
by Anti-Social Darwinism » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:45 pm

by Chrobalta » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:49 pm

by Azzers » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:50 pm

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:50 pm
Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:to sedation.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Azzers » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:52 pm
Chrobalta wrote:Set aside a special section for them (and by that I mean the back of the plane near the bathrooms).

by Lackadaisical2 » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:52 pm
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by Northwest Slobovia » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:53 pm

by Czardas » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:53 pm

by Dimoniquid » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:54 pm
Jimmy Carr wrote:GET OVER IT, NO-ONE CARES.

by Lunatic Goofballs » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:54 pm


by Maurepas » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:54 pm
Czardas wrote:The airline is a private institution. It is within its rights to kick off any passenger from the airplane for any reason, if it refunds the passenger the cost of their ticket afterwards (according to law). If you're not happy about getting kicked off, you can choose to fly with a different airline next time.

by The Tofu Islands » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:55 pm

by Northwest Slobovia » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:55 pm
Maurepas wrote:Unless you specify no children on planes, you, as an airline have to put up with it...

by Czardas » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:56 pm
Maurepas wrote:Czardas wrote:The airline is a private institution. It is within its rights to kick off any passenger from the airplane for any reason, if it refunds the passenger the cost of their ticket afterwards (according to law). If you're not happy about getting kicked off, you can choose to fly with a different airline next time.
Agreed, but they should be required to refund them if they kick them off, of course, which is where I would disagree with the OP...

by Dimoniquid » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:56 pm

by AB Again » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:56 pm
Azzers wrote:I personally absolutely HATE little children, they are usally unbehaved and hyperactive and I think the little -censored- deserved to get kicked off.

by Ryadn » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:57 pm

by Anti-Social Darwinism » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:57 pm
Maurepas wrote:Czardas wrote:The airline is a private institution. It is within its rights to kick off any passenger from the airplane for any reason, if it refunds the passenger the cost of their ticket afterwards (according to law). If you're not happy about getting kicked off, you can choose to fly with a different airline next time.
Agreed, but they should be required to refund them if they kick them off, of course, which is where I would disagree with the OP...

by Maurepas » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:58 pm
Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:Maurepas wrote:Czardas wrote:The airline is a private institution. It is within its rights to kick off any passenger from the airplane for any reason, if it refunds the passenger the cost of their ticket afterwards (according to law). If you're not happy about getting kicked off, you can choose to fly with a different airline next time.
Agreed, but they should be required to refund them if they kick them off, of course, which is where I would disagree with the OP...
Where did I say no refund? My first sentence said that there should be no compensation other than a refund. The airline shouldn't have to pay people because they couldn't keep their kids in line.

by Lackadaisical2 » Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:59 pm
AB Again wrote:Azzers wrote:I personally absolutely HATE little children, they are usally unbehaved and hyperactive and I think the little -censored- deserved to get kicked off.
And you never were a little child!
Small children have as much right to travel as you do. Not everyone on a long flight is going to behave in a manner that everyone else condones. Such is the variety of humankind. Why are the young kids being singled out here? There are obnoxious adults, intransigent geriatrics, and unbearable adolescents as well on most long haul flights. Unfortunately we can not, and should not, make everyone behave according to our personal values - so we just have to put up with the annoyance.
If it is a short flight then just get over it already
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by Azzers » Sat Oct 31, 2009 2:00 pm
AB Again wrote:Azzers wrote:I personally absolutely HATE little children, they are usally unbehaved and hyperactive and I think the little -censored- deserved to get kicked off.
And you never were a little child!
Small children have as much right to travel as you do. Not everyone on a long flight is going to behave in a manner that everyone else condones. Such is the variety of humankind. Why are the young kids being singled out here? There are obnoxious adults, intransigent geriatrics, and unbearable adolescents as well on most long haul flights. Unfortunately we can not, and should not, make everyone behave according to our personal values - so we just have to put up with the annoyance.
If it is a short flight then just get over it already
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Best Mexico, Borozia, Bovad, Dimetrodon Empire, Grinning Dragon, Page, Perikuresu, Republic Of Ludwigsburg, Thermodolia, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement