Dakini wrote:Bluth Corporation wrote:
Indeed it is. You'll note I said above:
"Archaeological evidence" should of course be added to that list.
Yes, which is what makes Mount Shavano's initial claim about the historicity of Jesus and the historicity of Alexander the Great being the same rather silly, don't you think?
Depends on how you interpret it, I suppose.
Quantitatively, they're not that comparable. Qualitatively, they are. You'll notice that the main thrust of Aesthetica's response to Mount Shavano (at least, as it seemed to me) indicated that there was an abundance of firsthand historical evidence that survives to the present, which there simply isn't.