Why banning Gay marriage IS unconstitutional

[New West Guiana]

I've gone through the pages of NS General and have noticed a rise of religious zealots pushing some from of craziness.


So the Republican Party is against gay marriage because they call it:

An attack upon the sanctity of traditional marriage

Well to you all who think that laws banning two men/ two women from getting married are fine and they're not Un-constitutional, well there is a problem with that, mainly if you use the word sanctity because in the dictionary if you've ever hard of one, it defines sanctity

sanc·ti·ty   [sangk-ti-tee]
noun, plural -ties.
1.
holiness, saintliness, or godliness.
2.
sacred or hallowed character: the inviolable sanctity of the temple.
3.
a sacred thing.

sanctity = sacred

sa·cred   [sey-krid]
adjective
1.
devoted or dedicated to a deity or to some religious purpose; consecrated.
2.
entitled to veneration or religious respect by association with divinity or divine things; holy.
3.
pertaining to or connected with religion ( opposed to secular or profane): sacred music; sacred books.

Sanctity = sacred = religious

First Amendment of the US Constitution
Congress shall make no law of respecting or establishment of religion

Banning gay marriage, because it goes against the sanctity of traditional marriage so your entire point of banning gays couples from marrying is void because using the word sanctity as a reason would be making laws of establishing a religion, which is Un-Constitutional. Federal law > state law. Supreme Court > federal Law > state law.

Thus I have no more to say.

So everyone do you agree?

[Fischistan]

Well done my friend! In one post, you have managed to destroy all of those ultra right religious nutjobs through unflawed logic and reasoning!

[Puissancevise]

Well done my friend! In one post, you have managed to destroy all of those ultra right religious nutjobs through unflawed logic and reasoning!

Yes. too bad they ignore logic and reason....

[Celritannia]

Bravo sir, bravo. This is so simple and brilliant at the same time. I tip my hat to you sir.

[Alexlantis]

Someone gets it. Too bad logic isn't contagious.

[Wikkiwallana]

This argument has been used and ignored before, good luck.

[Fischistan]

Well done my friend! In one post, you have managed to destroy all of those ultra right religious nutjobs through unflawed logic and reasoning!

Yes. too bad they ignore logic and reason....

That's true...damn.

[Krivoy]

The issue is that those who wish to ban gay marriage will continue to call for it regardless of any intellectual argument, because they believe in banning gay marriage for emotional reasons rather than intellectual reasons.

[Dude Ranch]

Well done. It is sad, though, that many will continue to believe their faith-based hypotheses and not come out into the glorious world of actual reality. Can't hurt to spread the word to other like-minded people, though.

[Maineiacs]

I've gone through the pages of NS General and have noticed a rise of religious zealots pushing some from of craziness.


So the Republican Party is against gay marriage because they call it:

An attack upon the sanctity of traditional marriage

Well to you all who think that laws banning two men/ two women from getting married are fine and they're not Un-constitutional, well there is a problem with that, mainly if you use the word sanctity because in the dictionary if you've ever hard of one, it defines sanctity

sanc·ti·ty   [sangk-ti-tee]
noun, plural -ties.
1.
holiness, saintliness, or godliness.
2.
sacred or hallowed character: the inviolable sanctity of the temple.
3.
a sacred thing.

sanctity = sacred

sa·cred   [sey-krid]
adjective
1.
devoted or dedicated to a deity or to some religious purpose; consecrated.
2.
entitled to veneration or religious respect by association with divinity or divine things; holy.
3.
pertaining to or connected with religion ( opposed to secular or profane): sacred music; sacred books.

Sanctity = sacred = religious

First Amendment of the US Constitution
Congress shall make no law of respecting or establishment of religion

Banning gay marriage, because it goes against the sanctity of traditional marriage so your entire point of banning gays couples from marrying is void because using the word sanctity as a reason would be making laws of establishing a religion, which is Un-Constitutional. Federal law > state law. Supreme Court > federal Law > state law.

Thus I have no more to say.

So everyone do you agree?

Allow me to anticipate the far right's response...

[New Sapienta]

Although I don't disagree, the circle jerking here is pissing me off.

Such things always do.

[Hallistar]

Whoa there you non True American™ OP, cut the Satan-worshiping talk and get with the Lord.

[Norstal]

New West Guiana used LOGIC!

It's not very effective...

We've heard this argument several times and I'm tired of it. I don't disagree. I'm just tired of it.

[Big Jim P]

I've gone through the pages of NS General and have noticed a rise of religious zealots pushing some from of craziness.


So the Republican Party is against gay marriage because they call it:

An attack upon the sanctity of traditional marriage

Well to you all who think that laws banning two men/ two women from getting married are fine and they're not Un-constitutional, well there is a problem with that, mainly if you use the word sanctity because in the dictionary if you've ever hard of one, it defines sanctity

sanc·ti·ty   [sangk-ti-tee]
noun, plural -ties.
1.
holiness, saintliness, or godliness.
2.
sacred or hallowed character: the inviolable sanctity of the temple.
3.
a sacred thing.

sanctity = sacred

sa·cred   [sey-krid]
adjective
1.
devoted or dedicated to a deity or to some religious purpose; consecrated.
2.
entitled to veneration or religious respect by association with divinity or divine things; holy.
3.
pertaining to or connected with religion ( opposed to secular or profane): sacred music; sacred books.

Sanctity = sacred = religious

First Amendment of the US Constitution
Congress shall make no law of respecting or establishment of religion

Banning gay marriage, because it goes against the sanctity of traditional marriage so your entire point of banning gays couples from marrying is void because using the word sanctity as a reason would be making laws of establishing a religion, which is Un-Constitutional. Federal law > state law. Supreme Court > federal Law > state law.

Thus I have no more to say.

So everyone do you agree?

Good one sir or ma'am.

[Transeden]

Someone gets it. Too bad logic isn't contagious.

>convert logic into gas
>create hollow capsular pill to hold gas
>disguise it as a laxative
>prescribe pill to old fart republicans
>see logic spread through GOP

>:D

[Hallistar]

I've gone through the pages of NS General and have noticed a rise of religious zealots pushing some from of craziness.


So the Republican Party is against gay marriage because they call it:


Well to you all who think that laws banning two men/ two women from getting married are fine and they're not Un-constitutional, well there is a problem with that, mainly if you use the word sanctity because in the dictionary if you've ever hard of one, it defines sanctity



sanctity = sacred



Sanctity = sacred = religious



Banning gay marriage, because it goes against the sanctity of traditional marriage so your entire point of banning gays couples from marrying is void because using the word sanctity as a reason would be making laws of establishing a religion, which is Un-Constitutional. Federal law > state law. Supreme Court > federal Law > state law.

Thus I have no more to say.

So everyone do you agree?

Allow me to anticipate the far right's response...

"Lalalalala not listening all you heathens going straight to hell and I know that my religion is right cause God said so"

[New Sapienta]

Whoa there you non True American™ OP, cut the Satan-worshiping talk and get with the Lord.

Honestly, this baby-killing wuss that spits on the Bible is probably a commie who hates Freedom™

[Page]

Go back to my solution - government ceases to recognize word 'marriage', call everything a civil union or domestic partnership, even all the heterosexuals, but give everyone all the current benefits and rights of marriage. And then everyone can just call marriage whatever the fuck they want.

[Timegate]

The government can't force a church to marry two people. You're just using the arm of the government to force social change while jerking off your liberal boyfriend at the same time. Repent your sins before you regret it, you mindless pinko heathen. Shame on you, and shame on those who agree with this! I will not sit here idly while these attacks on the traditional values and beliefs of my country are being attacked by European socialism!

[AETEN II]

Someone gets it. Too bad logic isn't contagious.

And stupidity is. Gah I hate the modern world.

[New Sapienta]

The government can't force a church to marry two people. You're just using the arm of the government to force social change while jerking off your liberal boyfriend at the same time. Repent your sins before you regret it, you mindless pinko heathen. Shame on you, and shame on those who agree with this! I will not sit here idly while these attacks on the traditional values and beliefs of my country are being attacked by European socialism!

ALERT

TOO MANY STEROTYPICAL WORDS

TROLL DETECTED

SYSTEMS DISENGAGED

FOOD REDACTED

[Ifreann]

Go back to my solution - government ceases to recognize word 'marriage', call everything a civil union or domestic partnership, even all the heterosexuals, but give everyone all the current benefits and rights of marriage. And then everyone can just call marriage whatever the fuck they want.

Compromise with the mad theists? Fuck that for a game of soldiers.

[Hallistar]

Whoa there you non True American™ OP, cut the Satan-worshiping talk and get with the Lord.

Honestly, this baby-killing wuss that spits on the Bible is probably a commie who hates Freedom™

Liberal media be attacking our wholesome christian family values™ with their antichrist president

[Timegate]

Honestly, this baby-killing wuss that spits on the Bible is probably a commie who hates Freedom™

Liberal media be attacking our wholesome christian family values™ with their antichrist president

I want a man like Ronald Reagen back into office. He'll shut those elitist propaganda making crypto-fascist up real good.

[Norstal]

Go back to my solution - government ceases to recognize word 'marriage', call everything a civil union or domestic partnership, even all the heterosexuals, but give everyone all the current benefits and rights of marriage. And then everyone can just call marriage whatever the fuck they want.

No. We don't get to change the words of a legal term just to appease a bunch of angry people.