Me too
Advertisement
by Bazatia » Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:49 pm
Tsaraine wrote:Somewhere in Philadelphia, one school administrator has just smacked another school administrator upside the head. "Damnit, Jenkins! I told you we should just have gone with chastity belts!"
by Nouvelle Rhodes » Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:48 pm
by Flibbleites » Thu Dec 17, 2009 9:31 am
Nouvelle Rhodes wrote:And what about other Weapons of Mass Destruction? Radioactive, chemical, biological weaponry?
by The Archiepelago » Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:31 am
by Nordicus » Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:32 pm
The Archiepelago wrote:I am completely and totally OPPOSED to this. Ban Nukes?
H N Fiddlebottoms VIII wrote:Engineers hate biology, because it has very few right angles. Everything is all curves and bumps and the only penis-shaped items are actual penises.
Dregruk wrote:Kma2 wrote:How else could it be that they are so uneducated regarding what is going on in America.
Same as anyone else; I slaughter gibbons and frolic in their blood. Or just, y'know, disagree with you.
Tsaraine wrote:Somewhere in Philadelphia, one school administrator has just smacked another school administrator upside the head. "Damnit, Jenkins! I told you we should just have gone with chastity belts!"
by Grays Harbor » Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:59 pm
by Philimbesi » Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:03 pm
by Grays Harbor » Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:16 pm
Philimbesi wrote:I say we repeal it and then give the power to the SC, it can be a new categeory for them, Commend, Condem, Nuke....
by Nordicus » Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:19 pm
Philimbesi wrote:I say we repeal it and then give the power to the SC, it can be a new categeory for them, Commend, Condem, Nuke....
H N Fiddlebottoms VIII wrote:Engineers hate biology, because it has very few right angles. Everything is all curves and bumps and the only penis-shaped items are actual penises.
Dregruk wrote:Kma2 wrote:How else could it be that they are so uneducated regarding what is going on in America.
Same as anyone else; I slaughter gibbons and frolic in their blood. Or just, y'know, disagree with you.
Tsaraine wrote:Somewhere in Philadelphia, one school administrator has just smacked another school administrator upside the head. "Damnit, Jenkins! I told you we should just have gone with chastity belts!"
by Hirota » Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:45 am
by Philimbesi » Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:47 am
by Freeoplis » Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:20 am
by Grays Harbor » Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:30 am
Freeoplis wrote:The Republic of Frepolis will not agree to a repeal of the Nuclear Arms Possession Act. We wish to continue with a nuclear weapon free world.
Freeoplis
GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION # 10
Nuclear Arms Possession Act
A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.
Category: International Security
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Flibbleites
Description: REALIZING that WA members are outnumbered by non members by about 3 to 1,
ACKNOWLEDGING the fact that only WA members are required to comply with WA resolutions,
NOTICING the fact that many non member nations are hostile towards WA members,
REALIZING that the WA members need to be able to defend themselves if attacked,
1. DECLARES that WA members are allowed to possess nuclear weapons to defend themselves from hostile nations,
2. PRESERVES the right for individual nations to decide if they want to possess nuclear weapons,
3. REQUIRES that any nation choosing to possess nuclear weapons take every available precaution to ensure that their weapons do not fall into the wrong hands.
Votes For: 6,313
Votes Against: 4,663
Implemented: Fri Jun 6 2008
by Freeoplis » Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:25 am
by A mean old man » Tue Dec 22, 2009 11:43 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement