NATION

PASSWORD

[PASSED] Repeal "Liberate South Pacific"

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.
User avatar
Goddess Relief Office
Diplomat
 
Posts: 584
Founded: Jun 04, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

[PASSED] Repeal "Liberate South Pacific"

Postby Goddess Relief Office » Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:40 pm

Ver. 3 submitted
Repeal "Liberate South Pacific"

Category: Repeal | Resolution: SC #108 | Proposed by: Goddess Relief Office



The Security Council,

REVIEWING Security Council resolution #108, passed on January 24, 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific,

NOTING that soon after the resolution's passage, invaders left the region on their own accord,

SATISFIED to learn that South Pacific's legal government has been restored and the region is now at peace,

COGNIZANT that the native community has requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,

AFFIRMING their right to self-determination and their desire to be free from limitations imposed by the Liberation,

WISHING to restore full regional sovereignty to the region of South Pacific,

Hereby,

REPEALS Security Council Resolution #108 "Liberate South Pacific"


The Security Council,

REVIEWING the case of SC #108, passed on January 24, 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific,

NOTING that its passage precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces and led to the restoration of South Pacific's legal government within a week,

GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 to free the region from invader occupation had been achieved,

COGNIZANT that natives of the region have requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,

AFFIRMING the natives' right to self-determination and their desire to be free from limitations imposed by the Liberation,

WISHING to restore full regional sovereignty to the region of South Pacific,

Hereby,

REPEALS Security Council Resolution #108 "Liberate South Pacific".

The Security Council,

RECALLING the passage of SC #108 in January 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific by invader forces,

NOTING that Security Council intervention through #SC 108 precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces 4 days later, and defenders have since restored the rightful government of South Pacific to its place,

GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 has now been achieved,

UNDERSTANDING that natives have requested the #SC 108 be repealed, so that full regional control can once again be return

WISHING to respect the natives' wishes and restore full sovereignty to South Pacific,

Hereby,

Repeals Security Council Resolution #108 Liberate South Pacific.


Proposal is self-explanatory. The original liberation was authored by me some time back. Recently I've been told that natives want it repealed because they want SP to become a normal region again. Hence, I've started work on this.

Edit: Delegate's post: viewtopic.php?p=19503389#p19503389

Regards,
~GRO~
Last edited by Goddess Relief Office on Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:08 pm, edited 14 times in total.
Keeper of The World Tree - Yggdrasil
General Assembly:
GA#053 - Epidemic Response Act
GA#163 - Repeal LOTS
GA#223 - Transboundary Water Use Act

Security Council:
SC#030 - Commend 10000 Islands (co-author)
SC#044 - Commend Texas (co-author)
SC#066 - Repeal "Liberate Wonderful Paradise"
SC#108 - Liberate South Pacific
SC#135 - Liberate Anarchy (co-author)
SC#139 - Repeal "Liberate South Pacific"

Former delegate and retired defender
Nice links for easy reference:
Passed WA Resolutions | GA Resolutions (sorted by category) | GA Rules

User avatar
Mallorea and Riva
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 9237
Founded: Sep 29, 2010
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Mallorea and Riva » Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:57 pm

Support, we'd be more than happy to come back and throw a password on the place.
Ideological Bulwark #253
Retired Charter Nation: Political Affairs in Antarctic Oasis
Retired Major and Field Marshal of The Black Hawks
Retired Colonel of DEN Central Command, now defunct
Former Delegate of The South Pacific, winner of TSP's "Best Dali" Award
Retired Secretary of Defense of Stargate
Terror of The Joint Systems Alliance
Mall Isaraider, son of Tram and Spartz, Brother of Jakker, Tal, and apparently Sev the treacherous bastard.
Frattastan quote of the month: "I don't think chatting with someone over the Internet about casual topics falls under faithful or unfaithful. :<"

User avatar
Eist
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1194
Founded: May 10, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Eist » Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:57 pm

>COGNIZANT that natives of the region have requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,

If this has native support, then it seems reasonable.
Unibot III wrote:Frankly, the lows that people sink to in this game is perhaps the most disturbing thing about NationStates Gameplay.

