NATION

PASSWORD

Saudi prince and billionaire backs letting women drive

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Saudi prince and billionaire backs letting women drive

Postby Divair » Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:29 am

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/ ... DB20130415

(Reuters) - Saudi Arabian billionaire Prince AlWaleed bin Talal, a nephew of King Abdullah, has thrown his support behind allowing Saudi women to drive, saying it makes economic sense.

Women are barred from driving in the Arab kingdom - leaving them reliant on mostly foreign drivers.

"(The question of) women driving will result in dispensing with at least 500,000 foreign drivers, and that has an economic and social impact for the country," the prince said on his Twitter account on Sunday.

He did not spell out the economic benefits, but Saudi officials have said they are worried about the amount of money being sent out of the country by foreign workers.

Many Saudi families would also have more disposable income if they no longer had to pay for drivers.

Saudi Arabia, home to about nine million foreign workers, began a crackdown on illegal immigrants this year to boost the proportion of Saudi citizens in private sector jobs from the current 10 percent.

In the same Twitter message, the prince said he supported that campaign.

Saudi Arabia is a conservative monarchy, backed by religious scholars. It follows an austere Salafist form of Sunni Islam and allows clerics wide powers in society where they dominate the judicial system and run their own police squad to enforce religious morals.

After pro-democracy protests swept through the region in 2011, dozens of Saudi women responded to the "Women 2 Drive" campaign, posting pictures and videos of their driving on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube.

Some of the women were detained briefly and two faced charges, including that of "challenging the monarch".

One of them was let go after signing a pledge not to drive again, while the other was sentenced to 10 lashes. Reuters could not confirm if the lashing sentence was inflicted, but a Saudi princess tweeted that it had been revoked.

While there is no written legislation banning women from driving, Saudi law requires citizens to use locally issued licenses while in the country. Such licenses are not issued to women, making it effectively illegal for them to drive.



At least Saudi Arabia is making some progress.

User avatar
Vitaphone Racing
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10123
Founded: Aug 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Vitaphone Racing » Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:37 am

Saudi Arabian billionaire Prince AlWaleed bin Talal, a nephew of King Abdullah, has thrown his support behind allowing Saudi women to drive, saying it makes economic sense.


Provided they benefit from said progress by the looks.
Parhe on my Asian-ness.
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.

ayy lmao

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:42 am

Divair wrote:At least Saudi Arabia is making some progress.

Haha yeah. This isn't nearly enough, but it certainly is a step in the right direction. Or would be if it happens. It probably will.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:43 am

Vitaphone Racing wrote:
Saudi Arabian billionaire Prince AlWaleed bin Talal, a nephew of King Abdullah, has thrown his support behind allowing Saudi women to drive, saying it makes economic sense.


Provided they benefit from said progress by the looks.

Better than nothing.

Still, a bad reason to do it. I understand that.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:44 am

Sibirsky wrote:
Vitaphone Racing wrote:
Provided they benefit from said progress by the looks.

Better than nothing.

Still, a bad reason to do it. I understand that.

To be fair, it's a good cover if he actually cares about equal rights.

User avatar
Vietnam
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1263
Founded: Oct 31, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vietnam » Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:44 am

Because of economic benefit rather than equal rights? >:v

oijrgojerogjg
Join Tiandi!

User avatar
Vietnam
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1263
Founded: Oct 31, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vietnam » Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:45 am

Divair wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:Better than nothing.

Still, a bad reason to do it. I understand that.

To be fair, it's a good cover if he actually cares about equal rights.

Agreed.
Join Tiandi!

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:46 am

Divair wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:Better than nothing.

Still, a bad reason to do it. I understand that.

To be fair, it's a good cover if he actually cares about equal rights.

You think that might be the case?

Hey whatever works. The place is conservative.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
New Naephak
Minister
 
Posts: 3143
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby New Naephak » Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:46 am

When I saw the title the first thing I thought of were Nigerian princes.

Anyways, good for Saudi Arabia, if it happens.

User avatar
Darmalstan
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Apr 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Darmalstan » Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:20 am

Wow and here I thought America was the most patriarchal, woman-hating country in the world. Maybe those feminists should direct their energy towards countries like this where women actually are oppressed and treated unfairly under the law.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69785
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:37 am

Divair wrote:http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/15/us-saudi-driving-idUSBRE93E0DB20130415

(Reuters) - Saudi Arabian billionaire Prince AlWaleed bin Talal, a nephew of King Abdullah, has thrown his support behind allowing Saudi women to drive, saying it makes economic sense.

Women are barred from driving in the Arab kingdom - leaving them reliant on mostly foreign drivers.

"(The question of) women driving will result in dispensing with at least 500,000 foreign drivers, and that has an economic and social impact for the country," the prince said on his Twitter account on Sunday.

He did not spell out the economic benefits, but Saudi officials have said they are worried about the amount of money being sent out of the country by foreign workers.

Many Saudi families would also have more disposable income if they no longer had to pay for drivers.

Saudi Arabia, home to about nine million foreign workers, began a crackdown on illegal immigrants this year to boost the proportion of Saudi citizens in private sector jobs from the current 10 percent.

In the same Twitter message, the prince said he supported that campaign.

Saudi Arabia is a conservative monarchy, backed by religious scholars. It follows an austere Salafist form of Sunni Islam and allows clerics wide powers in society where they dominate the judicial system and run their own police squad to enforce religious morals.

After pro-democracy protests swept through the region in 2011, dozens of Saudi women responded to the "Women 2 Drive" campaign, posting pictures and videos of their driving on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube.

Some of the women were detained briefly and two faced charges, including that of "challenging the monarch".

One of them was let go after signing a pledge not to drive again, while the other was sentenced to 10 lashes. Reuters could not confirm if the lashing sentence was inflicted, but a Saudi princess tweeted that it had been revoked.

While there is no written legislation banning women from driving, Saudi law requires citizens to use locally issued licenses while in the country. Such licenses are not issued to women, making it effectively illegal for them to drive.



At least Saudi Arabia is making some progress.

So what do you think? 18th century? 19th?
Anarcho-Communist, Democratic Confederalist
"The Earth isn't dying, it's being killed. And those killing it have names and addresses." -Utah Phillips

User avatar
Regnum Dominae
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12345
Founded: Feb 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Regnum Dominae » Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:41 am

Genivaria wrote:
Divair wrote:http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/15/us-saudi-driving-idUSBRE93E0DB20130415




At least Saudi Arabia is making some progress.

So what do you think? 18th century? 19th?

Early 17th.
I support peace in Israel and Palestine. The governments and people in power on all sides are an absolute disgrace, and their unwillingness to pursue peace is a disservice to the people they are meant to be serving. The status quo is not simply untenable; it is unquestionably unacceptable.

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:43 am

Glad to see Saudi is catching up with civilized world... they are just three or four hundred years behind now.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Riparian March
Diplomat
 
Posts: 522
Founded: Feb 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Riparian March » Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:52 am

The opinion of one Prince/billionaire is not that important in Saudi Arabia, because they have so many of them. Anyway the Sultan has to balance any desires he has to institute change with the forces opposed to that change. I am not sure what the current reasoning behind having woman not drive. I am sure it is not because they are bad drivers. Anyway, it seems odd that they would rather have their women ride in a car with a foreigner than by herself. I forget which country it is, but there is one with taxis just for women driven by women.
All tips and pointers are appreciated.
Then register your dynasty here: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=225068

User avatar
Duvniask
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6335
Founded: Aug 30, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Duvniask » Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:54 am

Well good I guess?

Darmalstan wrote:Wow and here I thought America was the most patriarchal, woman-hating country in the world. Maybe those feminists should direct their energy towards countries like this where women actually are oppressed and treated unfairly under the law.


I don't know what would give you that impression?
Last edited by Duvniask on Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:55 am, edited 2 times in total.
One of these days, I'm going to burst a blood vessel in my brain.

User avatar
Lunaris
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 174
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lunaris » Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:03 am

Darmalstan wrote:Wow and here I thought America was the most patriarchal, woman-hating country in the world. Maybe those feminists should direct their energy towards countries like this where women actually are oppressed and treated unfairly under the law.


Only, it won't do much of anything. You have to remember who we are talking about here.

Who came up with the idea that woman shouldn't drive anyway ? I mean there are stupid laws and really idiotic ones...

User avatar
New Chalcedon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12226
Founded: Sep 20, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Chalcedon » Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:08 am

Divair wrote:http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/15/us-saudi-driving-idUSBRE93E0DB20130415

(Reuters) - Saudi Arabian billionaire Prince AlWaleed bin Talal, a nephew of King Abdullah, has thrown his support behind allowing Saudi women to drive, saying it makes economic sense.

Women are barred from driving in the Arab kingdom - leaving them reliant on mostly foreign drivers.

"(The question of) women driving will result in dispensing with at least 500,000 foreign drivers, and that has an economic and social impact for the country," the prince said on his Twitter account on Sunday.

He did not spell out the economic benefits, but Saudi officials have said they are worried about the amount of money being sent out of the country by foreign workers.

Many Saudi families would also have more disposable income if they no longer had to pay for drivers.

Saudi Arabia, home to about nine million foreign workers, began a crackdown on illegal immigrants this year to boost the proportion of Saudi citizens in private sector jobs from the current 10 percent.

In the same Twitter message, the prince said he supported that campaign.

Saudi Arabia is a conservative monarchy, backed by religious scholars. It follows an austere Salafist form of Sunni Islam and allows clerics wide powers in society where they dominate the judicial system and run their own police squad to enforce religious morals.

After pro-democracy protests swept through the region in 2011, dozens of Saudi women responded to the "Women 2 Drive" campaign, posting pictures and videos of their driving on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube.

Some of the women were detained briefly and two faced charges, including that of "challenging the monarch".

One of them was let go after signing a pledge not to drive again, while the other was sentenced to 10 lashes. Reuters could not confirm if the lashing sentence was inflicted, but a Saudi princess tweeted that it had been revoked.

While there is no written legislation banning women from driving, Saudi law requires citizens to use locally issued licenses while in the country. Such licenses are not issued to women, making it effectively illegal for them to drive.



At least Saudi Arabia is making some progress.


True, but it'd mean a lot more if the King or one of the (surviving) Sudairi Seven were to back it - the four surviving brothers are the core of royalist power in Riyadh, even though none of them is currently King. Sure, the others are "royal", but what does that mean with 7,000+ members of the Saudi Royal Family?
Fuck it all. Let the world burn - there's no way roaches could do a worse job of being decent than we have.

User avatar
Riparian March
Diplomat
 
Posts: 522
Founded: Feb 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Riparian March » Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:56 am

New Chalcedon wrote:[quote="Divair";p="13973097"

True, but it'd mean a lot more if the King or one of the (surviving) Sudairi Seven were to back it - the four surviving brothers are the core of royalist power in Riyadh, even though none of them is currently King. Sure, the others are "royal", but what does that mean with 7,000+ members of the Saudi Royal Family?


Yeah, but that is why they don't. I am pretty sure Arab culture is indirect, so I imagine they might have one of the less important Prince's propose it. That way it creates a national discussion and they can sound out the idea with little risk. If there is a huge domestic backlash against it, the King doesn't risk anything, and no one talks about it again. No big deal.
All tips and pointers are appreciated.
Then register your dynasty here: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=225068

User avatar
Churchilland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1691
Founded: Feb 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Churchilland » Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:03 am

It's a start towards rights, I suppose
Churchilland Embassy Project
Personification, as done by The Merchant Republics
The National anthem "Ode to the Nation"
Morgan Jones Tea Shops
http://www.politicaltest.net/test/graph ... 66_eng.jpg
Ceannairceach wrote:
Because Britain is the other, better America. Its like America 1.0, when America 2.0 failed miserably.

Zuri Nyuni wrote:
There are things men speak only in hushed voices, afraid that if the wind caught their words, great evil would befall them. One of these things is Birmingham. The other is Peirs Morgan.

Ifreann wrote:
Maybe thinking the Illuminati exist is what the Illuminati want us to think.

User avatar
Radiatia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8376
Founded: Oct 25, 2011
Capitalizt

Postby Radiatia » Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:04 am

What? That's disgusting. It's just wrong for women to be allowed to drive. They're not like us. What if they have a PMS attack in the middle of an intersection, causing accidents? Don't they know driving causes women to grow beards!?

I am outraged!

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54739
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:04 am

Divair wrote:http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/15/us-saudi-driving-idUSBRE93E0DB20130415

(Reuters) - Saudi Arabian billionaire Prince AlWaleed bin Talal, a nephew of King Abdullah, has thrown his support behind allowing Saudi women to drive, saying it makes economic sense.


Damn pinko elitist commie hippies... next thing you'll know, they'll even support women being considered as human beings! :evil:
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:05 am

Not sure if yay...

User avatar
Khadgar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11006
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Khadgar » Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:06 am

Will they still require a male relative escort everywhere? If so, it's not progress. It just means they'll have to drive their minders around.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54739
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:08 am

Khadgar wrote:Will they still require a male relative escort everywhere? If so, it's not progress. It just means they'll have to drive their minders around.

It's good for the economy: there's never enough slaves with a driver license, you know.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
New Octopucta
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1778
Founded: Jun 14, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Octopucta » Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:13 am

Radiatia wrote:What? That's disgusting. It's just wrong for women to be allowed to drive. They're not like us. What if they have a PMS attack in the middle of an intersection, causing accidents? Don't they know driving causes women to grow beards!?

I am outraged!

Finally someone gets it.

Can anyone show me where it says in the Good Book that women should be allowed to drive?

Anyone? That's what I thought.

Allowing women to drive is the greatest human rights atrocity since allowing the placement of ramps in and around buildings.
Last edited by New Octopucta on Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:14 am, edited 3 times in total.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name

Advertisement

Remove ads