, you do not.
2. A) All resolutions have some measure of inaccuracy. This one was picked purposefully by you, not due to its content, but due to its commended. B) That things change does not mean that they did not matter. Lot's of effort went into Dharma, it's not as if he purposefully destroyed it. 3) Except, that we do commend those who were deleted for site rules violations; See Unibot II commendation after DEAT of Unibot.
by Naginii » Mon Jun 15, 2015 9:13 am
Kanaia wrote:
3) Except, that we do commend those who were deleted for site rules violations; See Unibot II commendation after DEAT of Unibot.
by Todd McCloud » Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:52 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement