Advertisement
by Naivetry » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:31 pm
by Meritocratic States » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:31 pm
by Cromarty » Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:12 am
Jamie Anumia wrote:Why should one native represent a whole region?
- WA Ambassador - Treacle Smith -
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
by Cromarty » Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:16 am
Will it? Or will it be inactive for 11 and a half months and used as a puppet dump and then comes alive once a year as Asgard's winter retreat?Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:This is a completely inactive region that will have new life given to it by an active community.
What, exactly, does the one native that Mahaj goaded into posting here lose by joining a refounded region?
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
by Baubles » Tue Jul 24, 2012 1:22 am
Cormac Stark wrote:That's unfortunate but unsurprising, although Lebuckte is the only native who has spoken out against refounding in this thread so I'm afraid I'm not going to concede that there is more than one native opposed to refounding until they say so publicly. I certainly have not heard from any other native that they are opposed to our refounding plan
That said, it wouldn't be surprising if natives are opposed to refounding given the smear campaign that has been conducted against us by this proposal's author and his friends in the UDL over the past few days.
We have assured the natives of Christmas that we are only interested in providing security and building up the community and culture of the region [...]
Naivetry wrote:So, what gives you the right to decide what's best for a region without actually consulting the natives? You just jumped in and did what you wanted, without bothering to ask how any of them felt about it.
by Doctor whooves » Tue Jul 24, 2012 1:23 am
by Cormac Stark » Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:01 am
Baubles wrote:Well then you are in luck...
You yourself forcibly ejected me from my home region of.... Christmas, four days ago. And as I'm currently locked out of my HOME region with no way of getting back in, I have no option but to support this 'liberation'. So this is me, telling you that I am opposed to your refounding plan.
Baubles wrote:I'm not sure what smear campaign this is? The only person who has contacted me was yourself; first to tell me Christmas had been raided then to tell me that we were to become part of Asgard.
Baubles wrote:I can assure you that I was not assured that you were only interested in providing us with security. You first wanted to talk to me about the future of Christmas, then just five days later it would appear that you have decided what the future of Christmas should be...a colony of Asgard. I know I didn't ask to become a colony... even if you could provide us with security
by Baubles » Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:35 am
Cormac Stark wrote:I would note that it has taken you four days to notice that you've been ejected from your home region. I would also note that you did not respond to my telegrams and that we would have been willing to work with you had you responded.
Cormac Stark wrote:You will also have the opportunity to be more active if you so choose, and free of the possibility of constant invasion and possible refounding by a much less friendly region.
Cormac Stark wrote:The smear campaign to which I was referring has been the insidious and undiplomatic campaign of deception and slander that has been perpetrated by this proposal's author.
Cormac Stark wrote:I'm not surprised that he didn't contact you, though. I contacted you because Asgard actually cares about the natives of Christmas and wanted all of you to be aware of what was going on; Mahaj only cares about passage of his liberation resolution.
Cormac Stark wrote:Should you decide not to refound, the number of nations will eventually dwindle and another region or organization -- perhaps one far less friendly and with far less noble intentions than our own, like The Greater German Reich -- will password protect the region and eject all remaining nations before the Security Council can act to prevent it. Unlike us, they may not guarantee you the right of return. If they do, they will almost certainly not assist you in establishing an offsite forum or a regional government.
by Cormac Stark » Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:47 am
Baubles wrote:Answer me this. If you guys are no longer in our region because it has been liberated and that liberation is still in place because we have chosen not to repeal it; then how in the hell can The Greater German Reich password our region?
by Cromarty » Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:49 am
Because a region named Chrsitmas wasn't on the fucking map already.Cormac Stark wrote:Baubles wrote:Answer me this. If you guys are no longer in our region because it has been liberated and that liberation is still in place because we have chosen not to repeal it; then how in the hell can The Greater German Reich password our region?
You've got me there. That made absolutely no sense. I blame the lack of sleep; see, I've been logging a lot of hours trying to defend your region against the UDL for the past couple of days.
In any event, you're completely wrong about the future of your region. This liberation resolution has put it on the map
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
by Of the Free Socialist Territories » Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:51 am
Cromarty wrote:Because a region named Chrsitmas wasn't on the fucking map already.Cormac Stark wrote:You've got me there. That made absolutely no sense. I blame the lack of sleep; see, I've been logging a lot of hours trying to defend your region against the UDL for the past couple of days.
In any event, you're completely wrong about the future of your region. This liberation resolution has put it on the map
by Cromarty » Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:05 am
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
by Bears Armed » Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:44 am
by Skyrim Diplomacy » Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:26 am
Mahaj wrote:I did not goade anybody into posting here.
I find it funny that at first the complain is that no native supports it.
Then its that only one native supported it.
Then its that the native was forced to support it.
I tire of this nonsense.
Cromarty wrote:I love this argument.
First you say 'No natives oppose us.'
Then one says 'Uh, actually guys, I don't want this.'
Then you say 'Oh he doesn't matter! Mahaj must've forced him to post!'
by Cromarty » Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:32 am
Two natives now.Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:Someone, please remind me where I asked for a native to come forward. Please find that for me, as I'm fairly sure it doesn't exist in this thread. I don't ask because I know if you prod the natives enough, as the first post ever by the native in question here was surely prodded to do, they will respond. One native voice does not an entire proposal support. If it's honestly true that the native here posted without any prodding, I'll eat that point. Does it change the argument-not one bit. One native in a region of 2-10 inactive nations before the invasion is not exactly a stable crux to rest the argument of "They natives want it!" on.
All the natives lose the sovereignty of their region to a group that most definitely can't be trusted.I would like to see my previous point addressed as well: what does this one, inactive native lose by joining a refounded region?
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
by Skyrim Diplomacy » Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:46 am
Cromarty wrote:Two natives now.
Cromarty wrote:All the natives lose the sovereignty of their region to a group that most definitely can't be trusted.
by Jamie Anumia » Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:59 am
Baubles wrote:Answer me this. If you guys are no longer in our region because it has been liberated and that liberation is still in place because we have chosen not to repeal it; then how in the hell can The Greater German Reich password our region?
by Mahaj » Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:18 am
Jamie Anumia wrote:Baubles wrote:Answer me this. If you guys are no longer in our region because it has been liberated and that liberation is still in place because we have chosen not to repeal it; then how in the hell can The Greater German Reich password our region?
Having the liberation in place would still leave your region in danger of being invaded, and even if the the proposal passes, your region will likely not be liberated by defenders.
- WA Ambassador - Treacle Smith -
<Koth> I'm still going by the assumption that Mahaj is Unibot's kid brother or something
Kandarin(Naivetry): You're going to have a great NS career ahead of you if you want it, Mahaj. :)
<@Eluvatar> Why is SkyDip such a purist raiderist
<+frattastan> Because his region was never raided.
<+maxbarry> EarthAway: I guess I might dabble in raiding just to experience it better, but I would not like to raid regions of natives, so I'd probably be more interested in defense and liberations
by Jamie Anumia » Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:22 am
Mahaj wrote:Jamie Anumia wrote:Having the liberation in place would still leave your region in danger of being invaded, and even if the the proposal passes, your region will likely not be liberated by defenders.
- WA Ambassador - Treacle Smith -
Except defenders have liberated it before.
Except that stability over liberty is a crap argument.
by Mahaj » Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:22 am
Jamie Anumia wrote:Mahaj wrote:Except defenders have liberated it before.
Except that stability over liberty is a crap argument.
The ambassador from Jamie Anumia raises her eyebrows and shakes her head.
It's a region which the natives don't care about for 11 months of the year. I just don't see why this liberation is necessary.
- WA Ambassador - Treacle Smith -
<Koth> I'm still going by the assumption that Mahaj is Unibot's kid brother or something
Kandarin(Naivetry): You're going to have a great NS career ahead of you if you want it, Mahaj. :)
<@Eluvatar> Why is SkyDip such a purist raiderist
<+frattastan> Because his region was never raided.
<+maxbarry> EarthAway: I guess I might dabble in raiding just to experience it better, but I would not like to raid regions of natives, so I'd probably be more interested in defense and liberations
by Jamie Anumia » Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:27 am
Mahaj wrote:Jamie Anumia wrote:The ambassador from Jamie Anumia raises her eyebrows and shakes her head.
It's a region which the natives don't care about for 11 months of the year. I just don't see why this liberation is necessary.
- WA Ambassador - Treacle Smith -
It's a region which Asgard doesn't care about for 11.5 months of the year.
Who's more inactive now?
by Mahaj » Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:31 am
Jamie Anumia wrote:Mahaj wrote:It's a region which Asgard doesn't care about for 11.5 months of the year.
Who's more inactive now?
You are now just grasping at straws, you know as well as I do that the natives would be/are just as inactive or even more so than Asgard.
- WA Ambassador - Treacle Smith -
<Koth> I'm still going by the assumption that Mahaj is Unibot's kid brother or something
Kandarin(Naivetry): You're going to have a great NS career ahead of you if you want it, Mahaj. :)
<@Eluvatar> Why is SkyDip such a purist raiderist
<+frattastan> Because his region was never raided.
<+maxbarry> EarthAway: I guess I might dabble in raiding just to experience it better, but I would not like to raid regions of natives, so I'd probably be more interested in defense and liberations
by Jamie Anumia » Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:35 am
Mahaj wrote:Jamie Anumia wrote:You are now just grasping at straws, you know as well as I do that the natives would be/are just as inactive or even more so than Asgard.
- WA Ambassador - Treacle Smith -
No, because Asgard stated their plans to hold things 'around christmastime to celebrate the winter'.
and that the details haven't been finalized. So they really don't know what they're doing.
Doesn't sound like somebody you'd elect to be the head of culture, why should we vote for them now?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement