NATION

PASSWORD

Rape prevention

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Is rape preventable on an individual basis?

Yes
151
71%
No
61
29%
 
Total votes : 212

User avatar
Uawc
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5102
Founded: Oct 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Rape prevention

Postby Uawc » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:25 am

Hi, NSG.

A short while ago we had a rape thread, which was labelled as a "safe space". In that thread, I suggested that women (let's be realistic, it is almost always women who are victimized) should carry and learn how to use weapons in order to prevent rapes. I was very clear that I was not attempting to place the blame on victims, and was trying to be supportive. It was apparent that some people were still offended, however, and and some people even suggested that I was aiding rapists by promoting the carry of and training with weapons among women. I cannot with any intellectual honesty apologize for what I said, because I still sand by it. I want to emphasize that my heart goes out to the victims of abuse.

So, here is a different thread with a different purpose. I want to ask you, NSG: do you believe that rape is preventable? If so, what can women do to prevent rape? If not, why not?

Here is a video with some statistics which support the idea that women should carry and learn how to use weapons.

I really, really don't want this to turn into a flame war. Please keep it civil. I want this to be a good thread with some good, constructive discussion, and I don't want any victims who may be reading this to feel that it is in any way their fault.
Last edited by Uawc on Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:29 am, edited 2 times in total.
Pro-democracy, pro-NATO, anti-authoritarian. Mostly disinterested in the current political climate. Polarization is the cancer of the body politic.

Glory to Ukraine, glory to the heroes!

User avatar
Rereumrari
Diplomat
 
Posts: 650
Founded: Dec 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rereumrari » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:27 am

I think NS simply needs to get over its obsession with rape. I'm starting to grow concerned for NS.
Last edited by Rereumrari on Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
The political compass is a lie.

User avatar
Uawc
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5102
Founded: Oct 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Uawc » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:28 am

Rereumrari wrote:I think NS simply needs to get over its obsession with rape. I'm starting to grow concerned for NS.

It's a very serious and emotional topic which naturally provokes a lot of passionate thoughts and feelings.
Pro-democracy, pro-NATO, anti-authoritarian. Mostly disinterested in the current political climate. Polarization is the cancer of the body politic.

Glory to Ukraine, glory to the heroes!

User avatar
Wallonochia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 981
Founded: Jul 21, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Wallonochia » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:29 am

UAWC wrote:So, here is a different thread with a different purpose. I want to ask you, NSG: do you believe that rape is preventable? If so, what can women do to prevent rape? If not, why not?


I think rape is preventable, just it's not really the job of the victims to do that.

How to stop rape.

Image

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:29 am

Rereumrari wrote:I think NS simply needs to get over its obsession with rape. I'm starting to grow concerned for NS.


What's this "obsession with rape"? I'll stop discussing rape when rape stops happening. It's a problem. It needs to be tackled.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Uawc
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5102
Founded: Oct 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Uawc » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:30 am

Wallonochia wrote:
UAWC wrote:So, here is a different thread with a different purpose. I want to ask you, NSG: do you believe that rape is preventable? If so, what can women do to prevent rape? If not, why not?


I think rape is preventable, just it's not really the job of the victims to do that.

How to stop rape.

Image


That image implies that women are weak, hapless victims, and as a feminist, I find it offensive.
Pro-democracy, pro-NATO, anti-authoritarian. Mostly disinterested in the current political climate. Polarization is the cancer of the body politic.

Glory to Ukraine, glory to the heroes!

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:31 am

How are firearms going to stop date rape, far and away the most common form of rape?
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:31 am

UAWC wrote:-snip-


But when you say that women should learn to carry and use weapons, you are, like it or not, saying that some people who have been raped might not have been raped if they had carried weapons. That's victim blaming.
Last edited by Ovisterra on Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Stephania Incognita
Envoy
 
Posts: 204
Founded: Feb 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Stephania Incognita » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:31 am

Wallonochia wrote:
UAWC wrote:So, here is a different thread with a different purpose. I want to ask you, NSG: do you believe that rape is preventable? If so, what can women do to prevent rape? If not, why not?


I think rape is preventable, just it's not really the job of the victims to do that.

How to stop rape.

Image


I 110% agree but it is also only sensible for a potential victim to take precautions too, just like people take precautions in case they suffer from any crime.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57871
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:32 am

Define preventable. It's never the victims fault, but they can do things that reduce their likelihood to get preyed on.
Carrying legal weaponry such as mace as one example would probably help, travel in groups, do not leave drinks unattended, etc.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:32 am

UAWC wrote:
Wallonochia wrote:
I think rape is preventable, just it's not really the job of the victims to do that.

How to stop rape.

Image


That image implies that women are weak, hapless victims, and as a feminist, I find it offensive.


-Says the person who thinks all women should carry weapons

Your hypocrisy would be laughable if we were on a more light hearted topic. Instead, I'm closer to crying.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Kvatchdom
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8111
Founded: Nov 08, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kvatchdom » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:32 am

Or generate a state-controlled brothel system, with free sex for all who crave for it.
boo
Left-wing nationalist, socialist, souverainist and anti-American.

User avatar
Tsuntion
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1939
Founded: Nov 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsuntion » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:33 am

UAWC wrote:
Wallonochia wrote:
I think rape is preventable, just it's not really the job of the victims to do that.

How to stop rape.



That image implies that women are weak, hapless victims, and as a feminist, I find it offensive.


I honestly don't see how it implies anything beyond rape being the fault of a rapist. It doesn't say something like "Be careful to avoid forcing a woman into sex because she won't be able to resist you physically".
I'm not a roleplayer, but check these out: The United Defenders League and The Versutian Federation.

The Emerald Dawn wrote:Jumpin' on the SOURCE-TRAIN!

CHOO CHOO MUFUKA! We be ridin' the rails, checkin' the trails, you get nothin' and your argument fails!

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:34 am

Kvatchdom wrote:Or generate a state-controlled brothel system, with free sex for all who crave for it.

Casual sex is already quite available, yet rape still happens. Somehow, I think there is more to it than a desire to get laid once in a while.
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
Rereumrari
Diplomat
 
Posts: 650
Founded: Dec 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rereumrari » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:34 am

Ovisterra wrote:
Rereumrari wrote:I think NS simply needs to get over its obsession with rape. I'm starting to grow concerned for NS.


What's this "obsession with rape"? I'll stop discussing rape when rape stops happening. It's a problem. It needs to be tackled.
It will never stop happening, though. Society is imperfect. There will always be murders, muggings, rapes, and beatings. Worrying about what you can't control will just destroy you inside.
Last edited by Rereumrari on Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
The political compass is a lie.

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:34 am

Rereumrari wrote:I think NS simply needs to get over its obsession with rape. I'm starting to grow concerned for NS.

Cause if we stop talking about it, it will go away, right?

I guess if you are lucky enough to belong to a group whose odds of being raped are vanishingly small, that's true.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Uawc
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5102
Founded: Oct 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Uawc » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:34 am

Wikkiwallana wrote:How are firearms going to stop date rape, far and away the most common form of rape?

I'm not saying that weapons can stop every form of rape all the time. Just that it can reduce the chances.

Ovisterra wrote:
UAWC wrote:-snip-


But when you say that women should learn to carry and use weapons, you are, like it or not, saying that some people who have been raped might not have been raped if they had carried weapons. That's victim blaming.

I'm not trying to make anybody feel bad, but I want to ask you to look at the stats and then come back and tell me that I'm wrong.

Ovisterra wrote:
UAWC wrote:
That image implies that women are weak, hapless victims, and as a feminist, I find it offensive.


-Says the person who thinks all women should carry weapons

Your hypocrisy would be laughable if we were on a more light hearted topic. Instead, I'm closer to crying.


I fail to see how this is hypocritical at all. Granted, I'm not a liberal in any sense of the word, so I'm not looking at this through a liberal point of view.
Pro-democracy, pro-NATO, anti-authoritarian. Mostly disinterested in the current political climate. Polarization is the cancer of the body politic.

Glory to Ukraine, glory to the heroes!

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57871
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:34 am

Tsuntion wrote:
UAWC wrote:
That image implies that women are weak, hapless victims, and as a feminist, I find it offensive.


I honestly don't see how it implies anything beyond rape being the fault of a rapist. It doesn't say something like "Be careful to avoid forcing a woman into sex because she won't be able to resist you physically".


It ignores that men are also raped, and implies only woman are raped.
Ergo, it implies only men are capable of rape, and only women are capable of being raped.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Varijnland
Minister
 
Posts: 2760
Founded: Mar 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Varijnland » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:34 am

Yes, it is preventable. There's not that much more to say. You know the drill, stay in groups, don't walk home on your own yada yada yada etc etc.

Retiring from NS, I wish you all the best in your future endevours :)

- Rasmus


P.S stay off drugs

User avatar
Kvatchdom
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8111
Founded: Nov 08, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kvatchdom » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:35 am

Wikkiwallana wrote:
Kvatchdom wrote:Or generate a state-controlled brothel system, with free sex for all who crave for it.

Casual sex is already quite available, yet rape still happens. Somehow, I think there is more to it than a desire to get laid once in a while.

But free sex with nothing but asking for it is not. It should be made easier, and brothels made legal.
boo
Left-wing nationalist, socialist, souverainist and anti-American.

User avatar
Uawc
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5102
Founded: Oct 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Uawc » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:36 am

Varijnland wrote:Yes, it is preventable. There's not that much more to say. You know the drill, stay in groups, don't walk home on your own yada yada yada etc etc.

But apparently you're victim blaming by implying that there is any way that rape could have been prevented, the same way you'd be victim blaming if a career criminal had his home invaded and his skull ventilated by some other criminals.
Pro-democracy, pro-NATO, anti-authoritarian. Mostly disinterested in the current political climate. Polarization is the cancer of the body politic.

Glory to Ukraine, glory to the heroes!

User avatar
Wallonochia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 981
Founded: Jul 21, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Wallonochia » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:37 am

UAWC wrote:That image implies that women are weak, hapless victims, and as a feminist, I find it offensive.


It does no such thing and I suspect that you're aware of that.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57871
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:38 am

Wallonochia wrote:
UAWC wrote:That image implies that women are weak, hapless victims, and as a feminist, I find it offensive.


It does no such thing and I suspect that you're aware of that.


It explicitly mentions women as the victims of rape. It's a sexist poster.
It implies that men are incapable of being raped (Sexist against men)
And that only women care capable of being raped (Sexist against women)
You could follow every single one of the posters rules (Except the last) and still be a rapist if you target men.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:39 am, edited 2 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Uawc
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5102
Founded: Oct 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Uawc » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:39 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Wallonochia wrote:
It does no such thing and I suspect that you're aware of that.


It explicitly mentions women as the victims of rape. It's a sexist poster.
It implies that men are incapable of being raped (Sexist against men)
And that only women care capable of being raped (Sexist against women)


That's not why it offends me, because statistically, it is generally men who rape women.

It offends me because it only speaks to potential rapists and doesn't address what women can do.

However, reading it again, it does strike me as satirical.
Last edited by Uawc on Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pro-democracy, pro-NATO, anti-authoritarian. Mostly disinterested in the current political climate. Polarization is the cancer of the body politic.

Glory to Ukraine, glory to the heroes!

User avatar
Tsuntion
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1939
Founded: Nov 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tsuntion » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:40 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Tsuntion wrote:
I honestly don't see how it implies anything beyond rape being the fault of a rapist. It doesn't say something like "Be careful to avoid forcing a woman into sex because she won't be able to resist you physically".


It ignores that men are also raped, and implies only woman are raped.
Ergo, it implies only men are capable of rape, and only women are capable of being raped.


Ah, okay; I've gotten so used to seeing female-on-someone or someone-on-male rape being ignored that I don't really register it any more, I guess. I should work on changing that part of my thoughts.

Rereumrari wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
What's this "obsession with rape"? I'll stop discussing rape when rape stops happening. It's a problem. It needs to be tackled.
It will never stop happening, though. Society is imperfect. There will always be murders, muggings, rapes, and beatings. Worrying about what you can't control will just destroy you inside.


But why can't we try to think of ways to reduce it? People will (probably) always die from illness, but that doesn't mean we don't work on medicine.
I'm not a roleplayer, but check these out: The United Defenders League and The Versutian Federation.

The Emerald Dawn wrote:Jumpin' on the SOURCE-TRAIN!

CHOO CHOO MUFUKA! We be ridin' the rails, checkin' the trails, you get nothin' and your argument fails!

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bradfordville, Galloism, Hirota, Jerzylvania, Kostane, Kubra, Kuntland, La Xinga, Mesogiria, Narland, The Pirateariat, The Rio Grande River Basin, The Snazzylands, Umeria, Weltkria

Advertisement

Remove ads