NATION

PASSWORD

North Korea renders armistice null and void,cuts S.K Hotline

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:57 pm

I think this could very well result in a war.

I'd be willing to bet that the North thinks that it very well could successfully take over the South. Yes, the North is aware that it would then have to face America, and won't have China to back it up. However, it could very well be the case that the North has itself deluded into thinking that it could take on the entire planet if it controlled the South. Of course, this is pure speculation on my part.

Personally, as somebody who's grandfather served in the Korean War, and as I am myself heavily considering a career in the military, I see a fair bit of poetic justice in that I could very well end up fighting where my grandfather once did.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Hurtful Thoughts
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Sep 09, 2005
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Hurtful Thoughts » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:02 pm

Y'know, the sooner North Korea lets South Korea win, the sooner they can stop glaring across that immaginary demilitarized-zone and worry about how they're going to get rid of all those American Imperialists.

When it comes to communism, the only way to win is by losing gracefully like a champ.

Even Ghandi knew that.
Last edited by Hurtful Thoughts on Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:04 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Factbook and general referance thread.
HOI <- Storefront (WiP)
Due to population-cuts, military-size currently being revised

The People's Republic of Hurtful Thoughts is a gargantuan, environmentally stunning nation, ruled by Leader with an even hand, and renowned for its compulsory military service, multi-spousal wedding ceremonies, and smutty television.
Mokostana wrote:See, Hurty cared not if the mission succeeded or not, as long as it was spectacular trainwreck. Sometimes that was the host Nation firing a SCUD into a hospital to destroy a foreign infection and accidentally sparking a rebellion... or accidentally starting the Mokan Drug War

Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:If there was only a "like" button for NS posts....

User avatar
The God-Realm
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8759
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The God-Realm » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:21 pm

Grand Britannia wrote:Slightly relevant.

Propaganda.
Add me on Steam: Hatekindler

Member of: IWW, EF!, La Raza, the KFA, and NSG Senate and Red Army
Esternial wrote:
The God-Realm wrote:No

people who qq over losing a gf over a small penis size are insecure and need to check themselves

Before they wreck themselves?

Or their ex' car.

User avatar
Gallifra
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 181
Founded: Jan 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Gallifra » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:28 pm

War is seeming inevitable. Diplomacy must still be the first option, but we must be ready for war. Maybe we can finally put an end to the suffering of 24 million people by a family of mentally ill, fat bastards.
Last edited by Gallifra on Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
New Sapienta
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9298
Founded: Sep 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Sapienta » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:28 pm

The God-Realm wrote:
Grand Britannia wrote:Slightly relevant.

Propaganda.

Yeah, okay :roll:

Not that I put much value with Deadliest Warrior, what with matchups like IRA vs. Spetznaz, it's not propganda. Pretty sure that U.S. Rnagers would win.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:30 pm

New Sapienta wrote:
The God-Realm wrote:Propaganda.

Yeah, okay :roll:

Not that I put much value with Deadliest Warrior, what with matchups like IRA vs. Spetznaz, it's not propganda. Pretty sure that U.S. Rnagers would win.

Rnagers?

Were those the washout units?

User avatar
New Sapienta
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9298
Founded: Sep 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Sapienta » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:30 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
New Sapienta wrote:Yeah, okay :roll:

Not that I put much value with Deadliest Warrior, what with matchups like IRA vs. Spetznaz, it's not propganda. Pretty sure that U.S. Rnagers would win.

Rnagers?

Were those the washout units?

Yeah, the real badasses went to the Grammar Nazi Battalion.

User avatar
The God-Realm
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8759
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The God-Realm » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:31 pm

New Sapienta wrote:
The God-Realm wrote:Propaganda.

Yeah, okay :roll:

Not that I put much value with Deadliest Warrior, what with matchups like IRA vs. Spetznaz, it's not propganda. Pretty sure that U.S. Rnagers would win.

Rnagers are shit, Rangers however.
Add me on Steam: Hatekindler

Member of: IWW, EF!, La Raza, the KFA, and NSG Senate and Red Army
Esternial wrote:
The God-Realm wrote:No

people who qq over losing a gf over a small penis size are insecure and need to check themselves

Before they wreck themselves?

Or their ex' car.

User avatar
New Sapienta
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9298
Founded: Sep 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Sapienta » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:32 pm

The God-Realm wrote:
New Sapienta wrote:Yeah, okay :roll:

Not that I put much value with Deadliest Warrior, what with matchups like IRA vs. Spetznaz, it's not propganda. Pretty sure that U.S. Rnagers would win.

Rnagers are shit, Rangers however.

Yup, you already lost the race.

User avatar
Grand Britannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14615
Founded: Apr 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grand Britannia » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:34 pm

The God-Realm wrote:
Grand Britannia wrote:Slightly relevant.

Propaganda.


Rangers lead the way.
ଘ( ˘ ᵕ˘)つ----x .*・。゚・ᵕ

User avatar
The God-Realm
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8759
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The God-Realm » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:35 pm

Grand Britannia wrote:
The God-Realm wrote:Propaganda.


Rangers lead the way.

No Dear Pudgy Leader does.
Add me on Steam: Hatekindler

Member of: IWW, EF!, La Raza, the KFA, and NSG Senate and Red Army
Esternial wrote:
The God-Realm wrote:No

people who qq over losing a gf over a small penis size are insecure and need to check themselves

Before they wreck themselves?

Or their ex' car.

User avatar
Grand Britannia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14615
Founded: Apr 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grand Britannia » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:36 pm

The God-Realm wrote:
Grand Britannia wrote:
Rangers lead the way.

No Dear Pudgy Leader does.


Why you call Kimmy fat?
ଘ( ˘ ᵕ˘)つ----x .*・。゚・ᵕ

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:36 pm

Grand Britannia wrote:
The God-Realm wrote:No Dear Pudgy Leader does.


Why you call Kimmy fat?

Because the ass was fat.

User avatar
The God-Realm
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8759
Founded: Jul 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The God-Realm » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:39 pm

Grand Britannia wrote:
The God-Realm wrote:No Dear Pudgy Leader does.


Why you call Kimmy fat?

Not fat, pleasingly pudgy.
Add me on Steam: Hatekindler

Member of: IWW, EF!, La Raza, the KFA, and NSG Senate and Red Army
Esternial wrote:
The God-Realm wrote:No

people who qq over losing a gf over a small penis size are insecure and need to check themselves

Before they wreck themselves?

Or their ex' car.

User avatar
Nicer potlimitomaha
Minister
 
Posts: 3226
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Nicer potlimitomaha » Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:37 pm

Rio Cana wrote:
Nicer potlimitomaha wrote:
Not currently. Give it 10 more years and China will execute Kim Jong Un and company.


But by that time NK. will be a US allie. Yes, in politics anything can happen.


Yes but it's highly likely that as China gets more and more capitalistic it would be more interested in technologically advanced nations like South Korea that pose no military threat then a hellhole ruled by a guy who's age is a state secret.
Joined in 2012. Recently rejoined after a 6 year pause.

User avatar
The Tiger Kingdom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12281
Founded: May 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tiger Kingdom » Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:28 pm

This might explain the NK server hiccup from a few days ago that got mentioned here:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/14/world/asi ... hpt=hp_bn2
Last edited by The Tiger Kingdom on Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
When the war is over
Got to start again
Try to hold a trace of what it was back then
You and I we sent each other stories
Just a page I'm lost in all its glory
How can I go home and not get blown away


User avatar
New Libertarian States
Minister
 
Posts: 3279
Founded: Jan 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Libertarian States » Sat Mar 16, 2013 12:48 pm

by Liriena » Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:25 pm
Do you hear the people sing?
Singing the song of "No one cares".
It is the music of a people
who are sick NK waving its dick.
When the beating of our ignore cannon
echoes the beating of our facepalms,
there is a life about to start
when we nuke Pyongyang!

Literally a Horse
Not a Libertarian, just like the name.[benevolentthomas] horse is a defender leader in multiple region- whore organizations.
23:07 Unibot If an article could have a sack of testicles - it would.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sat Mar 16, 2013 1:52 pm


User avatar
Arumdaum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24565
Founded: Oct 21, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Arumdaum » Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:21 pm

Last edited by Arumdaum on Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
LITERALLY UNLIKE ANY OTHER RP REGION & DON'T REPORT THIS SIG
█████████████████▌TIANDI ____________██____██
_______███▌MAP _______________██_____██_████████
█████████████████▌WIKI _______██______██___██____██
_______████ DISCORD ________██████___██____██______█

____████__████ SIGNUP _________██___████___██____
__████_______████_____________██______██__________██
████____________████_______█████████___███████████

User avatar
Fintanland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1767
Founded: Aug 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Fintanland » Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:25 pm

Grenartia wrote:I'd be willing to bet that the North thinks that it very well could successfully take over the South. Yes, the North is aware that it would then have to face America, and won't have China to back it up. However, it could very well be the case that the North has itself deluded into thinking that it could take on the entire planet if it controlled the South. Of course, this is pure speculation on my part.

I do not think the North Korean leadership is as crazy as it appears to be. Much of it is deliberate propaganda, a sort of NK take on that old asshole Kissinger's good old "Madman Strategy". They have more access to accurate information than their people, and profit from a constant state of war. Better to keep your people in a 1984-style perma-war than to risk everything on a big gamble.
Pro: Communists, Trotskyists, neo-Trotskyists, crypto-Trotskyists, union leaders, Communist union leaders, atheists, agnostics, long-haired weirdos, short-haired weirdos, football supporters, namby- pamby probation officers, foreign surgeons - headshrinkers, Wedgwood Benn, keg bitter, punk rock, glue- sniffers, Play For Today, squatters, Clive Jenkins, Roy Jenkins, Up Jenkins, up everybody's, Chinese restaurants

Anti: Thugs, bully-boys, psychopaths, sacked policemen, security guards, sacked security guards, racialists, Pakistani-bashers, queer-bashers, Chinese-bashers, anybody-bashers, Rear Admirals, Vice-Admirals, fascists, neo-fascists, crypto-fascists, loyalists, neo- loyalists, crypto-loyalists.

(With apologies to "The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin")

User avatar
The Joseon Dynasty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6015
Founded: Jan 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Joseon Dynasty » Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:53 pm

Grenartia wrote:I think this could very well result in a war.

I'd be willing to bet that the North thinks that it very well could successfully take over the South. Yes, the North is aware that it would then have to face America, and won't have China to back it up. However, it could very well be the case that the North has itself deluded into thinking that it could take on the entire planet if it controlled the South. Of course, this is pure speculation on my part.

Personally, as somebody who's grandfather served in the Korean War, and as I am myself heavily considering a career in the military, I see a fair bit of poetic justice in that I could very well end up fighting where my grandfather once did.


I seriously doubt it. Here's my evidence, if you're interested.
  • No, I'm not Korean. I'm British and as white as the Queen's buttocks.
  • Bio: I'm a PhD student in Statistics. Interested in all sorts of things. Currently getting into statistical signal processing for brain imaging. Currently co-authoring a paper on labour market dynamics, hopefully branching off into a test of the Markov property for labour market transition rates.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sat Mar 16, 2013 5:34 pm

Fintanland wrote:
Grenartia wrote:I'd be willing to bet that the North thinks that it very well could successfully take over the South. Yes, the North is aware that it would then have to face America, and won't have China to back it up. However, it could very well be the case that the North has itself deluded into thinking that it could take on the entire planet if it controlled the South. Of course, this is pure speculation on my part.

I do not think the North Korean leadership is as crazy as it appears to be. Much of it is deliberate propaganda, a sort of NK take on that old asshole Kissinger's good old "Madman Strategy". They have more access to accurate information than their people, and profit from a constant state of war. Better to keep your people in a 1984-style perma-war than to risk everything on a big gamble.


I never read 1984. But I do have a passing familiarity with the Madman Strategy.

However, at some point in NK's chain of command, it is very possible that somebody in the chain of command will order a unilateral attack.

The Joseon Dynasty wrote:
Grenartia wrote:I think this could very well result in a war.

I'd be willing to bet that the North thinks that it very well could successfully take over the South. Yes, the North is aware that it would then have to face America, and won't have China to back it up. However, it could very well be the case that the North has itself deluded into thinking that it could take on the entire planet if it controlled the South. Of course, this is pure speculation on my part.

Personally, as somebody who's grandfather served in the Korean War, and as I am myself heavily considering a career in the military, I see a fair bit of poetic justice in that I could very well end up fighting where my grandfather once did.


I seriously doubt it. Here's my evidence, if you're interested.


I can see where you're coming from. I really can. However, I think NK thinks it has a lot to gain from a swift takeover of the South. After all, too many people are STILL starving in NK, much like they were in the 90's, when you said the threat of war was greatest. And with NK's recent nuclear test, and a demonstrated ability to at least hit Japan, one EMP could conceivably knock out much of the capable resistance to NK forces.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
The Joseon Dynasty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6015
Founded: Jan 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Joseon Dynasty » Sat Mar 16, 2013 6:13 pm

Grenartia wrote:I can see where you're coming from. I really can. However, I think NK thinks it has a lot to gain from a swift takeover of the South. After all, too many people are STILL starving in NK, much like they were in the 90's, when you said the threat of war was greatest. And with NK's recent nuclear test, and a demonstrated ability to at least hit Japan, one EMP could conceivably knock out much of the capable resistance to NK forces.


For one, I think the extent and consistency of North Korean starvation is well over-stated. As I argued here, poverty in North Korea has improved significantly since the nineties, and is more-or-less consistent with levels seen in other developing countries. Furthermore, the increasing influx of Chinese investors, bringing with them infrastructural and economic development, is another change in the landscape from the nineties, and not something that North Korea is keen to lose.

As I noted in the other post, the regime has often been a calculating, well-informed and risk-averse actor. At the moment, although it is pushing the bounds of what it thinks it can get away with (in order, I think, to force the international community's hand on its nuclear programme), and is maybe over-stepping them, I do not see any indications of a real desire for conflict.

What do you think North Korea would gain from it?
  • No, I'm not Korean. I'm British and as white as the Queen's buttocks.
  • Bio: I'm a PhD student in Statistics. Interested in all sorts of things. Currently getting into statistical signal processing for brain imaging. Currently co-authoring a paper on labour market dynamics, hopefully branching off into a test of the Markov property for labour market transition rates.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sat Mar 16, 2013 6:46 pm

The Joseon Dynasty wrote:
Grenartia wrote:I can see where you're coming from. I really can. However, I think NK thinks it has a lot to gain from a swift takeover of the South. After all, too many people are STILL starving in NK, much like they were in the 90's, when you said the threat of war was greatest. And with NK's recent nuclear test, and a demonstrated ability to at least hit Japan, one EMP could conceivably knock out much of the capable resistance to NK forces.


For one, I think the extent and consistency of North Korean starvation is well over-stated. As I argued here, poverty in North Korea has improved significantly since the nineties, and is more-or-less consistent with levels seen in other developing countries. Furthermore, the increasing influx of Chinese investors, bringing with them infrastructural and economic development, is another change in the landscape from the nineties, and not something that North Korea is keen to lose.

As I noted in the other post, the regime has often been a calculating, well-informed and risk-averse actor. At the moment, although it is pushing the bounds of what it thinks it can get away with (in order, I think, to force the international community's hand on its nuclear programme), and is maybe over-stepping them, I do not see any indications of a real desire for conflict.

What do you think North Korea would gain from it?


Ultimately, unification of Korea.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Azurius, Fractalnavel, Shrillland, The Matthew Islands

Advertisement

Remove ads