NATION

PASSWORD

Is it possible to REQUEST a condemnation?

A chamber dedicated to the dissemination of inter-regional peace and goodwill, via force if necessary.
User avatar
Seaplant13
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Jan 07, 2010
Ex-Nation

Is it possible to REQUEST a condemnation?

Postby Seaplant13 » Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:23 pm

As I was governing my nation Seaplant13 (which is a harsh dictatorship with little to no freedoms), a thought crossed my mind: would it be even remotely possible for nations to REQUEST a condemnation by the World Assembly in order to boost that nation's bad reputation? As strange as it sounds, I don't think that it's that bad of an option, given that just as a compassionate nation would ask to be commended, an evil nation would ask to be condemned. What do other people think about this?

User avatar
Eist
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1197
Founded: May 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Eist » Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:44 pm

Yes.

EDIT: Oh, yes, you can ask me if I'd spend a few hours of my time writing one up for you.
Last edited by Eist on Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Unibot III wrote:Frankly, the lows that people sink to in this game is perhaps the most disturbing thing about NationStates Gameplay.

User avatar
A mean old man
Senator
 
Posts: 4384
Founded: Jun 27, 2008
Father Knows Best State

Postby A mean old man » Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:52 pm

It has been done before.
A: SC#16 - Repeal "Liberate The Security Council"
A: SC#26 - Commend The Joint Systems Alliance
A: SC#30 - Commend 10000 Islands
A: SC#37 - Condemn NAZI EUROPE
A: SC#38 - Repeal "Condemn NAZI EUROPE"
A: GA#149 - On Expiration Dates
C: SC#58 - Repeal "Commend Sedgistan"
A: SC#62 - Repeal "Condemn Swarmlandia"
C: SC#63 - Commend Ballotonia
A: SC#65 - Condemn Punk Reloaded
C: GA#163 - Repeal "Law of the Sea"
A: SC#72 - Repeal "Commend Mikeswill"
C: SC#74 - Condemn Lone Wolves United
C: SC#76 - Repeal "Condemn Thatcherton"
A: SC#81 - Repeal "Condemn Anthony Delasanta"
C: SC#83 - Condemn Automagfreek
C: SC#84 - Repeal "Liberate Islam"
C: SC#111 - Commend Krulltopia ← please forget

User avatar
Seaplant13
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Jan 07, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Seaplant13 » Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:27 pm

As strange and twisted as it may sound, being condemned sounds like a LOT of fun. I would expect that other nations have done such, but it sounded so strange that I had to ask anyway out of morbid curiosity. I can certainly imagine that it would be within the realm of imagination that other nations would have done the same. Thank you both for your answers.

As a reply, I would like to ask that one question. Here goes nothing.

Is it possible that you would spend a few hours of your time writing one up for me?

Also, as a side question, is it possible to condemn oneself? If so, would that help ease the suffering of said question? And if not, is there anything I can do in exchange for such exasperating work?

Once again, I express my gratitude towards your answers.

User avatar
Frisbeeteria
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 27253
Founded: Dec 16, 2003
Capitalizt

Postby Frisbeeteria » Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:31 pm

Ego-driven condemnations have a history of failure unless you have a LOT of history in the game (like the recently-passed condemnation of AMF). Plus, people will point at you and laugh at your pathetic attempts to appear evil.

Just sayin'.

User avatar
Milograd
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5894
Founded: Feb 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Milograd » Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:42 pm

Frisbeeteria wrote:Ego-driven condemnations have a history of failure unless you have a LOT of history in the game (like the recently-passed condemnation of AMF). Plus, people will point at you and laugh at your pathetic attempts to appear evil.

Just sayin'.

Even AMF didn't request his condemnation; if I recall correctly, he was approached by Unibot who wanted to condemn him, and said that he would not mind it.
Last edited by Milograd on Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Retired

User avatar
Seaplant13
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Jan 07, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Seaplant13 » Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:29 pm

Frisbeeteria wrote:Ego-driven condemnations have a history of failure unless you have a LOT of history in the game (like the recently-passed condemnation of AMF). Plus, people will point at you and laugh at your pathetic attempts to appear evil.

Just sayin'.


Pardon me, but my question was just a question. It was in no way intended to be egotistical, annoying, or stupid in any way. It was simply a question, and was never intended to be offensive to senior players of nationstates. There is no need to be rude about it and call the question pathetic or ego-driven, unless I have seriously offended you in any way, shape or form.

User avatar
Frisbeeteria
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 27253
Founded: Dec 16, 2003
Capitalizt

Postby Frisbeeteria » Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:04 pm

Seaplant13 wrote:Pardon me, but my question was just a question.

