Advertisement
by Grenartia » Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:57 pm
by Hurtful Thoughts » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:02 pm
Mokostana wrote:See, Hurty cared not if the mission succeeded or not, as long as it was spectacular trainwreck. Sometimes that was the host Nation firing a SCUD into a hospital to destroy a foreign infection and accidentally sparking a rebellion... or accidentally starting the Mokan Drug War
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:If there was only a "like" button for NS posts....
by Gallifra » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:28 pm
by New Sapienta » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:28 pm
by The Emerald Dawn » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:30 pm
by New Sapienta » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:30 pm
by New Sapienta » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:32 pm
by The Emerald Dawn » Thu Mar 14, 2013 4:36 pm
by Nicer potlimitomaha » Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:37 pm
by The Tiger Kingdom » Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:28 pm
by United States of Raptors » Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:19 pm
The Archregimancy wrote:I only have one:
That most people in NSG actually know that much about history/archaeology in the first place.
by New Libertarian States » Sat Mar 16, 2013 12:48 pm
United States of Raptors wrote:For anyone who wanted to know what Kim Jong-Un looked like well we have a good guess at what he looks like, click to see. Warning: the picture involved may be ugly as hell and the title of the page is Korean for stupid aggressive lunatic which coincidentally could describe Kim Jong-Un completely.
by Arumdaum » Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:21 pm
United States of Raptors wrote:For anyone who wanted to know what Kim Jong-Un looked like well we have a good guess at what he looks like, click to see. Warning: the picture involved may be ugly as hell and the title of the page is Korean for stupid aggressive lunatic which coincidentally could describe Kim Jong-Un completely.
by Fintanland » Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:25 pm
Grenartia wrote:I'd be willing to bet that the North thinks that it very well could successfully take over the South. Yes, the North is aware that it would then have to face America, and won't have China to back it up. However, it could very well be the case that the North has itself deluded into thinking that it could take on the entire planet if it controlled the South. Of course, this is pure speculation on my part.
by The Joseon Dynasty » Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:53 pm
Grenartia wrote:I think this could very well result in a war.
I'd be willing to bet that the North thinks that it very well could successfully take over the South. Yes, the North is aware that it would then have to face America, and won't have China to back it up. However, it could very well be the case that the North has itself deluded into thinking that it could take on the entire planet if it controlled the South. Of course, this is pure speculation on my part.
Personally, as somebody who's grandfather served in the Korean War, and as I am myself heavily considering a career in the military, I see a fair bit of poetic justice in that I could very well end up fighting where my grandfather once did.
by Grenartia » Sat Mar 16, 2013 5:34 pm
Fintanland wrote:Grenartia wrote:I'd be willing to bet that the North thinks that it very well could successfully take over the South. Yes, the North is aware that it would then have to face America, and won't have China to back it up. However, it could very well be the case that the North has itself deluded into thinking that it could take on the entire planet if it controlled the South. Of course, this is pure speculation on my part.
I do not think the North Korean leadership is as crazy as it appears to be. Much of it is deliberate propaganda, a sort of NK take on that old asshole Kissinger's good old "Madman Strategy". They have more access to accurate information than their people, and profit from a constant state of war. Better to keep your people in a 1984-style perma-war than to risk everything on a big gamble.
The Joseon Dynasty wrote:Grenartia wrote:I think this could very well result in a war.
I'd be willing to bet that the North thinks that it very well could successfully take over the South. Yes, the North is aware that it would then have to face America, and won't have China to back it up. However, it could very well be the case that the North has itself deluded into thinking that it could take on the entire planet if it controlled the South. Of course, this is pure speculation on my part.
Personally, as somebody who's grandfather served in the Korean War, and as I am myself heavily considering a career in the military, I see a fair bit of poetic justice in that I could very well end up fighting where my grandfather once did.
I seriously doubt it. Here's my evidence, if you're interested.
by The Joseon Dynasty » Sat Mar 16, 2013 6:13 pm
Grenartia wrote:I can see where you're coming from. I really can. However, I think NK thinks it has a lot to gain from a swift takeover of the South. After all, too many people are STILL starving in NK, much like they were in the 90's, when you said the threat of war was greatest. And with NK's recent nuclear test, and a demonstrated ability to at least hit Japan, one EMP could conceivably knock out much of the capable resistance to NK forces.
by Grenartia » Sat Mar 16, 2013 6:46 pm
The Joseon Dynasty wrote:Grenartia wrote:I can see where you're coming from. I really can. However, I think NK thinks it has a lot to gain from a swift takeover of the South. After all, too many people are STILL starving in NK, much like they were in the 90's, when you said the threat of war was greatest. And with NK's recent nuclear test, and a demonstrated ability to at least hit Japan, one EMP could conceivably knock out much of the capable resistance to NK forces.
For one, I think the extent and consistency of North Korean starvation is well over-stated. As I argued here, poverty in North Korea has improved significantly since the nineties, and is more-or-less consistent with levels seen in other developing countries. Furthermore, the increasing influx of Chinese investors, bringing with them infrastructural and economic development, is another change in the landscape from the nineties, and not something that North Korea is keen to lose.
As I noted in the other post, the regime has often been a calculating, well-informed and risk-averse actor. At the moment, although it is pushing the bounds of what it thinks it can get away with (in order, I think, to force the international community's hand on its nuclear programme), and is maybe over-stepping them, I do not see any indications of a real desire for conflict.
What do you think North Korea would gain from it?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Azurius, Fractalnavel, Shrillland, The Matthew Islands
Advertisement