NS Military Realism Consultation Thread #5

by **New Vihenia** » Mon May 19, 2014 5:19 am

Questers wrote: ok, its about the stormers and the FV101s. how much were they acquired for?

Price ? You won't believe it.. We acquire our scorpions and stormers in pretty much same price as early challenger tank.

by **Questers** » Mon May 19, 2014 5:21 am

New Vihenia wrote:
Questers wrote: ok, its about the stormers and the FV101s. how much were they acquired for?

Price ? You won't believe it.. We acquire our scorpions and stormers in pretty much same price as early challenger I tank.

what. kenapa

corruption?

by **Oaledonia** » Mon May 19, 2014 5:24 am

I need to buy big ships from a foreign suplier so that I feel more like Imperial Japan

by **New Vihenia** » Mon May 19, 2014 5:31 am

Questers wrote:Price ? You won't believe it.. We acquire our scorpions and stormers in pretty much same price as early challenger I tank. what. kenapa

corruption?

Yes. a dark side of our arms procurement, price increase because some ppl wants extra cash, and not only in army..in airforce we have acquire our hawk in same price as hornet and in navy..remember our trimaran ? There's a news circulating in our military community that the funds for one trimaran is actually used to built two or three.. Thus why it used crappy composites and cheap cranes. Some navy official knowing it was dissatisfied..thus burned the ship.

Why our anti-corruption commission can't enter ? Because they have no law that will protect their entry to military procurements.

Well let's wish our new trimaran will be managed by sane person who can sanely managed the provided funds.

by **Questers** » Mon May 19, 2014 5:56 am

should I post #6 yet?

New Vihenia wrote:
Questers wrote:Price ? You won't believe it.. We acquire our scorpions and stormers in pretty much same price as early challenger I tank. what. kenapa

corruption?

Yes. a dark side of our arms procurement, price increase because some ppl wants extra cash, and not only in army..in airforce we have acquire our hawk in same price as hornet and in navy..remember our trimaran ? There's a news circulating in our military community that the funds for one trimaran is actually used to built two or three.. Thus why it used crappy composites and cheap cranes. Some navy official knowing it was dissatisfied..thus burned the ship.

Why our anti-corruption commission can't enter ? Because they have no law that will protect their entry to military procurements.

Well let's wish our new trimaran will be managed by sane person who can sanely managed the provided funds.

wow. well thanks for the knowledge LL

by **Gallia-** » Mon May 19, 2014 5:58 am

by **Vetok** » Mon May 19, 2014 5:59 am

Questers wrote:should I post #6 yet?

New Vihenia wrote:Yes. a dark side of our arms procurement, price increase because some ppl wants extra cash, and not only in army..in airforce we have acquire our hawk in same price as hornet and in navy..remember our trimaran ? There's a news circulating in our military community that the funds for one trimaran is actually used to built two or three.. Thus why it used crappy composites and cheap cranes. Some navy official knowing it was dissatisfied..thus burned the ship.

Why our anti-corruption commission can't enter ? Because they have no law that will protect their entry to military procurements.

Well let's wish our new trimaran will be managed by sane person who can sanely managed the provided funds.
wow. well thanks for the knowledge LL

I would. We're on pg 500 and the mods do tend to lock threads when they hit 500 so they don't go over the limit.

by **Questers** » Mon May 19, 2014 6:19 am

viewtopic.php?ns=1&f=23&t=296708

by **Rich and Corporations** » Mon May 19, 2014 9:20 am

Vetok wrote:
Questers wrote:should I post #6 yet?

wow. well thanks for the knowledge LL

I would. We're on pg 500 and the mods do tend to lock threads when they hit 500 so they don't go over the limit.

Actually it's to prevent the server from slowing down from long threads...

shouldn't there be a cache?

by **Voltrovia** » Mon May 19, 2014 9:21 am

500 pages...here we are.

Onto Questers' new thread then.

by **DnalweN acilbupeR** » Mon May 19, 2014 11:55 am

link to new thread plox?

by **Kouralia** » Mon May 19, 2014 11:59 am

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:link to new thread plox?

Holy fuck, really?

Use reading comprehension, pl0z.

by **Ea90** » Mon May 19, 2014 1:41 pm

woot woot page 500

by **Voltrovia** » Mon May 19, 2014 2:20 pm

Ea90 wrote:woot woot page 500

Indeed...Questers has provided a link to the new thread:

Questers wrote:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?ns=1&f=23&t=296708

by **The Soodean Imperium** » Mon May 19, 2014 2:28 pm

Odd that this thread hasn't been locked yet. I'm almost tempted to make an obligatory "Ha, I got to post on page 500" tag.

by **Imperializt Russia** » Mon May 19, 2014 2:30 pm

They'll get round to it at some point.

by **Romic** » Mon May 19, 2014 3:18 pm

To be part of the club....

by **Austrasien** » Mon May 19, 2014 4:01 pm

Look mom, I'm posting in a zombie thread!

by **Rich and Corporations** » Mon May 19, 2014 4:02 pm

This thread is no longer about military realism.

It is about modernist art apparently.

by **Hurtful Thoughts** » Mon May 19, 2014 8:55 pm

In b4 the lock

by **Mozria** » Tue May 20, 2014 7:15 am

I guess that I have made it in before the thread lock, then.

by **Transnapastain** » Tue May 20, 2014 8:15 am

viewtopic.php?f=23&t=296708

NS Military Realism Consultation Thread #5

Thread Author #6 Poll

Who is online