Don't worry about it. My failure to use smilies and 'air quotes' doesn't mean I wasn't being humorous. I'm just sayin' that those are the types of responses such threads usually get. I wasn't pickin' on you specifically, 'cause I'd never heard of you before you posted this thread. All the more reason to expect that sort of response.

User avatar
Klaus Devestatorie
Minister
 
Posts: 2812
Founded: Aug 28, 2008
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Klaus Devestatorie » Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:42 am

Seems to me like you've got to do something unique, and you have to do it well.

User avatar
Seaplant13
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Jan 07, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Seaplant13 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:35 pm

Frisbeeteria wrote:
Seaplant13 wrote:Pardon me, but my question was just a question.

Don't worry about it. My failure to use smilies and 'air quotes' doesn't mean I wasn't being humorous. I'm just sayin' that those are the types of responses such threads usually get. I wasn't pickin' on you specifically, 'cause I'd never heard of you before you posted this thread. All the more reason to expect that sort of response.


I apologize for my rather brash response. I must admit I was taken aback a little, but your response makes me feel a lot better that it wasn't a personal attack. What I was asking about does seem a little absurd, but I guess through trial and error I'll figure things out around here, and what not to do to make people annoyed or angry...

Klaus Devestatorie wrote:Seems to me like you've got to do something unique, and you have to do it well.


It is a little hard to do something unique in this game, given that we all get the same issues. However, I DO have a smiling piece of seaweed as a flag. Does that count?
Last edited by Seaplant13 on Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Soviet Canuckistan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5029
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Canuckistan » Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:56 pm

Seaplant13 wrote:
Frisbeeteria wrote:Don't worry about it. My failure to use smilies and 'air quotes' doesn't mean I wasn't being humorous. I'm just sayin' that those are the types of responses such threads usually get. I wasn't pickin' on you specifically, 'cause I'd never heard of you before you posted this thread. All the more reason to expect that sort of response.


I apologize for my rather brash response. I must admit I was taken aback a little, but your response makes me feel a lot better that it wasn't a personal attack. What I was asking about does seem a little absurd, but I guess through trial and error I'll figure things out around here, and what not to do to make people annoyed or angry...

Klaus Devestatorie wrote:Seems to me like you've got to do something unique, and you have to do it well.


It is a little hard to do something unique in this game, given that we all get the same issues. However, I DO have a smiling piece of seaweed as a flag. Does that count?

Nope, that's where gameplay comes in
Economic Left/Right: -3.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.49

User avatar
Tim-Opolis
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6182
Founded: Feb 17, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Tim-Opolis » Wed Apr 04, 2012 2:25 pm

Seaplant13 wrote:
Klaus Devestatorie wrote:Seems to me like you've got to do something unique, and you have to do it well.


It is a little hard to do something unique in this game, given that we all get the same issues. However, I DO have a smiling piece of seaweed as a flag. Does that count?


Gameplay and Roleplay.

Try them out. Commit some genocides and wreck a few regions... Then we can talk
Want to be a hero? Join The Grey Wardens - Help Us Save Nationstates
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Commended by Security Council Resolution #420 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Author of SC#74, SC #203, SC #222, and SC #238 | Co-Author of SC#191
Founder of Spiritus | Three-Time Delegate of Osiris | Pharaoh of the Islamic Republics of Iran | Hero of Greece
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic

User avatar
New Heathera
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1082
Founded: Oct 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Heathera » Wed Apr 04, 2012 5:29 pm

Reminds me of the past resolution to condemn Punk, or whatever the West Pacific's ex-delegate was called. He kind of went overboard with the "I want to be condemned!" thing.

User avatar
Milograd
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5894
Founded: Feb 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Milograd » Wed Apr 04, 2012 5:33 pm

Tim-Opolis wrote:
Seaplant13 wrote:

It is a little hard to do something unique in this game, given that we all get the same issues. However, I DO have a smiling piece of seaweed as a flag. Does that count?


Gameplay and Roleplay.

Try them out. Commit some genocides and wreck a few regions... Then we can talk

Genocide alone does not make someone worthy of condemnation; countless nations have done genocides, but only so many have done it with a certain style and creativity that distinguishes them from everyone else. It is those nations which deserve condemnation.
Retired

User avatar
Malshan
Senator
 
Posts: 4469
Founded: Sep 08, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Malshan » Wed Apr 04, 2012 5:41 pm

Milograd wrote:
Tim-Opolis wrote:
Gameplay and Roleplay.

