Redundant thread

by **North Wiedna** » Fri Mar 30, 2012 7:25 am

viewtopic.php?f=19&t=171272

A dupe of this: viewtopic.php?f=19&t=161617

yeah

by **Monochromicon** » Fri Mar 30, 2012 7:29 am

by **Ularn** » Fri Mar 30, 2012 8:15 am

Monochromicon wrote:yeah

Helpful tip since you're new: The Moderators do not appreciate people posting in the Moderation forum unless you're adding something useful or informative to the thread, like more information on the situation, or links to particular rules or past decisions which might be relevant. Posts which don't do anything and only consist of "Me too," "I agree," or "Yeah," are likely to earn you a warning.

by **Jormengand** » Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:28 am

One's a general discussion, one's more specific, so it's not really a duplicate.

Then again, not my call.

by **Frisbeeteria** » Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:32 am

The first listed thread wasn't a duplicate per se, but the OP was generic enough to make it spam. It's been locked.

Monochromicon, what Ularn said is correct.

Redundant thread

Redundant thread

Who is online