Inflatable Gandalfs wrote:I don't care if this was endorsed by Jesus, Buddha and the Space Pope; something does not become worthwhile just because a lot of people agree with you.
If you consider this to be true then why are you in the WA? As all the proposals that come before us to be voted upon have been there because "a lot of people agree with" with the proposal. It is why the WA is consided a democratic istitution and not a dictatorship.
And for the record, there is a difference between "a waste of time" and "a waste of the WA's time." Preventing region-griefing certainly is not a waste of players' and moderators' time; using the WA as a griefing arbitration panel undoubtedly is.
But it IS the WA Security Council duty to be "a griefing arbitration panel". A member of the WA with enough endorsement put it there before us. It was there we judge if it was worthy of our time. It is now up to the WA body to decide if it passes or not, and at the moment it looks like it will.
To be honest my esteemed fellow member of the WA, it sound as you seem to be troubled by the fact that having things decided by a majority upsets you. I therefore suggest that you take the time to decide if you should be in the WA, or if you should withdraw from the WA and progress unhindered by the will of other nations.