Try them out. Commit some genocides and wreck a few regions... Then we can talk

Genocide alone does not make someone worthy of condemnation; countless nations have done genocides, but only so many have done it with a certain style and creativity that distinguishes them from everyone else. It is those nations which deserve condemnation.


Or a commendation, for those nations who pull off their genocides while still retaining a justified stance.

And still coming out smiling and looking like the good guys.
ET IN ARCADIA EGO
A certain therianthropy thing.
*sigh*
My factbook
Rupudska wrote:
Hetland 2 wrote:
You catch on quick. That's why I like you. :)
I'm kidding of course you aren't a thing. You're a person.


Dude, don't insult the werefurry.

Rupudska wrote:RP Sample: Let me in, or we take another third of Mexico.
Rupudska wrote:You're NS's Wolfman, therefore your argument is negated due to bias.
"Sarcasm works so much better when you can look down your fire-breathing nose at someone." -Callistan Sairias
"Lupus magnus est, lupus fortis est, lupus deus est."
I'm an atheist, transhumanist, asexual, cladotherian (Canini) male.
Also known as Canarius, your friendly-ish dog person Lycanthropic American.
Kshrlmnt wrote:Malshan

User avatar
Cinistra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 863
Founded: Oct 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Cinistra » Sat Apr 07, 2012 11:56 am

Milograd wrote:
Tim-Opolis wrote:
Gameplay and Roleplay.

Try them out. Commit some genocides and wreck a few regions... Then we can talk

Genocide alone does not make someone worthy of condemnation; countless nations have done genocides, but only so many have done it with a certain style and creativity that distinguishes them from everyone else. It is those nations which deserve condemnation.

An interesting viewpoint, indeed. Any style in particular your prefer? Any style which should be avoided?
"Send forth all legions! Do not stop the attack until the city is taken! Slay them all!"
>Can I invade other people's regions?

Yes. The practice of "region crashing," where a group of nations all move to a region with the aim of seizing the WA Delegate position, is part of the game. Certain groups within NationStates are particularly adroit at this, and can attack very quickly.
>Once I've taken over a region, can I eject everyone else?

You can try. Invader Delegates tend to have very little Regional Influence, which makes ejecting long-time residents difficult. But Delegates can be as kind, generous, evil, or despotic as they wish. It's up to regional residents to elect good Delegates.

User avatar
Aglrinia
Minister
 
Posts: 2848
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aglrinia » Tue Apr 10, 2012 6:46 pm

Tim-Opolis wrote:
Seaplant13 wrote:

It is a little hard to do something unique in this game, given that we all get the same issues. However, I DO have a smiling piece of seaweed as a flag. Does that count?


Gameplay and Roleplay.

Try them out. Commit some genocides and wreck a few regions... Then we can talk


Now a days, even two genocides, eight raids, two covert raids, attempts on a forum, and a rogue delegate move on sinker doesn't get you a condemnation >__>

You pretty much have to be an epic Roleplay and a favorite among the proposal writers.
Jakker wrote:TBH is Pro-bring Life to GP

User avatar
Milograd
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5894
Founded: Feb 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Milograd » Tue Apr 10, 2012 7:07 pm

Cinistra wrote:
Milograd wrote:Genocide alone does not make someone worthy of condemnation; countless nations have done genocides, but only so many have done it with a certain style and creativity that distinguishes them from everyone else. It is those nations which deserve condemnation.

An interesting viewpoint, indeed. Any style in particular your prefer? Any style which should be avoided?

I myself got condemned by doing stuff like this. That essentially reflects my style, but in reality it is a matter of personal preference.
Last edited by Milograd on Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Retired

User avatar
Swkoll
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1388
Founded: Nov 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Swkoll » Tue Apr 17, 2012 5:55 am

I believe this card is in order.

Image
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Dec 21, 2012 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.


Need an Ignore Cannon?
Embassy NS wiki page
Current Wars: None as of now
Member of: Nothing right now
Defcon: 1 [2] 3 4 5
6*9=42
February 17, 2011: Never Forget.
Copy and paste this into your sig if you remember the old F7.
97% of People of NS won't notice I did my math wrong, if you are the 1% who did, copy and paste this into your sig.

I lost the Game.
Zonolia wrote:You are without doubt the smartest NS player ever...
Montiar wrote:Best f*cking idea for a storefront ever.

Bluth Corporation wrote:You know, I used to be anti-Obama.

Then the anti-Obama folks opened their mouths and I listened to what they had to say.

Now I'm pro-Obama.


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Security Council

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads