Attraction is Objectification

[Four-sided Triangles]

http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscienc ... glance.php

At last, proof of my ideas. No man should ever be attracted to a female body because it has the effect of objectification. Note, however, that females staring at male bodies does not produce the same effect.

I'm vindicated. All sexual attraction is objectification. You can't get out of it.

[SaintB]

We get it you hate sex and sexuality. What you seem to fail to understand is the rest of the world actually likes sex and sexuality and you aren't going to win many if any supporters to your side on this issue because we are biologically hardwired to love fucking.

[Ifreann]

http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2010/01/how_sexual_objectification_silences_women_-_the_male_glance.php

At last, proof of my ideas. No man should ever be attracted to a female body because it has the effect of objectification. Note, however, that females staring at male bodies does not produce the same effect.

I'm vindicated. All sexual attraction is objectification. You can't get out of it.

Your source doesn't say that being attracted to women has the effect of objectification. Nice try, though.

[Holy Paradise]

Still don't see how attraction is a bad thing, being that it is necessary to promulgate the human race.

[Conserative Morality]

Except not. All this says is that when women THINK they're being objectified by men, they become significantly unnerved, while men just don't give a shit. This is a matter of societal influence rather than "Lol, everything is objectification".

[Four-sided Triangles]

Still don't see how attraction is a bad thing, being that it is necessary to promulgate the human race.

Any outward manifestation of male attraction toward females appears to cause them psychological harm.

[Augustus Este]

The fact that I'm attracted to women doesn't mean I see them as sub human or that they only exist so I can have sex with them...

[Fedeledland]

We get it you hate sex and sexuality. What you seem to fail to understand is the rest of the world actually likes sex and sexuality and you aren't going to win many if any supporters to your side on this issue because we are biologically hardwired to love fucking.

Oh, this so much.

[Trotskylvania]

http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2010/01/how_sexual_objectification_silences_women_-_the_male_glance.php

At last, proof of my ideas. No man should ever be attracted to a female body because it has the effect of objectification. Note, however, that females staring at male bodies does not produce the same effect.

I'm vindicated. All sexual attraction is objectification. You can't get out of it.

So basically, you're saying that because women in this study shrunk under men looking at them, and became less talkative, that is proof positive that women are inferior to men, and are by their very biological nature silenced and objectified by men being attracted to them. (I will leave aside the false equivalence your thesis places in the male gaze and attraction. You don't have to like what you're looking at to glare at it)

I honestly don't know how you pretend that you in any way believe in feminism or feminine empowerment. In truth, you're the worst sexist of them all, and you hide your sexism under the puritanical guise of whiteknighting.

[The Murtunian Tribes]

http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2010/01/how_sexual_objectification_silences_women_-_the_male_glance.php

At last, proof of my ideas. No man should ever be attracted to a female body because it has the effect of objectification. Note, however, that females staring at male bodies does not produce the same effect.

I'm vindicated. All sexual attraction is objectification. You can't get out of it.

Yes I can. By not caring. You are a bad person. I know that comes across as childish, but i'm really not sure how else to say it.

EDIT: Although Trot did a decent job of it.

[Meryuma]

It never said anything about sexual attraction in and of itself, it talked about sexual objectification in our society. You constantly treat patriarchy as a given. You are the opposite of a feminist.

[Mike the Progressive]

We get it you hate sex and sexuality. What you seem to fail to understand is the rest of the world actually likes sex and sexuality and you aren't going to win many if any supporters to your side on this issue because we are biologically hardwired to love fucking.

Dude, awesome.

[Conserative Morality]

Any outward manifestation of male attraction toward females appears to cause them psychological harm.

...

Now I'm convinced that you didn't even read the source.

[Gauthier]

We get it you hate sex and sexuality. What you seem to fail to understand is the rest of the world actually likes sex and sexuality and you aren't going to win many if any supporters to your side on this issue because we are biologically hardwired to love fucking.

Oh, this so much.

Something tells me this guy won't be happy and stop blogging until every single male in the world lop off their own balls.

[Manahakatouki]

http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2010/01/how_sexual_objectification_silences_women_-_the_male_glance.php

At last, proof of my ideas. No man should ever be attracted to a female body because it has the effect of objectification. Note, however, that females staring at male bodies does not produce the same effect.

I'm vindicated. All sexual attraction is objectification. You can't get out of it.

I think it's ok to be attracted to a female body, because a healthy good looking body that attracts you means that she has a good chance of being biologically good enough to pass down your genes with you. Thus, as you've been attracted to her good healthy body, you're subconsciously keeping the human race healthy as you continue to pass down healthiness...

