Advertisement
by Skyrim Diplomacy » Fri Jul 27, 2012 9:43 am
by Bears Armed » Fri Jul 27, 2012 10:46 am
by Punk Reloaded » Fri Jul 27, 2012 2:44 pm
by Sethanon » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:21 pm
by Great Kingdom of Calomo » Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:23 pm
War status: at war
Trade status: trading
by Milograd » Fri Jul 27, 2012 9:00 pm
The Great Destruction wrote:I don't know. Even though the nation no longer exists I feel that the resolution should still stand based on the historical context on which it was founded and remain as a representation of the horrible crimes that Kalaparata commited.
Christian Democrats wrote:Milograd wrote:BELIEVING that resolutions that are outdated, misleading and superfluous deserve to be repealed
In my opinion, a commendation or condemnation should not be repealed just because a nation has ceased to exist.
Secondly, I do not believe that the cure for superfluous resolutions is the passage of more resolutions.
Therefore, I plan to vote against this proposal because I believe that it is unnecessary.
Kalaspia-Shimarata wrote:Okay, thanks.
We'll give you a free nuke
Delegate Vinage wrote:Additionally, it was all just someone power roleplaying some sort of insane nation.... as well democratic nation. Since, like, totally every-single political party would support running people over as a punishment.
Anyway, yeah - the original proposal isn't a good piece of work and was based on a few rantings from some immature so-and-so.
by Debit » Sat Jul 28, 2012 9:28 am
by Eurussia » Sat Jul 28, 2012 7:09 pm
by Jovian Empire » Sat Jul 28, 2012 10:26 pm
by Cromarty » Sat Jul 28, 2012 11:55 pm
Debit wrote:Personally, I just find it a waste of time. I set an example for my region by voting against it, to signify all the better things we could be doing besides pointlessly repealing condemnations of dead nations who were condemned for crimes I don't even want to know about. Who cares if it's dead? Leave it alone! No one's gonna go through the books fact-checking every resolution that the Security Council voted on. This is one giant filibuster.
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
by Skyrim Diplomacy » Sun Jul 29, 2012 5:21 am
Cromarty wrote:Debit wrote:Personally, I just find it a waste of time. I set an example for my region by voting against it, to signify all the better things we could be doing besides pointlessly repealing condemnations of dead nations who were condemned for crimes I don't even want to know about. Who cares if it's dead? Leave it alone! No one's gonna go through the books fact-checking every resolution that the Security Council voted on. This is one giant filibuster.
So what could the Security Council be doing?
by Great Kingdom of Calomo » Sun Jul 29, 2012 9:47 am
War status: at war
Trade status: trading
by Valyria Falls » Sun Jul 29, 2012 10:47 am
by Cromarty » Sun Jul 29, 2012 12:11 pm
Valyria Falls wrote:I see NO difference in the ideology of Kalasparata and Milograd.
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
by Socialist States Owen » Sun Jul 29, 2012 12:22 pm
by Ironicness » Sun Jul 29, 2012 7:46 pm
Socialist States Owen wrote:Let it be known to the council that the Euran Government will not condone these savages declaring trustworthy members of the international communities to be corrupt. We hereby declare that for the next hour, my aides will sneak into your private rooms in the World Assembly building and defecate on everything you love, including any children present.
If you'll pardon the pun, we will give you a lot of shit for this.
- Lucas Marshall
- Senior Aide to the Minister of World Assembly Affairs
by Simsantania » Mon Jul 30, 2012 3:30 am
by The Great Destruction » Mon Jul 30, 2012 6:48 am
by Cromarty » Mon Jul 30, 2012 9:00 am
The motivation is this: Roleplay condemnations are usually reserved for long standing members of the community who roleplay excellently. Kalasparata fulfils none of these criteria. A typical Kalasparata thread was a medium sized text wall containing fantastically ridiculous bullshittery.The Great Destruction wrote:What is the motivation behind this proposal I wonder?
Yes.Is this really nessasary?
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
by Notalza » Mon Jul 30, 2012 7:12 pm
Cromarty wrote:Entirely in fucking favour. The fact this condemnation was even on the books in the first place was a fucking disgrace.
by The Christendom of NOD » Mon Jul 30, 2012 9:04 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement