http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=strange-but-true-males-can-lactate
Advertisement
by Warda » Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:02 pm
Las Palmeras wrote:Decent enough for the Middle East.
by Wikipedia and Universe » Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:38 pm
By what standard? The autumnal equinox isn't for another month, and many students (speaking for the school calendar used in the United States and similar) haven't started school yet.
So that explains RationalWiki's fixation on goats.
An ODECON Naval Analyst wrote:Superior tactics and training can in fact triumph over force of numbers and missile spam.
Bottle wrote:This is not rocket surgery, folks.
Senestrum wrote:This is relativity, the theory that takes everything we know about the world, bends it over, and fucks it to death with a spiked dildo.
by Farnhamia » Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:44 pm
Warda wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Show me. I have heard of it happening in some men but all?
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=strange-but-true-males-can-lactate
by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:53 pm
Farnhamia wrote:
Huh. Dustin Hoffman, bats and lactating men. Will wonders never cease?
"Males of many different mammalian species have the potential to lactate, although only one, the Dayak fruit bat of Southeast Asia, does so spontaneously. Diamond points out, however, that with the societal norm of fathers helping to rear their young, male milk production could actually be to our advantage, especially with all the career women trying to balance the demands of job and family. Why else would men still have nipples?"
by Farnhamia » Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:56 pm
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Huh. Dustin Hoffman, bats and lactating men. Will wonders never cease?
"Males of many different mammalian species have the potential to lactate, although only one, the Dayak fruit bat of Southeast Asia, does so spontaneously. Diamond points out, however, that with the societal norm of fathers helping to rear their young, male milk production could actually be to our advantage, especially with all the career women trying to balance the demands of job and family. Why else would men still have nipples?"
They don't need use to be still there, but...
Because anus is a complex erogenous spot and requires training to feel it as pleasurable, the scrotum even more (for some weird reason many men are indifferent to it, and I only felt it as a normal erogenous spot after 1 year getting used to using it), and sometimes even penile stimulation will cloy you. Furthermore, male chests are extremely beautiful with nipples and aureolas and I can't imagine them otherwise. G_G
Breastfeeding my possible/likely children as well only adds even more to the picture.
by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Fri Aug 23, 2013 6:17 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Uhm ... como se diz "Too much information" em português?
by The Nuclear Fist » Fri Aug 23, 2013 6:46 pm
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
by Farnhamia » Fri Aug 23, 2013 6:46 pm
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Isn't Alex Jones a gibbering lunatic?
by Wikkiwallana » Fri Aug 23, 2013 6:46 pm
The Independent States wrote:Divair wrote:Sourcing Alex Jones and NaturalNews (just look at their Wiki page, "NaturalNews (formerly Newstarget) is a website dedicated to alternative medicine and various conspiracy theories, such as chemtrails,[1] the alleged dangers of fluoride in drinking water (as well as that of MSG and aspartame) and alleged health problems caused by "toxic" ingredients in vaccines, including the now-discredited link to autism.")
This thread.. my sides...
You're saying that fluoride, MSG, and aspartame are safe?
Nope, even some mainstream articles are hinting that they're not but very blindly. Fluoride has been proven to reduce IQ and testosterone, and aspartame was proven to increase hunger and obesity in children (aspartame transfers into the body as wood alcohol, which is linked to blindness and seizures). But I can see that someone would doubt it if they have been listening to puppet stations such as NBC or CNN. Do you know who discredits the vaccine claims? People that sell them. Mercury causes brain damage, and mercury is in the vaccines, if that isn't common sense then nothing is.
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/fluoride-childrens-health-grandjean-choi/
http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/2013/02/15/artificial-sweetners-diet-nutrition.html
http://vactruth.com/2013/07/04/vaccination-causes-autism/
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by Wikkiwallana » Fri Aug 23, 2013 6:47 pm
Wikipedia and Universe wrote:As a small but important nitpick, one is better off consulting with a dietitian than a "nutritionist." People calling themselves "nutritionists" have an alarming tendency to be quacks.Nailed to the Perch wrote:http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/125/4/e973.abstract
Goat's milk is not at ALL a "perfect alternative for babies." The AAP states that it should only be given to infants under one year of age if they are allergic to all other options, and even then it should only be done in active consultation with a doctor or pediatricnutritionistdietitian.
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Isn't Alex Jones a gibbering lunatic?
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by L Ron Cupboard » Sat Aug 24, 2013 12:20 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Daphomir, Dartropica, Ethel mermania, Gnark, Hidrandia, Port Carverton, Ravemath, The Two Jerseys, Urine Town, Valyxias, Welskerland, Xmara
Advertisement