by White pioneers » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:36 pm
by The Texas Lands » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:38 pm
by White pioneers » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:39 pm
The Texas Lands wrote:The mods have every right to lock threads. You may not understand their reasoning and may not like it but you have to live with it. I'm pretty sure the mods wouldn't abuse their powers just to annoy people. I find the OP unreasonable and biased.
by Wazkyraque » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:40 pm
by The Texas Lands » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:40 pm
White pioneers wrote:The Texas Lands wrote:The mods have every right to lock threads. You may not understand their reasoning and may not like it but you have to live with it. I'm pretty sure the mods wouldn't abuse their powers just to annoy people. I find the OP unreasonable and biased.
then lock it i am done with nationstates
by The Republic of Lanos » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:41 pm
by Alexlantis » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:42 pm
Wazkyraque wrote:What Texas lands said.
Individuality-ness wrote:You are Alex, NSG's writer and lead procrastinator. *nods* :P
by Pauper Kings » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:43 pm
White pioneers wrote:this thread will be locked and that is a gauruntee. i am sick of moderators locking stuff for fun. people like katganistan and sedgestan lock posts for fun. my nation my get deleted for this but if you agree then respond because they make girly excuses for there reason to lock!!!!!! DONT YOU AGREE ????????????????????
by Malshan » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:44 pm
Rupudska wrote:Hetland 2 wrote:
You catch on quick. That's why I like you. :)
I'm kidding of course you aren't a thing. You're a person.
Dude, don't insult the werefurry.
Rupudska wrote:RP Sample: Let me in, or we take another third of Mexico.
Rupudska wrote:You're NS's Wolfman, therefore your argument is negated due to bias.
"Sarcasm works so much better when you can look down your fire-breathing nose at someone." -Callistan Sairias
by New Synavia » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:45 pm
The Scientific Unity of New SynaviaFactbook
Frisbeeteria wrote:Mwah hah hahhhhh!
☑ Saddam Hussein
☑ Osama Bin Laden
☑ Khaddafi
☑ Kim Jong Il
☐ Internet Explorer
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
by Metanih » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:46 pm
by White pioneers » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:47 pm
Malshan wrote:The Texas Lands wrote:
Mods usually don't lock threads unless reported. And, there is no reason to report this thread. I find your biased opinions arrogent and stupid.
^This. And if you believe that mods are doing this for fun (which they don't), then you should ask a mod, politely their reasoning as to why they lock the thread. No need to get upset. Learn from your mistakes.
by The Texas Lands » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:48 pm
Metanih wrote:If hes leaving... Meh.
I don't think i will shed a tear, if he cannot learn to follow the rules of the forum, he shouldn't be on the forum.
by NERVUN » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:48 pm
by New Synavia » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:50 pm
The Scientific Unity of New SynaviaFactbook
Frisbeeteria wrote:Mwah hah hahhhhh!
☑ Saddam Hussein
☑ Osama Bin Laden
☑ Khaddafi
☑ Kim Jong Il
☐ Internet Explorer
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
by Malshan » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:51 pm
White pioneers wrote:Malshan wrote:
^This. And if you believe that mods are doing this for fun (which they don't), then you should ask a mod, politely their reasoning as to why they lock the thread. No need to get upset. Learn from your mistakes.
sometimes i put a good post in the the right spot and it is still locked
Rupudska wrote:Hetland 2 wrote:
You catch on quick. That's why I like you. :)
I'm kidding of course you aren't a thing. You're a person.
Dude, don't insult the werefurry.
Rupudska wrote:RP Sample: Let me in, or we take another third of Mexico.
Rupudska wrote:You're NS's Wolfman, therefore your argument is negated due to bias.
"Sarcasm works so much better when you can look down your fire-breathing nose at someone." -Callistan Sairias
by NERVUN » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:52 pm
White pioneers wrote:Malshan wrote:
^This. And if you believe that mods are doing this for fun (which they don't), then you should ask a mod, politely their reasoning as to why they lock the thread. No need to get upset. Learn from your mistakes.
sometimes i put a good post in the the right spot and it is still locked
by White pioneers » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:53 pm
NERVUN wrote:White pioneers wrote:sometimes i put a good post in the the right spot and it is still locked
The spam rules are pretty clear. Also, we've been tasked by Max Barry (You know, the dude who owns the site) to keep things more or less clean and on track.
I'm sorry if you feel that the rules are against you, but those rules were the ones you agreed to when you joined this site. Also, contrary to your opinion, we don't go around locking threads for fun.
by NERVUN » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:54 pm
White pioneers wrote:NERVUN wrote:The spam rules are pretty clear. Also, we've been tasked by Max Barry (You know, the dude who owns the site) to keep things more or less clean and on track.
I'm sorry if you feel that the rules are against you, but those rules were the ones you agreed to when you joined this site. Also, contrary to your opinion, we don't go around locking threads for fun.
look nervun you are the only the modrator i like but i am sick of the locks for no good reason
by Malshan » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:55 pm
White pioneers wrote:NERVUN wrote:The spam rules are pretty clear. Also, we've been tasked by Max Barry (You know, the dude who owns the site) to keep things more or less clean and on track.
I'm sorry if you feel that the rules are against you, but those rules were the ones you agreed to when you joined this site. Also, contrary to your opinion, we don't go around locking threads for fun.
look nervun you are the only the modrator i like but i am sick of the locks for no good reason
Rupudska wrote:Hetland 2 wrote:
You catch on quick. That's why I like you. :)
I'm kidding of course you aren't a thing. You're a person.
Dude, don't insult the werefurry.
Rupudska wrote:RP Sample: Let me in, or we take another third of Mexico.
Rupudska wrote:You're NS's Wolfman, therefore your argument is negated due to bias.
"Sarcasm works so much better when you can look down your fire-breathing nose at someone." -Callistan Sairias
by The Republic of Lanos » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:55 pm
by New Synavia » Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:59 pm
The Scientific Unity of New SynaviaFactbook
Frisbeeteria wrote:Mwah hah hahhhhh!
☑ Saddam Hussein
☑ Osama Bin Laden
☑ Khaddafi
☑ Kim Jong Il
☐ Internet Explorer
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
by White pioneers » Tue Sep 20, 2011 7:01 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Eurocom, Sylh Alanor, Trump Almighty
Advertisement