Sexuality as a social construct.

[Jormengand]

I sometimes think he might be having us on.

[sarcasm]Y-you mean trolling? No wai! That's impossible![/sarcasm]

[Forster Keys]

I sometimes think he might be having us on.

Y-you mean trolling? No wai! That's impossible!

I know how rare it is. I'm sorry I brought it up.

[1000 Cats]

Yeah. And when he does answer something that wouldn't be easily countered even by someone who doesn't share his viewpoints, he just rattles off something he has said before with little meaning, no evidence, and that has no relevance to the post he is supposed to be answering, as in Simon Cowell's post above.

Has he actually answered how it could be considered a "social construct" when sexual stimulation has inbuilt evolutionary chemical rewards? And that this phenomenon exists in even animals of basic psychology?

I sometimes think he might be having us on.

He hasn't yet, no, and there must be two dozen people who have said it. He's just a confused and repressed fellow who has difficulty reconciling differences between his feelings and empiricism. His threads haven't changed in half a year. So no, I don't think he's having us on, and I certainly feel sorry for him, however much these threads aggravate me.

[Jormengand]

[sarcasm]Y-you mean trolling? No wai! That's impossible![/sarcasm]

I know how rare it is. I'm sorry I brought it up.

Fixed my quote.

[New Amerik]

Guys, guys, I think you're all missing the point here.

It's aliens. All aliens. They created mankind to be a single sex race that propagated by pathogenesis, a random mutated cause there to be two sexes instead, and now they're trying to get the unwanted sex to kill themselves off by making them as bastardly and objectifying as possible. And we can't even see them, because they have invisible spaceships.

I tell you, it's the simplest tidy solution to this entire problem. Really.

****

Ah, to hell with it.

As snarky as that was, the simplest and best way to explain it for now would be to accept it as the byproduct of nature, not society at large. We have a great deal of information (as noted throughout the thread) of masturbation being a nonexclusive trait to humans as well as a non harmful act by its own, and little to none on the part of the society case. I don't think there's much more room for argument.

[Domicia Rex]

Oh don't you know? Whenever a guy faps, all women instantly detect it and receive 12 damage to their defence stats.

Except when a Beholder has his anti-magic eye open.

But then the men would be objectifying the Beholder by pretending it's a woman-substitute! ...or however the hell it happens in FST's books.

[Forster Keys]

Has he actually answered how it could be considered a "social construct" when sexual stimulation has inbuilt evolutionary chemical rewards? And that this phenomenon exists in even animals of basic psychology?

I sometimes think he might be having us on.

He hasn't yet, no, and there must be two dozen people who have said it. He's just a confused and repressed fellow who has difficulty reconciling differences between his feelings and empiricism. His threads haven't changed in half a year. So no, I don't think he's having us on, and I certainly feel sorry for him, however much these threads aggravate me.

My inklings are the same. I've said as much to him.

[Forster Keys]

I know how rare it is. I'm sorry I brought it up.

Fixed my quote.

Haha! But I was using sarcasm too!

[Tlaceceyaya]

Yeah. And when he does answer something that wouldn't be easily countered even by someone who doesn't share his viewpoints, he just rattles off something he has said before with little meaning, no evidence, and that has no relevance to the post he is supposed to be answering, as in Simon Cowell's post above.

Has he actually answered how it could be considered a "social construct" when sexual stimulation has inbuilt evolutionary chemical rewards? And that this phenomenon exists in even animals of basic psychology?

I sometimes think he might be having us on.

No, he hasn't answered how. He's just said that it's objectification of women no matter what. Then he refused to respond to another person's hypothetical situation wherein a male was raised without knowledge of women and then masturbated to the thought of men. I restated it a couple of pages later and got an answer that was to the extent of 'It's hypothetical.'

[Dread Lady Nathicana]

There's places to blog about personal hangups, insecurities, and delusional opinions. Our forums are not it.