I'm opposed. I don't want to say that the above noted spelling error is the reason, but, well, it's kind of the reason.
First, I want to make clear that I'm not opposed to this because the target of the condemnation might view it as a badge of honor. I've given that argument a lot of thought over the past few months, and while I can see why it concerns people I don't think it should be a factor. Condemnations are supposed to be a diplomatic tool; the point of passing them isn't, or shouldn't be, to punish the target of the condemnation or to make him feel bad. The goal should be to first inform other regions and nations of the behavior worthy of condemnation and then to collectively condemn it. Condemnations should be about the nations and regions passing them, not the person targeted by them.
Aside from that, from a completely out of character perspective Jakker has made a substantive contribution to his aspect of the game. While in character I'm 100% opposed to his aspect of the game, out of character I can see why he should be permanently recognized for it.
However...
While I don't much care whether the target of the condemnation wants it or not, I do think the perspective of the author is important. If condemnations are supposed to be a diplomatic tool for expressing our collective condemnation of someone's actions, it's less important how the target feels about it but still relatively important how the author views it. If the author doesn't actually disapprove of the actions and is trying to reward the target of the condemnation that's very different than the target himself wanting the condemnation as a reward. I think that may be the case here. SkyDip is a well known advocate of invading in the Security Council and is typically known for trying to block or repeal liberation resolutions. I think the dim view he takes toward native communities and toward the Security Council is well exemplified in his failure to spell the name of Furry Federation's Delegate correctly. Neither the Delegate, the region he represents, nor its history are at all important to him; only the invasion is noteworthy, and the only reason anything about that native community or its Delegate are notable is because of how much juicier they made the invasion and griefing.
TL;DR: I don't much care whether Jakker wants a condemnation badge or not, but I would prefer that his condemnation be authored by someone who actually condemns his behavior and not someone who wants to get his name on the books and give Jakker a shiny. What the target wants is irrelevant but what the author wants to express by drafting a condemnation and what we want to express by voting for it are extremely important. For that reason, opposed.
Did Cormac send out some "vote against" telegrams or what?