NATION

PASSWORD

[RE-DRAFT] Prohibiting Animal Abuse

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.
User avatar
Losthaven
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 393
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

[RE-DRAFT] Prohibiting Animal Abuse

Postby Losthaven » Mon Jun 08, 2015 7:28 pm

Prohibiting Animal Abuse
Category: Moral Decency ~*~ Strength: Significant

The Member Nations of the World Assembly:

Recognizing that animals are sentient beings capable of experiencing stress, fear, and pain;

Convinced that there is no just cause for intentionally abusing an animal, and that animals should be cared for in ways that support a healthy life free from suffering;

Resolved that animal abuse is utterly unjustifiable and should be universally condemned and prohibited;

Saddened that some individuals continue to permit or perpetrate acts of animal abuse out of antipathy, intransigence, and even malicious character;

Resolved that putting an end to unjustifiable cruelty - wherever possible - is part of what it means to make the world a better place, one resolution at a time;

Now, therefore, the General Assembly hereby enacts the following provisions, subject to the rules and laws set by earlier WA resolutions that are still in force:

1. Defines an "animal" for the purposes of this resolution as any non-person species that is capable of experiencing pain, stress, and fear.

2. Prohibits the intentional abuse of animals. "Abuse" has its ordinary meaning and includes:
  • causing an animal serious and debilitating bodily disfigurement,
  • inflicting physical trauma or intense pain on an animal,
  • recklessly abandoning an animal or otherwise placing the animal at grave risk of death, injury, disfigurement or disease,
  • torturing an animal,
  • sexually assaulting an animal, and
  • maliciously or cruelly killing an animal;
3. Clarifies that the following acts do not constitute abuse:
  • acts of veterinary medicine and emergency aid,
  • animal research that is conducted for a scientific purpose and does not needlessly inflict pain or suffering,
  • killing an animal for food or other consumption, so long as the methods used are not cruel, unnecessarily slow, or needlessly painful,
  • acts of pest control, including any reasonable method of dealing with pests that is not cruel or malicious,
  • the employment of properly trained animals in potentially dangerous situations or occupations - such as law enforcement animals, guard dogs, war horses, and other service animals,
  • acts based on the science of animal breeding and appropriate care;
4. Declares that individuals have an absolute right to defend themselves and others against a hostile animal, and nothing in this law shall be read to prevent or prohibit reasonable acts of self-defense;

5. Outlaws the use of animals in fighting sports, or any other exhibition where the purpose of the exhibition endangers the long term health and safety of the animal;

6. Requires that any person who keeps an animal must provide that animal with reasonable and appropriate care, including:
  • food of appropriate quantity and quality to keep the animal healthy,
  • access to a sufficient quantity of clean water to satisfy the animal's needs,
  • sufficient space for exercise as necessary for the health of the animal,
  • regular maintenance of the animal's space to keep it reasonably free of debris, waste, and disease, if the animal is kept in an enclosure,
  • shelter, refuge, or other appropriate protective barriers that supply reasonable protection from weather and injury, and
  • adequate attention and care to keep the animal reasonably free from distress, injury, neglect and disease;
7. Further requires that any person who keeps an animal must, to the best of their means and ability, provide the animal with access to professional veterinary care deemed necessary for the health of the animal.

Prohibiting Animal Abuse
Category: Moral Decency ~*~ Strength: Significant

The Member Nations of the World Assembly:

Recognizing that animals are sentient beings capable of experiencing stress, fear, and pain;

Convinced that there is no just cause for intentionally abusing an animal, and that animals should be cared for in ways that support a healthy life free from suffering;

Resolved that animal abuse is utterly unjustifiable and should be universally condemned and prohibited;

Now, therefore, the General Assembly hereby enacts the following provisions, subject to the rules and laws set by earlier WA resolutions that are still in force:

1. Defines an "animal" for the purposes of this resolution as any non-person species of mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish.

2. Prohibits the intentional abuse of animals, including:
  • causing an animal serious and debilitating bodily disfigurement;
  • inflicting physical trauma or intense pain on an animal;
  • recklessly abandoning an animal or otherwise placing the animal at grave risk of death, injury, disfigurement or disease;
  • torturing an animal;
  • sexually assaulting an animal; and
  • maliciously or cruelly killing an animal;
3. Clarifies that the following acts do not constitute abuse and are not prohibited by this resolution:
  • acts of veterinary medicine - including the acts of a licensed veterinarian taken in the course of caring for an animal, emergency aid provided to an animal in distress, and any other acts based on sound veterinary science;
  • animal research that is conducted for a legitimate scientific purpose and does not needlessly inflict pain or suffering;
  • butchering, slaughtering, or killing an animal for food or other consumption, so long as the methods used are not cruel and the animal is killed as swiftly and painlessly as possible;
  • acts of pest control, including any reasonable method of dealing with pests that is not unnecessarily cruel,
  • the employment of properly trained animals in potentially dangerous situations or occupations - such as law enforcement animals, guard dogs, war horses, and other service animals - so long as the animal is adequately handled for use in such situations and the intent is to avoid harm to the animal,
  • acts based on the science of animal breeding and appropriate care;
4. Outlaws the use of animals in fighting sports, or any other exhibition where the purpose, theme, or substance of the exhibition endangers the long term health and safety of the animal;

5. Requires that any person who keeps an animal - whether commercially, as a pet, or for any other purpose - must provide that animal with reasonable and appropriate care, including:
  • food of appropriate quantity and quality to keep the animal healthy,
  • access to a sufficient quantity of clean water to satisfy the animal's needs,
  • sufficient space for exercise as necessary for the health of the animal,
  • regular maintenance of the animal's space to keep it reasonably free of debris, waste, and disease, if the animal is kept in an enclosure,
  • shelter, refuge, or other appropriate protective barriers that supply reasonable protection from weather and injury, and
  • adequate personal attention and care necessary to keep the animal free from distress, injury, neglect and disease;
6. Further requires that any person who keeps an animal must, to the best of their means and ability, provide the animal with access to professional veterinary care deemed necessary to relieve the animal from distress, injury, neglect or disease.