[Conserative Morality]

So basically, you're saying that because women in this study shrunk under men looking at them, and became less talkative, that is proof positive that women are inferior to men, and are by their very biological nature silenced and objectified by men being attracted to them. (I will leave aside the false equivalence your thesis places in the male gaze and attraction. You don't have to like what you're looking at to glare at it)

I honestly don't know how you pretend that you in any way believe in feminism or feminine empowerment. In truth, you're the worst sexist of them all, and you hide your sexism under the puritanical guise of whiteknighting.

^This, basically.

[Meryuma]

http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2010/01/how_sexual_objectification_silences_women_-_the_male_glance.php

At last, proof of my ideas. No man should ever be attracted to a female body because it has the effect of objectification. Note, however, that females staring at male bodies does not produce the same effect.

I'm vindicated. All sexual attraction is objectification. You can't get out of it.

I think it's ok to be attracted to a female body, because a healthy good looking body that attracts you means that she has a good chance of being biologically good enough to pass down your genes with you. Thus, as you've been attracted to her good healthy body, you're subconsciously keeping the human race healthy as you continue to pass down healthiness...

God, so many problems with this.

[Trotskylvania]

Still don't see how attraction is a bad thing, being that it is necessary to promulgate the human race.

Any outward manifestation of male attraction toward females appears to cause them psychological harm.

You keep getting further and further away from what the paper actually says.

And this statement is probably the most vile and terrible lie I've ever seen in print. There's a huge body of literature on the correlation between self-esteem and feeling that others are attracted to you, regardless of gender.

[Conserative Morality]

Something tells me this guy won't be happy and stop blogging until every single male in the world lop off their own balls.

No, because then we'd still be alive, and we're the inferior sex.

[The Cookish States]

The fact that I'm attracted to women doesn't mean I see them as sub human or that they only exist so I can have sex with them...

Which is funny, because women only exist to have sex with.

...

Who didn't tell you?


Nah, sexuality is part of human nature, FST you should go be a monk, that kind of self control shouldn't be wasted on a pointless cause like this.

[Nightkill the Emperor]

http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2010/01/how_sexual_objectification_silences_women_-_the_male_glance.php

At last, proof of my ideas. No man should ever be attracted to a female body because it has the effect of objectification. Note, however, that females staring at male bodies does not produce the same effect.

I'm vindicated. All sexual attraction is objectification. You can't get out of it.

So basically, you're saying that because women in this study shrunk under men looking at them, and became less talkative, that is proof positive that women are inferior to men, and are by their very biological nature silenced and objectified by men being attracted to them. (I will leave aside the false equivalence your thesis places in the male gaze and attraction. You don't have to like what you're looking at to glare at it)

I honestly don't know how you pretend that you in any way believe in feminism or feminine empowerment. In truth, you're the worst sexist of them all, and you hide your sexism under the puritanical guise of whiteknighting.

This.

And frankly, FST, you need professional help.

[Rynatia]

In sex does it matter? Both parties are having a pleasurable time and it's natural, as long as in everyday life we can see each other as people, I don't care, i'l be her lamp post and she can be my statue when were in the bed room

[Four-sided Triangles]

So basically, you're saying that because women in this study shrunk under men looking at them, and became less talkative, that is proof positive that women are inferior to men, and are by their very biological nature silenced and objectified by men being attracted to them. (I will leave aside the false equivalence your thesis places in the male gaze and attraction. You don't have to like what you're looking at to glare at it)

I honestly don't know how you pretend that you in any way believe in feminism or feminine empowerment. In truth, you're the worst sexist of them all, and you hide your sexism under the puritanical guise of whiteknighting.

Why do you keep putting shit into my mouth? Why must you all construct straw man after straw man in all of my threads?

[Hydesland]

http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2010/01/how_sexual_objectification_silences_women_-_the_male_glance.php

At last, proof of my ideas. No man should ever be attracted to a female body because it has the effect of objectification. Note, however, that females staring at male bodies does not produce the same effect.

I'm vindicated. All sexual attraction is objectification. You can't get out of it.

You can't apply normative statements to this because attraction is not a choice.

[Desperate Measures]

http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2010/01/how_sexual_objectification_silences_women_-_the_male_glance.php

At last, proof of my ideas. No man should ever be attracted to a female body because it has the effect of objectification. Note, however, that females staring at male bodies does not produce the same effect.

I'm vindicated. All sexual attraction is objectification. You can't get out of it.

So basically, you're saying that because women in this study shrunk under men looking at them, and became less talkative, that is proof positive that women are inferior to men, and are by their very biological nature silenced and objectified by men being attracted to them. (I will leave aside the false equivalence your thesis places in the male gaze and attraction. You don't have to like what you're looking at to glare at it)

I honestly don't know how you pretend that you in any way believe in feminism or feminine empowerment. In truth, you're the worst sexist of them all, and you hide your sexism under the puritanical guise of whiteknighting.

This needs to be repeated as often as possible.