User avatar
Mallorea and Riva
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 9237
Founded: Sep 29, 2010
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Mallorea and Riva » Wed Apr 02, 2014 10:09 pm

Goddess Relief Office wrote:NOTING that its passage precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces and led to the restoration of South Pacific's legal government within a week,

This is simply incorrect.
Ideological Bulwark #253
Retired Charter Nation: Political Affairs in Antarctic Oasis
Retired Major and Field Marshal of The Black Hawks
Retired Colonel of DEN Central Command, now defunct
Former Delegate of The South Pacific, winner of TSP's "Best Dali" Award
Retired Secretary of Defense of Stargate
Terror of The Joint Systems Alliance
Mall Isaraider, son of Tram and Spartz, Brother of Jakker, Tal, and apparently Sev the treacherous bastard.
Frattastan quote of the month: "I don't think chatting with someone over the Internet about casual topics falls under faithful or unfaithful. :<"

User avatar
The lepearchauns
Diplomat
 
Posts: 548
Founded: Feb 05, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Just leave us be Mallorea

Postby The lepearchauns » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:13 am

As the current and elected delegate for South Pacific, I fully support the removal of the liberation. We have always been a neutral, open door region, and the liberation is a blemish reflecting the fact that some people dont respect that aspect of our regions culture.
Lep

Former CoDF/ Vice Chancellor, FRA
Former Delegate, South Pacific
Former being of awesomeness, everywhere


Kogvuron, the answer to how long you owned my signature from the IPO auction is apparently 9 months

User avatar
Feux
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1594
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Feux » Thu Apr 03, 2014 6:15 am

I am always a little reluctant to remove liberations from regions like South Pacific for fear that we will be passing another liberation six months from now - like Mall has implied; however, I'll vote for. Not entirely sure why. Anyway, this proposal should have no difficultly passing once put to vote.
Last edited by Feux on Thu Apr 03, 2014 6:41 am, edited 2 times in total.
Always Changing Shapes
TheBestDudeInHistory wrote:Feux is what would happen if I had my shitposting physically removed, isolated, and permitted to become sentient on its own. And I mean that in the best way possible. Clearly I need to marry Feux.

User avatar
Mallorea and Riva
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 9237
Founded: Sep 29, 2010
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Mallorea and Riva » Thu Apr 03, 2014 8:16 am

The lepearchauns wrote:As the current and elected delegate for South Pacific, I fully support the removal of the liberation. We have always been a neutral, open door region, and the liberation is a blemish reflecting the fact that some people dont respect that aspect of our regions culture.

I normally never notice the "Subject" line of comments but I saw that one heh.
Ideological Bulwark #253
Retired Charter Nation: Political Affairs in Antarctic Oasis
Retired Major and Field Marshal of The Black Hawks
Retired Colonel of DEN Central Command, now defunct
Former Delegate of The South Pacific, winner of TSP's "Best Dali" Award
Retired Secretary of Defense of Stargate
Terror of The Joint Systems Alliance
Mall Isaraider, son of Tram and Spartz, Brother of Jakker, Tal, and apparently Sev the treacherous bastard.
Frattastan quote of the month: "I don't think chatting with someone over the Internet about casual topics falls under faithful or unfaithful. :<"

User avatar
Eist
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1194
Founded: May 10, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Eist » Thu Apr 03, 2014 10:14 am

Mallorea and Riva wrote:
Goddess Relief Office wrote:NOTING that its passage precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces and led to the restoration of South Pacific's legal government within a week,

This is simply incorrect.


Uh huh... :roll:
Unibot III wrote:Frankly, the lows that people sink to in this game is perhaps the most disturbing thing about NationStates Gameplay.

User avatar
Mallorea and Riva
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 9237
Founded: Sep 29, 2010
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Mallorea and Riva » Thu Apr 03, 2014 11:20 am

Eist wrote:
Mallorea and Riva wrote:This is simply incorrect.


Uh huh... :roll:

We didn't withdraw because a Liberation was passed. I don't think we've (tbh) ever done that.
Ideological Bulwark #253
Retired Charter Nation: Political Affairs in Antarctic Oasis
Retired Major and Field Marshal of The Black Hawks
Retired Colonel of DEN Central Command, now defunct
Former Delegate of The South Pacific, winner of TSP's "Best Dali" Award
Retired Secretary of Defense of Stargate
Terror of The Joint Systems Alliance
Mall Isaraider, son of Tram and Spartz, Brother of Jakker, Tal, and apparently Sev the treacherous bastard.
Frattastan quote of the month: "I don't think chatting with someone over the Internet about casual topics falls under faithful or unfaithful. :<"

User avatar
The UFoC Special Operations Division
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The UFoC Special Operations Division » Thu Apr 03, 2014 6:40 pm

Mallorea and Riva wrote:
Eist wrote:
Uh huh... :roll:

We didn't withdraw because a Liberation was passed. I don't think we've (tbh) ever done that.


The massive UDL liberation that was launched took care of that for you....

User avatar
Sichuan Pepper
Diplomat
 
Posts: 974
Founded: Aug 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Sichuan Pepper » Thu Apr 03, 2014 11:58 pm

I will of course support the natives decision to repeal the liberation.
Wordy, EX-TITO Field Commander.
Now just ornamental.

Mallorea and Riva wrote:Yeah but no one here can read. Literacy is a tool used by fendas, like IRC or morals.

User avatar
Goddess Relief Office
Diplomat
 
Posts: 584
Founded: Jun 04, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Goddess Relief Office » Fri Apr 04, 2014 2:09 am

Mallorea and Riva wrote:
Eist wrote:Uh huh... :roll:

We didn't withdraw because a Liberation was passed. I don't think we've (tbh) ever done that.


I can make a small change to that sentence's wording.
Last edited by Goddess Relief Office on Fri Apr 04, 2014 2:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Keeper of The World Tree - Yggdrasil
General Assembly:
GA#053 - Epidemic Response Act
GA#163 - Repeal LOTS
GA#223 - Transboundary Water Use Act

Security Council:
SC#030 - Commend 10000 Islands (co-author)
SC#044 - Commend Texas (co-author)
SC#066 - Repeal "Liberate Wonderful Paradise"
SC#108 - Liberate South Pacific
SC#135 - Liberate Anarchy (co-author)
SC#139 - Repeal "Liberate South Pacific"

Former delegate and retired defender
Nice links for easy reference:
Passed WA Resolutions | GA Resolutions (sorted by category) | GA Rules

User avatar
Holy Trek
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1274
Founded: Mar 14, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Holy Trek » Fri Apr 04, 2014 2:14 am

Goddess Relief Office wrote:Draft 2.5
Repeal "Liberate South Pacific"

Category: Repeal | Resolution: SC #108 | Proposed by: Goddess Relief Office



The Security Council,

REVIEWING the case of SC #108, passed on January 24, 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific,

NOTING that its passage was followed by the withdrawal of invader forces and the restoration of South Pacific's legal government within a week,

GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 to free the region from invader occupation had been achieved,

COGNIZANT that natives of the region have requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,

AFFIRMING the natives' right to self-determination and their desire to be free from limitations imposed by the Liberation,

WISHING to restore full regional sovereignty to the region of South Pacific,

Hereby,

REPEALS Security Council Resolution #108 "Liberate South Pacific".


The Security Council,

REVIEWING the case of SC #108, passed on January 24, 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific,

NOTING that its passage precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces and led to the restoration of South Pacific's legal government within a week,

GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 to free the region from invader occupation had been achieved,

COGNIZANT that natives of the region have requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,

AFFIRMING the natives' right to self-determination and their desire to be free from limitations imposed by the Liberation,

WISHING to restore full regional sovereignty to the region of South Pacific,

Hereby,

REPEALS Security Council Resolution #108 "Liberate South Pacific".

The Security Council,

RECALLING the passage of SC #108 in January 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific by invader forces,

NOTING that Security Council intervention through #SC 108 precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces 4 days later, and defenders have since restored the rightful government of South Pacific to its place,

GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 has now been achieved,

UNDERSTANDING that natives have requested the #SC 108 be repealed, so that full regional control can once again be return

WISHING to respect the natives' wishes and restore full sovereignty to South Pacific,

Hereby,

Repeals Security Council Resolution #108 Liberate South Pacific.


Draft is self-explanatory. The original liberation was authored by me some time back. Recently I've been told that natives want it repealed because they want SP to become a normal region again. Hence, I've started work on this.


Regards,
~GRO~


Sounds good to me. I support it.
ALSO RP AS: Federate Cherokee State, New Aztlan
Founder/member of: Dual Monarchy of Holy Trek-Inuyashina, Intergalactic Federacy and member of ANTO
Type VII, Tier I Civilization
Pro: Obamacare, gun control, choice, gay rights, Israel, Church and State separation, Liberalism
Anti: Theocracy, Tea Party, Radical Republicans, Limbaugh, Palin, Cruz, Conservatism
My nation reflects certain of my OOC and RL beliefs, a few of which are listed. Don't like it? Don't engage me in debate.
MT nation: Imperial Columbia PT nation: Levantine Empire of Palmyra
Factbooks coming soon!

User avatar
Mallorea and Riva
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 9237
Founded: Sep 29, 2010
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Mallorea and Riva » Fri Apr 04, 2014 9:46 am

The UFoC Special Operations Division wrote:
Mallorea and Riva wrote:We didn't withdraw because a Liberation was passed. I don't think we've (tbh) ever done that.


The massive UDL liberation that was launched took care of that for you....

The occupation of South Pacific was hilarious because the UDL liberation attempts consistently missed update. Frankly it was an amazing display of ineptitude.
Goddess Relief Office wrote:
Mallorea and Riva wrote:We didn't withdraw because a Liberation was passed. I don't think we've (tbh) ever done that.


I can make a small change to that sentence's wording.
Goddess Relief Office wrote:GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 to free the region from invader occupation had been achieved,
This line is disingenuous in the same vein as the other was.
Ideological Bulwark #253
Retired Charter Nation: Political Affairs in Antarctic Oasis
Retired Major and Field Marshal of The Black Hawks
Retired Colonel of DEN Central Command, now defunct
Former Delegate of The South Pacific, winner of TSP's "Best Dali" Award
Retired Secretary of Defense of Stargate
Terror of The Joint Systems Alliance
Mall Isaraider, son of Tram and Spartz, Brother of Jakker, Tal, and apparently Sev the treacherous bastard.
Frattastan quote of the month: "I don't think chatting with someone over the Internet about casual topics falls under faithful or unfaithful. :<"

User avatar
Goddess Relief Office
Diplomat
 
Posts: 584
Founded: Jun 04, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Goddess Relief Office » Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:24 am

Version 3 up.
Keeper of The World Tree - Yggdrasil
General Assembly:
GA#053 - Epidemic Response Act
GA#163 - Repeal LOTS
GA#223 - Transboundary Water Use Act

Security Council:
SC#030 - Commend 10000 Islands (co-author)
SC#044 - Commend Texas (co-author)
SC#066 - Repeal "Liberate Wonderful Paradise"
SC#108 - Liberate South Pacific
SC#135 - Liberate Anarchy (co-author)
SC#139 - Repeal "Liberate South Pacific"

Former delegate and retired defender
Nice links for easy reference:
Passed WA Resolutions | GA Resolutions (sorted by category) | GA Rules

User avatar
Mallorea and Riva
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 9237
Founded: Sep 29, 2010
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Mallorea and Riva » Sat Apr 05, 2014 8:13 am

Goddess Relief Office wrote:Version 3 up.

I appreciate the changes.
Ideological Bulwark #253
Retired Charter Nation: Political Affairs in Antarctic Oasis
Retired Major and Field Marshal of The Black Hawks
Retired Colonel of DEN Central Command, now defunct
Former Delegate of The South Pacific, winner of TSP's "Best Dali" Award
Retired Secretary of Defense of Stargate
Terror of The Joint Systems Alliance
Mall Isaraider, son of Tram and Spartz, Brother of Jakker, Tal, and apparently Sev the treacherous bastard.
Frattastan quote of the month: "I don't think chatting with someone over the Internet about casual topics falls under faithful or unfaithful. :<"

User avatar
SkyDip
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1693
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby SkyDip » Sat Apr 05, 2014 9:47 am

Looks happy to me.
Elias Thaddeus Greyjoy, WA Ambassador of SkyDip
Read my Guide to the Security Council, a comprehensive collection of history, tactics, and tips for the Security Council!


Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.

Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.

Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.

User avatar
Xanthal
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1026
Founded: Apr 16, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Xanthal » Sat Apr 05, 2014 4:56 pm

If the natives want it, who am I to argue?
Last edited by Xanthal on Sat Apr 05, 2014 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
General Assembly IC
Security Council OOC

User avatar
Hakio
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1584
Founded: Nov 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hakio » Sat Apr 05, 2014 6:20 pm

Goddess Relief Office wrote:Draft Three
Repeal "Liberate South Pacific"

Category: Repeal | Resolution: SC #108 | Proposed by: Goddess Relief Office



The Security Council,

REVIEWING Security Council resolution #108, passed on January 24, 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific,

NOTING that soon after the resolution's passage, invaders left the region on their own accord,

SATISFIED to learn that South Pacific's legal government has been restored and the region is now at peace,

COGNIZANT that the native community has requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,

AFFIRMING their right to self-determination and their desire to be free from limitations imposed by the Liberation,

WISHING to restore full regional sovereignty to the region of South Pacific,

Hereby,

REPEALS Security Council Resolution #108 "Liberate South Pacific"


The Security Council,

REVIEWING the case of SC #108, passed on January 24, 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific,

NOTING that its passage precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces and led to the restoration of South Pacific's legal government within a week,

GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 to free the region from invader occupation had been achieved,

COGNIZANT that natives of the region have requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,

AFFIRMING the natives' right to self-determination and their desire to be free from limitations imposed by the Liberation,

WISHING to restore full regional sovereignty to the region of South Pacific,

Hereby,

REPEALS Security Council Resolution #108 "Liberate South Pacific".