Prohibiting Animal Abuse
Category: Moral Decency ~*~ Strength: Significant

The Member Nations of the World Assembly:

Recognizing that animals are sentient beings capable of experiencing stress, fear, and pain;

Convinced that there is no just cause for intentionally abusing an animal, and that animals should be cared for in ways that support a healthy life free from suffering;

Resolved that animal abuse is utterly unjustifiable and should be universally condemned and prohibited;

Now, therefore, the General Assembly hereby enacts the following provisions, subject to the rules and laws set by earlier WA resolutions that are still in force:

1. Defines an "animal" for the purposes of this resolution as any non-person species of mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish.

2. Prohibits the intentional abuse of animals, including:
  • causing an animal serious and debilitating bodily disfigurement;
  • inflicting physical trauma or intense pain on an animal;
  • recklessly abandoning an animal or otherwise placing the animal at grave risk of death, injury, disfigurement or disease;
  • torturing an animal;
  • sexually assaulting an animal; and
  • maliciously or cruelly killing an animal;
3. Clarifies that the following acts do not constitute abuse and are not prohibited by this resolution:
  • acts of veterinary medicine - including the acts of a licensed veterinarian taken in the course of caring for an animal, emergency aid provided to an animal in distress, and any other acts based on sound veterinary science;
  • animal research that is conducted for a legitimate scientific purpose and does not needlessly inflict pain or suffering;
  • butchering, slaughtering, or killing an animal for food or other consumption, so long as the methods used are not cruel and the animal is killed as swiftly and painlessly as possible;
  • acts of pest control, including any reasonable method of dealing with pests that is not unnecessarily cruel;
  • acts based on the science of animal breeding and appropriate care;
4. Requires that any person who keeps an animal commercially, as a pet, or for any other purpose must provide that animal with reasonable and appropriate care, including:
  • adequate shelter to protect the animal from weather and injury;
  • food of apporpriate quantity and quality to keep the animal healthy;
  • access to a sufficient quantity of clean water to satisfy the animal's needs;
  • veterinary care deemed necessary to relieve the animal from distress, injury, neglect or disease;
  • access to adequate space for exercise as necessary for the health of the animal;
  • regular maintenance of the animal's space to keep it reasonably free of debris, waste, and disease;
5. Outlaws the use of animals in fighting sports, or any other exhibition where the purpose, theme, or substance of the exhibition endangers the long term health and safety of the animal, except that animals may be utilized in potentially dangerous situations or occupations - such as law enforcement animals, guard dogs, war horses, and other service animals - so long as the animal has been properly trained and handled for use in such situations.

Prohibiting Animal Abuse
Category: Moral Decency ~*~ Strength: Significant

The Member Nations of the World Assembly:

Recognizing that animals are sentient beings capable of experiencing stress, fear, and pain;

Convinced that there are no legitimate reasons to intentionally abuse an animal, and that animals should be cared for in ways that minimize and avoid suffering;

Resolved that animal abuse is ethically impermissible, morally unjustifiable, and rationally indefensible, and thus should be universally condemned;

Now, therefore, the General Assembly hereby enacts the following provisions, subject to the rules and laws set by earlier WA resolutions that are still in force:

1. Defines an "animal" for the purposes of this resolution as any non-person species of mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish. (definition courtesy of Zurgonia)

2. Prohibits the intentional abuse of animals, including:
  • causing an animal serious and protracted bodily disfigurement;
  • inflicting physical trauma or intense pain on an animal; (Grays Harbor amendment)
  • recklessly abandoning an animal or otherwise placing the animal at grave risk of death, injury, or disfigurement;
  • torturing an animal;
  • sexually assaulting an animal; and
  • maliciously or cruelly killing an animal;
3. Clarifies that the following acts do not constitute abuse and therefore are not prohibited by Clause 2 of this resolution:
  • acts of good animal husbandry - including the dehorning of cattle, the docking of horses, the castration, neutering, or spaying of non-breeding animal stock, and any other act based on the science of animal breeding and care;
  • animal research that is conducted pursuant to a proper research proposal and methodology, so long as it does not needlessly inflict pain or suffering;
  • butchering or slaughtering an animal for food or other consumption, so long as the animal is killed instantly, or rendered insensible to pain until death occurs;
  • acts of veterinary medicine - including the acts of a licensed veterinarian taken in the course of caring for an animal, emergency aid provided to an animal in distress, and any other acts based on sound veterinary science;
  • hunting, fishing, or any other taking of quarry animals, so long as the methods used do not needlessly inflict pain and suffering; (Caracasus amendment)
  • acts of pest control, including any reasonable method of deterring, discouraging, or destroying organisms which compete directly with people, are detrimental to society, or spread malignant disease;
  • capturing and taming wild animals, and acts of training any animal, so long as the methods used do not needlessly inflict pain or suffering; (Bari amendment)
4. Requires that any person who keeps an animal commercially, as a pet, or for any other purpose must, to the best of their ability (Elysees ammendment), provide that animal with reasonable and appropriate care, including:
  • adequate shelter sufficient to protect the animal from weather and injury;
  • food of sufficient quantity and quality to allow for normal growth and body weight;
  • access to a sufficient quantity of clean water to satisfy the animals needs;
  • veterinary care deemed necessary to relieve the animal from distress, injury, neglect or disease;
  • access to an area with adequate space for exercise necessary for the health of the animal;
  • regular maintenance of the animal's space to keep it reasonably free of debris, waste, and disease;
5. Outlaws the use of animals in fighting sports, or any other exhibition where the purpose, theme, or substance of the exhibition endangers the long term health and safety of the animal, except that animals may be utilized in potentially dangerous situations or occupations - such as law enforcement animals, guard dogs, war horses, and other service animals - so long as the animal has been properly trained and handled for use in such situations.

Prohibiting Animal Abuse
Category: Moral Decency ~*~ Strength: Significant

The Member Nations of the World Assembly:

Recognizing that animals are sentient beings capable of experiencing stress, fear, and pain;

Convinced that there are no legitimate reasons to intentionally abuse an animal, and that animals should be cared for in ways that minimize and avoid suffering;

Resolved that animal abuse is ethically impermissible, morally unjustifiable, and rationally indefensible, and thus should be universally condemned;

Now, therefore, the General Assembly hereby enacts the following provisions, subject to the rules and laws set by earlier WA resolutions that are still in force:

1. Defines an "animal" for the purposes of this resolution as any non-sapient mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish.

2. Prohibits the intentional abuse of animals, including:
  • causing an animal serious and protracted bodily disfigurement;
  • inflicting physical trauma or intense pain on an animal; (Grays Harbor amendment)
  • recklessly abandoning an animal or otherwise placing the animal at grave risk of death, injury, or disfigurement;
  • torturing an animal;
  • sexually assaulting an animal; and
  • maliciously or cruelly killing an animal;
3. Clarifies that the following acts do not constitute abuse and therefore are not prohibited by Clause 2 of this resolution:
  • acts of good animal husbandry - including the dehorning of cattle, the docking of horses, the castration, neutering, or spaying of non-breeding animal stock, and any other act based on the science of animal breeding and care;
  • animal research that is conducted pursuant to a proper research proposal and methodology, so long as it does not needlessly inflict pain or suffering;
  • butchering or slaughtering an animal for food or other consumption, so long as the animal is killed instantly, or rendered insensible to pain until death occurs;
  • acts of veterinary medicine - including the acts of a licensed veterinarian taken in the course of caring for an animal, emergency aid provided to an animal in distress, and any other acts based on sound veterinary science;
  • hunting, fishing, or any other taking of quarry animals, so long as the methods used do not needlessly inflict pain and suffering; (Caracasus amendment)
  • acts of pest control, including any reasonable method of deterring, discouraging, or destroying organisms which compete directly with people, are detrimental to society, or spread malignant disease;
4. Requires that any person who keeps an animal commercially, as a pet, or for any other purpose must, to the best of their ability (Elysees ammendment), provide that animal with reasonable and appropriate care, including:
  • adequate shelter sufficient to protect the animal from weather and injury;
  • food of sufficient quantity and quality to allow for normal growth and body weight;
  • access to a sufficient quantity of clean water to satisfy the animals needs;
  • veterinary care deemed necessary to relieve the animal from distress, injury, neglect or disease;
  • access to an area with adequate space for exercise necessary for the health of the animal;
  • regular maintenance of the animal's space to keep it reasonably free of debris, waste, and disease;
5. Outlaws the use of animals in fighting sports, or any other exhibition where the purpose, theme, or substance of the exhibition endangers the long term health and safety of the animal, except that animals may be utilized in potentially dangerous situations or occupations - such as law enforcement animals, guard dogs, war horses, and other service animals - so long as the animal has been properly trained and handled for use in such situations; (Bears Armed amendment)

Humane Treatment of Animals
Category: Moral Decency ~*~ Strength: Significant

The Member Nations of the World Assembly:

Recognizing that animals are sentient beings capable of experiencing stress, fear, and pain;

Convinced that there are no legitimate reasons to intentionally abuse an animal, and that animals should be cared for in ways that minimize and avoid suffering;

Resolved that animal abuse is ethically impermissible, morally unjustifiable, and rationally indefensible, and thus should be universally condemned;

Now, therefore, the General Assembly hereby:

1. Defines an "animal" for the purposes of this resolution as any non-sapient living organism belonging to the biological Kingdom Animalia. (definition courtesy of Ceni)

2. Prohibits the intentional abuse of animals, including:
  • causing an animal serious and protracted bodily disfigurement;
  • inflicting physical trauma or intense pain on an animal; (Grays Harbor amendment)
  • recklessly abandoning an animal or otherwise placing the animal at grave risk of death, injury, or disfigurement;
  • torturing an animal;
  • sexually assaulting an animal; and
  • maliciously or cruelly killing an animal;
3. Clarifies that the following acts do not constitute abuse and therefore are not prohibited by Clause 2 of this resolution:
  • acts of good animal husbandry - including the dehorning of cattle, the docking of horses, the castration, neutering, or spaying of non-breeding animal stock, and any other act based on the science of animal breeding and care;
  • animal research that is conducted pursuant to a proper research proposal and methodology, so long as it does not needlessly inflict pain or suffering;
  • butchering or slaughtering an animal for food or other consumption, so long as the animal is killed instantly, or rendered insensible to pain until death occurs;
  • acts of veterinary medicine - including the acts of a licensed veterinarian taken in the course of caring for an animal, emergency aid provided to an animal in distress, and any other acts based on sound veterinary science;
  • hunting, fishing, or any other taking of quarry animals, so long as the methods used do not needlessly inflict pain and suffering; (Caracasus amendment)
  • acts of pest control, including any reasonable method of deterring, discouraging, or destroying organisms which compete directly with people, are detrimental to society, or spread malignant disease;
4. Requires that any person who keeps an animal - whether commercially, as a pet, or for any other purpose - must, to the best of their ability (Elysees ammendment), provide that animal with reasonable and appropriate care, including:
  • adequate shelter sufficient to protect the animal from weather and injury;
  • food of sufficient quantity and quality to allow for normal growth and body weight;
  • access to a sufficient quantity of clean water to satisfy the animals needs;
  • veterinary care deemed necessary to relieve the animal from distress, injury, neglect or disease;
  • access to an area with adequate space for exercise necessary for the health of the animal;
  • regular maintenance of the animal's space to keep it reasonably free of debris, waste, and disease;
5. Outlaws the use of animals in fighting sports, or any other exhibition where the purpose, theme, or substance of the exhibition endangers the long term health and safety of the animal, except that animals may be utilized in potentially dangerous situations or occupations - such as law enforcement animals, guard dogs, war horses, and other services animals - so long as the animal has been properly trained and handled for use in such situations; (Bears Armed amendment)

Humane Treatment of Animals
Category: Moral Decency ~*~ Strength: Significant

The Member Nations of the World Assembly:

Recognizing that animals are sentient beings capable of experiencing stress, fear, and pain;

Convinced that there are no legitimate reasons to intentionally abuse an animal, and that animals should be cared for in ways that minimize and avoid suffering;

Resolved that animal abuse is ethically impermissible, morally unjustifiable, and rationally indefensible, and thus should be universally condemned;

Now, therefore, the General Assembly hereby:

1. Defines an "animal" for the purposes of this resolution as any non-sapient mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish.

2. Prohibits the intentional abuse of animals, including:
  • causing an animal serious and protracted bodily disfigurement;
  • inflicting physical trauma or intense pain on an animal; (Grays Harbor amendment)
  • recklessly abandoning an animal or otherwise placing the animal at grave risk of death, injury, or disfigurement;
  • torturing an animal;
  • sexually assaulting an animal; and
  • maliciously or cruelly killing an animal;
3. Clarifies that the following acts do not constitute abuse and therefore are not prohibited by Clause 2 of this resolution:
  • acts of good animal husbandry - including the dehorning of cattle, the docking of horses, the castration, neutering, or spaying of non-breeding animal stock, and any other act based on the science of animal breeding and care;
  • animal research that is conducted pursuant to a proper research proposal and methodology, so long as it does not needlessly inflict pain or suffering;
  • butchering or slaughtering an animal for food or other consumption, so long as the animal is killed instantly, or rendered insensible to pain until death occurs;
  • acts of veterinary medicine - including the acts of a licensed veterinarian taken in the course of caring for an animal, emergency aid provided to an animal in distress, and any other acts based on sound veterinary science;
  • hunting, fishing, or any other taking of quarry animals, so long as the methods used do not needlessly inflict pain and suffering; (Caracasus amendment)
4. Requires that any person who keeps an animal - whether commercially, as a pet, or for any other purpose - must, to the best of their ability (Elysees ammendment), provide that animal with reasonable and appropriate care, including:
  • adequate shelter sufficient to protect the animal from weather and injury;
  • food of sufficient quantity and quality to allow for normal growth and body weight;
  • access to a sufficient quantity of clean water to satisfy the animals needs;
  • veterinary care deemed necessary to relieve the animal from distress, injury, neglect or disease;
  • access to an area with adequate space for exercise necessary for the health of the animal;
  • regular maintenance of the animal's space to keep it reasonably free of debris, waste, and disease;
5. Outlaws the use of animals in fighting sports, or any other exhibition where the purpose, theme, or substance of the exhibition endangers the long term health and safety of the animal, except that animals may be utilized in potentially dangerous situations or occupations - such as law enforcement animals, guard dogs, war horses, and other services animals - so long as the animal has been properly trained and handled for use in such situations; (Bears Armed amendment)

Humane Treatment of Animals
Category: Moral Decency ~*~ Strength: Strong


The Member Nations of the World Assembly:

Recognizing that animals are sentient beings capable of experiencing stress, fear, and pain;

Convinced that there are no legitimate reasons to intentionally abuse an animal, and that animals should be cared for in ways that minimize and avoid suffering;

Resolved that animal abuse is ethically impermissible, morally unjustifiable, and rationally indefensible, and thus should be universally condemned;

Now, therefore, the General Assembly hereby:

1. Defines an "animal" for the purposes of this resolution as any non-sapient mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish.

2. Prohibits the intentional abuse of animals, including:
  • causing an animal serious and protracted bodily disfigurement;
  • inflicting physical trauma or substantial pain on an animal;
  • recklessly abandoning an animal or placing the animal at grave risk of death, disfigurement, or loss of the function of a limb or bodily organ;
  • torturing an animal;
  • sexually assaulting an animal; and
  • maliciously or cruelly killing an animal;
3. Requires that any person who keeps an animal - whether commercially, as a pet, or for any other purpose - must, to the best of their ability (Elysees ammendment), provide that animal with reasonable and appropriate care, including:
  • adequate shelter sufficient to protect the animal from weather and physical injury;
  • food of sufficient quantity and quality to allow for normal growth and body weight;
  • access to a sufficient quantity of clean water to satisfy the animals needs;
  • veterinary care deemed necessary to relieve the animal from distress, injury, neglect or disease;
  • access to an area with adequate space for exercise necessary for the health of the animal;
  • regular maintenance of the animal's space to keep it reasonably free of debris, waste, and disease;
4. Clarifies that the following acts do not violate provisions 2 or 3 above:
  • acts of good animal husbandry, including the dehorning of cattle, the docking of horses, the castration, neutering, or spaying of non-breeding animal stock, and any other accepted act based on the science of breeding and caring for animals;
  • animal research conducted pursuant to a proper research proposal and methodology which does not needlessly inflict pain or suffering;
  • butchering or slaughtering an animal for food or other consumption, so long as the animal is killed instantly or rendered insensible to pain until death occurs;
  • proper acts of a licensed veterinarian in the course of caring for an animal, or any other act based on sound veterinary medicine and science;
  • hunting, fishing, or any other taking of quarry animals so long as the methods used do not needlessly inflict pain and suffering (Caracasus amendment)
5. Outlaws the use of animals in fighting sports, or any other exhibition where the purpose, theme, or substance of the exhibition endangers the long term health and safety of the animal;

6. Permits the use of animals in dangerous situations or occupations - such as law enforcement animals, guard dogs, war horses, and other services animals - so long as the animal has been properly trained and handled for use in such situations; (Bears Armed amendment)

7. Encourages Member Nations to establish animal welfare organizations within their jurisdiction that work to eradicate animal abuse and mistreatment, and provide appropriate care to animals that have been abused and mistreated;

8. Establishes the International Commission for Humane Treatment of Animals (ICHTA) and assigns it the following duties:
  • To assist local animal welfare organizations to accomplish their mandate within member nations, and to establish animal welfare organizations within member nations where the need is particularly great;
  • To research and compile reference materials regarding good animal husbandry, valid animal research techniques, good butchering practices, and sound veterinary science, and to make those materials available to member nations and the public at large;
  • To advise member nations on which acts do and do not constitute animal abuse or fighting when such advice is requested.

Humane Treatment of Animals
Category: Moral Decency ~*~ Strength: Strong


The Member Nations of the World Assembly:

Recognizing that animals are sentient beings capable of experiencing stress, fear, and pain;

Convinced that there are no legitimate reasons to intentionally abuse an animal, and that animals should be cared for in ways that minimize and avoid suffering;

Resolved that animal abuse is ethically impermissible, morally unjustifiable, and rationally indefensible, and thus should be universally condemned;

Now, therefore, the General Assembly hereby:

1. Defines an "animal" for the purposes of this resolution as any non-sapient mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish.

2. Prohibits the intentional abuse of animals, including:
  • causing an animal serious and protracted bodily disfigurement;
  • inflicting physical trauma or substantial pain on an animal;
  • recklessly abandoning an animal or placing the animal at grave risk of death, disfigurement, or loss of the function of a limb or bodily organ;
  • torturing an animal;
  • sexually assaulting an animal; and
  • maliciously or cruelly killing an animal;
3. Requires that any person who keeps an animal - whether commercially, as a pet, or for any other purpose - must provide that animal with reasonable care appropriate to that animal, including:
  • adequate shelter sufficient to protect the animal from weather and physical injury;
  • food of sufficient quantity and quality to allow for normal growth and body weight;
  • access to a sufficient quantity of clean water to satisfy the animals needs;
  • veterinary care deemed necessary to relieve the animal from distress, injury, neglect or disease;
  • access to an area with adequate space for exercise necessary for the health of the animal;
  • regular maintenance of the animal's space to keep it reasonably free of debris, waste, and disease;
4. Clarifies that the following acts do not violate provisions 2 or 3 above:
  • acts of good animal husbandry, including the dehorning of cattle, the docking of horses, the castration, neutering, or spaying of non-breeding animal stock, and any other accepted act based on the science of breeding and caring for animals according to accepted practices of veterinary medicine;
  • animal research conducted pursuant to a proper research proposal and methodology which does not needlessly inflict pain or suffering;
  • butchering or slaughtering an animal for food or other consumption, so long as the animal is killed instantly or rendered insensible to pain until death occurs;
  • proper acts of a licensed veterinarian in the course of caring for an animal, or any other act based on sound veterinary medicine and science;
5. Outlaws the use of animals in fighting sports, or any other exhibition where the purpose, theme, or substance of the exhibition endangers the long term health and safety of the animal;

6. Encourages Member Nations to establish animal welfare organizations within their jurisdiction that work to eradicate animal abuse and mistreatment, and provide appropriate care to animals that have been abused and mistreated;

7. Establishes the International Commission for Humane Treatment of Animals (ICHTA) and assigns it the following duties:
  • To assist local animal welfare organizations to accomplish their mandate within member nations, and to establish animal welfare organizations within member nations where the need is particularly great;
  • To research and compile reference materials regarding good animal husbandry, valid animal research techniques, good butchering practices, and sound veterinary science, and to make those materials available to member nations and the public at large;
  • To advise member nations on which acts do and do not constitute animal abuse or fighting when such advice is requested.
Last edited by Losthaven on Tue Jul 28, 2015 7:36 am, edited 58 times in total.
Once a great nation, a true superpower; now just watching the world go by

User avatar
Respected Marshal Kim Jong Un
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 20
Founded: Apr 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Respected Marshal Kim Jong Un » Mon Jun 08, 2015 7:31 pm

If I actually supported this I would be forced to treat my people humanly? Is this not correct?

User avatar
Losthaven
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 393
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Losthaven » Mon Jun 08, 2015 7:32 pm

Respected Marshal Kim Jong Un wrote:If I actually supported this I would be forced to treat my people humanly? Is this not correct?

People are not "animals" as defined by this proposal (see clause 1).
Once a great nation, a true superpower; now just watching the world go by

User avatar
Respected Marshal Kim Jong Un
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 20
Founded: Apr 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Respected Marshal Kim Jong Un » Mon Jun 08, 2015 7:38 pm

Losthaven wrote:
Respected Marshal Kim Jong Un wrote:If I actually supported this I would be forced to treat my people humanly? Is this not correct?

People are not "animals" as defined by this proposal (see clause 1).


The human being is bacteria

User avatar
Flibbleites
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6569
Founded: Jan 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Flibbleites » Mon Jun 08, 2015 7:43 pm

Respected Marshal Kim Jong Un wrote:
Losthaven wrote:People are not "animals" as defined by this proposal (see clause 1).


The human being is bacteria

And bacteria are not listed in what this proposal defines as being an animal

Bob Flibble
WA Representative
Last edited by Flibbleites on Mon Jun 08, 2015 7:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ceni
Senator
 
Posts: 4347
Founded: Jun 26, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Ceni » Mon Jun 08, 2015 7:51 pm

Perhaps changing the wording to "any non-sapient organism belonging to the biological kingdom Animalia" would clear up some confusion?
THE REPUBLIC OF CENI (the user behind this nation uses he/him/his pronouns)
Air Terranea | The Wanderlust Guide to Ceni | Seven Restaurants in Seven Days: Cataloging Cenian Food
Champions: Di Bradini Cup 38, U-18 World Cup 17
Runners-up: Di Bradini Cup 39, Di Bradini Cup 41
NSTT #1s: Lonus Varalin, Ardil Navsal (singles), Gyrachor Rentos, Val Korekal, Elia Xal/Fia Xal (doubles)
UICA Champions' Cup titles (1): 1860 Azoth
World Cup 76, World Cup 79
Baptism of Fire 61
Cup of Harmony 63
Copa Rushmori 41
International Basketball Championships 20
Cenian Open (Grand Slam) 1-8
<Schottia> I always think of Ceni as what it would be like if Long Island was its own nation, ran by Bernie Sanders lol.

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18574
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Grays Harbor » Mon Jun 08, 2015 7:52 pm

inflicting physical trauma or substantial pain on an animal;

This would seem to prohibit most veterinarian procedures.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Jordsindia
Minister
 
Posts: 2358
Founded: Apr 10, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Jordsindia » Mon Jun 08, 2015 7:54 pm

No, the details are fuzzy and could be applied to things it wasn't meant to be applied to.
Represent

American and Proud!

10% luck, 20% skill, 15% concentrated power of will, 5% pleasure, 50% pain, and 100% reason to remember the name!

-∮ The Crumpet Cult ∮-

User avatar
Jarish Inyo
Diplomat
 
Posts: 981
Founded: Jul 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Jarish Inyo » Mon Jun 08, 2015 9:35 pm

Opposed. I can not support anything that denies people the companionship of a pet. Everything in clause 3 would prevent homeless, low income, or people in remote areas from having a pet.
Ambassador Nameless
Empire of Jaresh Inyo

User avatar
Losthaven
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 393
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Losthaven » Mon Jun 08, 2015 9:47 pm

Jarish Inyo wrote:Opposed. I can not support anything that denies people the companionship of a pet. Everything in clause 3 would prevent homeless, low income, or people in remote areas from having a pet.

What part of provision 3, specifically, do you think prohibits homeless people from having a pet? Even homeless people should be expected to provide a companion animal with a minimum standard of care. If you can't provide the animal with minimum care, you really shouldn't own it.

Are there any ways this could be amended to allay your concerns, short of allowing people to deprive their pets of basic necessities like food, water, shelter and clean surroundings?
Once a great nation, a true superpower; now just watching the world go by

User avatar
Jarish Inyo
Diplomat
 
Posts: 981
Founded: Jul 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Jarish Inyo » Mon Jun 08, 2015 10:04 pm

Losthaven wrote:
Jarish Inyo wrote:Opposed. I can not support anything that denies people the companionship of a pet. Everything in clause 3 would prevent homeless, low income, or people in remote areas from having a pet.

What part of provision 3, specifically, do you think prohibits homeless people from having a pet? Even homeless people should be expected to provide a companion animal with a minimum standard of care. If you can't provide the animal with minimum care, you really shouldn't own it.

Are there any ways this could be amended to allay your concerns, short of allowing people to deprive their pets of basic necessities like food, water, shelter and clean surroundings?


There is no way for this to amend to allay my concerns. Homeless people can not be expected to provide themselves with a minimum standard of care. Yet they can cherish their companion animals more then those that can meet your standards. We do not find this a reason to deny them a companion animal.

Low income people can not provide animals with veterinary care and access to an area with adequate space for exercise necessary for the health of the animal. We do not find this a reason to deny them a companion animal.

People in remote areas may not be able to provide an animal with most of clause 3. Again, we do not find this a reason to deny them a companion animal.

They are animals. They have spent thousands of years without any of the things you want to impose on people so they can get a pet. They still continue to survive and flourish without them. All I see this doing is having shelters filled with animals that can't be adopted because people can't meet the requirements for pet ownership.

How is pet ownership an international issue?
Last edited by Jarish Inyo on Mon Jun 08, 2015 10:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ambassador Nameless
Empire of Jaresh Inyo

User avatar
Jean Pierre Trudeau
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1158
Founded: Nov 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Jean Pierre Trudeau » Mon Jun 08, 2015 11:28 pm

Ughhh... Moral Decency? Opposed.
Jean Pierre Trudeau
Chancellor, United Federation of Canada,
Premier, The North American Union
World Assembly Resolution Author

Socialism is NOT Communism.

User avatar
Kaboomlandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7395
Founded: May 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaboomlandia » Tue Jun 09, 2015 6:03 am

"We do need a replacement to GA #228, so I SUPPORT."
In=character, Kaboomlandia is a World Assembly member and abides by its resolutions. If this nation isn't in the WA, it's for practical reasons.
Author of GA #371 and SC #208, #214, #226, #227, #230, #232
Co-Author of SC #204
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

"Your legitimacy, Kaboom, has melted away in my eyes. I couldn't have believed that only a shadow of your once brilliant WA career remains."

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18574
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Grays Harbor » Tue Jun 09, 2015 6:14 am

Grays Harbor wrote:
inflicting physical trauma or substantial pain on an animal;

This would seem to prohibit most veterinarian procedures.

Going to address this at some point or ignore it as inconvenient to your crusade?
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Losthaven
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 393
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Losthaven » Tue Jun 09, 2015 7:45 am

Grays Harbor wrote:
Grays Harbor wrote:
inflicting physical trauma or substantial pain on an animal;

This would seem to prohibit most veterinarian procedures.

Going to address this at some point or ignore it as inconvenient to your crusade?

I was going to ignore it out of respect for Your Grace, seeing as the proposal specifically states that acts of veterinary medicine are not abuse.

Losthaven wrote:4. Clarifies that the following acts do not violate provisions 2 or 3 above:
...
  • proper acts of a licensed veterinarian in the course of caring for an animal, or any other act based on sound veterinary medicine and science;

Furthermore, I don't think most veterinary procedures cause physical trauma to animals. Whether or not some veterinary procedures cause some pain is a closer question, though I would still hope that most veterinarians do not cause substantial pain to animals by providing care. I could change the word "substantial" to something stronger like "intense" if you think that would make a positive difference.
Last edited by Losthaven on Tue Jun 09, 2015 7:56 am, edited 2 times in total.
Once a great nation, a true superpower; now just watching the world go by

User avatar
Kaboomlandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7395
Founded: May 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaboomlandia » Tue Jun 09, 2015 7:47 am

"So, this:
5. Outlaws the use of animals in fighting sports, or any other exhibition where the purpose, theme, or substance of the exhibition endangers the long term health and safety of the animal;

bans bullfighting?"
In=character, Kaboomlandia is a World Assembly member and abides by its resolutions. If this nation isn't in the WA, it's for practical reasons.
Author of GA #371 and SC #208, #214, #226, #227, #230, #232
Co-Author of SC #204
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

"Your legitimacy, Kaboom, has melted away in my eyes. I couldn't have believed that only a shadow of your once brilliant WA career remains."

User avatar
Losthaven
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 393
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Losthaven » Tue Jun 09, 2015 7:55 am

Kaboomlandia wrote:"So, this:
5. Outlaws the use of animals in fighting sports, or any other exhibition where the purpose, theme, or substance of the exhibition endangers the long term health and safety of the animal;

bans bullfighting?"

As written, yes. And dog fighting, cock fighting, bear baiting, squirrel stomping, snake whacking, and whathaveyou. I do see your point, but I'm not sure how willing we should be to accept animal abuse merely because it is culturally condoned. Especially when the cultures that condone it may themselves be phasing it out on animal cruelty grounds.

I am, of course, willing to hear more on this issue and amend the language if there's strong political will to do so, as I understand that some cultural exhibitions require the use of animals. I felt like the language I used ("endangers the long term health and safety of the animal") was broad enough to allow for most animals exhibitions that do not pose a serious risk to the animal.
Last edited by Losthaven on Thu Jun 11, 2015 7:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Once a great nation, a true superpower; now just watching the world go by

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21475
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:14 am

Losthaven wrote:
Kaboomlandia wrote:"So, this:

bans bullfighting?"

As written, yes. And dog fighting, cock fighting, bear baiting, squirrel stomping, snake whacking, and whathaveyou

However it doesn't restrict the use of animals in non-'sports' forms of fighting, hrright? So, for example, those member nations that still employ horse-mounted cavalry would be allowed to continue doing so?


Hr'rmm, as hunters can not absolutely guarantee a painless and instantaneous kill every time, this would seem to place serious restrictions on hunting... and thus to be in contradiction of #267: 'Sensible Limits on Hunting', which specifically states that the further regulation of such activities falls within the jurisdiction of the separate nations' governments rather than under the jurisdiction of this Assembly...
Last edited by Bears Armed on Tue Jun 09, 2015 9:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
Losthaven
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 393
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Losthaven » Tue Jun 09, 2015 11:28 am

Bears Armed wrote:
Losthaven wrote:As written, yes. And dog fighting, cock fighting, bear baiting, squirrel stomping, snake whacking, and whathaveyou

However it doesn't restrict the use of animals in non-'sports' forms of fighting, hrright? So, for example, those member nations that still employ horse-mounted cavalry would be allowed to continue doing so?

That was my intent, but just to be sure I'll likely add a police/military/service animal exception.

Bears Armed wrote:Hr'rmm, as hunters can not absolutely guarantee a painless and instantaneous kill every time, this would seem to place serious restrictions on hunting... and thus to be in contradiction of #267: 'Sensible Limits on Hunting', which specifically states that the further regulation of such activities falls within the jurisdiction of the separate nations' governments rather than under the jurisdiction of this Assembly...

I don't think hunting qualifies as "abuse" and it's not included in any of the specific examples. I can explicitly exempt it if necessary.
Once a great nation, a true superpower; now just watching the world go by

User avatar
Elysees
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Jun 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Elysees » Tue Jun 09, 2015 1:23 pm

I will support.

Hunting shouldn't violate the resolution, as long as the hunter is not intentionally subjecting the animal to unnecessary pains.

I would consider perhaps revising provision 3 to read "Requires that any person who keeps an animal ... must provide that animal with reasonable care to the best of their ability appropriate to that animal, including ..."

Since, as brought up previously, homeless/low income people can hardly be expected provide their pets an excellent living.

User avatar
Caracasus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7918
Founded: Apr 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Caracasus » Tue Jun 09, 2015 2:01 pm

Perhaps you could add a bullet point to your clarifies that section along the lines of:

Acts of hunting, provided the quarry is not subject to unreasonable suffering or cruelty

So hunting for food, even sport would be ok, if said hunting was not conducted in a way that inflicted unreasonable levels of suffering or cruelty. Hunting a deer? Sure, that's OK. Capturing a deer and flaying it alive? No, not really.
As an editor I seam to spend an awful lot of thyme going threw issues and checking that they're no oblivious errars. Its a tough job but someone's got too do it!



Issues editor, not a moderator.

User avatar
Grays Harbor
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18574
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Grays Harbor » Tue Jun 09, 2015 2:41 pm

Caracasus wrote:Perhaps you could add a bullet point to your clarifies that section along the lines of:

Acts of hunting, provided the quarry is not subject to unreasonable suffering or cruelty

So hunting for food, even sport would be ok, if said hunting was not conducted in a way that inflicted unreasonable levels of suffering or cruelty. Hunting a deer? Sure, that's OK. Capturing a deer and flaying it alive? No, not really.

That is what clause 7 of resolution 267 covers, unless you are actually trying for duplication?
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Caracasus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7918
Founded: Apr 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Caracasus » Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:07 am

Ah, my apologies, so there is no issue with a conflict between the existing reasonable hunting legislation and this legislation then?
As an editor I seam to spend an awful lot of thyme going threw issues and checking that they're no oblivious errars. Its a tough job but someone's got too do it!



Issues editor, not a moderator.

User avatar
Losthaven
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 393
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Losthaven » Fri Jun 12, 2015 11:11 am

NEW DRAFT UP

Changes have been made to address several of the concerns brought up so far, including:
Bears Armed wrote:However it doesn't restrict the use of animals in non-'sports' forms of fighting, hrright? So, for example, those member nations that still employ horse-mounted cavalry would be allowed to continue doing so?
...
Hr'rmm... hunters...?

Caracasus wrote:Perhaps you could add a bullet point to your clarifies that section along the lines of:

Acts of hunting, provided the quarry is not subject to unreasonable suffering or cruelty

So hunting for food, even sport would be ok, if said hunting was not conducted in a way that inflicted unreasonable levels of suffering or cruelty. Hunting a deer? Sure, that's OK. Capturing a deer and flaying it alive? No, not really.

Elysees wrote:I would consider perhaps revising provision 3 to read "Requires that any person who keeps an animal ... must provide that animal with reasonable care to the best of their ability appropriate to that animal, including ..."

Since, as brought up previously, homeless/low income people can hardly be expected provide their pets an excellent living.


I did not make the following requested changes:
Ceni wrote:Perhaps changing the wording to "any non-sapient organism belonging to the biological kingdom Animalia" would clear up some confusion?

I greatly appreciate the Cenian input as their prowress in the field of biology is well known. However, I don't think the individual who made the "humans are bacteria" comment is really confused about the proposed definition and instead seemed to be suggesting something about human behavior, generally. I think the current definition of animal is succinct and appropriate, and I'm afraid I might just lose people if I rely on science jargon or make the definition too tautological (i.e. "an animal is a member of a species that belongs to the 'animal' category of species" isn't all that helpful.
Last edited by Losthaven on Fri Jun 12, 2015 11:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
Once a great nation, a true superpower; now just watching the world go by

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 16989
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Separatist Peoples » Fri Jun 12, 2015 11:55 am

"I'm struggling to see why this is an international issue. If the C.D.S.P. puts salty thumbtacks into the tails of donkeys for fun, how exactly does that affect the citizens of Lockhaven? It doesn't. Waste of the WA's time. Opposed."

His Worshipfulness, the Most Unscrupulous, Plainly Deceitful, Dissembling, Strategicly Calculating Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads