Not complaining about anyone this time, just wanting a ruling on the legality of this:
Regarding this proposal, and this one, is it OK for the proposer to announce themselves at the start of the resolution? Particularly with the second one, it looks like it is the proposer who is "Asserting, Believing, and Hereby commending A Mean Old Man" rather than the World Assembly or The Security Council.
Also, AMON thinks that the ruling here means that if Liberate The Security Council "was proposed nowadays, it would be deemed illegal" - is that interpretation correct? I thought that if you're directing a resolution at a concept via a region/nation, you just had to demonstrate that the designated region/nation had to support that concept - as The Security Council (region) originally did when its WFE claimed it was being oppressed by the General Assembly. The problem that his proposal then (Condemn Shitty Proposal Writing) had was that its WFE was also condemning shitty proposal writing, rather than showing evidence it supported it.