The Security Council,

RECALLING the passage of SC #108 in January 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific by invader forces,

NOTING that Security Council intervention through #SC 108 precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces 4 days later, and defenders have since restored the rightful government of South Pacific to its place,

GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 has now been achieved,

UNDERSTANDING that natives have requested the #SC 108 be repealed, so that full regional control can once again be return

WISHING to respect the natives' wishes and restore full sovereignty to South Pacific,

Hereby,

Repeals Security Council Resolution #108 Liberate South Pacific.


Draft is self-explanatory. The original liberation was authored by me some time back. Recently I've been told that natives want it repealed because they want SP to become a normal region again. Hence, I've started work on this.


Regards,
~GRO~


We know that it says on the Passed WA proposals the date of which a resolution is passed, but would using it in a repeal or resolution make it a RL violation?
Last edited by Hakio on Sat Apr 05, 2014 6:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Proud International Federalist

WA Voting History
Progressivism 97.5
Socialism 81.25
Tenderness 46.875
Economic Left/Right: -4.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.28
#1
Pandeeria wrote:Racism is almost as good as eating babies.

User avatar
Mallorea and Riva
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 9237
Founded: Sep 29, 2010
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Mallorea and Riva » Sat Apr 05, 2014 6:20 pm

Hakio wrote:
Goddess Relief Office wrote:Draft Three
Repeal "Liberate South Pacific"

Category: Repeal | Resolution: SC #108 | Proposed by: Goddess Relief Office



The Security Council,

REVIEWING Security Council resolution #108, passed on January 24, 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific,

NOTING that soon after the resolution's passage, invaders left the region on their own accord,

SATISFIED to learn that South Pacific's legal government has been restored and the region is now at peace,

COGNIZANT that the native community has requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,

AFFIRMING their right to self-determination and their desire to be free from limitations imposed by the Liberation,

WISHING to restore full regional sovereignty to the region of South Pacific,

Hereby,

REPEALS Security Council Resolution #108 "Liberate South Pacific"


The Security Council,

REVIEWING the case of SC #108, passed on January 24, 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific,

NOTING that its passage precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces and led to the restoration of South Pacific's legal government within a week,

GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 to free the region from invader occupation had been achieved,

COGNIZANT that natives of the region have requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,

AFFIRMING the natives' right to self-determination and their desire to be free from limitations imposed by the Liberation,

WISHING to restore full regional sovereignty to the region of South Pacific,

Hereby,

REPEALS Security Council Resolution #108 "Liberate South Pacific".

The Security Council,

RECALLING the passage of SC #108 in January 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific by invader forces,

NOTING that Security Council intervention through #SC 108 precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces 4 days later, and defenders have since restored the rightful government of South Pacific to its place,

GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 has now been achieved,

UNDERSTANDING that natives have requested the #SC 108 be repealed, so that full regional control can once again be return

WISHING to respect the natives' wishes and restore full sovereignty to South Pacific,

Hereby,

Repeals Security Council Resolution #108 Liberate South Pacific.


Draft is self-explanatory. The original liberation was authored by me some time back. Recently I've been told that natives want it repealed because they want SP to become a normal region again. Hence, I've started work on this.


Regards,
~GRO~


We knowthat it says on the Passed WA proposals the date of which a resolution is passed, but would using it in a repeal or resolution make it a RL violation?

Why on earth would it? It happened in both RL and in the in-game world.
Ideological Bulwark #253
Retired Charter Nation: Political Affairs in Antarctic Oasis
Retired Major and Field Marshal of The Black Hawks
Retired Colonel of DEN Central Command, now defunct
Former Delegate of The South Pacific, winner of TSP's "Best Dali" Award
Retired Secretary of Defense of Stargate
Terror of The Joint Systems Alliance
Mall Isaraider, son of Tram and Spartz, Brother of Jakker, Tal, and apparently Sev the treacherous bastard.
Frattastan quote of the month: "I don't think chatting with someone over the Internet about casual topics falls under faithful or unfaithful. :<"

User avatar
Hakio
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1584
Founded: Nov 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hakio » Sat Apr 05, 2014 6:23 pm

Mallorea and Riva wrote:
Hakio wrote:
We knowthat it says on the Passed WA proposals the date of which a resolution is passed, but would using it in a repeal or resolution make it a RL violation?

Why on earth would it? It happened in both RL and in the in-game world.

Dates in nations vary greatly. Some take place on different planets and other cultures may think it to be a different year since most calendars are highly culturally subjective due to their ties to religious events.
EDIT: Some take place in the future and the past also.
Last edited by Hakio on Sat Apr 05, 2014 6:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Proud International Federalist

WA Voting History
Progressivism 97.5
Socialism 81.25
Tenderness 46.875
Economic Left/Right: -4.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.28
#1
Pandeeria wrote:Racism is almost as good as eating babies.

User avatar
Mallorea and Riva
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 9237
Founded: Sep 29, 2010
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Mallorea and Riva » Sat Apr 05, 2014 6:25 pm

Hakio wrote:
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Why on earth would it? It happened in both RL and in the in-game world.

Dates in nations vary greatly. Some take place on different planets and other cultures may think it to be a different year since most calendars are highly culturally subjective due to their ties to religious events.

Perhaps but the WA has a clear label on the resolutions that are passed giving a date for their passage. I think to state that it's illegal is an incredibly massive stretch that wouldn't stand a chance of holding up. Furthermore it's been done before.
Ideological Bulwark #253
Retired Charter Nation: Political Affairs in Antarctic Oasis
Retired Major and Field Marshal of The Black Hawks
Retired Colonel of DEN Central Command, now defunct
Former Delegate of The South Pacific, winner of TSP's "Best Dali" Award
Retired Secretary of Defense of Stargate
Terror of The Joint Systems Alliance
Mall Isaraider, son of Tram and Spartz, Brother of Jakker, Tal, and apparently Sev the treacherous bastard.
Frattastan quote of the month: "I don't think chatting with someone over the Internet about casual topics falls under faithful or unfaithful. :<"

User avatar
Hakio
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1584
Founded: Nov 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hakio » Sat Apr 05, 2014 6:29 pm

Mallorea and Riva wrote:
Hakio wrote:Dates in nations vary greatly. Some take place on different planets and other cultures may think it to be a different year since most calendars are highly culturally subjective due to their ties to religious events.

Perhaps but the WA has a clear label on the resolutions that are passed giving a date for their passage. I think to state that it's illegal is an incredibly massive stretch that wouldn't stand a chance of holding up. Furthermore it's been done before.

It's been done before? Well, nevermind then.
Proud International Federalist

WA Voting History
Progressivism 97.5
Socialism 81.25
Tenderness 46.875
Economic Left/Right: -4.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.28
#1
Pandeeria wrote:Racism is almost as good as eating babies.

User avatar
Mallorea and Riva
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 9237
Founded: Sep 29, 2010
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Mallorea and Riva » Sat Apr 05, 2014 6:35 pm

Hakio wrote:
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Perhaps but the WA has a clear label on the resolutions that are passed giving a date for their passage. I think to state that it's illegal is an incredibly massive stretch that wouldn't stand a chance of holding up. Furthermore it's been done before.

It's been done before? Well, nevermind then.

My condemnation makes a reference to the years that delegates were in power before I unseated them. This never raised any issues.
Ideological Bulwark #253
Retired Charter Nation: Political Affairs in Antarctic Oasis
Retired Major and Field Marshal of The Black Hawks
Retired Colonel of DEN Central Command, now defunct
Former Delegate of The South Pacific, winner of TSP's "Best Dali" Award
Retired Secretary of Defense of Stargate
Terror of The Joint Systems Alliance
Mall Isaraider, son of Tram and Spartz, Brother of Jakker, Tal, and apparently Sev the treacherous bastard.
Frattastan quote of the month: "I don't think chatting with someone over the Internet about casual topics falls under faithful or unfaithful. :<"

User avatar
Darwinish Brentsylvania
Senator
 
Posts: 4590
Founded: Aug 21, 2013
Corporate Bordello

Postby Darwinish Brentsylvania » Sat Apr 05, 2014 6:45 pm

Yeah, support of this.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads